[1]
Adler and E 2002. Constructivism and IR. Handbook of international relations. Sage.
[2]
Adler and E 1997. Seizing the Middle Ground:: Constructivism in World Politics. European journal of international relations. 3, (1997).
[3]
Agamben, Giorgio and Heller-Roazen, Daniel 1998. Homo sacer: sovereign power and bare life. Stanford University Press.
[4]
Angell, N. The great illusion: a study of the relation of military power to national advantage. Heinemann.
[5]
Ashley and R. 1989. Living on border lines. International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics. Lexington Books.
[6]
Ashley and R. 1996. The achievements of post-structuralism. International theory: positivism and beyond. C.U.P.
[7]
Ashley and R. The geopolitics of political space. Alternatives: a journal of world policy.
[8]
Ashley and R. 1986. The poverty of Neo-realism. Neorealism and its critics. Columbia U.P.
[9]
Ayers, Alison J. 2008. Gramsci, political economy, and international relations theory: modern princes and naked emperors. Palgrave Macmillan.
[10]
Bain and W. 2000. Deconfusing Morgenthau: moral inquiry and classical realism reconsidered. Review of international studies. 26, (2000).
[11]
Baldwin, David A. 1993. Neorealism and neoliberalism: the contemporary debate. Columbia University Press.
[12]
Banks and M. 1985. The inter-paradigm debate. International relations: a handbook of current theory. Pinter.
[13]
Barnett et al. 1999. The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations. International Organization: World Peace Foundation. 53, (1999).
[14]
Barry Buzan and Richard Little 2001. Why International Relations has Failed. Millennium: journal of international studies. 30, (2001).
[15]
Beitz, Charles R. 1999. Political theory and international relations. Princeton University Press.
[16]
Beitz, Charles R. and Alexander, Lawrence A. 1985. International ethics. Princeton University Press.
[17]
Bieler, Andreas and Morton, Adam David 2006. Images of Gramsci: connections and contentions in political theory and international relations. Routledge.
[18]
Boucher, David 1998. Political theories of international relations: from Thucydides to the present. Oxford University Press.
[19]
Brown, Chris et al. 2002. International relations in political thought: texts from the ancient Greeks to the First World War. Cambridge University Press.
[20]
Brown, Chris 1992. International relations theory: new normative approaches. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
[21]
Brown, Chris 2002. Sovereignty, rights, and justice: international political theory today. Polity.
[22]
Brown, Chris and Ainley, Kirsten 2009. Understanding international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[23]
Brown, Chris and Ainley, Kirsten 2009. Understanding international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[24]
Bull and H. 1969. International theory: The case for the classical approach. Contending approaches to international politics. Princeton University Press.
[25]
Bull and H. 1995. Society and anarchy in international relations. International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.
[26]
Bull and H. 1995. The theory of international politics. International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.
[27]
Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam 1984. The Expansion of international society. Clarendon Press.
[28]
Burchill and S. 2009. Introduction. Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[29]
Burchill and S. 2009. Liberalism. Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[30]
Buzan and B 1996. The timeless wisdom of realism. International theory: positivism and beyond. C.U.P.
[31]
Buzan, Barry 1991. People, states and fear: an agenda for international security studies in the post-cold warera. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
[32]
Campbell 1998. MetaBosnia: narratives of the Bosnian War. Review of international studies. 24, (1998).
[33]
Campbell, David 1998. Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity. Manchester University Press.
[34]
Carr, Edward Hallett and Cox, Michael 2001. The twenty years’ crisis, 1919-1939: an introduction to the study of international relations. Palgrave.
[35]
Carr, Edward Hallett and Cox, Michael 2001. The twenty years’ crisis, 1919-1939: an introduction to the study of international relations. Palgrave.
[36]
Carr, Edward Hallett and Evans, Richard J. 2001. What is history?. Palgrave.
[37]
Chase-Dunn et al. 1977. Toward a Structural Perspective on the World-System. Politics & society. 7, (1977).
[38]
Christopher Chase-Dunn 1981. Interstate System and Capitalist World-Economy: One Logic or Two? International studies quarterly. 25, (1981).
[39]
Clark, Ian et al. 1996. Classical theories of international relations. in association with St. Antony’s College, Oxford.
[40]
Clark, Ian 1989. The hierarchy of states: reform and resistance in the international order. C.U.P.
[41]
Clark, Ian and Clark, Ian 1989. The hierarchy of states: reform and resistance in the international order. Cambridge University Press.
[42]
Claude, Inis L. 1962. Power and international relations. Random House.
[43]
Cochran, Molly 1999. Normative theory in international relations: a pragmatic approach. Cambridge University Press.
[44]
Cox and R. 1981. Social forces, States and world orders. Millennium: journal of international studies. 10, (1981).
[45]
Cox and R. 1986. Social forces, States and world orders. Neorealism and its critics. Columbia U.P.
[46]
Cox, Robert W. 1996. Approaches to world order. Cambridge University Press.
[47]
Cox, Robert W. 1987. Production, power and world order: social forces in the making of history. Columbia University Press.
[48]
David Davies Memorial Institute of International Studies 2009. Forum on Waltz. International relations. 23, (2009).
[49]
Dessler and D 1999. Constructivism within a positivist social science. Review of international studies. 25, (1999).
[50]
Deudney et al. 1999. The nature and sources of liberal international order. Review of international studies. 25, (1999).
[51]
Devetak, R. 2005. Postmodernism. Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[52]
Devetek and R. 1996. Critical theory. Theories of international relations. St. Martin’s Press.
[53]
Dillon, Michael and Neal, Andrew W. 2008. Foucault on politics, security and war. Palgrave Macmillan.
[54]
Donnelly, Jack 2000. Realism and international relations. Cambridge University Press.
[55]
Dunne et al. 2008. Realism. The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford University Press.
[56]
Dunne and T. 2008. Liberalism. The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford University Press.
[57]
Dunne and T. 2003. Society and hierarchy in international relations. International relations. 17, (2003).
[58]
Dunne and T. 1995. The social construction of international society. European journal of international relations. 1, (1995).
[59]
Dunne, Tim and St. Antony’s College (University of Oxford) 1998. Inventing international society: a history of the English school. Macmillan in association with St. Antony’s College, Oxford.
[60]
Dunne, Timothy et al. 2007. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press.
[61]
Dunne, Timothy et al. 2007. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press.
[62]
Dunne, Timothy et al. 2007. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press.
[63]
Dunne, Timothy et al. 2007. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press.
[64]
Dunne, Timothy et al. 2007. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press.
[65]
Dunne, Timothy et al. 2007. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press.
[66]
Dunne, Timothy et al. 2007. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press.
[67]
Dunne, Timothy et al. 2007. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press.
[68]
Dunne, Timothy et al. 2007. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press.
[69]
Edkins, Jenny 1999. Poststructuralism & international relations: bringing the political back in. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
[70]
Elshtain and B. 1998. Women and War: ten years on. Review of international studies. 24, (1998).
[71]
Elshtain and J. 1997. Feminist inquiry and international relations. New thinking in international relations theory. Westview.
[72]
Elshtain and J. 1995. International politics and political theory. International relations theory today. Polity.
[73]
Elshtain and J. 1995. International politics and political theory. International relations theory today. Polity.
[74]
Enloe, Cynthia H 1990. Bananas, beaches, and bases: making feminist sense of international politics. University of California.
[75]
Fierke and K.M. 2002. Links across the Abyss: Language and Logic in International Relations. International studies quarterly. 46, (2002).
[76]
Frost and M. 1998. A turn not taken: Ethics in IR at the millenium. Review of international studies. 24, (1998).
[77]
Frost and M. 1998. Migrants, civil society and sovereign states: Investigating an ethical hierarchy. Political studies: the journal of the Political Studies Association of the U.K. 46, (1998).
[78]
Frost, Mervyn 1996. Ethics in international relations: a constitutive theory. C.U.P.
[79]
Garnett and J. 1992. State-centric perspectives. Dilemmas of world politics: international issues in a changing world. Oxford University Press.
[80]
Germain et al. 1998. Engaging Gramsci: international relations theory and the new Gramscians. Review of international studies. 24, (1998).
[81]
Gill, Stephen 1993. Gramsci, historical materialism and international relations. Cambridge University Press.
[82]
Gill, Stephen 2003. Power and resistance in the new world order. Palgrave Macmillan.
[83]
Gilpin and R 1986. The richness of the tradition of political realism. Neorealism and its critics. Columbia U.P.
[84]
Gilpin, Robert 1981. War and change in world politics. Cambridge University Press.
[85]
Grant, Rebecca and Newland, Kathleen 1991. Gender and international relations. Open U.P., in assoc. with Millennium: journal of international studies.
[86]
Greico and J. 1988. Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. International Organization: World Peace Foundation. 42, (1988).
[87]
Griffiths, Martin 1992. Realism, idealism, and international politics: a reinterpretation. Routledge.
[88]
Guzzini and S 2000. A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations. European journal of international relations. 6, (2000).
[89]
Guzzini and S. 1993. Structural power: The limits of neorealism power analysis. International Organization: World Peace Foundation. 47, (1993).
[90]
Guzzini, Stefano 1998. Realism in international relations and international political economy: the continuing story of a death foretold. Routledge.
[91]
Hasenclever, Andreas et al. 1997. Theories of international regimes. Cambridge University Press.
[92]
Hidemi Suganami 2001. Alexander Wendt and the English School. (2001).
[93]
Hobson, John M. 2000. The state and international relations. Cambridge University Press.
[94]
Hoffman and M. 1987. Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate. Millennium: journal of international studies. 16, (1987).
[95]
Hoffmann and M. 1994. Normative international relations theory: approaches and issues. Contemporary international relations: a guide to theory. Pinter.
[96]
Hoffmann, Stanley 1981. Duties beyond borders: on the limits and possibilities of ethical international politics. Syracuse University Press.
[97]
Hollis and M. 1996. The last post? International theory: positivism and beyond. C.U.P.
[98]
Hollis, Martin and Smith, Steve 1991. Explaining and understanding international relations. Oxford University Press.
[99]
Hollis, Martin and Smith, Steve 1991. Explaining and understanding international relations. Oxford University Press.
[100]
Hopf and T 1998. The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International security. 23, (1998).
[101]
Hurrell and A. 2002. Norms and ethics in IR. Handbook of international relations. Sage.
[102]
Hutchings, Kimberly 1999. International political theory: rethinking ethics in a global era. SAGE.
[103]
Hutchings, Kimberly 1999. International political theory: rethinking ethics in a global era. SAGE.
[104]
Institute for World Order 1993. Feminists write IR. Alternatives: a journal of world policy. (1993).
[105]
Jackson and R. 1996. Is there a classical international theory? International theory: positivism and beyond. C.U.P.
[106]
Jackson and R. 2008. The evolution of international society. The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford University Press.
[107]
Jackson and R. 1995. The political theory of international society. International relations theory today. Polity.
[108]
Jackson, Robert H. 2005. Classical and modern thought on international relations: from anarchy to cosmopolis. Palgrave Macmillan.
[109]
Jackson, Robert H. 2005. Classical and modern thought on international relations: from anarchy to cosmopolis. Palgrave Macmillan.
[110]
Jackson, Robert H. and Sørensen, Georg 2007. Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. Oxford University Press.
[111]
Jackson, Robert H. and Sørensen, Georg 2007. Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. Oxford University Press.
[112]
Jackson, Robert H. and Sørensen, Georg 2007. Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. Oxford University Press.
[113]
Jackson, Robert H. and Sørensen, Georg 2003. Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. Oxford University Press.
[114]
Jackson, Robert H. and Sørensen, Georg 2007. Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. Oxford University Press.
[115]
Jahn, Beate 2006. Classical theory in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
[116]
John J. Mearsheimer 1990. Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International security. 15, (1990).
[117]
Jones and A. 1996. s:43:"Does. Review of international studies. 22, (1996).
[118]
Kaplan and M. 1969. The New Great Debate: Traditionalism vs. Science in International Relations. Contending approaches to international politics. Princeton University Press.
[119]
Kaplan and M. 1966. The New Great Debate: Traditionalism vs. Science in International Relations. World politics: a quarterly journal of international relations. 19, (1966).
[120]
Kennan, George F. 1952. American diplomacy, 1900-1950. Secker & Warburg.
[121]
Kennan, George F. American diplomacy, 1900-1950. New English Library.
[122]
Keohane R. 1988. International Institutions: Two Approaches. International studies quarterly. 32, (1988).
[123]
Keohane and R. 1995. International Institutions: Two Approaches. International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.
[124]
Keohane and R. 1999. Theory of world politics: Structural realism and beyond. International relations theory: realism, pluralism, globalism, and beyond. Allyn and Bacon.
[125]
Keohane and R. 1989. Theory of world politics: Structural realism and beyond. International institutions and state power: essays in international relations theory. Westview Press.
[126]
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press.
[127]
Keohane, Robert Owen and Nye, Joseph S. 1977. Power and interdependence: world politics in transition. Little, Brown.
[128]
Klotz, Audie 1995. Norms in international relations: the struggle against apartheid. Cornell University Press.
[129]
Kolodziej, Edward A. 2005. Security and international relations. Cambridge University Press.
[130]
Kolodziej, Edward A. 2005. Security and international relations. Cambridge University Press.
[131]
Krasner and S. 1993. Westphalia and all that. Ideas and foreign policy: beliefs, institutions, and political change. Cornell University Press.
[132]
Krasner, Stephen D. and Center for International and Strategic Affairs 1989. International regimes. Cornell U.P.
[133]
Kratochwil and F. 1993. The embarrassment of changes: neo-realism as the science of Realpolitik without politics. Review of international studies. 19, (1993).
[134]
Lapid and J 1989. The Third Debate. International studies quarterly. 33, (1989).
[135]
Lenin, Vladimir Ilich Imperialism, the highest stage of capitalism: a popular outline. Progress Publishers.
[136]
Lepgold and J. Is Anyone Listening? International Relations Theory and the Problem of Policy Relevance. Political science quarterly. Academy of Political Science.
[137]
Linklater and A. 2005. Dialogic politics and the civilising process. Review of international studies. 31, (2005).
[138]
Linklater and A. 1996. Marxism. Theories of international relations. St. Martin’s Press.
[139]
Linklater and A. 1995. Neo-realism in theory and practice. International relations theory today. Polity.
[140]
Linklater and A. 2001. Rationalism. Theories of international relations. Palgrave.
[141]
Linklater and A. 2005. The English school. Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[142]
Linklater, Andrew 1990. Beyond realism and Marxism: critical theory and international relations. Macmillan.
[143]
Linklater, Andrew 1990. Beyond realism and Marxism: critical theory and international relations. Macmillan.
[144]
Linklater, Andrew 2007. Critical theory and world politics: citizenship, sovereignty and humanity. Routledge.
[145]
Linklater, Andrew et al. 2006. The English school of international relations: a contemporary reassessment. Cambridge University Press.
[146]
Linklater, Andrew 1998. The transformation of political community: ethical foundations of the Post-Westphalian era. University of South Carolina Press.
[147]
Little and R. 1985. Structuralism and realism. International relations: a handbook of current theory. Pinter.
[148]
MacMillan, John 1998. On liberal peace: democracy, war, and the international order. Tauris Academic Studies.
[149]
Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The tragedy of Great Power politics. W. W. Norton & Company.
[150]
Michael C. Williams 1996. Hobbes and International Relations: A Reconsideration. International Organization: World Peace Foundation. 50, (1996).
[151]
Millikin and J 1999. You have access to this article via a personal or institutional subscription The Study of Discourse in International Relations:: A Critique of Research and Methods. European journal of international relations. 5, (1999).
[152]
Moravcsik and A ‘Is something rotten in the state of Denmark?’ Constructivism and European integration. Journal of European public policy. 6.
[153]
Morgenthau and H. 1995. The intellectual and political functions of theory. International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.
[154]
Morgenthau, Hans Joachim et al. 2006. Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
[155]
Morgenthau, Hans Joachim 1965. Scientific man vs. power politics. Phoenix Books.
[156]
Morgenthau, Hans Joachim 1965. Scientific man vs. power politics. University of Chicago Press.
[157]
Nardin, Terry 1983. Law, morality and the relations of states. Princeton U.P.
[158]
Neufeld and M 1993. Reflectivity and international relations. Millennium: journal of international studies. 22, (1993).
[159]
Nicholson and M. 2000. What’s the use of international relations. Review of international studies. 26, (2000).
[160]
Nye and Joseph S. 1988. Neorealism and Neoliberalism. World politics: a quarterly journal of international relations. 40, (1988).
[161]
Olson, William Clinton and Groom, Arthur John Richard 1991. International relations then and now: origins and trends in interpretation. HarperCollins Academic.
[162]
Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood 1989. World of our making: rules and rule in social theory and international relations. University of South Carolina Press.
[163]
Osiander and A. 1998. Rereading early twentieth-century IR theory: Idealism revisited. International studies quarterly. 42, (1998).
[164]
Peterson and S 1992. Transgressing boundaries. Millennium: journal of international studies. 21, (1992).
[165]
Peterson, V. Spike 1992. Gendered states: feminist (re)visions of international relations theory. Lynne Rienner.
[166]
Price et al. 1998. Dangerous Liaisons?: Critical International Theory and Constructivism. European journal of international relations. 4, (1998).
[167]
Reus-Smit and C. 1996. Constructivism. Theories of international relations. St. Martin’s Press.
[168]
Richardson and J.L. 1997. Contending liberalisms - past and present. European journal of international relations. 3, (1997).
[169]
Robinson, William I. 1996. Promoting polyarchy globalization, US intervention, and hegemony. Cambridge University Press.
[170]
Rosenberg, Justin 1994. The empire of civil society: a critique of the realist theory of international relations. Verso.
[171]
Rupert and M. 2003. Globalising common sense: a Marxian-Gramscian (re-)vision of the politics of governance/resistance. Review of international studies. 29, (2003).
[172]
Rupert, Mark and Smith, Hazel 2002. Historical materialism and globalization. Routledge.
[173]
Schmidt and B. 1998. Lessons from the past: Reassessing the interwar disciplinary history of international relations. International studies quarterly. 42, (1998).
[174]
Schmidt and B. 2002. On the history and historiography of International Relations. Handbook of international relations. Sage.
[175]
Shapcott, Richard 2001. Justice, community and dialogue in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
[176]
Singer and D.J. 1982. The level-of-analysis problem in international relations. The international system: theoretical essays; ed K Knorr and S Verba. Greenwood Press.
[177]
Smith and S. 1997. New approaches to international relations. The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford University Press.
[178]
Smith and S. 2008. New approaches to international theory. The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford University Press.
[179]
Smith and S. 1996. Positivism and beyond. International theory: positivism and beyond. C.U.P.
[180]
Smith and S. 1997. Power of truth: A reply to William Wallace. Review of international studies. 23, (1997).
[181]
Smith and S. 1995. Ten self-images of a discipline. International relations theory today. Polity.
[182]
Snidal and D 2002. Rational choice and international relations. Handbook of international relations. Sage.
[183]
Steans, Jill 1998. Gender and international relations: an introduction. Polity.
[184]
Sylvester and C. 1996. The contributions of feminist theory to IR. International theory: positivism and beyond. C.U.P.
[185]
Sylvester, Christine 1994. Feminist theory and international relations in a postmodern era. Cambridge University Press.
[186]
Sylvester, Christine 1994. Feminist theory and international relations in a postmodern era. Cambridge University Press.
[187]
Thomas Risse 2000. ‘Let’s Argue!’: Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization: World Peace Foundation. 54, (2000).
[188]
Tickner and J. A. 1997. You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists. International studies quarterly. 41, (1997).
[189]
Tickner, J. Ann 1992. Gender in international relations: feminist perspectives on achieving global security. Columbia University Press.
[190]
Tickner, J. Ann 2001. Gendering world politics: issues and approaches in the post-Cold War era. Columbia University Press.
[191]
Tickner and JA. 2006. On The Frontlines or Sidelines of Knowledge and Power? International studies review. 8, (2006).
[192]
True and J. 2009. Feminism. Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[193]
Tuck, Richard and Dawsonera 2001. The rights of war and peace: political thought and the international order from Grotius to Kant. Oxford University Press.
[194]
Vasquez and J. 1995. The post-positive debate. International relations theory today. Polity.
[195]
Vasquez, John A. 1998. The power of power politics: from classical realism to neotraditionalism. Cambridge University Press.
[196]
Vincent, Raymond John and Miller, John Donald Bruce 1990. Order and violence: Hedley Bull and international relations. Clarendon.
[197]
Viotti, Paul R. and Kauppi, Mark V. 1999. International relations theory: realism, pluralism, globalism, and beyond. Allyn and Bacon.
[198]
Waever and O. 1995. International Society: Theoretical Promises Fulfilled? Cooperation and conflict: Nordic studies in international politics. 27, (1995).
[199]
Waever and O. 1996. The rise and fall of the inter-paradigm debate. International theory: positivism and beyond. C.U.P.
[200]
Walker, R. B. J. 1993. Inside/outside: international relations as political theory. Cambridge University Press.
[201]
Waltz and K. 1986. Theory of international politics. Neorealism and its critics. Columbia U.P.
[202]
Waltz and Kenneth N 1990. Realist thought and neorealist theory. (1990).
[203]
Waltz and Kenneth N 1986. Reflections on Theory if international politics. Neorealism and its critics. Columbia U.P.
[204]
Waltz, Kenneth Neal 1979. Theory of international politics. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
[205]
Walzer, Michael 2006. Just and unjust wars: a moral argument with historical illustrations. Basic Books.
[206]
Welch and D 2003. Why International Relations theorists should stop reading Thucydides. Review of international studies. 29, (2003).
[207]
Wendt and A 1992. Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization: World Peace Foundation. 46, (1992).
[208]
Wendt and A 1995. Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.
[209]
Wendt and A. 1995. Constructing International Politics. International security. 20, (1995).
[210]
Wendt, Alexander 1999. Social theory of international politics. Cambridge University Press.
[211]
Wheeler et al. 1992. The security dilemma in theory. Dilemmas of world politics: international issues in a changing world. Oxford University Press.
[212]
Wheeler, Nicholas J. and Oxford University Press 2000. Saving strangers: humanitarian intervention in international society. Oxford University Press.
[213]
Whitworth and S. 1989. Gender in the Inter- Paradigm Debate. Millennium: journal of international studies. 18, (1989).
[214]
Wight and C. 1996. Incommensurability and Cross-Paradigm Communication in International Relations Theory. Millennium: journal of international studies. 25, (1996).
[215]
Wight and C. 1999. MetaCampbell: the epistemological problematics of perspectivism. Review of international studies. 25, (1999).
[216]
Wight and C. 2002. Philosophy if social science and IR. Handbook of international relations. Sage.
[217]
Wight and M. 1995. Why is there no international theory. International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.
[218]
Wight, Martin et al. 1978. Power politics. Royal Institute of International Affairs.
[219]
Williams, Michael C. 2004. The realist tradition and the limits of international relations. Cambridge University Press.
[220]
English School of International Relations Theory, University of Leeds. English School of International Relations Theory | Politics and International Studies (POLIS) | University of Leeds.
[221]
2003. Forum on American realism. Review of international studies. 29, (2003).
[222]
2002. Forum on Waltz. Review of international studies. 28, (2002).
[223]
2000. Forum on Wendt. Review of international studies. 26, (2000).
[224]
1990. Special Issue. International studies quarterly. 34, (1990).
