1.
Wight, M. Why is there no international theory. In: International theory: critical investigations. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1995.
2.
Brown, Chris, Ainley, Kirsten. Understanding international relations. 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
3.
Burchill, S. Introduction. In: Theories of international relations. 4th ed. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
4.
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, Smith, Steve. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
5.
Elshtain, J. International politics and political theory. In: International relations theory today. Cambridge: Polity; 1995.
6.
Jackson, Robert H. Classical and modern thought on international relations: from anarchy to cosmopolis. Vol. Palgrave Macmillan history of international thought series. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005.
7.
Lepgold, J. Is Anyone Listening? International Relations Theory and the Problem of Policy Relevance. In: Political science quarterly. Lancaster Pa: Academy of Political Science;
8.
Nicholson, M. What’s the use of international relations. Review of international studies. 2000;26.
9.
Morgenthau, H. The intellectual and political functions of theory. In: International theory: critical investigations. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1995.
10.
Smith, S. Power of truth: A reply to William Wallace. Review of international studies. 1997;23.
11.
Smith, S. Ten self-images of a discipline. In: International relations theory today. Cambridge: Polity; 1995.
12.
Jackson, Robert H., Sørensen, Georg. Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
13.
Viotti, Paul R., Kauppi, Mark V. International relations theory: realism, pluralism, globalism, and beyond. 3rd ed. Boston ; London: Allyn and Bacon; 1999.
14.
Boucher, David. Political theories of international relations: from Thucydides to the present. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998.
15.
Brown, Chris, Nardin, Terry, Rengger, N. J. International relations in political thought: texts from the ancient Greeks to the First World War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
16.
Buzan, B. The timeless wisdom of realism. In: International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: C.U.P.; 1996.
17.
Carr, Edward Hallett, Cox, Michael. The twenty years’ crisis, 1919-1939: an introduction to the study of international relations. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2001.
18.
Carr, Edward Hallett, Evans, Richard J. What is history? 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2001.
19.
Clark, Ian, Neumann, Iver B., St. Antony’s College (University of Oxford). Classical theories of international relations. Vol. St. Antony’s series. Basingstoke: in association with St. Antony’s College, Oxford; 1996.
20.
Elshtain, J. International politics and political theory. In: International relations theory today. Cambridge: Polity; 1995.
21.
Hutchings, Kimberly. International political theory: rethinking ethics in a global era. Vol. SAGE politics texts. London: SAGE; 1999.
22.
Jackson, R. The evolution of international society. In: The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
23.
Jackson, R. Is there a classical international theory? In: International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: C.U.P.; 1996.
24.
Jahn, Beate. Classical theory in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
25.
Krasner, S. Westphalia and all that. In: Ideas and foreign policy: beliefs, institutions, and political change. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1993.
26.
Morgenthau, Hans Joachim. Scientific man vs. power politics. 1st Phoenix ed. Chicago, Ill: Phoenix Books; 1965.
27.
Schmidt, B. Lessons from the past: Reassessing the interwar disciplinary history of international relations. International studies quarterly. 1998;42.
28.
Schmidt, B. On the history and historiography of International Relations. In: Handbook of international relations. London: Sage; 2002.
29.
Tuck, Richard, Dawsonera. The rights of war and peace: political thought and the international order from Grotius to Kant [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9780191542879
30.
Welch, D. Why International Relations theorists should stop reading Thucydides. Review of international studies. 2003;29.
31.
Michael C. Williams. Hobbes and International Relations: A Reconsideration. International Organization: World Peace Foundation. 1996;50.
32.
Morgenthau, Hans Joachim, Thompson, Kenneth W., Clinton, W. David. Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace. 7th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education; 2006.
33.
Bain, W. Deconfusing Morgenthau: moral inquiry and classical realism reconsidered. Review of international studies. 2000;26.
34.
Claude, Inis L. Power and international relations. New York: Random House; 1962.
35.
Donnelly, Jack. Realism and international relations [Internet]. Vol. Themes in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=202341
36.
Dunne, T. and Schmidt, B. Realism. In: The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
37.
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, Smith, Steve. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
38.
Garnett, J. State-centric perspectives. In: Dilemmas of world politics: international issues in a changing world. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992.
39.
Gilpin, Robert. War and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1981.
40.
Guzzini, Stefano. Realism in international relations and international political economy: the continuing story of a death foretold. Vol. The new international relations. London: Routledge; 1998.
41.
Jackson, Robert H., Sørensen, Georg. Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
42.
Forum on American realism. Review of international studies. 2003;29.
43.
Kennan, George F. American diplomacy, 1900-1950. Vol. Charles R. Walgreen Foundation lectures. London: Secker & Warburg; 1952.
44.
Kennan, George F. American diplomacy, 1900-1950. Vol. Mentor books. London: New English Library;
45.
Morgenthau, Hans Joachim. Scientific man vs. power politics. 1st Phoenix ed. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press; 1965.
46.
Vasquez, John A. The power of power politics: from classical realism to neotraditionalism. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
47.
Wheeler, N. and Booth, K. The security dilemma in theory. In: Dilemmas of world politics: international issues in a changing world. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992.
48.
Williams, Michael C. The realist tradition and the limits of international relations. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
49.
Angell, N. The great illusion: a study of the relation of military power to national advantage. [Place of publication not identified]: Heinemann;
50.
Burchill, S. Liberalism. In: Theories of international relations. 4th ed. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
51.
Griffiths, Martin. Realism, idealism, and international politics: a reinterpretation. London: Routledge; 1992.
52.
MacMillan, John. On liberal peace: democracy, war, and the international order. Vol. The library of international relations. London: Tauris Academic Studies; 1998.
53.
Richardson, J.L. Contending liberalisms - past and present. European journal of international relations. 1997;3.
54.
Bull, H. Society and anarchy in international relations. In: International theory: critical investigations. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1995.
55.
Bull, H. The theory of international politics. In: International theory: critical investigations. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1995.
56.
Bull, Hedley, Watson, Adam. The Expansion of international society. New York: Clarendon Press; 1984.
57.
Brown, Chris. Sovereignty, rights, and justice: international political theory today. Cambridge: Polity; 2002.
58.
Brown, Chris, Ainley, Kirsten. Understanding international relations. 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
59.
Carr, Edward Hallett, Cox, Michael. The twenty years’ crisis, 1919-1939: an introduction to the study of international relations. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2001.
60.
Clark, Ian. The hierarchy of states: reform and resistance in the international order. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: C.U.P.; 1989.
61.
Clark, Ian, Clark, Ian. The hierarchy of states: reform and resistance in the international order. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989.
62.
Dunne, T. Liberalism. In: The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
63.
Dunne, Tim, St. Antony’s College (University of Oxford). Inventing international society: a history of the English school. Vol. St. Antony’s series. Basingstoke: Macmillan in association with St. Antony’s College, Oxford; 1998.
64.
Dunne, T. Society and hierarchy in international relations. International relations. 2003;17.
65.
Dunne, T. The social construction of international society. European journal of international relations. 1995;1.
66.
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, Smith, Steve. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
67.
Hollis, Martin, Smith, Steve. Explaining and understanding international relations. New York: Oxford University Press; 1991.
68.
Jackson, Robert H. Classical and modern thought on international relations: from anarchy to cosmopolis. Vol. Palgrave Macmillan history of international thought series. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005.
69.
Jackson, R. The political theory of international society. In: International relations theory today. Cambridge: Polity; 1995.
70.
Linklater, A. Rationalism. In: Theories of international relations. 2nd ed. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave; 2001.
71.
Linklater, A. The English school. In: Theories of international relations. 3rd ed. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005.
72.
Linklater, Andrew, Suganami, Hidemi, Dawsonera. The English school of international relations: a contemporary reassessment [Internet]. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9780511314704
73.
Vincent, Raymond John, Miller, John Donald Bruce. Order and violence: Hedley Bull and international relations. Oxford: Clarendon; 1990.
74.
Olson, William Clinton, Groom, Arthur John Richard. International relations then and now: origins and trends in interpretation. London: HarperCollins Academic; 1991.
75.
Osiander, A. Rereading early twentieth-century IR theory: Idealism revisited. International studies quarterly. 1998;42.
76.
Hidemi Suganami. Alexander Wendt and the English School. 2001;
77.
Wight, Martin, Bull, Hedley, Holbraad, Carsten, Royal Institute of International Affairs. Power politics. [Leicester]: Royal Institute of International Affairs; 1978.
78.
Waever, O. International Society: Theoretical Promises Fulfilled? Cooperation and conflict: Nordic studies in international politics. 1995;27.
79.
Wheeler, Nicholas J., Oxford University Press. Saving strangers: humanitarian intervention in international society [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/oso/public/content/politicalscience/0199253102/toc.html
80.
English School of International Relations Theory, University of Leeds. English School of International Relations Theory | Politics and International Studies (POLIS) | University of Leeds.
81.
Waltz, Kenneth Neal. Theory of international politics. Vol. Addison-Wesley series in political science. Reading, Mass.; London: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co; 1979.
82.
Waltz, K. Theory of international politics. In: Neorealism and its critics. New York: Columbia U.P.; 1986.
83.
Greico, J. Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. International Organization: World Peace Foundation. 1988;42.
84.
Ashley, R. The poverty of Neo-realism. In: Neorealism and its critics. New York: Columbia U.P.; 1986.
85.
Baldwin, David A. Neorealism and neoliberalism: the contemporary debate. Vol. New directions in world politics. Chichester: Columbia University Press; 1993.
86.
Buzan, Barry. People, states and fear: an agenda for international security studies in the post-cold warera. 2nd ed. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf; 1991.
87.
Deudney, D. and Ikenberry, J.G. The nature and sources of liberal international order. Review of international studies. 1999;25.
88.
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, Smith, Steve. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
89.
Forum on Waltz. Review of international studies. 2002;28.
90.
David Davies Memorial Institute of International Studies. Forum on Waltz. International relations. 2009;23.
91.
Gilpin, R. The richness of the tradition of political realism. In: Neorealism and its critics. New York: Columbia U.P.; 1986.
92.
Guzzini, S. Structural power: The limits of neorealism power analysis. International Organization: World Peace Foundation. 1993;47.
93.
Hasenclever, Andreas, Mayer, Peter, Rittberger, Volker. Theories of international regimes. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.
94.
Hobson, John M. The state and international relations. Vol. Themes in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
95.
Hollis, Martin, Smith, Steve. Explaining and understanding international relations. New York: Oxford University Press; 1991.
96.
Keohane, R. Theory of world politics: Structural realism and beyond. In: International relations theory: realism, pluralism, globalism, and beyond. 3rd ed. Boston ; London: Allyn and Bacon; 1999.
97.
Keohane, R. Theory of world politics: Structural realism and beyond. In: International institutions and state power: essays in international relations theory. Boulder: Westview Press; 1989.
98.
Keohane, Robert O. After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1984.
99.
Keohane, Robert Owen, Nye, Joseph S. Power and interdependence: world politics in transition. Boston: Little, Brown; 1977.
100.
Kolodziej, Edward A. Security and international relations. Vol. Themes in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
101.
Krasner, Stephen D., Center for International and Strategic Affairs. International regimes. Ithaca: Cornell U.P.; 1989.
102.
Kratochwil, F. The embarrassment of changes: neo-realism as the science of Realpolitik without politics. Review of international studies. 1993;19.
103.
Linklater, A. Neo-realism in theory and practice. In: International relations theory today. Cambridge: Polity; 1995.
104.
Little, R. Structuralism and realism. In: International relations: a handbook of current theory. London: Pinter; 1985.
105.
John J. Mearsheimer. Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International security. 1990;15.
106.
Mearsheimer, John J. The tragedy of Great Power politics. London: W. W. Norton & Company; 2001.
107.
Nye, Joseph S. Neorealism and Neoliberalism. World politics: a quarterly journal of international relations. 1988;40.
108.
Jackson, Robert H., Sørensen, Georg. Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
109.
Snidal, D. Rational choice and international relations. In: Handbook of international relations. London: Sage; 2002.
110.
Waltz, Kenneth N. Realist thought and neorealist theory. 1990;
111.
Waltz, Kenneth N. Reflections on Theory if international politics. In: Neorealism and its critics. New York: Columbia U.P.; 1986.
112.
Smith, S. Positivism and beyond. In: International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: C.U.P.; 1996.
113.
Lapid, J. The Third Debate. International studies quarterly. 1989;33.
114.
Banks, M. The inter-paradigm debate. In: International relations: a handbook of current theory. London: Pinter; 1985.
115.
Bull, H. International theory: The case for the classical approach. In: Contending approaches to international politics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1969.
116.
Barry Buzan and Richard Little. Why International Relations has Failed. Millennium: journal of international studies. 2001;30.
117.
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, Smith, Steve. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
118.
Hollis, M. The last post? In: International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: C.U.P.; 1996.
119.
Jackson, Robert H., Sørensen, Georg. Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. Rev. and expanded 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
120.
Jackson, Robert H., Sørensen, Georg. Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
121.
Kaplan, M. The New Great Debate: Traditionalism vs. Science in International Relations. In: Contending approaches to international politics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1969.
122.
Kaplan, M. The New Great Debate: Traditionalism vs. Science in International Relations. World politics: a quarterly journal of international relations. 1966;19.
123.
Singer, D.J. The level-of-analysis problem in international relations. In: The international system: theoretical essays; ed K Knorr and S Verba. [Place of publication not identified]: Greenwood Press; 1982.
124.
Smith, S. New approaches to international theory. In: The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
125.
Vasquez, J. The post-positive debate. In: International relations theory today. Cambridge: Polity; 1995.
126.
Waever, O. The rise and fall of the inter-paradigm debate. In: International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: C.U.P.; 1996.
127.
Wight, C. Incommensurability and Cross-Paradigm Communication in International Relations Theory. Millennium: journal of international studies. 1996;25.
128.
Whitworth, S. Gender in the Inter- Paradigm Debate. Millennium: journal of international studies. 1989;18.
129.
Wight, C. Philosophy if social science and IR. In: Handbook of international relations. London: Sage; 2002.
130.
Hopf, T. The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International security. 1998;23.
131.
Wendt, A. Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization: World Peace Foundation. 1992;46.
132.
Wendt, A. Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. In: International theory: critical investigations. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1995.
133.
Adler, E. Seizing the Middle Ground:: Constructivism in World Politics. European journal of international relations. 1997;3.
134.
Adler, E. Constructivism and IR. In: Handbook of international relations. London: Sage; 2002.
135.
Barnett, M and Finnemore, M. The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations. International Organization: World Peace Foundation. 1999;53.
136.
Dessler, D. Constructivism within a positivist social science. Review of international studies. 1999;25.
137.
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, Smith, Steve. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
138.
Fierke, K.M. Links across the Abyss: Language and Logic in International Relations. International studies quarterly. 2002;46.
139.
Forum on Wendt. Review of international studies. 2000;26.
140.
Guzzini, S. A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations. European journal of international relations. 2000;6.
141.
Keohane R. International Institutions: Two Approaches. International studies quarterly. 1988;32.
142.
Keohane, R. International Institutions: Two Approaches. In: International theory: critical investigations. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1995.
143.
Kolodziej, Edward A. Security and international relations. Vol. Themes in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
144.
Klotz, Audie. Norms in international relations: the struggle against apartheid. Vol. Cornell studies in political economy. Ithaca, N.Y., London: Cornell University Press; 1995.
145.
Moravcsik, A. ‘Is something rotten in the state of Denmark?’ Constructivism and European integration. Journal of European public policy. 6.
146.
Millikin, J. You have access to this article via a personal or institutional subscription The Study of Discourse in International Relations:: A Critique of Research and Methods. European journal of international relations. 1999;5.
147.
Neufeld, M. Reflectivity and international relations. Millennium: journal of international studies. 1993;22.
148.
Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood. World of our making: rules and rule in social theory and international relations. Vol. Studies in international relations. Columbia, S.C.: University of South Carolina Press; 1989.
149.
Reus-Smit, C. Constructivism. In: Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: St. Martin’s Press; 1996.
150.
Price, R. and Reus-Smit, C. Dangerous Liaisons?: Critical International Theory and Constructivism. European journal of international relations. 1998;4.
151.
Thomas Risse. ‘Let’s Argue!’: Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization: World Peace Foundation. 2000;54.
152.
Wendt, Alexander. Social theory of international politics [Internet]. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=144678
153.
Wendt, A. Constructing International Politics. International security. 1995;20.
154.
Cox, R. Social forces, States and world orders. Millennium: journal of international studies. 1981;10.
155.
Cox, R. Social forces, States and world orders. In: Neorealism and its critics. New York: Columbia U.P.; 1986.
156.
Ayers, Alison J. Gramsci, political economy, and international relations theory: modern princes and naked emperors. 1st ed. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008.
157.
Christopher Chase-Dunn. Interstate System and Capitalist World-Economy: One Logic or Two? International studies quarterly. 1981;25.
158.
Chase-Dunn, C. and Rubinson, R. Toward a Structural Perspective on the World-System. Politics & society. 1977;7.
159.
Cox, Robert W. Production, power and world order: social forces in the making of history. Vol. New directions in world politics. Chichester: Columbia University Press; 1987.
160.
Cox, Robert W. Approaches to world order. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
161.
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, Smith, Steve. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
162.
Germain, R. and Kenny, M. Engaging Gramsci: international relations theory and the new Gramscians. Review of international studies. 1998;24.
163.
Gill, Stephen. Gramsci, historical materialism and international relations. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993.
164.
Gill, Stephen. Power and resistance in the new world order. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2003.
165.
Linklater, Andrew. Beyond realism and Marxism: critical theory and international relations. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1990.
166.
Linklater, Andrew. The transformation of political community: ethical foundations of the Post-Westphalian era. Vol. Studies in international relations (Columbia, S.C.). Columbia: University of South Carolina Press; 1998.
167.
Linklater, A. Marxism. In: Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: St. Martin’s Press; 1996.
168.
Lenin, Vladimir Ilich. Imperialism, the highest stage of capitalism: a popular outline. Vol. Scientific socialism series. Moscow: Progress Publishers;
169.
Linklater, Andrew. Beyond realism and Marxism: critical theory and international relations. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1990.
170.
Devetek, R. Critical theory. In: Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: St. Martin’s Press; 1996.
171.
Hoffman, M. Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate. Millennium: journal of international studies. 1987;16.
172.
Bieler, Andreas, Morton, Adam David. Images of Gramsci: connections and contentions in political theory and international relations. London: Routledge; 2006.
173.
Rosenberg, Justin. The empire of civil society: a critique of the realist theory of international relations. London: Verso; 1994.
174.
Robinson, William I. Promoting polyarchy globalization, US intervention, and hegemony. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
175.
Rupert, M. Globalising common sense: a Marxian-Gramscian (re-)vision of the politics of governance/resistance. Review of international studies. 2003;29.
176.
Rupert, Mark, Smith, Hazel. Historical materialism and globalization. Vol. Warwick studies in globalisation. London: Routledge; 2002.
177.
Linklater, Andrew. Critical theory and world politics: citizenship, sovereignty and humanity. London: Routledge; 2007.
178.
Tickner, J. A. You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists. International studies quarterly. 1997;41.
179.
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, Smith, Steve. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
180.
Elshtain, J. Feminist inquiry and international relations. In: New thinking in international relations theory. Boulder, Colo: Westview; 1997.
181.
Elshtain, B. Women and War: ten years on. Review of international studies. 1998;24.
182.
Enloe, Cynthia H. Bananas, beaches, and bases: making feminist sense of international politics. Berkeley, Calif: University of California; 1990.
183.
Institute for World Order. Feminists write IR. Alternatives: a journal of world policy. 1993;
184.
Grant, Rebecca, Newland, Kathleen. Gender and international relations. Milton Keynes: Open U.P., in assoc. with Millennium: journal of international studies; 1991.
185.
Jones, A. s:43:"Does. Review of international studies. 1996;22.
186.
Peterson, V. Spike. Gendered states: feminist (re)visions of international relations theory. Vol. Gender and political theory. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner; 1992.
187.
Peterson, S. Transgressing boundaries. Millennium: journal of international studies. 1992;21.
188.
Steans, Jill. Gender and international relations: an introduction. Oxford: Polity; 1998.
189.
Sylvester, Christine. Feminist theory and international relations in a postmodern era. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.
190.
Sylvester, C. The contributions of feminist theory to IR. In: International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: C.U.P.; 1996.
191.
Tickner, JA. On The Frontlines or Sidelines of Knowledge and Power? International studies review. 2006;8.
192.
Tickner, J. Ann. Gendering world politics: issues and approaches in the post-Cold War era. Chichester: Columbia University Press; 2001.
193.
Tickner, J. Ann. Gender in international relations: feminist perspectives on achieving global security. Vol. New directions in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press; 1992.
194.
True, J. Feminism. In: Theories of international relations. 4th ed. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
195.
Frost, M. A turn not taken: Ethics in IR at the millenium. Review of international studies. 1998;24.
196.
Beitz, Charles R., Alexander, Lawrence A. International ethics. Vol. A Philosophy&public affairs reader. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1985.
197.
Beitz, Charles R. Political theory and international relations. Chichester: Princeton University Press; 1999.
198.
Brown, Chris. International relations theory: new normative approaches. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf; 1992.
199.
Cochran, Molly. Normative theory in international relations: a pragmatic approach [Internet]. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=201788
200.
Frost, Mervyn. Ethics in international relations: a constitutive theory. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: C.U.P.; 1996.
201.
Frost, M. Migrants, civil society and sovereign states: Investigating an ethical hierarchy. Political studies: the journal of the Political Studies Association of the UK. 1998;46.
202.
Hurrell, A. Norms and ethics in IR. In: Handbook of international relations. London: Sage; 2002.
203.
Hoffmann, M. Normative international relations theory: approaches and issues. In: Contemporary international relations: a guide to theory. London: Pinter; 1994.
204.
Hoffmann, Stanley. Duties beyond borders: on the limits and possibilities of ethical international politics. 1st ed. Vol. The Frank W. Abrams lectures. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press; 1981.
205.
Hutchings, Kimberly. International political theory: rethinking ethics in a global era. Vol. SAGE politics texts. London: SAGE; 1999.
206.
Linklater, A. Dialogic politics and the civilising process. Review of international studies. 2005;31.
207.
Nardin, Terry. Law, morality and the relations of states. [Place of publication not identified]: Princeton U.P.; 1983.
208.
Shapcott, Richard. Justice, community and dialogue in international relations. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
209.
Walzer, Michael. Just and unjust wars: a moral argument with historical illustrations. 4th ed. New York: Basic Books; 2006.
210.
Devetak R. Postmodernism. In: Theories of international relations. 3rd ed. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005.
211.
Agamben, Giorgio, Heller-Roazen, Daniel. Homo sacer: sovereign power and bare life. Vol. Meridian. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press; 1998.
212.
Ashley, R. The achievements of post-structuralism. In: International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: C.U.P.; 1996.
213.
Ashley, R. Living on border lines. In: International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books; 1989.
214.
Ashley, R. The geopolitics of political space. Alternatives: a journal of world policy.
215.
Campbell. MetaBosnia: narratives of the Bosnian War. Review of international studies. 1998;24.
216.
Campbell, David. Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity [Internet]. Rev. ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1998. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=310792
217.
Dillon, Michael, Neal, Andrew W. Foucault on politics, security and war. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008.
218.
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, Smith, Steve. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
219.
Edkins, Jenny. Poststructuralism & international relations: bringing the political back in. Vol. Critical perspectives on world politics. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers; 1999.
220.
Smith, S. New approaches to international relations. In: The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997.
221.
Special Issue. International studies quarterly. 1990;34.
222.
Sylvester, Christine. Feminist theory and international relations in a postmodern era. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.
223.
Walker, R. B. J. Inside/outside: international relations as political theory. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993.
224.
Wight, C. MetaCampbell: the epistemological problematics of perspectivism. Review of international studies. 1999;25.
