[1]
Wight and M., ‘Why is there no international theory’, in International theory: critical investigations, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995.
[2]
Brown, Chris and Ainley, Kirsten, Understanding international relations, 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
[3]
Burchill and S., ‘Introduction’, in Theories of international relations, 4th ed., Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
[4]
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, and Smith, Steve, International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
[5]
Elshtain and J., ‘International politics and political theory’, in International relations theory today, Cambridge: Polity, 1995.
[6]
Jackson, Robert H., Classical and modern thought on international relations: from anarchy to cosmopolis, vol. Palgrave Macmillan history of international thought series. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
[7]
Lepgold and J., ‘Is Anyone Listening? International Relations Theory and the Problem of Policy Relevance’, in Political science quarterly, vol. 113, Lancaster Pa: Academy of Political Science.
[8]
Nicholson and M., ‘What’s the use of international relations’, Review of international studies, vol. 26, 2000.
[9]
Morgenthau and H., ‘The intellectual and political functions of theory’, in International theory: critical investigations, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995.
[10]
Smith and S., ‘Power of truth: A reply to William Wallace’, Review of international studies, vol. 23, 1997.
[11]
Smith and S., ‘Ten self-images of a discipline’, in International relations theory today, Cambridge: Polity, 1995.
[12]
Jackson, Robert H. and Sørensen, Georg, Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
[13]
Viotti, Paul R. and Kauppi, Mark V., International relations theory: realism, pluralism, globalism, and beyond, 3rd ed. Boston ; London: Allyn and Bacon, 1999.
[14]
Boucher, David, Political theories of international relations: from Thucydides to the present. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
[15]
Brown, Chris, Nardin, Terry, and Rengger, N. J., International relations in political thought: texts from the ancient Greeks to the First World War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
[16]
Buzan and B, ‘The timeless wisdom of realism’, in International theory: positivism and beyond, Cambridge: C.U.P., 1996.
[17]
Carr, Edward Hallett and Cox, Michael, The twenty years’ crisis, 1919-1939: an introduction to the study of international relations. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001.
[18]
Carr, Edward Hallett and Evans, Richard J., What is history?, 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001.
[19]
Clark, Ian, Neumann, Iver B., and St. Antony’s College (University of Oxford), Classical theories of international relations, vol. St. Antony’s series. Basingstoke: in association with St. Antony’s College, Oxford, 1996.
[20]
Elshtain and J., ‘International politics and political theory’, in International relations theory today, Cambridge: Polity, 1995.
[21]
Hutchings, Kimberly, International political theory: rethinking ethics in a global era, vol. SAGE politics texts. London: SAGE, 1999.
[22]
Jackson and R., ‘The evolution of international society’, in The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations, 4th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
[23]
Jackson and R., ‘Is there a classical international theory?’, in International theory: positivism and beyond, Cambridge: C.U.P., 1996.
[24]
Jahn, Beate, Classical theory in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
[25]
Krasner and S., ‘Westphalia and all that.’, in Ideas and foreign policy: beliefs, institutions, and political change, vol. Cornell studies in political economy, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993.
[26]
Morgenthau, Hans Joachim, Scientific man vs. power politics, 1st Phoenix ed. Chicago, Ill: Phoenix Books, 1965.
[27]
Schmidt and B., ‘Lessons from the past: Reassessing the interwar disciplinary history of international relations’, International studies quarterly, vol. 42, 1998.
[28]
Schmidt and B., ‘On the history and historiography of International Relations’, in Handbook of international relations, London: Sage, 2002.
[29]
Tuck, Richard and Dawsonera, The rights of war and peace: political thought and the international order from Grotius to Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9780191542879
[30]
Welch and D, ‘Why International Relations theorists should stop reading Thucydides’, Review of international studies, vol. 29, 2003.
[31]
Michael C. Williams, ‘Hobbes and International Relations: A Reconsideration’, International Organization: World Peace Foundation, vol. 50, 1996.
[32]
Morgenthau, Hans Joachim, Thompson, Kenneth W., and Clinton, W. David, Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace, 7th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2006.
[33]
Bain and W., ‘Deconfusing Morgenthau: moral inquiry and classical realism reconsidered’, Review of international studies, vol. 26, 2000.
[34]
Claude, Inis L., Power and international relations. New York: Random House, 1962.
[35]
Donnelly, Jack, Realism and international relations, vol. Themes in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=202341
[36]
Dunne, T. and Schmidt, and B., ‘Realism’, in The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations, 4th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
[37]
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, and Smith, Steve, International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
[38]
Garnett and J., ‘State-centric perspectives’, in Dilemmas of world politics: international issues in a changing world, New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
[39]
Gilpin, Robert, War and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
[40]
Guzzini, Stefano, Realism in international relations and international political economy: the continuing story of a death foretold, vol. The new international relations. London: Routledge, 1998.
[41]
Jackson, Robert H. and Sørensen, Georg, Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
[42]
‘Forum on American realism’, Review of international studies, vol. 29, 2003.
[43]
Kennan, George F., American diplomacy, 1900-1950, vol. Charles R. Walgreen Foundation lectures. London: Secker & Warburg, 1952.
[44]
Kennan, George F., American diplomacy, 1900-1950, vol. Mentor books. London: New English Library.
[45]
Morgenthau, Hans Joachim, Scientific man vs. power politics, 1st Phoenix ed. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press, 1965.
[46]
Vasquez, John A., The power of power politics: from classical realism to neotraditionalism, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
[47]
Wheeler, N. and Booth, and K., ‘The security dilemma in theory’, in Dilemmas of world politics: international issues in a changing world, New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
[48]
Williams, Michael C., The realist tradition and the limits of international relations, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
[49]
Angell, N., The great illusion: a study of the relation of military power to national advantage. [Place of publication not identified]: Heinemann.
[50]
Burchill and S., ‘Liberalism’, in Theories of international relations, 4th ed., Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
[51]
Griffiths, Martin, Realism, idealism, and international politics: a reinterpretation. London: Routledge, 1992.
[52]
MacMillan, John, On liberal peace: democracy, war, and the international order, vol. The library of international relations. London: Tauris Academic Studies, 1998.
[53]
Richardson and J.L., ‘Contending liberalisms - past and present’, European journal of international relations, vol. 3, 1997.
[54]
Bull and H., ‘Society and anarchy in international relations’, in International theory: critical investigations, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995.
[55]
Bull and H., ‘The theory of international politics’, in International theory: critical investigations, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995.
[56]
Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam, The Expansion of international society. New York: Clarendon Press, 1984.
[57]
Brown, Chris, Sovereignty, rights, and justice: international political theory today. Cambridge: Polity, 2002.
[58]
Brown, Chris and Ainley, Kirsten, Understanding international relations, 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
[59]
Carr, Edward Hallett and Cox, Michael, The twenty years’ crisis, 1919-1939: an introduction to the study of international relations. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001.
[60]
Clark, Ian, The hierarchy of states: reform and resistance in the international order, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: C.U.P., 1989.
[61]
Clark, Ian and Clark, Ian, The hierarchy of states: reform and resistance in the international order, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
[62]
Dunne and T., ‘Liberalism’, in The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations, 4th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
[63]
Dunne, Tim and St. Antony’s College (University of Oxford), Inventing international society: a history of the English school, vol. St. Antony’s series. Basingstoke: Macmillan in association with St. Antony’s College, Oxford, 1998.
[64]
Dunne and T., ‘Society and hierarchy in international relations’, International relations, vol. 17, 2003.
[65]
Dunne and T., ‘The social construction of international society’, European journal of international relations, vol. 1, 1995.
[66]
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, and Smith, Steve, International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
[67]
Hollis, Martin and Smith, Steve, Explaining and understanding international relations. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.
[68]
Jackson, Robert H., Classical and modern thought on international relations: from anarchy to cosmopolis, vol. Palgrave Macmillan history of international thought series. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
[69]
Jackson and R., ‘The political theory of international society’, in International relations theory today, Cambridge: Polity, 1995.
[70]
Linklater and A., ‘Rationalism’, in Theories of international relations, 2nd ed., Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave, 2001.
[71]
Linklater and A., ‘The English school’, in Theories of international relations, 3rd ed., Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
[72]
Linklater, Andrew, Suganami, Hidemi, and Dawsonera, The English school of international relations: a contemporary reassessment, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9780511314704
[73]
Vincent, Raymond John and Miller, John Donald Bruce, Order and violence: Hedley Bull and international relations. Oxford: Clarendon, 1990.
[74]
Olson, William Clinton and Groom, Arthur John Richard, International relations then and now: origins and trends in interpretation. London: HarperCollins Academic, 1991.
[75]
Osiander and A., ‘Rereading early twentieth-century IR theory: Idealism revisited.’, International studies quarterly, vol. 42, 1998.
[76]
Hidemi Suganami, ‘Alexander Wendt and the English School’, 2001.
[77]
Wight, Martin, Bull, Hedley, Holbraad, Carsten, and Royal Institute of International Affairs, Power politics. [Leicester]: Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1978.
[78]
Waever and O., ‘International Society: Theoretical Promises Fulfilled?’, Cooperation and conflict: Nordic studies in international politics, vol. 27, 1995.
[79]
Wheeler, Nicholas J. and Oxford University Press, Saving strangers: humanitarian intervention in international society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/oso/public/content/politicalscience/0199253102/toc.html
[80]
‘English School of International Relations Theory, University of Leeds’, English School of International Relations Theory | Politics and International Studies (POLIS) | University of Leeds.
[81]
Waltz, Kenneth Neal, Theory of international politics, vol. Addison-Wesley series in political science. Reading, Mass.; London: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co, 1979.
[82]
Waltz and K., ‘Theory of international politics’, in Neorealism and its critics, New York: Columbia U.P., 1986.
[83]
Greico and J., ‘Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism’, International Organization: World Peace Foundation, vol. 42, 1988.
[84]
Ashley and R., ‘The poverty of Neo-realism’, in Neorealism and its critics, New York: Columbia U.P., 1986.
[85]
Baldwin, David A., Neorealism and neoliberalism: the contemporary debate, vol. New directions in world politics. Chichester: Columbia University Press, 1993.
[86]
Buzan, Barry, People, states and fear: an agenda for international security studies in the post-cold warera, 2nd ed. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991.
[87]
Deudney, D. and Ikenberry, and J.G., ‘The nature and sources of liberal international order’, Review of international studies, vol. 25, 1999.
[88]
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, and Smith, Steve, International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
[89]
‘Forum on Waltz’, Review of international studies, vol. 28, 2002.
[90]
David Davies Memorial Institute of International Studies, ‘Forum on Waltz’, International relations, vol. 23, 2009.
[91]
Gilpin and R, ‘The richness of the tradition of political realism’, in Neorealism and its critics, New York: Columbia U.P., 1986.
[92]
Guzzini and S., ‘Structural power: The limits of neorealism power analysis’, International Organization: World Peace Foundation, vol. 47, 1993.
[93]
Hasenclever, Andreas, Mayer, Peter, and Rittberger, Volker, Theories of international regimes, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
[94]
Hobson, John M., The state and international relations, vol. Themes in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
[95]
Hollis, Martin and Smith, Steve, Explaining and understanding international relations. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.
[96]
Keohane and R., ‘Theory of world politics: Structural realism and beyond’, in International relations theory: realism, pluralism, globalism, and beyond, 3rd ed., Boston ; London: Allyn and Bacon, 1999.
[97]
Keohane and R., ‘Theory of world politics: Structural realism and beyond’, in International institutions and state power: essays in international relations theory, Boulder: Westview Press, 1989.
[98]
Keohane, Robert O., After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.
[99]
Keohane, Robert Owen and Nye, Joseph S., Power and interdependence: world politics in transition. Boston: Little, Brown, 1977.
[100]
Kolodziej, Edward A., Security and international relations, vol. Themes in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
[101]
Krasner, Stephen D. and Center for International and Strategic Affairs, International regimes. Ithaca: Cornell U.P., 1989.
[102]
Kratochwil and F., ‘The embarrassment of changes: neo-realism as the science of Realpolitik without politics’, Review of international studies, vol. 19, 1993.
[103]
Linklater and A., ‘Neo-realism in theory and practice’, in International relations theory today, Cambridge: Polity, 1995.
[104]
Little and R., ‘Structuralism and realism’, in International relations: a handbook of current theory, London: Pinter, 1985.
[105]
John J. Mearsheimer, ‘Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War’, International security, vol. 15, 1990.
[106]
Mearsheimer, John J., The tragedy of Great Power politics. London: W. W. Norton & Company, 2001.
[107]
Nye and Joseph S., ‘Neorealism and Neoliberalism’, World politics: a quarterly journal of international relations, vol. 40, 1988.
[108]
Jackson, Robert H. and Sørensen, Georg, Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
[109]
Snidal and D, ‘Rational choice and international relations’, in Handbook of international relations, London: Sage, 2002.
[110]
Waltz and Kenneth N, ‘Realist thought and neorealist theory’, 1990.
[111]
Waltz and Kenneth N, ‘Reflections on Theory if international politics’, in Neorealism and its critics, New York: Columbia U.P., 1986.
[112]
Smith and S., ‘Positivism and beyond’, in International theory: positivism and beyond, Cambridge: C.U.P., 1996.
[113]
Lapid and J, ‘The Third Debate’, International studies quarterly, vol. 33, 1989.
[114]
Banks and M., ‘The inter-paradigm debate’, in International relations: a handbook of current theory, London: Pinter, 1985.
[115]
Bull and H., ‘International theory: The case for the classical approach’, in Contending approaches to international politics, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1969.
[116]
Barry Buzan and Richard Little, ‘Why International Relations has Failed’, Millennium: journal of international studies, vol. 30, 2001.
[117]
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, and Smith, Steve, International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
[118]
Hollis and M., ‘The last post?’, in International theory: positivism and beyond, Cambridge: C.U.P., 1996.
[119]
Jackson, Robert H. and Sørensen, Georg, Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches, Rev. and Expanded 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
[120]
Jackson, Robert H. and Sørensen, Georg, Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
[121]
Kaplan and M., ‘The New Great Debate: Traditionalism vs. Science in International Relations’, in Contending approaches to international politics, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1969.
[122]
Kaplan and M., ‘The New Great Debate: Traditionalism vs. Science in International Relations’, World politics: a quarterly journal of international relations, vol. 19, 1966.
[123]
Singer and D.J., ‘The level-of-analysis problem in international relations’, in The international system: theoretical essays; ed K Knorr and S Verba, [Place of publication not identified]: Greenwood Press, 1982.
[124]
Smith and S., ‘New approaches to international theory’, in The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations, 4th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
[125]
Vasquez and J., ‘The post-positive debate’, in International relations theory today, Cambridge: Polity, 1995.
[126]
Waever and O., ‘The rise and fall of the inter-paradigm debate’, in International theory: positivism and beyond, Cambridge: C.U.P., 1996.
[127]
Wight and C., ‘Incommensurability and Cross-Paradigm Communication in International Relations Theory’, Millennium: journal of international studies, vol. 25, 1996.
[128]
Whitworth and S., ‘Gender in the Inter- Paradigm Debate’, Millennium: journal of international studies, vol. 18, 1989.
[129]
Wight and C., ‘Philosophy if social science and IR’, in Handbook of international relations, London: Sage, 2002.
[130]
Hopf and T, ‘The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory’, International security, vol. 23, 1998.
[131]
Wendt and A, ‘Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics.’, International Organization: World Peace Foundation, vol. 46, 1992.
[132]
Wendt and A, ‘Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics.’, in International theory: critical investigations, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995.
[133]
Adler and E, ‘Seizing the Middle Ground:: Constructivism in World Politics’, European journal of international relations, vol. 3, 1997.
[134]
Adler and E, ‘Constructivism and IR’, in Handbook of international relations, London: Sage, 2002.
[135]
Barnett, M and Finnemore, and M, ‘The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations.’, International Organization: World Peace Foundation, vol. 53, 1999.
[136]
Dessler and D, ‘Constructivism within a positivist social science’, Review of international studies, vol. 25, 1999.
[137]
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, and Smith, Steve, International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
[138]
Fierke and K.M., ‘Links across the Abyss: Language and Logic in International Relations’, International studies quarterly, vol. 46, 2002.
[139]
‘Forum on Wendt’, Review of international studies, vol. 26, 2000.
[140]
Guzzini and S, ‘A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations’, European journal of international relations, vol. 6, 2000.
[141]
Keohane R., ‘International Institutions: Two Approaches’, International studies quarterly, vol. 32, 1988.
[142]
Keohane and R., ‘International Institutions: Two Approaches’, in International theory: critical investigations, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995.
[143]
Kolodziej, Edward A., Security and international relations, vol. Themes in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
[144]
Klotz, Audie, Norms in international relations: the struggle against apartheid, vol. Cornell studies in political economy. Ithaca, N.Y., London: Cornell University Press, 1995.
[145]
Moravcsik and A, ‘“Is something rotten in the state of Denmark?” Constructivism and European integration.’, Journal of European public policy, vol. 6.
[146]
Millikin and J, ‘You have access to this article via a personal or institutional subscription The Study of Discourse in International Relations:: A Critique of Research and Methods’, European journal of international relations, vol. 5, 1999.
[147]
Neufeld and M, ‘Reflectivity and international relations’, Millennium: journal of international studies, vol. 22, 1993.
[148]
Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood, World of our making: rules and rule in social theory and international relations, vol. Studies in international relations. Columbia, S.C.: University of South Carolina Press, 1989.
[149]
Reus-Smit and C., ‘Constructivism’, in Theories of international relations, Basingstoke: St. Martin’s Press, 1996.
[150]
Price, R. and Reus-Smit, and C., ‘Dangerous Liaisons?: Critical International Theory and Constructivism’, European journal of international relations, vol. 4, 1998.
[151]
Thomas Risse, ‘“Let’s Argue!”: Communicative Action in World Politics’, International Organization: World Peace Foundation, vol. 54, 2000.
[152]
Wendt, Alexander, Social theory of international politics, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=144678
[153]
Wendt and A., ‘Constructing International Politics’, International security, vol. 20, 1995.
[154]
Cox and R., ‘Social forces, States and world orders.’, Millennium: journal of international studies, vol. 10, 1981.
[155]
Cox and R., ‘Social forces, States and world orders.’, in Neorealism and its critics, New York: Columbia U.P., 1986.
[156]
Ayers, Alison J., Gramsci, political economy, and international relations theory: modern princes and naked emperors, 1st ed. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
[157]
Christopher Chase-Dunn, ‘Interstate System and Capitalist World-Economy: One Logic or Two?’, International studies quarterly, vol. 25, 1981.
[158]
Chase-Dunn, C. and Rubinson, and R., ‘Toward a Structural Perspective on the World-System’, Politics & society, vol. 7, 1977.
[159]
Cox, Robert W., Production, power and world order: social forces in the making of history, vol. New directions in world politics. Chichester: Columbia University Press, 1987.
[160]
Cox, Robert W., Approaches to world order, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
[161]
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, and Smith, Steve, International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
[162]
Germain, R. and Kenny, and M., ‘Engaging Gramsci: international relations theory and the new Gramscians’, Review of international studies, vol. 24, 1998.
[163]
Gill, Stephen, Gramsci, historical materialism and international relations, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
[164]
Gill, Stephen, Power and resistance in the new world order. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
[165]
Linklater, Andrew, Beyond realism and Marxism: critical theory and international relations. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1990.
[166]
Linklater, Andrew, The transformation of political community: ethical foundations of the Post-Westphalian era, vol. Studies in international relations (Columbia, S.C.). Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1998.
[167]
Linklater and A., ‘Marxism’, in Theories of international relations, Basingstoke: St. Martin’s Press, 1996.
[168]
Lenin, Vladimir Ilich, Imperialism, the highest stage of capitalism: a popular outline, vol. Scientific socialism series. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
[169]
Linklater, Andrew, Beyond realism and Marxism: critical theory and international relations. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1990.
[170]
Devetek and R., ‘Critical theory’, in Theories of international relations, Basingstoke: St. Martin’s Press, 1996.
[171]
Hoffman and M., ‘Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate’, Millennium: journal of international studies, vol. 16, 1987.
[172]
Bieler, Andreas and Morton, Adam David, Images of Gramsci: connections and contentions in political theory and international relations. London: Routledge, 2006.
[173]
Rosenberg, Justin, The empire of civil society: a critique of the realist theory of international relations. London: Verso, 1994.
[174]
Robinson, William I., Promoting polyarchy globalization, US intervention, and hegemony, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
[175]
Rupert and M., ‘Globalising common sense: a Marxian-Gramscian (re-)vision of the politics of governance/resistance’, Review of international studies, vol. 29, 2003.
[176]
Rupert, Mark and Smith, Hazel, Historical materialism and globalization, vol. Warwick studies in globalisation. London: Routledge, 2002.
[177]
Linklater, Andrew, Critical theory and world politics: citizenship, sovereignty and humanity. London: Routledge, 2007.
[178]
Tickner and J. A., ‘You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists’, International studies quarterly, vol. 41, 1997.
[179]
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, and Smith, Steve, International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
[180]
Elshtain and J., ‘Feminist inquiry and international relations’, in New thinking in international relations theory, Boulder, Colo: Westview, 1997.
[181]
Elshtain and B., ‘Women and War: ten years on.’, Review of international studies, vol. 24, 1998.
[182]
Enloe, Cynthia H, Bananas, beaches, and bases: making feminist sense of international politics. Berkeley, Calif: University of California, 1990.
[183]
Institute for World Order, ‘Feminists write IR’, Alternatives: a journal of world policy, 1993.
[184]
Grant, Rebecca and Newland, Kathleen, Gender and international relations. Milton Keynes: Open U.P., in assoc. with Millennium: journal of international studies, 1991.
[185]
Jones and A., ‘s:43:"Does’, Review of international studies, vol. 22, 1996.
[186]
Peterson, V. Spike, Gendered states: feminist (re)visions of international relations theory, vol. Gender and political theory. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner, 1992.
[187]
Peterson and S, ‘Transgressing boundaries’, Millennium: journal of international studies, vol. 21, 1992.
[188]
Steans, Jill, Gender and international relations: an introduction. Oxford: Polity, 1998.
[189]
Sylvester, Christine, Feminist theory and international relations in a postmodern era, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
[190]
Sylvester and C., ‘The contributions of feminist theory to IR’, in International theory: positivism and beyond, Cambridge: C.U.P., 1996.
[191]
Tickner and JA., ‘On The Frontlines or Sidelines of Knowledge and Power?’, International studies review, vol. 8, 2006.
[192]
Tickner, J. Ann, Gendering world politics: issues and approaches in the post-Cold War era. Chichester: Columbia University Press, 2001.
[193]
Tickner, J. Ann, Gender in international relations: feminist perspectives on achieving global security, vol. New directions in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1992.
[194]
True and J., ‘Feminism’, in Theories of international relations, 4th ed., Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
[195]
Frost and M., ‘A turn not taken: Ethics in IR at the millenium’, Review of international studies, vol. 24, 1998.
[196]
Beitz, Charles R. and Alexander, Lawrence A., International ethics, vol. A Philosophy&public affairs reader. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1985.
[197]
Beitz, Charles R., Political theory and international relations. Chichester: Princeton University Press, 1999.
[198]
Brown, Chris, International relations theory: new normative approaches. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1992.
[199]
Cochran, Molly, Normative theory in international relations: a pragmatic approach, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=201788
[200]
Frost, Mervyn, Ethics in international relations: a constitutive theory, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: C.U.P., 1996.
[201]
Frost and M., ‘Migrants, civil society and sovereign states: Investigating an ethical hierarchy.’, Political studies: the journal of the Political Studies Association of the U.K., vol. 46, 1998.
[202]
Hurrell and A., ‘Norms and ethics in IR’, in Handbook of international relations, London: Sage, 2002.
[203]
Hoffmann and M., ‘Normative international relations theory: approaches and issues.’, in Contemporary international relations: a guide to theory, London: Pinter, 1994.
[204]
Hoffmann, Stanley, Duties beyond borders: on the limits and possibilities of ethical international politics, 1st ed., vol. The Frank W. Abrams lectures. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press, 1981.
[205]
Hutchings, Kimberly, International political theory: rethinking ethics in a global era, vol. SAGE politics texts. London: SAGE, 1999.
[206]
Linklater and A., ‘Dialogic politics and the civilising process’, Review of international studies, vol. 31, 2005.
[207]
Nardin, Terry, Law, morality and the relations of states. [Place of publication not identified]: Princeton U.P., 1983.
[208]
Shapcott, Richard, Justice, community and dialogue in international relations, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
[209]
Walzer, Michael, Just and unjust wars: a moral argument with historical illustrations, 4th ed. New York: Basic Books, 2006.
[210]
R. Devetak, ‘Postmodernism’, in Theories of international relations, 3rd ed., Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
[211]
Agamben, Giorgio and Heller-Roazen, Daniel, Homo sacer: sovereign power and bare life, vol. Meridian. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1998.
[212]
Ashley and R., ‘The achievements of post-structuralism’, in International theory: positivism and beyond, Cambridge: C.U.P., 1996.
[213]
Ashley and R., ‘Living on border lines’, in International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics, vol. World politics series, Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books, 1989.
[214]
Ashley and R., ‘The geopolitics of political space’, Alternatives: a journal of world policy.
[215]
Campbell, ‘MetaBosnia: narratives of the Bosnian War’, Review of international studies, vol. 24, 1998.
[216]
Campbell, David, Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity, Rev. ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1998 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=310792
[217]
Dillon, Michael and Neal, Andrew W., Foucault on politics, security and war. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
[218]
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, and Smith, Steve, International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
[219]
Edkins, Jenny, Poststructuralism & international relations: bringing the political back in, vol. Critical perspectives on world politics. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1999.
[220]
Smith and S., ‘New approaches to international relations’, in The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
[221]
‘Special Issue’, International studies quarterly, vol. 34, 1990.
[222]
Sylvester, Christine, Feminist theory and international relations in a postmodern era, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
[223]
Walker, R. B. J., Inside/outside: international relations as political theory, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
[224]
Wight and C., ‘MetaCampbell: the epistemological problematics of perspectivism’, Review of international studies, vol. 25, 1999.
