1.
Wight, M. Why is there no international theory. In: International Theory: Critical Investigations. Macmillan; 1995.
2.
Brown, Chris, Ainley, Kirsten. Understanding International Relations. 4th ed. Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
3.
Burchill, S. Introduction. In: Theories of International Relations. 4th ed. Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
4.
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, Smith, Steve. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford University Press; 2007.
5.
Elshtain, J. International politics and political theory. In: International Relations Theory Today. Polity; 1995.
6.
Jackson, Robert H. Classical and Modern Thought on International Relations: From Anarchy to Cosmopolis. Vol Palgrave Macmillan history of international thought series. Palgrave Macmillan; 2005.
7.
Lepgold, J. Is Anyone Listening? International Relations Theory and the Problem of Policy Relevance. In: Political Science Quarterly. Vol 113. Academy of Political Science.
8.
Nicholson, M. What’s the use of international relations. Review of international studies. 2000;26.
9.
Morgenthau, H. The intellectual and political functions of theory. In: International Theory: Critical Investigations. Macmillan; 1995.
10.
Smith, S. Power of truth: A reply to William Wallace. Review of international studies. 1997;23.
11.
Smith, S. Ten self-images of a discipline. In: International Relations Theory Today. Polity; 1995.
12.
Jackson, Robert H., Sørensen, Georg. Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press; 2007.
13.
Viotti, Paul R., Kauppi, Mark V. International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond. 3rd ed. Allyn and Bacon; 1999.
14.
Boucher, David. Political Theories of International Relations: From Thucydides to the Present. Oxford University Press; 1998.
15.
Brown, Chris, Nardin, Terry, Rengger, N. J. International Relations in Political Thought: Texts from the Ancient Greeks to the First World War. Cambridge University Press; 2002.
16.
Buzan, B. The timeless wisdom of realism. In: International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. C.U.P.; 1996.
17.
Carr, Edward Hallett, Cox, Michael. The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. Palgrave; 2001.
18.
Carr, Edward Hallett, Evans, Richard J. What Is History? 2nd ed. Palgrave; 2001.
19.
Clark, Ian, Neumann, Iver B., St. Antony’s College (University of Oxford). Classical Theories of International Relations. Vol St. Antony’s series. in association with St. Antony’s College, Oxford; 1996.
20.
Elshtain, J. International politics and political theory. In: International Relations Theory Today. Polity; 1995.
21.
Hutchings, Kimberly. International Political Theory: Rethinking Ethics in a Global Era. Vol SAGE politics texts. SAGE; 1999.
22.
Jackson, R. The evolution of international society. In: The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. 4th ed. Oxford University Press; 2008.
23.
Jackson, R. Is there a classical international theory? In: International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. C.U.P.; 1996.
24.
Jahn, Beate. Classical Theory in International Relations. Cambridge University Press; 2006.
25.
Krasner, S. Westphalia and all that. In: Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change. Vol Cornell studies in political economy. Cornell University Press; 1993.
26.
Morgenthau, Hans Joachim. Scientific Man vs. Power Politics. 1st Phoenix ed. Phoenix Books; 1965.
27.
Schmidt, B. Lessons from the past: Reassessing the interwar disciplinary history of international relations. International studies quarterly. 1998;42.
28.
Schmidt, B. On the history and historiography of International Relations. In: Handbook of International Relations. Sage; 2002.
29.
Tuck, Richard, Dawsonera. The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant. Oxford University Press; 2001. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9780191542879
30.
Welch, D. Why International Relations theorists should stop reading Thucydides. Review of international studies. 2003;29.
31.
Michael C. Williams. Hobbes and International Relations: A Reconsideration. International Organization: World Peace Foundation. 1996;50.
32.
Morgenthau, Hans Joachim, Thompson, Kenneth W., Clinton, W. David. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. 7th ed. McGraw-Hill Higher Education; 2006.
33.
Bain, W. Deconfusing Morgenthau: moral inquiry and classical realism reconsidered. Review of international studies. 2000;26.
34.
Claude, Inis L. Power and International Relations. Random House; 1962.
35.
Donnelly, Jack. Realism and International Relations. Vol Themes in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 2000. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=202341
36.
Dunne, T. and Schmidt, B. Realism. In: The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. 4th ed. Oxford University Press; 2008.
37.
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, Smith, Steve. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford University Press; 2007.
38.
Garnett, J. State-centric perspectives. In: Dilemmas of World Politics: International Issues in a Changing World. Oxford University Press; 1992.
39.
Gilpin, Robert. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge University Press; 1981.
40.
Guzzini, Stefano. Realism in International Relations and International Political Economy: The Continuing Story of a Death Foretold. Vol The new international relations. Routledge; 1998.
41.
Jackson, Robert H., Sørensen, Georg. Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press; 2007.
42.
Forum on American realism. Review of international studies. 2003;29.
43.
Kennan, George F. American Diplomacy, 1900-1950. Vol Charles R. Walgreen Foundation lectures. Secker & Warburg; 1952.
44.
Kennan, George F. American Diplomacy, 1900-1950. Vol Mentor books. New English Library
45.
Morgenthau, Hans Joachim. Scientific Man vs. Power Politics. 1st Phoenix ed. University of Chicago Press; 1965.
46.
Vasquez, John A. The Power of Power Politics: From Classical Realism to Neotraditionalism. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 1998.
47.
Wheeler, N. and Booth, K. The security dilemma in theory. In: Dilemmas of World Politics: International Issues in a Changing World. Oxford University Press; 1992.
48.
Williams, Michael C. The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 2004.
49.
Angell, N. The Great Illusion: A Study of the Relation of Military Power to National Advantage. Heinemann
50.
Burchill, S. Liberalism. In: Theories of International Relations. 4th ed. Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
51.
Griffiths, Martin. Realism, Idealism, and International Politics: A Reinterpretation. Routledge; 1992.
52.
MacMillan, John. On Liberal Peace: Democracy, War, and the International Order. Vol The library of international relations. Tauris Academic Studies; 1998.
53.
Richardson, J.L. Contending liberalisms - past and present. European journal of international relations. 1997;3.
54.
Bull, H. Society and anarchy in international relations. In: International Theory: Critical Investigations. Macmillan; 1995.
55.
Bull, H. The theory of international politics. In: International Theory: Critical Investigations. Macmillan; 1995.
56.
Bull, Hedley, Watson, Adam. The Expansion of International Society. Clarendon Press; 1984.
57.
Brown, Chris. Sovereignty, Rights, and Justice: International Political Theory Today. Polity; 2002.
58.
Brown, Chris, Ainley, Kirsten. Understanding International Relations. 4th ed. Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
59.
Carr, Edward Hallett, Cox, Michael. The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. Palgrave; 2001.
60.
Clark, Ian. The Hierarchy of States: Reform and Resistance in the International Order. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. C.U.P.; 1989.
61.
Clark, Ian, Clark, Ian. The Hierarchy of States: Reform and Resistance in the International Order. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 1989.
62.
Dunne, T. Liberalism. In: The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. 4th ed. Oxford University Press; 2008.
63.
Dunne, Tim, St. Antony’s College (University of Oxford). Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. Vol St. Antony’s series. Macmillan in association with St. Antony’s College, Oxford; 1998.
64.
Dunne, T. Society and hierarchy in international relations. International relations. 2003;17.
65.
Dunne, T. The social construction of international society. European journal of international relations. 1995;1.
66.
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, Smith, Steve. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford University Press; 2007.
67.
Hollis, Martin, Smith, Steve. Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford University Press; 1991.
68.
Jackson, Robert H. Classical and Modern Thought on International Relations: From Anarchy to Cosmopolis. Vol Palgrave Macmillan history of international thought series. Palgrave Macmillan; 2005.
69.
Jackson, R. The political theory of international society. In: International Relations Theory Today. Polity; 1995.
70.
Linklater, A. Rationalism. In: Theories of International Relations. 2nd ed. Palgrave; 2001.
71.
Linklater, A. The English school. In: Theories of International Relations. 3rd ed. Palgrave Macmillan; 2005.
72.
Linklater, Andrew, Suganami, Hidemi, Dawsonera. The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 2006. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9780511314704
73.
Vincent, Raymond John, Miller, John Donald Bruce. Order and Violence: Hedley Bull and International Relations. Clarendon; 1990.
74.
Olson, William Clinton, Groom, Arthur John Richard. International Relations Then and Now: Origins and Trends in Interpretation. HarperCollins Academic; 1991.
75.
Osiander, A. Rereading early twentieth-century IR theory: Idealism revisited. International studies quarterly. 1998;42.
76.
Hidemi Suganami. Alexander Wendt and the English School. Published online 2001.
77.
Wight, Martin, Bull, Hedley, Holbraad, Carsten, Royal Institute of International Affairs. Power Politics. Royal Institute of International Affairs; 1978.
78.
Waever, O. International Society: Theoretical Promises Fulfilled? Cooperation and conflict: Nordic studies in international politics. 1995;27.
79.
Wheeler, Nicholas J., Oxford University Press. Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society. Oxford University Press; 2000. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/oso/public/content/politicalscience/0199253102/toc.html
80.
English School of International Relations Theory, University of Leeds. English School of International Relations Theory | Politics and International Studies (POLIS) | University of Leeds.
81.
Waltz, Kenneth Neal. Theory of International Politics. Vol Addison-Wesley series in political science. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co; 1979.
82.
Waltz, K. Theory of international politics. In: Neorealism and Its Critics. Columbia U.P.; 1986.
83.
Greico, J. Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. International Organization: World Peace Foundation. 1988;42.
84.
Ashley, R. The poverty of Neo-realism. In: Neorealism and Its Critics. Columbia U.P.; 1986.
85.
Baldwin, David A. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. Vol New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press; 1993.
86.
Buzan, Barry. People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold Warera. 2nd ed. Harvester Wheatsheaf; 1991.
87.
Deudney, D. and Ikenberry, J.G. The nature and sources of liberal international order. Review of international studies. 1999;25.
88.
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, Smith, Steve. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford University Press; 2007.
89.
Forum on Waltz. Review of international studies. 2002;28.
90.
David Davies Memorial Institute of International Studies. Forum on Waltz. International relations. 2009;23.
91.
Gilpin, R. The richness of the tradition of political realism. In: Neorealism and Its Critics. Columbia U.P.; 1986.
92.
Guzzini, S. Structural power: The limits of neorealism power analysis. International Organization: World Peace Foundation. 1993;47.
93.
Hasenclever, Andreas, Mayer, Peter, Rittberger, Volker. Theories of International Regimes. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 1997.
94.
Hobson, John M. The State and International Relations. Vol Themes in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 2000.
95.
Hollis, Martin, Smith, Steve. Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford University Press; 1991.
96.
Keohane, R. Theory of world politics: Structural realism and beyond. In: International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond. 3rd ed. Allyn and Bacon; 1999.
97.
Keohane, R. Theory of world politics: Structural realism and beyond. In: International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory. Westview Press; 1989.
98.
Keohane, Robert O. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press; 1984.
99.
Keohane, Robert Owen, Nye, Joseph S. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Little, Brown; 1977.
100.
Kolodziej, Edward A. Security and International Relations. Vol Themes in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 2005.
101.
Krasner, Stephen D., Center for International and Strategic Affairs. International Regimes. Cornell U.P.; 1989.
102.
Kratochwil, F. The embarrassment of changes: neo-realism as the science of Realpolitik without politics. Review of international studies. 1993;19.
103.
Linklater, A. Neo-realism in theory and practice. In: International Relations Theory Today. Polity; 1995.
104.
Little, R. Structuralism and realism. In: International Relations: A Handbook of Current Theory. Pinter; 1985.
105.
John J. Mearsheimer. Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International security. 1990;15.
106.
Mearsheimer, John J. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. W. W. Norton & Company; 2001.
107.
Nye, Joseph S. Neorealism and Neoliberalism. World politics: a quarterly journal of international relations. 1988;40.
108.
Jackson, Robert H., Sørensen, Georg. Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press; 2007.
109.
Snidal, D. Rational choice and international relations. In: Handbook of International Relations. Sage; 2002.
110.
Waltz, Kenneth N. Realist thought and neorealist theory. Published online 1990.
111.
Waltz, Kenneth N. Reflections on Theory if international politics. In: Neorealism and Its Critics. Columbia U.P.; 1986.
112.
Smith, S. Positivism and beyond. In: International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. C.U.P.; 1996.
113.
Lapid, J. The Third Debate. International studies quarterly. 1989;33.
114.
Banks, M. The inter-paradigm debate. In: International Relations: A Handbook of Current Theory. Pinter; 1985.
115.
Bull, H. International theory: The case for the classical approach. In: Contending Approaches to International Politics. Princeton University Press; 1969.
116.
Barry Buzan and Richard Little. Why International Relations has Failed. Millennium: journal of international studies. 2001;30.
117.
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, Smith, Steve. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford University Press; 2007.
118.
Hollis, M. The last post? In: International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. C.U.P.; 1996.
119.
Jackson, Robert H., Sørensen, Georg. Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches. Rev. and expanded 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2003.
120.
Jackson, Robert H., Sørensen, Georg. Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press; 2007.
121.
Kaplan, M. The New Great Debate: Traditionalism vs. Science in International Relations. In: Contending Approaches to International Politics. Princeton University Press; 1969.
122.
Kaplan, M. The New Great Debate: Traditionalism vs. Science in International Relations. World politics: a quarterly journal of international relations. 1966;19.
123.
Singer, D.J. The level-of-analysis problem in international relations. In: The International System: Theoretical Essays; Ed K Knorr and S Verba. Greenwood Press; 1982.
124.
Smith, S. New approaches to international theory. In: The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. 4th ed. Oxford University Press; 2008.
125.
Vasquez, J. The post-positive debate. In: International Relations Theory Today. Polity; 1995.
126.
Waever, O. The rise and fall of the inter-paradigm debate. In: International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. C.U.P.; 1996.
127.
Wight, C. Incommensurability and Cross-Paradigm Communication in International Relations Theory. Millennium: journal of international studies. 1996;25.
128.
Whitworth, S. Gender in the Inter- Paradigm Debate. Millennium: journal of international studies. 1989;18.
129.
Wight, C. Philosophy if social science and IR. In: Handbook of International Relations. Sage; 2002.
130.
Hopf, T. The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International security. 1998;23.
131.
Wendt, A. Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization: World Peace Foundation. 1992;46.
132.
Wendt, A. Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. In: International Theory: Critical Investigations. Macmillan; 1995.
133.
Adler, E. Seizing the Middle Ground:: Constructivism in World Politics. European journal of international relations. 1997;3.
134.
Adler, E. Constructivism and IR. In: Handbook of International Relations. Sage; 2002.
135.
Barnett, M and Finnemore, M. The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations. International Organization: World Peace Foundation. 1999;53.
136.
Dessler, D. Constructivism within a positivist social science. Review of international studies. 1999;25.
137.
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, Smith, Steve. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford University Press; 2007.
138.
Fierke, K.M. Links across the Abyss: Language and Logic in International Relations. International studies quarterly. 2002;46.
139.
Forum on Wendt. Review of international studies. 2000;26.
140.
Guzzini, S. A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations. European journal of international relations. 2000;6.
141.
Keohane R. International Institutions: Two Approaches. International studies quarterly. 1988;32.
142.
Keohane, R. International Institutions: Two Approaches. In: International Theory: Critical Investigations. Macmillan; 1995.
143.
Kolodziej, Edward A. Security and International Relations. Vol Themes in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 2005.
144.
Klotz, Audie. Norms in International Relations: The Struggle against Apartheid. Vol Cornell studies in political economy. Cornell University Press; 1995.
145.
Moravcsik, A. ‘Is something rotten in the state of Denmark?’ Constructivism and European integration. Journal of European public policy. 6.
146.
Millikin, J. You have access to this article via a personal or institutional subscription The Study of Discourse in International Relations:: A Critique of Research and Methods. European journal of international relations. 1999;5.
147.
Neufeld, M. Reflectivity and international relations. Millennium: journal of international studies. 1993;22.
148.
Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood. World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Vol Studies in international relations. University of South Carolina Press; 1989.
149.
Reus-Smit, C. Constructivism. In: Theories of International Relations. St. Martin’s Press; 1996.
150.
Price, R. and Reus-Smit, C. Dangerous Liaisons?: Critical International Theory and Constructivism. European journal of international relations. 1998;4.
151.
Thomas Risse. ‘Let’s Argue!’: Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization: World Peace Foundation. 2000;54.
152.
Wendt, Alexander. Social Theory of International Politics. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 1999. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=144678
153.
Wendt, A. Constructing International Politics. International security. 1995;20.
154.
Cox, R. Social forces, States and world orders. Millennium: journal of international studies. 1981;10.
155.
Cox, R. Social forces, States and world orders. In: Neorealism and Its Critics. Columbia U.P.; 1986.
156.
Ayers, Alison J. Gramsci, Political Economy, and International Relations Theory: Modern Princes and Naked Emperors. 1st ed. Palgrave Macmillan; 2008.
157.
Christopher Chase-Dunn. Interstate System and Capitalist World-Economy: One Logic or Two? International studies quarterly. 1981;25.
158.
Chase-Dunn, C. and Rubinson, R. Toward a Structural Perspective on the World-System. Politics & society. 1977;7.
159.
Cox, Robert W. Production, Power and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History. Vol New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press; 1987.
160.
Cox, Robert W. Approaches to World Order. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 1996.
161.
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, Smith, Steve. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford University Press; 2007.
162.
Germain, R. and Kenny, M. Engaging Gramsci: international relations theory and the new Gramscians. Review of international studies. 1998;24.
163.
Gill, Stephen. Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 1993.
164.
Gill, Stephen. Power and Resistance in the New World Order. Palgrave Macmillan; 2003.
165.
Linklater, Andrew. Beyond Realism and Marxism: Critical Theory and International Relations. Macmillan; 1990.
166.
Linklater, Andrew. The Transformation of Political Community: Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era. Vol Studies in international relations (Columbia, S.C.). University of South Carolina Press; 1998.
167.
Linklater, A. Marxism. In: Theories of International Relations. St. Martin’s Press; 1996.
168.
Lenin, Vladimir Ilich. Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism: A Popular Outline. Vol Scientific socialism series. Progress Publishers
169.
Linklater, Andrew. Beyond Realism and Marxism: Critical Theory and International Relations. Macmillan; 1990.
170.
Devetek, R. Critical theory. In: Theories of International Relations. St. Martin’s Press; 1996.
171.
Hoffman, M. Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate. Millennium: journal of international studies. 1987;16.
172.
Bieler, Andreas, Morton, Adam David. Images of Gramsci: Connections and Contentions in Political Theory and International Relations. Routledge; 2006.
173.
Rosenberg, Justin. The Empire of Civil Society: A Critique of the Realist Theory of International Relations. Verso; 1994.
174.
Robinson, William I. Promoting Polyarchy Globalization, US Intervention, and Hegemony. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 1996.
175.
Rupert, M. Globalising common sense: a Marxian-Gramscian (re-)vision of the politics of governance/resistance. Review of international studies. 2003;29.
176.
Rupert, Mark, Smith, Hazel. Historical Materialism and Globalization. Vol Warwick studies in globalisation. Routledge; 2002.
177.
Linklater, Andrew. Critical Theory and World Politics: Citizenship, Sovereignty and Humanity. Routledge; 2007.
178.
Tickner, J. A. You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists. International studies quarterly. 1997;41.
179.
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, Smith, Steve. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford University Press; 2007.
180.
Elshtain, J. Feminist inquiry and international relations. In: New Thinking in International Relations Theory. Westview; 1997.
181.
Elshtain, B. Women and War: ten years on. Review of international studies. 1998;24.
182.
Enloe, Cynthia H. Bananas, Beaches, and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. University of California; 1990.
183.
Institute for World Order. Feminists write IR. Alternatives: a journal of world policy. Published online 1993.
184.
Grant, Rebecca, Newland, Kathleen. Gender and International Relations. Open U.P., in assoc. with Millennium: journal of international studies; 1991.
185.
Jones, A. s:43:"Does. Review of international studies. 1996;22.
186.
Peterson, V. Spike. Gendered States: Feminist (Re)Visions of International Relations Theory. Vol Gender and political theory. Lynne Rienner; 1992.
187.
Peterson, S. Transgressing boundaries. Millennium: journal of international studies. 1992;21.
188.
Steans, Jill. Gender and International Relations: An Introduction. Polity; 1998.
189.
Sylvester, Christine. Feminist Theory and International Relations in a Postmodern Era. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 1994.
190.
Sylvester, C. The contributions of feminist theory to IR. In: International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. C.U.P.; 1996.
191.
Tickner, JA. On The Frontlines or Sidelines of Knowledge and Power? International studies review. 2006;8.
192.
Tickner, J. Ann. Gendering World Politics: Issues and Approaches in the Post-Cold War Era. Columbia University Press; 2001.
193.
Tickner, J. Ann. Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security. Vol New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press; 1992.
194.
True, J. Feminism. In: Theories of International Relations. 4th ed. Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
195.
Frost, M. A turn not taken: Ethics in IR at the millenium. Review of international studies. 1998;24.
196.
Beitz, Charles R., Alexander, Lawrence A. International Ethics. Vol A Philosophy&public affairs reader. Princeton University Press; 1985.
197.
Beitz, Charles R. Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton University Press; 1999.
198.
Brown, Chris. International Relations Theory: New Normative Approaches. Harvester Wheatsheaf; 1992.
199.
Cochran, Molly. Normative Theory in International Relations: A Pragmatic Approach. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 1999. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=201788
200.
Frost, Mervyn. Ethics in International Relations: A Constitutive Theory. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. C.U.P.; 1996.
201.
Frost, M. Migrants, civil society and sovereign states: Investigating an ethical hierarchy. Political studies: the journal of the Political Studies Association of the UK. 1998;46.
202.
Hurrell, A. Norms and ethics in IR. In: Handbook of International Relations. Sage; 2002.
203.
Hoffmann, M. Normative international relations theory: approaches and issues. In: Contemporary International Relations: A Guide to Theory. Pinter; 1994.
204.
Hoffmann, Stanley. Duties beyond Borders: On the Limits and Possibilities of Ethical International Politics. Vol The Frank W. Abrams lectures. 1st ed. Syracuse University Press; 1981.
205.
Hutchings, Kimberly. International Political Theory: Rethinking Ethics in a Global Era. Vol SAGE politics texts. SAGE; 1999.
206.
Linklater, A. Dialogic politics and the civilising process. Review of international studies. 2005;31.
207.
Nardin, Terry. Law, Morality and the Relations of States. Princeton U.P.; 1983.
208.
Shapcott, Richard. Justice, Community and Dialogue in International Relations. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 2001.
209.
Walzer, Michael. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. 4th ed. Basic Books; 2006.
210.
Devetak R. Postmodernism. In: Theories of International Relations. 3rd ed. Palgrave Macmillan; 2005.
211.
Agamben, Giorgio, Heller-Roazen, Daniel. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Vol Meridian. Stanford University Press; 1998.
212.
Ashley, R. The achievements of post-structuralism. In: International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. C.U.P.; 1996.
213.
Ashley, R. Living on border lines. In: International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. Vol World politics series. Lexington Books; 1989.
214.
Ashley, R. The geopolitics of political space. Alternatives: a journal of world policy.
215.
Campbell. MetaBosnia: narratives of the Bosnian War. Review of international studies. 1998;24.
216.
Campbell, David. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Rev. ed. Manchester University Press; 1998. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=310792
217.
Dillon, Michael, Neal, Andrew W. Foucault on Politics, Security and War. Palgrave Macmillan; 2008.
218.
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, Smith, Steve. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford University Press; 2007.
219.
Edkins, Jenny. Poststructuralism & International Relations: Bringing the Political Back In. Vol Critical perspectives on world politics. Lynne Rienner Publishers; 1999.
220.
Smith, S. New approaches to international relations. In: The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. Oxford University Press; 1997.
221.
Special Issue. International studies quarterly. 1990;34.
222.
Sylvester, Christine. Feminist Theory and International Relations in a Postmodern Era. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 1994.
223.
Walker, R. B. J. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 1993.
224.
Wight, C. MetaCampbell: the epistemological problematics of perspectivism. Review of international studies. 1999;25.
