1
Wight, M. Why is there no international theory. In: International theory: critical investigations. Basingstoke: : Macmillan 1995.
2
Brown, Chris, Ainley, Kirsten. Understanding international relations. 4th ed. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2009.
3
Burchill, S. Introduction. In: Theories of international relations. Houndmills, Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2009.
4
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, Smith, Steve. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007.
5
Elshtain, J. International politics and political theory. In: International relations theory today. Cambridge: : Polity 1995.
6
Jackson, Robert H. Classical and modern thought on international relations: from anarchy to cosmopolis. Houndmills, Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2005.
7
Lepgold, J. Is Anyone Listening? International Relations Theory and the Problem of Policy Relevance. In: Political science quarterly. Lancaster Pa: : Academy of Political Science
8
Nicholson, M. What’s the use of international relations. Review of international studies 2000;26.
9
Morgenthau, H. The intellectual and political functions of theory. In: International theory: critical investigations. Basingstoke: : Macmillan 1995.
10
Smith, S. Power of truth: A reply to William Wallace. Review of international studies 1997;23.
11
Smith, S. Ten self-images of a discipline. In: International relations theory today. Cambridge: : Polity 1995.
12
Jackson, Robert H., Sørensen, Georg. Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. 3rd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007.
13
Viotti, Paul R., Kauppi, Mark V. International relations theory: realism, pluralism, globalism, and beyond. 3rd ed. Boston ; London: : Allyn and Bacon 1999.
14
Boucher, David. Political theories of international relations: from Thucydides to the present. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1998.
15
Brown, Chris, Nardin, Terry, Rengger, N. J. International relations in political thought: texts from the ancient Greeks to the First World War. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2002.
16
Buzan, B. The timeless wisdom of realism. In: International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: : C.U.P. 1996.
17
Carr, Edward Hallett, Cox, Michael. The twenty years’ crisis, 1919-1939: an introduction to the study of international relations. Houndmills, Basingstoke: : Palgrave 2001.
18
Carr, Edward Hallett, Evans, Richard J. What is history? 2nd ed. Basingstoke: : Palgrave 2001.
19
Clark, Ian, Neumann, Iver B., St. Antony’s College (University of Oxford). Classical theories of international relations. Basingstoke: : in association with St. Antony’s College, Oxford 1996.
20
Elshtain, J. International politics and political theory. In: International relations theory today. Cambridge: : Polity 1995.
21
Hutchings, Kimberly. International political theory: rethinking ethics in a global era. London: : SAGE 1999.
22
Jackson, R. The evolution of international society. In: The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2008.
23
Jackson, R. Is there a classical international theory? In: International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: : C.U.P. 1996.
24
Jahn, Beate. Classical theory in international relations. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2006.
25
Krasner, S. Westphalia and all that. In: Ideas and foreign policy: beliefs, institutions, and political change. Ithaca: : Cornell University Press 1993.
26
Morgenthau, Hans Joachim. Scientific man vs. power politics. 1st Phoenix ed. Chicago, Ill: : Phoenix Books 1965.
27
Schmidt, B. Lessons from the past: Reassessing the interwar disciplinary history of international relations. International studies quarterly 1998;42.
28
Schmidt, B. On the history and historiography of International Relations. In: Handbook of international relations. London: : Sage 2002.
29
Tuck, Richard, Dawsonera. The rights of war and peace: political thought and the international order from Grotius to Kant. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2001. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9780191542879
30
Welch, D. Why International Relations theorists should stop reading Thucydides. Review of international studies 2003;29.
31
Michael C. Williams. Hobbes and International Relations: A Reconsideration. International Organization: World Peace Foundation 1996;50.
32
Morgenthau, Hans Joachim, Thompson, Kenneth W., Clinton, W. David. Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace. 7th ed. Boston: : McGraw-Hill Higher Education 2006.
33
Bain, W. Deconfusing Morgenthau: moral inquiry and classical realism reconsidered. Review of international studies 2000;26.
34
Claude, Inis L. Power and international relations. New York: : Random House 1962.
35
Donnelly, Jack. Realism and international relations. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2000. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=202341
36
Dunne, T. and Schmidt, B. Realism. In: The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2008.
37
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, Smith, Steve. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007.
38
Garnett, J. State-centric perspectives. In: Dilemmas of world politics: international issues in a changing world. New York: : Oxford University Press 1992.
39
Gilpin, Robert. War and change in world politics. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1981.
40
Guzzini, Stefano. Realism in international relations and international political economy: the continuing story of a death foretold. London: : Routledge 1998.
41
Jackson, Robert H., Sørensen, Georg. Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. 3rd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007.
42
Forum on American realism. Review of international studies 2003;29.
43
Kennan, George F. American diplomacy, 1900-1950. London: : Secker & Warburg 1952.
44
Kennan, George F. American diplomacy, 1900-1950. London: : New English Library
45
Morgenthau, Hans Joachim. Scientific man vs. power politics. 1st Phoenix ed. Chicago, Ill: : University of Chicago Press 1965.
46
Vasquez, John A. The power of power politics: from classical realism to neotraditionalism. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1998.
47
Wheeler, N. and Booth, K. The security dilemma in theory. In: Dilemmas of world politics: international issues in a changing world. New York: : Oxford University Press 1992.
48
Williams, Michael C. The realist tradition and the limits of international relations. Cambridge, New York: : Cambridge University Press 2004.
49
Angell, N. The great illusion: a study of the relation of military power to national advantage. [Place of publication not identified]: : Heinemann
50
Burchill, S. Liberalism. In: Theories of international relations. Houndmills, Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2009.
51
Griffiths, Martin. Realism, idealism, and international politics: a reinterpretation. London: : Routledge 1992.
52
MacMillan, John. On liberal peace: democracy, war, and the international order. London: : Tauris Academic Studies 1998.
53
Richardson, J.L. Contending liberalisms - past and present. European journal of international relations 1997;3.
54
Bull, H. Society and anarchy in international relations. In: International theory: critical investigations. Basingstoke: : Macmillan 1995.
55
Bull, H. The theory of international politics. In: International theory: critical investigations. Basingstoke: : Macmillan 1995.
56
Bull, Hedley, Watson, Adam. The Expansion of international society. New York: : Clarendon Press 1984.
57
Brown, Chris. Sovereignty, rights, and justice: international political theory today. Cambridge: : Polity 2002.
58
Brown, Chris, Ainley, Kirsten. Understanding international relations. 4th ed. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2009.
59
Carr, Edward Hallett, Cox, Michael. The twenty years’ crisis, 1919-1939: an introduction to the study of international relations. Houndmills, Basingstoke: : Palgrave 2001.
60
Clark, Ian. The hierarchy of states: reform and resistance in the international order. Cambridge: : C.U.P. 1989.
61
Clark, Ian, Clark, Ian. The hierarchy of states: reform and resistance in the international order. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1989.
62
Dunne, T. Liberalism. In: The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2008.
63
Dunne, Tim, St. Antony’s College (University of Oxford). Inventing international society: a history of the English school. Basingstoke: : Macmillan in association with St. Antony’s College, Oxford 1998.
64
Dunne, T. Society and hierarchy in international relations. International relations 2003;17.
65
Dunne, T. The social construction of international society. European journal of international relations 1995;1.
66
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, Smith, Steve. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007.
67
Hollis, Martin, Smith, Steve. Explaining and understanding international relations. New York: : Oxford University Press 1991.
68
Jackson, Robert H. Classical and modern thought on international relations: from anarchy to cosmopolis. Houndmills, Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2005.
69
Jackson, R. The political theory of international society. In: International relations theory today. Cambridge: : Polity 1995.
70
Linklater, A. Rationalism. In: Theories of international relations. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave 2001.
71
Linklater, A. The English school. In: Theories of international relations. Houndmills, Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2005.
72
Linklater, Andrew, Suganami, Hidemi, Dawsonera. The English school of international relations: a contemporary reassessment. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2006. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9780511314704
73
Vincent, Raymond John, Miller, John Donald Bruce. Order and violence: Hedley Bull and international relations. Oxford: : Clarendon 1990.
74
Olson, William Clinton, Groom, Arthur John Richard. International relations then and now: origins and trends in interpretation. London: : HarperCollins Academic 1991.
75
Osiander, A. Rereading early twentieth-century IR theory: Idealism revisited. International studies quarterly 1998;42.
76
Hidemi Suganami. Alexander Wendt and the English School. 2001.
77
Wight, Martin, Bull, Hedley, Holbraad, Carsten, et al. Power politics. [Leicester]: : Royal Institute of International Affairs 1978.
78
Waever, O. International Society: Theoretical Promises Fulfilled? Cooperation and conflict: Nordic studies in international politics 1995;27.
79
Wheeler, Nicholas J., Oxford University Press. Saving strangers: humanitarian intervention in international society. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2000. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/oso/public/content/politicalscience/0199253102/toc.html
80
English School of International Relations Theory, University of Leeds. English School of International Relations Theory | Politics and International Studies (POLIS) | University of Leeds
81
Waltz, Kenneth Neal. Theory of international politics. Reading, Mass.; London: : Addison-Wesley Pub. Co 1979.
82
Waltz, K. Theory of international politics. In: Neorealism and its critics. New York: : Columbia U.P. 1986.
83
Greico, J. Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. International Organization: World Peace Foundation 1988;42.
84
Ashley, R. The poverty of Neo-realism. In: Neorealism and its critics. New York: : Columbia U.P. 1986.
85
Baldwin, David A. Neorealism and neoliberalism: the contemporary debate. Chichester: : Columbia University Press 1993.
86
Buzan, Barry. People, states and fear: an agenda for international security studies in the post-cold warera. 2nd ed. London: : Harvester Wheatsheaf 1991.
87
Deudney, D. and Ikenberry, J.G. The nature and sources of liberal international order. Review of international studies 1999;25.
88
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, Smith, Steve. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007.
89
Forum on Waltz. Review of international studies 2002;28.
90
David Davies Memorial Institute of International Studies. Forum on Waltz. International relations 2009;23.
91
Gilpin, R. The richness of the tradition of political realism. In: Neorealism and its critics. New York: : Columbia U.P. 1986.
92
Guzzini, S. Structural power: The limits of neorealism power analysis. International Organization: World Peace Foundation 1993;47.
93
Hasenclever, Andreas, Mayer, Peter, Rittberger, Volker. Theories of international regimes. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1997.
94
Hobson, John M. The state and international relations. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2000.
95
Hollis, Martin, Smith, Steve. Explaining and understanding international relations. New York: : Oxford University Press 1991.
96
Keohane, R. Theory of world politics: Structural realism and beyond. In: International relations theory: realism, pluralism, globalism, and beyond. Boston ; London: : Allyn and Bacon 1999.
97
Keohane, R. Theory of world politics: Structural realism and beyond. In: International institutions and state power: essays in international relations theory. Boulder: : Westview Press 1989.
98
Keohane, Robert O. After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: : Princeton University Press 1984.
99
Keohane, Robert Owen, Nye, Joseph S. Power and interdependence: world politics in transition. Boston: : Little, Brown 1977.
100
Kolodziej, Edward A. Security and international relations. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2005.
101
Krasner, Stephen D., Center for International and Strategic Affairs. International regimes. Ithaca: : Cornell U.P. 1989.
102
Kratochwil, F. The embarrassment of changes: neo-realism as the science of Realpolitik without politics. Review of international studies 1993;19.
103
Linklater, A. Neo-realism in theory and practice. In: International relations theory today. Cambridge: : Polity 1995.
104
Little, R. Structuralism and realism. In: International relations: a handbook of current theory. London: : Pinter 1985.
105
John J. Mearsheimer. Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International security 1990;15.
106
Mearsheimer, John J. The tragedy of Great Power politics. London: : W. W. Norton & Company 2001.
107
Nye, Joseph S. Neorealism and Neoliberalism. World politics: a quarterly journal of international relations 1988;40.
108
Jackson, Robert H., Sørensen, Georg. Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. 3rd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007.
109
Snidal, D. Rational choice and international relations. In: Handbook of international relations. London: : Sage 2002.
110
Waltz, Kenneth N. Realist thought and neorealist theory. 1990.
111
Waltz, Kenneth N. Reflections on Theory if international politics. In: Neorealism and its critics. New York: : Columbia U.P. 1986.
112
Smith, S. Positivism and beyond. In: International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: : C.U.P. 1996.
113
Lapid, J. The Third Debate. International studies quarterly 1989;33.
114
Banks, M. The inter-paradigm debate. In: International relations: a handbook of current theory. London: : Pinter 1985.
115
Bull, H. International theory: The case for the classical approach. In: Contending approaches to international politics. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1969.
116
Barry Buzan and Richard Little. Why International Relations has Failed. Millennium: journal of international studies 2001;30.
117
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, Smith, Steve. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007.
118
Hollis, M. The last post? In: International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: : C.U.P. 1996.
119
Jackson, Robert H., Sørensen, Georg. Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. Rev. and expanded 2nd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2003.
120
Jackson, Robert H., Sørensen, Georg. Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. 3rd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007.
121
Kaplan, M. The New Great Debate: Traditionalism vs. Science in International Relations. In: Contending approaches to international politics. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1969.
122
Kaplan, M. The New Great Debate: Traditionalism vs. Science in International Relations. World politics: a quarterly journal of international relations 1966;19.
123
Singer, D.J. The level-of-analysis problem in international relations. In: The international system: theoretical essays; ed K Knorr and S Verba. [Place of publication not identified]: : Greenwood Press 1982.
124
Smith, S. New approaches to international theory. In: The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2008.
125
Vasquez, J. The post-positive debate. In: International relations theory today. Cambridge: : Polity 1995.
126
Waever, O. The rise and fall of the inter-paradigm debate. In: International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: : C.U.P. 1996.
127
Wight, C. Incommensurability and Cross-Paradigm Communication in International Relations Theory. Millennium: journal of international studies 1996;25.
128
Whitworth, S. Gender in the Inter- Paradigm Debate. Millennium: journal of international studies 1989;18.
129
Wight, C. Philosophy if social science and IR. In: Handbook of international relations. London: : Sage 2002.
130
Hopf, T. The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International security 1998;23.
131
Wendt, A. Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization: World Peace Foundation 1992;46.
132
Wendt, A. Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. In: International theory: critical investigations. Basingstoke: : Macmillan 1995.
133
Adler, E. Seizing the Middle Ground:: Constructivism in World Politics. European journal of international relations 1997;3.
134
Adler, E. Constructivism and IR. In: Handbook of international relations. London: : Sage 2002.
135
Barnett, M and Finnemore, M. The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations. International Organization: World Peace Foundation 1999;53.
136
Dessler, D. Constructivism within a positivist social science. Review of international studies 1999;25.
137
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, Smith, Steve. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007.
138
Fierke, K.M. Links across the Abyss: Language and Logic in International Relations. International studies quarterly 2002;46.
139
Forum on Wendt. Review of international studies 2000;26.
140
Guzzini, S. A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations. European journal of international relations 2000;6.
141
Keohane R. International Institutions: Two Approaches. International studies quarterly 1988;32.
142
Keohane, R. International Institutions: Two Approaches. In: International theory: critical investigations. Basingstoke: : Macmillan 1995.
143
Kolodziej, Edward A. Security and international relations. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2005.
144
Klotz, Audie. Norms in international relations: the struggle against apartheid. Ithaca, N.Y., London: : Cornell University Press 1995.
145
Moravcsik, A. ‘Is something rotten in the state of Denmark?’ Constructivism and European integration. Journal of European public policy;6.
146
Millikin, J. You have access to this article via a personal or institutional subscription The Study of Discourse in International Relations:: A Critique of Research and Methods. European journal of international relations 1999;5.
147
Neufeld, M. Reflectivity and international relations. Millennium: journal of international studies 1993;22.
148
Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood. World of our making: rules and rule in social theory and international relations. Columbia, S.C.: : University of South Carolina Press 1989.
149
Reus-Smit, C. Constructivism. In: Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: : St. Martin’s Press 1996.
150
Price, R. and Reus-Smit, C. Dangerous Liaisons?: Critical International Theory and Constructivism. European journal of international relations 1998;4.
151
Thomas Risse. ‘Let’s Argue!’: Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization: World Peace Foundation 2000;54.
152
Wendt, Alexander. Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1999. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=144678
153
Wendt, A. Constructing International Politics. International security 1995;20.
154
Cox, R. Social forces, States and world orders. Millennium: journal of international studies 1981;10.
155
Cox, R. Social forces, States and world orders. In: Neorealism and its critics. New York: : Columbia U.P. 1986.
156
Ayers, Alison J. Gramsci, political economy, and international relations theory: modern princes and naked emperors. 1st ed. Houndmills, Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2008.
157
Christopher Chase-Dunn. Interstate System and Capitalist World-Economy: One Logic or Two? International studies quarterly 1981;25.
158
Chase-Dunn, C. and Rubinson, R. Toward a Structural Perspective on the World-System. Politics & society 1977;7.
159
Cox, Robert W. Production, power and world order: social forces in the making of history. Chichester: : Columbia University Press 1987.
160
Cox, Robert W. Approaches to world order. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1996.
161
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, Smith, Steve. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007.
162
Germain, R. and Kenny, M. Engaging Gramsci: international relations theory and the new Gramscians. Review of international studies 1998;24.
163
Gill, Stephen. Gramsci, historical materialism and international relations. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1993.
164
Gill, Stephen. Power and resistance in the new world order. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2003.
165
Linklater, Andrew. Beyond realism and Marxism: critical theory and international relations. Basingstoke: : Macmillan 1990.
166
Linklater, Andrew. The transformation of political community: ethical foundations of the Post-Westphalian era. Columbia: : University of South Carolina Press 1998.
167
Linklater, A. Marxism. In: Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: : St. Martin’s Press 1996.
168
Lenin, Vladimir Ilich. Imperialism, the highest stage of capitalism: a popular outline. Moscow: : Progress Publishers
169
Linklater, Andrew. Beyond realism and Marxism: critical theory and international relations. Basingstoke: : Macmillan 1990.
170
Devetek, R. Critical theory. In: Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: : St. Martin’s Press 1996.
171
Hoffman, M. Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate. Millennium: journal of international studies 1987;16.
172
Bieler, Andreas, Morton, Adam David. Images of Gramsci: connections and contentions in political theory and international relations. London: : Routledge 2006.
173
Rosenberg, Justin. The empire of civil society: a critique of the realist theory of international relations. London: : Verso 1994.
174
Robinson, William I. Promoting polyarchy globalization, US intervention, and hegemony. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1996.
175
Rupert, M. Globalising common sense: a Marxian-Gramscian (re-)vision of the politics of governance/resistance. Review of international studies 2003;29.
176
Rupert, Mark, Smith, Hazel. Historical materialism and globalization. London: : Routledge 2002.
177
Linklater, Andrew. Critical theory and world politics: citizenship, sovereignty and humanity. London: : Routledge 2007.
178
Tickner, J. A. You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists. International studies quarterly 1997;41.
179
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, Smith, Steve. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007.
180
Elshtain, J. Feminist inquiry and international relations. In: New thinking in international relations theory. Boulder, Colo: : Westview 1997.
181
Elshtain, B. Women and War: ten years on. Review of international studies 1998;24.
182
Enloe, Cynthia H. Bananas, beaches, and bases: making feminist sense of international politics. Berkeley, Calif: : University of California 1990.
183
Institute for World Order. Feminists write IR. Alternatives: a journal of world policy 1993.
184
Grant, Rebecca, Newland, Kathleen. Gender and international relations. Milton Keynes: : Open U.P., in assoc. with Millennium: journal of international studies 1991.
185
Jones, A. s:43:"Does. Review of international studies 1996;22.
186
Peterson, V. Spike. Gendered states: feminist (re)visions of international relations theory. Boulder, Colo: : Lynne Rienner 1992.
187
Peterson, S. Transgressing boundaries. Millennium: journal of international studies 1992;21.
188
Steans, Jill. Gender and international relations: an introduction. Oxford: : Polity 1998.
189
Sylvester, Christine. Feminist theory and international relations in a postmodern era. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1994.
190
Sylvester, C. The contributions of feminist theory to IR. In: International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: : C.U.P. 1996.
191
Tickner, JA. On The Frontlines or Sidelines of Knowledge and Power? International studies review 2006;8.
192
Tickner, J. Ann. Gendering world politics: issues and approaches in the post-Cold War era. Chichester: : Columbia University Press 2001.
193
Tickner, J. Ann. Gender in international relations: feminist perspectives on achieving global security. New York: : Columbia University Press 1992.
194
True, J. Feminism. In: Theories of international relations. Houndmills, Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2009.
195
Frost, M. A turn not taken: Ethics in IR at the millenium. Review of international studies 1998;24.
196
Beitz, Charles R., Alexander, Lawrence A. International ethics. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1985.
197
Beitz, Charles R. Political theory and international relations. Chichester: : Princeton University Press 1999.
198
Brown, Chris. International relations theory: new normative approaches. London: : Harvester Wheatsheaf 1992.
199
Cochran, Molly. Normative theory in international relations: a pragmatic approach. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1999. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=201788
200
Frost, Mervyn. Ethics in international relations: a constitutive theory. Cambridge: : C.U.P. 1996.
201
Frost, M. Migrants, civil society and sovereign states: Investigating an ethical hierarchy. Political studies: the journal of the Political Studies Association of the UK 1998;46.
202
Hurrell, A. Norms and ethics in IR. In: Handbook of international relations. London: : Sage 2002.
203
Hoffmann, M. Normative international relations theory: approaches and issues. In: Contemporary international relations: a guide to theory. London: : Pinter 1994.
204
Hoffmann, Stanley. Duties beyond borders: on the limits and possibilities of ethical international politics. 1st ed. Syracuse, N.Y.: : Syracuse University Press 1981.
205
Hutchings, Kimberly. International political theory: rethinking ethics in a global era. London: : SAGE 1999.
206
Linklater, A. Dialogic politics and the civilising process. Review of international studies 2005;31.
207
Nardin, Terry. Law, morality and the relations of states. [Place of publication not identified]: : Princeton U.P. 1983.
208
Shapcott, Richard. Justice, community and dialogue in international relations. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001.
209
Walzer, Michael. Just and unjust wars: a moral argument with historical illustrations. 4th ed. New York: : Basic Books 2006.
210
Devetak R. Postmodernism. In: Theories of international relations. Houndmills, Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2005.
211
Agamben, Giorgio, Heller-Roazen, Daniel. Homo sacer: sovereign power and bare life. Stanford, Calif: : Stanford University Press 1998.
212
Ashley, R. The achievements of post-structuralism. In: International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: : C.U.P. 1996.
213
Ashley, R. Living on border lines. In: International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics. Lexington, Mass: : Lexington Books 1989.
214
Ashley, R. The geopolitics of political space. Alternatives: a journal of world policy
215
Campbell. MetaBosnia: narratives of the Bosnian War. Review of international studies 1998;24.
216
Campbell, David. Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity. Rev. ed. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 1998. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=310792
217
Dillon, Michael, Neal, Andrew W. Foucault on politics, security and war. Houndmills, Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2008.
218
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, Smith, Steve. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007.
219
Edkins, Jenny. Poststructuralism & international relations: bringing the political back in. Boulder, Colo: : Lynne Rienner Publishers 1999.
220
Smith, S. New approaches to international relations. In: The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1997.
221
Special Issue. International studies quarterly 1990;34.
222
Sylvester, Christine. Feminist theory and international relations in a postmodern era. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1994.
223
Walker, R. B. J. Inside/outside: international relations as political theory. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1993.
224
Wight, C. MetaCampbell: the epistemological problematics of perspectivism. Review of international studies 1999;25.
