Adler & E. (1997). Seizing the Middle Ground:: Constructivism in World Politics. European Journal of International Relations, 3.
Adler & E. (2002). Constructivism and IR. In Handbook of international relations. Sage.
Agamben, Giorgio & Heller-Roazen, Daniel. (1998). Homo sacer: sovereign power and bare life: Vol. Meridian. Stanford University Press.
Angell, N. (n.d.). The great illusion: a study of the relation of military power to national advantage [New ed]. Heinemann.
Ashley & R. (n.d.). The geopolitics of political space. Alternatives: A Journal of World Policy.
Ashley & R. (1986). The poverty of Neo-realism. In Neorealism and its critics. Columbia U.P.
Ashley & R. (1989). Living on border lines. In International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics: Vol. World politics series. Lexington Books.
Ashley & R. (1996). The achievements of post-structuralism. In International theory: positivism and beyond. C.U.P.
Ayers, Alison J. (2008). Gramsci, political economy, and international relations theory: modern princes and naked emperors (1st ed). Palgrave Macmillan.
Bain & W. (2000). Deconfusing Morgenthau: moral inquiry and classical realism reconsidered. Review of International Studies, 26.
Baldwin, David A. (1993). Neorealism and neoliberalism: the contemporary debate: Vol. New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press.
Banks & M. (1985). The inter-paradigm debate. In International relations: a handbook of current theory. Pinter.
Barnett, M and Finnemore, & M. (1999). The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations. International Organization: World Peace Foundation, 53.
Barry Buzan and Richard Little. (2001). Why International Relations has Failed. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 30.
Beitz, Charles R. (1999). Political theory and international relations. Princeton University Press.
Beitz, Charles R. & Alexander, Lawrence A. (1985). International ethics: Vol. A Philosophy&public affairs reader. Princeton University Press.
Bieler, Andreas & Morton, Adam David. (2006). Images of Gramsci: connections and contentions in political theory and international relations. Routledge.
Boucher, David. (1998). Political theories of international relations: from Thucydides to the present. Oxford University Press.
Brown, Chris. (1992). International relations theory: new normative approaches. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Brown, Chris. (2002). Sovereignty, rights, and justice: international political theory today. Polity.
Brown, Chris & Ainley, Kirsten. (2009a). Understanding international relations (4th ed). Palgrave Macmillan.
Brown, Chris & Ainley, Kirsten. (2009b). Understanding international relations (4th ed). Palgrave Macmillan.
Brown, Chris, Nardin, Terry, & Rengger, N. J. (2002). International relations in political thought: texts from the ancient Greeks to the First World War. Cambridge University Press.
Bull & H. (1969). International theory: The case for the classical approach. In Contending approaches to international politics. Princeton University Press.
Bull & H. (1995a). Society and anarchy in international relations. In International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.
Bull & H. (1995b). The theory of international politics. In International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.
Bull, Hedley & Watson, Adam. (1984). The Expansion of international society. Clarendon Press.
Burchill & S. (2009a). Introduction. In Theories of international relations (4th ed). Palgrave Macmillan.
Burchill & S. (2009b). Liberalism. In Theories of international relations (4th ed). Palgrave Macmillan.
Buzan & B. (1996). The timeless wisdom of realism. In International theory: positivism and beyond. C.U.P.
Buzan, Barry. (1991). People, states and fear: an agenda for international security studies in the post-cold warera (2nd ed). Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Campbell. (1998). MetaBosnia: narratives of the Bosnian War. Review of International Studies, 24.
Campbell, David. (1998). Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity (Rev. ed). Manchester University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=310792
Carr, Edward Hallett & Cox, Michael. (2001a). The twenty years’ crisis, 1919-1939: an introduction to the study of international relations. Palgrave.
Carr, Edward Hallett & Cox, Michael. (2001b). The twenty years’ crisis, 1919-1939: an introduction to the study of international relations. Palgrave.
Carr, Edward Hallett & Evans, Richard J. (2001). What is history? (2nd ed). Palgrave.
Chase-Dunn, C. and Rubinson, & R. (1977). Toward a Structural Perspective on the World-System. Politics & Society, 7.
Christopher Chase-Dunn. (1981). Interstate System and Capitalist World-Economy: One Logic or Two? International Studies Quarterly, 25.
Clark, Ian. (1989). The hierarchy of states: reform and resistance in the international order: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. C.U.P.
Clark, Ian & Clark, Ian. (1989). The hierarchy of states: reform and resistance in the international order: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
Clark, Ian, Neumann, Iver B., & St. Antony’s College (University of Oxford). (1996). Classical theories of international relations: Vol. St. Antony’s series. in association with St. Antony’s College, Oxford.
Claude, Inis L. (1962). Power and international relations. Random House.
Cochran, Molly. (1999). Normative theory in international relations: a pragmatic approach: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=201788
Cox & R. (1981). Social forces, States and world orders. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10.
Cox & R. (1986). Social forces, States and world orders. In Neorealism and its critics. Columbia U.P.
Cox, Robert W. (1987). Production, power and world order: social forces in the making of history: Vol. New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press.
Cox, Robert W. (1996). Approaches to world order: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
David Davies Memorial Institute of International Studies. (2009). Forum on Waltz. International Relations, 23.
Dessler & D. (1999). Constructivism within a positivist social science. Review of International Studies, 25.
Deudney, D. and Ikenberry, & J.G. (1999). The nature and sources of liberal international order. Review of International Studies, 25.
Devetak, R. (2005). Postmodernism. In Theories of international relations (3rd ed). Palgrave Macmillan.
Devetek & R. (1996). Critical theory. In Theories of international relations. St. Martin’s Press.
Dillon, Michael & Neal, Andrew W. (2008). Foucault on politics, security and war. Palgrave Macmillan.
Donnelly, Jack. (2000). Realism and international relations: Vol. Themes in international relations. Cambridge University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=202341
Dunne & T. (1995). The social construction of international society. European Journal of International Relations, 1.
Dunne & T. (2003). Society and hierarchy in international relations. International Relations, 17.
Dunne & T. (2008). Liberalism. In The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations (4th ed). Oxford University Press.
Dunne, T. and Schmidt, & B. (2008). Realism. In The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations (4th ed). Oxford University Press.
Dunne, Tim & St. Antony’s College (University of Oxford). (1998). Inventing international society: a history of the English school: Vol. St. Antony’s series. Macmillan in association with St. Antony’s College, Oxford.
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, & Smith, Steve. (2007a). International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press.
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, & Smith, Steve. (2007b). International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press.
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, & Smith, Steve. (2007c). International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press.
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, & Smith, Steve. (2007d). International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press.
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, & Smith, Steve. (2007e). International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press.
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, & Smith, Steve. (2007f). International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press.
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, & Smith, Steve. (2007g). International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press.
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, & Smith, Steve. (2007h). International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press.
Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, & Smith, Steve. (2007i). International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press.
Edkins, Jenny. (1999). Poststructuralism & international relations: bringing the political back in: Vol. Critical perspectives on world politics. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Elshtain & B. (1998). Women and War: ten years on. Review of International Studies, 24.
Elshtain & J. (1995a). International politics and political theory. In International relations theory today. Polity.
Elshtain & J. (1995b). International politics and political theory. In International relations theory today. Polity.
Elshtain & J. (1997). Feminist inquiry and international relations. In New thinking in international relations theory. Westview.
English School of International Relations Theory, University of Leeds. (n.d.). English School of International Relations Theory | Politics and International Studies (POLIS) | University of Leeds.
Enloe, Cynthia H. (1990). Bananas, beaches, and bases: making feminist sense of international politics. University of California.
Fierke & K.M. (2002). Links across the Abyss: Language and Logic in International Relations. International Studies Quarterly, 46.
Forum on American realism. (2003). Review of International Studies, 29.
Forum on Waltz. (2002). Review of International Studies, 28.
Forum on Wendt. (2000). Review of International Studies, 26.
Frost & M. (1998a). A turn not taken: Ethics in IR at the millenium. Review of International Studies, 24.
Frost & M. (1998b). Migrants, civil society and sovereign states: Investigating an ethical hierarchy. Political Studies: The Journal of the Political Studies Association of the U.K., 46.
Frost, Mervyn. (1996). Ethics in international relations: a constitutive theory: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. C.U.P.
Garnett & J. (1992). State-centric perspectives. In Dilemmas of world politics: international issues in a changing world. Oxford University Press.
Germain, R. and Kenny, & M. (1998). Engaging Gramsci: international relations theory and the new Gramscians. Review of International Studies, 24.
Gill, Stephen. (1993). Gramsci, historical materialism and international relations: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
Gill, Stephen. (2003). Power and resistance in the new world order. Palgrave Macmillan.
Gilpin & R. (1986). The richness of the tradition of political realism. In Neorealism and its critics. Columbia U.P.
Gilpin, Robert. (1981). War and change in world politics. Cambridge University Press.
Grant, Rebecca & Newland, Kathleen. (1991). Gender and international relations. Open U.P., in assoc. with Millennium: journal of international studies.
Greico & J. (1988). Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. International Organization: World Peace Foundation, 42.
Griffiths, Martin. (1992). Realism, idealism, and international politics: a reinterpretation. Routledge.
Guzzini & S. (1993). Structural power: The limits of neorealism power analysis. International Organization: World Peace Foundation, 47.
Guzzini & S. (2000). A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 6.
Guzzini, Stefano. (1998). Realism in international relations and international political economy: the continuing story of a death foretold: Vol. The new international relations. Routledge.
Hasenclever, Andreas, Mayer, Peter, & Rittberger, Volker. (1997). Theories of international regimes: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
Hidemi Suganami. (2001). Alexander Wendt and the English School.
Hobson, John M. (2000). The state and international relations: Vol. Themes in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
Hoffman & M. (1987). Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 16.
Hoffmann & M. (1994). Normative international relations theory: approaches and issues. In Contemporary international relations: a guide to theory. Pinter.
Hoffmann, Stanley. (1981). Duties beyond borders: on the limits and possibilities of ethical international politics: Vol. The Frank W. Abrams lectures (1st ed). Syracuse University Press.
Hollis & M. (1996). The last post? In International theory: positivism and beyond. C.U.P.
Hollis, Martin & Smith, Steve. (1991a). Explaining and understanding international relations. Oxford University Press.
Hollis, Martin & Smith, Steve. (1991b). Explaining and understanding international relations. Oxford University Press.
Hopf & T. (1998). The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security, 23.
Hurrell & A. (2002). Norms and ethics in IR. In Handbook of international relations. Sage.
Hutchings, Kimberly. (1999a). International political theory: rethinking ethics in a global era: Vol. SAGE politics texts. SAGE.
Hutchings, Kimberly. (1999b). International political theory: rethinking ethics in a global era: Vol. SAGE politics texts. SAGE.
Institute for World Order. (1993). Feminists write IR. Alternatives: A Journal of World Policy.
Jackson & R. (1995). The political theory of international society. In International relations theory today. Polity.
Jackson & R. (1996). Is there a classical international theory? In International theory: positivism and beyond. C.U.P.
Jackson & R. (2008). The evolution of international society. In The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations (4th ed). Oxford University Press.
Jackson, Robert H. (2005a). Classical and modern thought on international relations: from anarchy to cosmopolis: Vol. Palgrave Macmillan history of international thought series. Palgrave Macmillan.
Jackson, Robert H. (2005b). Classical and modern thought on international relations: from anarchy to cosmopolis: Vol. Palgrave Macmillan history of international thought series. Palgrave Macmillan.
Jackson, Robert H. & Sørensen, Georg. (2003). Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches (Rev. and expanded 2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
Jackson, Robert H. & Sørensen, Georg. (2007a). Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches (3rd ed). Oxford University Press.
Jackson, Robert H. & Sørensen, Georg. (2007b). Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches (3rd ed). Oxford University Press.
Jackson, Robert H. & Sørensen, Georg. (2007c). Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches (3rd ed). Oxford University Press.
Jackson, Robert H. & Sørensen, Georg. (2007d). Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches (3rd ed). Oxford University Press.
Jahn, Beate. (2006). Classical theory in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
John J. Mearsheimer. (1990). Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security, 15.
Jones & A. (1996). s:43:"Does. Review of International Studies, 22.
Kaplan & M. (1966). The New Great Debate: Traditionalism vs. Science in International Relations. World Politics: A Quarterly Journal of International Relations, 19.
Kaplan & M. (1969). The New Great Debate: Traditionalism vs. Science in International Relations. In Contending approaches to international politics. Princeton University Press.
Kennan, George F. (n.d.). American diplomacy, 1900-1950: Vol. Mentor books. New English Library.
Kennan, George F. (1952). American diplomacy, 1900-1950: Vol. Charles R. Walgreen Foundation lectures. Secker & Warburg.
Keohane R. (1988). International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly, 32.
Keohane & R. (1989). Theory of world politics: Structural realism and beyond. In International institutions and state power: essays in international relations theory. Westview Press.
Keohane & R. (1995). International Institutions: Two Approaches. In International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.
Keohane & R. (1999). Theory of world politics: Structural realism and beyond. In International relations theory: realism, pluralism, globalism, and beyond (3rd ed). Allyn and Bacon.
Keohane, Robert O. (1984). After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press.
Keohane, Robert Owen & Nye, Joseph S. (1977). Power and interdependence: world politics in transition. Little, Brown.
Klotz, Audie. (1995). Norms in international relations: the struggle against apartheid: Vol. Cornell studies in political economy. Cornell University Press.
Kolodziej, Edward A. (2005a). Security and international relations: Vol. Themes in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
Kolodziej, Edward A. (2005b). Security and international relations: Vol. Themes in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
Krasner & S. (1993). Westphalia and all that. In Ideas and foreign policy: beliefs, institutions, and political change: Vol. Cornell studies in political economy. Cornell University Press.
Krasner, Stephen D. & Center for International and Strategic Affairs. (1989). International regimes. Cornell U.P.
Kratochwil & F. (1993). The embarrassment of changes: neo-realism as the science of Realpolitik without politics. Review of International Studies, 19.
Lapid & J. (1989). The Third Debate. International Studies Quarterly, 33.
Lenin, Vladimir Ilich. (n.d.). Imperialism, the highest stage of capitalism: a popular outline: Vol. Scientific socialism series. Progress Publishers.
Lepgold & J. (n.d.). Is Anyone Listening? International Relations Theory and the Problem of Policy Relevance. In Political science quarterly (Vol. 113). Academy of Political Science.
Linklater & A. (1995). Neo-realism in theory and practice. In International relations theory today. Polity.
Linklater & A. (1996). Marxism. In Theories of international relations. St. Martin’s Press.
Linklater & A. (2001). Rationalism. In Theories of international relations (2nd ed). Palgrave.
Linklater & A. (2005a). Dialogic politics and the civilising process. Review of International Studies, 31.
Linklater & A. (2005b). The English school. In Theories of international relations (3rd ed). Palgrave Macmillan.
Linklater, Andrew. (1990a). Beyond realism and Marxism: critical theory and international relations. Macmillan.
Linklater, Andrew. (1990b). Beyond realism and Marxism: critical theory and international relations. Macmillan.
Linklater, Andrew. (1998). The transformation of political community: ethical foundations of the Post-Westphalian era: Vol. Studies in international relations (Columbia, S.C.). University of South Carolina Press.
Linklater, Andrew. (2007). Critical theory and world politics: citizenship, sovereignty and humanity. Routledge.
Linklater, Andrew, Suganami, Hidemi, & Dawsonera. (2006). The English school of international relations: a contemporary reassessment: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9780511314704
Little & R. (1985). Structuralism and realism. In International relations: a handbook of current theory. Pinter.
MacMillan, John. (1998). On liberal peace: democracy, war, and the international order: Vol. The library of international relations. Tauris Academic Studies.
Mearsheimer, John J. (2001). The tragedy of Great Power politics. W. W. Norton & Company.
Michael C. Williams. (1996). Hobbes and International Relations: A Reconsideration. International Organization: World Peace Foundation, 50.
Millikin & J. (1999). You have access to this article via a personal or institutional subscription The Study of Discourse in International Relations:: A Critique of Research and Methods. European Journal of International Relations, 5.
Moravcsik & A. (n.d.). ‘Is something rotten in the state of Denmark?’ Constructivism and European integration. Journal of European Public Policy, 6.
Morgenthau & H. (1995). The intellectual and political functions of theory. In International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.
Morgenthau, Hans Joachim. (1965a). Scientific man vs. power politics (1st Phoenix ed). Phoenix Books.
Morgenthau, Hans Joachim. (1965b). Scientific man vs. power politics (1st Phoenix ed). University of Chicago Press.
Morgenthau, Hans Joachim, Thompson, Kenneth W., & Clinton, W. David. (2006). Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace (7th ed). McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Nardin, Terry. (1983). Law, morality and the relations of states. Princeton U.P.
Neufeld & M. (1993). Reflectivity and international relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 22.
Nicholson & M. (2000). What’s the use of international relations. Review of International Studies, 26.
Nye & Joseph S. (1988). Neorealism and Neoliberalism. World Politics: A Quarterly Journal of International Relations, 40.
Olson, William Clinton & Groom, Arthur John Richard. (1991). International relations then and now: origins and trends in interpretation. HarperCollins Academic.
Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood. (1989). World of our making: rules and rule in social theory and international relations: Vol. Studies in international relations. University of South Carolina Press.
Osiander & A. (1998). Rereading early twentieth-century IR theory: Idealism revisited. International Studies Quarterly, 42.
Peterson & S. (1992). Transgressing boundaries. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 21.
Peterson, V. Spike. (1992). Gendered states: feminist (re)visions of international relations theory: Vol. Gender and political theory. Lynne Rienner.
Price, R. and Reus-Smit, & C. (1998). Dangerous Liaisons?: Critical International Theory and Constructivism. European Journal of International Relations, 4.
Reus-Smit & C. (1996). Constructivism. In Theories of international relations. St. Martin’s Press.
Richardson & J.L. (1997). Contending liberalisms - past and present. European Journal of International Relations, 3.
Robinson, William I. (1996). Promoting polyarchy globalization, US intervention, and hegemony: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
Rosenberg, Justin. (1994). The empire of civil society: a critique of the realist theory of international relations. Verso.
Rupert & M. (2003). Globalising common sense: a Marxian-Gramscian (re-)vision of the politics of governance/resistance. Review of International Studies, 29.
Rupert, Mark & Smith, Hazel. (2002). Historical materialism and globalization: Vol. Warwick studies in globalisation. Routledge.
Schmidt & B. (1998). Lessons from the past: Reassessing the interwar disciplinary history of international relations. International Studies Quarterly, 42.
Schmidt & B. (2002). On the history and historiography of International Relations. In Handbook of international relations. Sage.
Shapcott, Richard. (2001). Justice, community and dialogue in international relations: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
Singer & D.J. (1982). The level-of-analysis problem in international relations. In The international system: theoretical essays; ed K Knorr and S Verba. Greenwood Press.
Smith & S. (1995). Ten self-images of a discipline. In International relations theory today. Polity.
Smith & S. (1996). Positivism and beyond. In International theory: positivism and beyond. C.U.P.
Smith & S. (1997a). New approaches to international relations. In The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford University Press.
Smith & S. (1997b). Power of truth: A reply to William Wallace. Review of International Studies, 23.
Smith & S. (2008). New approaches to international theory. In The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations (4th ed). Oxford University Press.
Snidal & D. (2002). Rational choice and international relations. In Handbook of international relations. Sage.
Special Issue. (1990). International Studies Quarterly, 34.
Steans, Jill. (1998). Gender and international relations: an introduction. Polity.
Sylvester & C. (1996). The contributions of feminist theory to IR. In International theory: positivism and beyond. C.U.P.
Sylvester, Christine. (1994a). Feminist theory and international relations in a postmodern era: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
Sylvester, Christine. (1994b). Feminist theory and international relations in a postmodern era: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
Thomas Risse. (2000). ‘Let’s Argue!’: Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization: World Peace Foundation, 54.
Tickner & J. A. (1997). You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly, 41.
Tickner, J. Ann. (1992). Gender in international relations: feminist perspectives on achieving global security: Vol. New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press.
Tickner, J. Ann. (2001). Gendering world politics: issues and approaches in the post-Cold War era. Columbia University Press.
Tickner & JA. (2006). On The Frontlines or Sidelines of Knowledge and Power? International Studies Review, 8.
True & J. (2009). Feminism. In Theories of international relations (4th ed). Palgrave Macmillan.
Tuck, Richard & Dawsonera. (2001). The rights of war and peace: political thought and the international order from Grotius to Kant. Oxford University Press. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9780191542879
Vasquez & J. (1995). The post-positive debate. In International relations theory today. Polity.
Vasquez, John A. (1998). The power of power politics: from classical realism to neotraditionalism: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
Vincent, Raymond John & Miller, John Donald Bruce. (1990). Order and violence: Hedley Bull and international relations. Clarendon.
Viotti, Paul R. & Kauppi, Mark V. (1999). International relations theory: realism, pluralism, globalism, and beyond (3rd ed). Allyn and Bacon.
Waever & O. (1995). International Society: Theoretical Promises Fulfilled? Cooperation and Conflict: Nordic Studies in International Politics, 27.
Waever & O. (1996). The rise and fall of the inter-paradigm debate. In International theory: positivism and beyond. C.U.P.
Walker, R. B. J. (1993). Inside/outside: international relations as political theory: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
Waltz & K. (1986). Theory of international politics. In Neorealism and its critics. Columbia U.P.
Waltz & Kenneth N. (1986). Reflections on Theory if international politics. In Neorealism and its critics. Columbia U.P.
Waltz & Kenneth N. (1990). Realist thought and neorealist theory.
Waltz, Kenneth Neal. (1979). Theory of international politics: Vol. Addison-Wesley series in political science. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
Walzer, Michael. (2006). Just and unjust wars: a moral argument with historical illustrations (4th ed). Basic Books.
Welch & D. (2003). Why International Relations theorists should stop reading Thucydides. Review of International Studies, 29.
Wendt & A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization: World Peace Foundation, 46.
Wendt & A. (1995). Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. In International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.
Wendt & A. (1995). Constructing International Politics. International Security, 20.
Wendt, Alexander. (1999). Social theory of international politics: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=144678
Wheeler, N. and Booth, & K. (1992). The security dilemma in theory. In Dilemmas of world politics: international issues in a changing world. Oxford University Press.
Wheeler, Nicholas J. & Oxford University Press. (2000). Saving strangers: humanitarian intervention in international society. Oxford University Press. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/oso/public/content/politicalscience/0199253102/toc.html
Whitworth & S. (1989). Gender in the Inter- Paradigm Debate. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 18.
Wight & C. (1996). Incommensurability and Cross-Paradigm Communication in International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 25.
Wight & C. (1999). MetaCampbell: the epistemological problematics of perspectivism. Review of International Studies, 25.
Wight & C. (2002). Philosophy if social science and IR. In Handbook of international relations. Sage.
Wight & M. (1995). Why is there no international theory. In International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.
Wight, Martin, Bull, Hedley, Holbraad, Carsten, & Royal Institute of International Affairs. (1978). Power politics. Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Williams, Michael C. (2004). The realist tradition and the limits of international relations: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
