1.
Graham G. Philosophy of the arts: an introduction to aesthetics [Internet]. Third edition. London: Routledge; 2005. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=254270
2.
Levinson J. The Oxford handbook of aesthetics [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199279456.001.0001
3.
Graham, Gordon. Art and Pleasure. In: Philosophy of the arts: an introduction to aesthetics. 2nd ed. London, New York: Routledge; 2000.
4.
Levinson, Jerrold. Pleasure and the Value of Works of Art. In: The pleasures of aesthetics: philosophical essays. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press; 1996.
5.
Graham, Gordon. Art and Emotion. In: Philosophy of the arts: an introduction to aesthetics. 2nd ed. London, New York: Routledge; 2000.
6.
Neill, Alex. Art and Emotion. In: The Oxford handbook of aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
7.
John, Eileen. Art and Knowledge. In: The Routledge companion to aesthetics. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2005.
8.
Goldman A. Beardsley’s Legacy: The Theory of Aesthetic Value. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 2005 Mar;63(2):185–9.
9.
Friday, Jonathan. Art and Aesthetic Experience. In: Aesthetics and photography. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2002.
10.
Haapala A, Levinson J, Rantala V. The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of the Commonplace. In: The end of art and beyond: essays after Danto. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press; 1997.
11.
Haapala A, Levinson J, Rantala V. The End of art. In: The end of art and beyond: essays after Danto. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press; 1997.
12.
Graham, Gordon. The ‘auteur’ in film. In: Philosophy of the arts: an introduction to aesthetics. 2nd ed. London, New York: Routledge; 2000.
13.
Carroll, Noël. Film as Art. In: The philosophy of motion pictures. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Pub. Ltd; 2008.
14.
Carroll, Noel. Pictorial Representation. In: Philosophy of art: a contemporary introduction [Internet]. London: Routledge; 1999. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.kentuk.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=168645
15.
Wollheim, Richard. What the Spectator Sees. In: Painting as an art. London: Thames and Hudson; 1987.
16.
Graham, Gordon. Architecture as an Art. In: Philosophy of the arts: an introduction to aesthetics. 2nd ed. London, New York: Routledge; 2000.
17.
Levinson J. Intention and Interpretation in Literature. In: Aesthetics and the philosophy of art - the analytic tradition: an anthology. Oxford: Blackwell Pub; 2004.
18.
Carroll, Noël. Philosophy of art: a contemporary introduction [Internet]. Vol. Routledge contemporary introductions to philosophy. London: Routledge; 1999. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=168645
19.
Davies, Stephen. The philosophy of art. Vol. Foundations of the philosophy of the arts. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Pub; 2006.
20.
Gaut, Berys Nigel, Lopes, Dominic. The Routledge companion to aesthetics. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2005.
21.
Graham, Gordon. Philosophy of the arts: an introduction to aesthetics. 2nd ed. London, New York: Routledge; 2000.
22.
Kivy, Peter. The Blackwell guide to aesthetics [Internet]. Vol. Blackwell philosophy guides. Oxford: Blackwell Pub; 2004. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=350962
23.
Levinson, Jerrold. The Oxford handbook of aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
24.
Neill, Alex, Ridley, Aaron. Arguing about art: contemporary philosophical debates. 3rd ed. London: Routledge; 2008.
25.
Warburton, Nigel. The art question. London: Routledge; 2003.
26.
Maes H. Intention, Interpretation, and Contemporary Visual Art. The British Journal of Aesthetics. 2010 Feb 1;50(2):121–38.
27.
Stecker, Robert. Interpretation. In: The Routledge companion to aesthetics. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2005.
28.
Hume D. Of The Standard of Taste. In: Art and enlightenment: Scottish aesthetics in the eighteenth century. Exeter: Imprint Academic; 2004.
29.
Levinson, Jerrold. Hume’s Standard of Taste: the Real Problem. In: Contemplating art: essays in aesthetics [Internet]. New York: Clarendon Press; 2006. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199206179.001.0001
30.
Kieran M. Contemporary debates in aesthetics and the philosophy of art [Internet]. Vol. Contemporary debates in philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub; 2006. Available from: http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip0510/2005009259.html
31.
Hanson L. The Reality of (Non-Aesthetic) Artistic Value. The Philosophical Quarterly. 2013 July;63(252):492–508.
32.
Nelson Goodman. How Buildings Mean. Critical Inquiry [Internet]. 1985;11(4):642–53. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1343421?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
33.
Kendall L. Walton. How Marvelous! Toward a Theory of Aesthetic Value. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism [Internet]. 1993;51(3):499–510. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/431521?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
34.
Gaut B. The Cluster Account of Art Defended. The British Journal of Aesthetics. 2005 July 1;45(3):273–88.
35.
Hyman J. The objective eye: color, form, and reality in the theory of art [Internet]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2006. Available from: http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip061/2005029205.html
36.
Newall M. What is a picture?: depiction, realism, abstraction [Internet]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9780230297531
37.
Michael Newall. A Restriction for Pictures and Some Consequences for a Theory of Depiction. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism [Internet]. 2003;61(4):381–94. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1559072?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
38.
Davies S. AESTHETIC JUDGEMENTS, ARTWORKS AND FUNCTIONAL BEAUTY. The Philosophical Quarterly. 2006 Apr;56(223):224–41.
39.
Hans Maes. The end of art: a Real Problem or not Really a Problem? Postgraduate Journal of Aesthetics [Internet]. 2004;1(2). Available from: http://www.pjaesthetics.org/index.php/pjaesthetics/article/view/18
40.
Gaut BN, Lopes D, Dawsonera. The Routledge companion to aesthetics [Internet]. Second edition. Vol. Routledge companions to philosophy. London: Routledge; 2005. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9780203390795
41.
Hans Maes. The End of Art Revisited: A Response to Kalle Puolakka. Postgraduate Journal of Aesthetics [Internet]. 2005;2(3). Available from: http://www.pjaesthetics.org/index.php/pjaesthetics/article/view/39
42.
Phillips, Sandra S., Baker, Simon, San Francisco Museum of Modern Art, Tate Modern (Gallery), Walker Art Center. Exposed: voyeurism, surveillance, and the camera since 1870. London: Tate Publishing; 2010.
43.
Lopes, D. Philosophy of computer art [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2010. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=446874
44.
Tavinor, G. Art of videogames [Internet]. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=470749
45.
Kieran, Matthew, Lopes, Dominic. Knowing art: essays in aesthetics and epistemology. Vol. Philosophical studies series. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer; 2007.
46.
Scruton, R. Green Philosophy: How to Think Seriously About the Planet. London: Atlantic Books; 2012.
47.
Robinson, Jenefer. Deeper than reason: emotion and its role in literature, music, and art [Internet]. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/oso/public/content/philosophy/0199263655/toc.html
48.
Nussbaum, Martha Craven. Upheavals of thought: the intelligence of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
49.
Maes, H. & Levinson, J. (eds.). Art and Pornography: Philosophical Essays. [Place of publication not identified]: Oxford University Press;
50.
Lamarque, P. The Philosophy of Literature. Vol. Foundations of the Philosophy of the Arts. Malden, Mass: Wiley-Blackwell (an imprint of John Wiley & Sons Ltd); 2009.
51.
Walton, K. Marvelous images: on values and the arts [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.kentuk.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=415522
52.
Davies, S. The Artful Species: Aesthetics, Art, and Evolution. [Place of publication not identified]: Oxford University Press;
53.
Shimamura, A.P. & Stephen E. Palmer, S.E. Aesthetic Science : Connecting Minds, Brains, and Experience : Connecting Minds, Brains, and Experience [Internet]. New York: Oxford University Press - Special; 2012. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9780199875740
54.
Lopes DM. THE MYTH OF (NON-AESTHETIC) ARTISTIC VALUE. The Philosophical Quarterly. 2011 July;61(244):518–36.
55.
Hanson L. The Reality of (Non-Aesthetic) Artistic Value. The Philosophical Quarterly. 2013 July;63(252):492–508.
56.
Carroll N, editor. Theories of art today. Madison, Wisconsin: Madison; 2000.
57.
Wollheim R, Bollingen Foundation Collection (Library of Congress). Painting as an art. Vol. The A.W. Mellon lectures in the fine arts. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 1987.
58.
Danto AC. The end of art. In: The philosophical disenfranchisement of art. [New ed.]. New York: Columbia University Press; 2005.
59.
Hume D. Of the standard of taste, and other essays. Lenz JW, editor. Vol. The library of liberal arts. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill; 1965.
60.
Levinson J. Contemplating art: essays in aesthetics [Internet]. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 2006. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199206179.001.0001
61.
Tolstoy L, Maude A. What is art? Chicheley: Paul P. B. Minet; 1971.
62.
Tolstoy L. Chto takoe iskusstvo? = What is art? [Place of publication not identified]: Bradda Books; 1963.
63.
Carroll N. Aesthetic Experience Revisited. The British Journal of Aesthetics. 2002 Apr 1;42(2):145–68.
64.
Livingston P. Utile Et Dulce: A Response to Noel Carroll. The British Journal of Aesthetics. 2006 July 1;46(3):274–81.
65.
STECKER ROBERT. Artistic Value Defended. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism [Internet]. 2012;70(4):355–62. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-6245.2012.01527.x/abstract?userIsAuthenticated=false&deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=
66.
Maes H. Intention, Interpretation, and Contemporary Visual Art. The British Journal of Aesthetics. 2010 Apr 1;50(2):121–38.
67.
Hans Maes. The end of art: a Real Problem or not Really a Problem? Postgraduate Journal of Aesthetics [Internet]. 2004;1(2). Available from: http://www.pjaesthetics.org/index.php/pjaesthetics/article/view/18
68.
Destrée P. Suffering art gladly: the paradox of negative emotion in art. Levinson J, editor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013.