1
Bowsher, Julian. Shakespeare’s London theatreland: archaeology, history and drama. London: : Museum of London Archaeology 2012.
2
Bevington, David M., Engle, Lars, Maus, Katharine Eisaman, et al. English Renaissance drama: a Norton anthology. London: : W.W. Norton 2002.
3
Shakespeare, William, Greenblatt, Stephen, Cohen, Walter, et al. The Norton Shakespeare: based on the Oxford edition. 2nd ed., International student ed. London: : W. W. Norton 2008.
4
Briggs J. This stage-play world: texts and contexts, 1580-1625. 2nd ed. New York: : Oxford University Press 1997.
5
Dillon, Janette. The Cambridge introduction to early English theatre. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2006.
6
Wrightson, Keith. English society, 1580-1680. London: : Routledge 2003.
7
Sharpe, J. A. Early modern England: a social history 1550-1760. 2nd ed. London: : Arnold 1997.
8
Wrightson, Keith. Earthly necessities: economic lives in early modern Britain, 1470-1750. London: : Penguin 2002.
9
Mendelson, Sara Heller, Crawford, Patricia. Women in early modern England, 1550-1720. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1998.
10
Tittler, Robert, Jones, Norman L., Dawsonera. A companion to Tudor Britain. Malden, MA: : Blackwell Pub 2004. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9781405137409
11
Adamson, Sylvia. Reading Shakespeare’s dramatic language: a guide. London: : Arden Shakespeare 2001.
12
Agnew, Jean-Christophe. Worlds apart: the market and the theater in Anglo-American thought, 1550-1750. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1986.
13
Arabm R.A. Work, Bodies and Gender in The Shoemaker’s Holiday. Medieval and renaissance drama in England;13.
14
Bamber, Linda. Comic women, tragic men: a study of gender and genre in Shakespeare. Stanford, Cal: : Stanford University Press 1982.
15
Barber, Cesar Lombardi. Shakespeare’s festive comedy: a study of dramatic form and its relation to social custom. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1959.
16
Barton, Anne. Shakespeare and the idea of the play. Westport, Conn: : Greenwood Press 1977.
17
Braunmuller, A. R., Hattaway, Michael. The Cambridge companion to English Renaissance drama. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2003.
18
Briggs, Julia. This stage-play world: texts and contexts, 1580-1625. 2nd ed. New York: : Oxford University Press 1997.
19
Bristol, Michael D. Carnival and theater: plebeian culture and the structure of authority in Renaissance England. London: : Methuen 1985.
20
Carlson, Susan. Women and comedy: rewriting the British theatrical tradition. Ann Arbor: : University of Michigan Press 1991.
21
Carson, Christie, Karim-Cooper, Farah. Introduction. In: Shakespeare’s Globe: a theatrical experiment. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2008.
22
Cavell, Stanley. Disowning knowledge, in six plays of Shakespeare. Cambridge: : C.U.P. 1987.
23
Champion, L. S. Shakespeare and Dekker: creative interaction and the form of romantic comedy.
24
W.K. The Sources of the Characters in The Shoemaker’s Holiday . Modern philology 1929;27:175–82.
25
Chapman A. Whose Saint Crispin’s Day Is It?: Shoemaking, Holiday Making, and the Politics of Memory in Early Modern England. Renaissance Quarterly ;52:1467–94.
26
Dollimore, Jonathan, Sinfield, Alan. Political Shakespeare: new essays in cultural materialism. Manchester: : Manchester U.P. 1985.
27
Drakakis, John. Alternative Shakespeares. London: : Methuen 1985.
28
Dunworth, Felicity Elizabeth. Mothers and meaning on the early modern English stage. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 2010.
29
Dusinberre, Juliet. Shakespeare and the nature of women. 3rd ed. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2003.
30
Dutton, Richard, Howard, Jean E. A companion to Shakespeare’s works: Vol. 3: The comedies. Oxford: : Blackwell 2003.
31
Eagleton, Terry. Sweet violence: the idea of the tragic. Malden, Mass., Oxford: : Blackwell 2003.
32
Farley-Hills, D. The comic in Renaissance comedy. [Place of publication not identified]: : Macmillan 1981.
33
Foakes, R.A. Shakespeare’s Elizabethan Stages. In: Shakespeare: an illustrated stage history. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1996.
34
Friedenreich, K. ‘Accompaninge the players’: essays celebrating Thomas Middleton, 1580-1980; ed K Friedenreich. [Place of publication not identified]: : AMS Press 1983.
35
Gay, Penny. As she likes it: Shakespeare’s unruly women. London: : Routledge 1994. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=169570
36
Harris, Jonathan Gil, Korda, Natasha. Introduction: towards a materialist account of stage properties. In: Staged properties in early modern English drama. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2002.
37
Griswold, Wendy. Renaissance revivals: city comedy and revenge tragedy in the London theatre, 1576-1980. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1986.
38
Gurr, Andrew. The plan of 1594. In: The Shakespeare Company, 1594-1642. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2004.
39
Hall, Jonathan. Anxious pleasures: Shakespearean comedy and the nation-state. London: : Fairleigh Dickinson University Press 1995.
40
Heinemann, M. Puritanism and theatre: Thomas Middleton and opposition drama under the early Stuarts. [Place of publication not identified]: : C.U.P. 1980.
41
Howard, J E. Shakespeare’s art of orchestration: stage technique and audience response. [Place of publication not identified]: : U. of Illinois P. 1984.
42
Howard, Jean Elizabeth. The stage and social struggle in early modern England. London: : Routledge 1994. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=179419
43
Jardine, Lisa. Reading Shakespeare historically. London: : Routledge 1996.
44
Jardine, Lisa. Still harping on daughters: women and drama in the Age of Shakespeare. Sussex, England: : Barnes & Noble 1983.
45
Joughin, John J. Shakespeare and national culture. Manchester: : Distributed exclusively in the USA by St. Martin’s Press 1997.
46
Kastan, D.S. Workshop and/as playhouse. In: Staging the Renaissance: reinterpretations of Elizabethan and Jacobean drama. London: : Routledge 1991.
47
Kastan, David Scott, Stallybrass, Peter. Staging the Renaissance: reinterpretations of Elizabethan and Jacobean drama. London: : Routledge 1991.
48
Knowles, Ronald. Shakespeare and carnival: after Bakhtin. Basingstoke: : Macmillan Press 1998.
49
Krieger, Elliot. A Marxist study of Shakespeare’s comedies. London: : Macmillan 1979.
50
Leech, Clifford, Craik, T. W., Barroll, John Leeds. The Revels history of drama in English: Vol.3: 1576-1613 ; [by]J. Leeds Barroll ... [et al.]. 1975: : Methuen
51
Leggatt, Alexander. English stage comedy, 1490-1990: five centuries of a genre. London: : Routledge 1998.
52
Leggatt, Alexander. The Cambridge companion to Shakespearean comedy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2002. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://cco.cambridge.org/login2%3Fdest%3D%252Fbook%253Fid%253Dccol0521770440_CCOL0521770440
53
Mahood, M. M. Shakespeare’s wordplay. London: : Methuen
54
M. The Construction of The Shoemakers’ Holiday. Studies in English literature;10:315–23.
55
Marcus, Leah S. Puzzling Shakespeare: local reading and its discontents. Berkeley, Ca: : University of California Press 1988.
56
Martin, Mathew R. Between theater and philosophy: skepticism in the major city comedies of Ben Jonson and Thomas Middleton. London: : Associated University Presses 2001.
57
Maynard S. Feasting on Eyre: Community, Consumption and Communion in The Shoemaker’s Holiday. Comparative drama 1998;32:327–46.
58
McDonald, Russ. Shakespeare and Jonson: Jonson and Shakespeare. Lincoln, Neb: : U. of Nebraska P. 1988.
59
McLuskie, Kathleen. Dekker and Heywood: professional dramatists. Basingstoke: : St. Martin’s Press 1994.
60
Miola, Robert S. Shakespeare and classical comedy: the influence of Plautus and Terence. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1994.
61
Mortenson P. The Economics of Joy in The Shoemakers’ Holiday. Studies in English literature, 1500-1900;16:241–52.
62
Nevo, R. Comic transformations in Shakespeare. [Place of publication not identified]: : Methuen 1980.
63
Newman, K. Shakespeare’s rhetoric of comic character: dramatic convention in classical and Renaissance comedy. [Place of publication not identified]: : Methuen 1985.
64
Novarr D. Dekker’s Gentle Craft and the Lord Mayor of London. Modern Philology ;57:233–9.
65
Ornstein, Robert. Shakespeare’s comedies: from Roman farce to romantic mystery. London: : Associated University Presses 1986.
66
Parker, P. Shakespeare and the question of theory; ed P Parker and G Hartman. New York: : Methuen 1985. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=179172
67
Purcell, Stephen. Popular Shakespeare: simulation and subversion on the modern stage. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2009.
68
A.L. Performing Cross-Class Clandestine Marriage in The Shoemaker’s Holiday. Studies in English literature, 1500-1900 2005;45:333–55.
69
Smith, B. Studies in Sexuality. In: Shakespeare: an Oxford guide. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2003.
70
Smith, David L., Strier, Richard, Bevington, David M. The theatrical city: culture, theatre, and politics in London, 1576-1649. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1995.
71
Wells, Stanley W. Shakespeare and Co: Christopher Marlowe, Thomas Dekker, Ben Johnson, Thomas Middleton, John Fletcher and the other players in his story. London: : Allen Lane 2006.
72
Smith, Emma, Sullivan, Garrett A. The Cambridge companion to English Renaissance tragedy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2010. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://cco.cambridge.org/login2%3Fdest%3D%252Fbook%253Fid%253Dccol9780521519373_CCOL9780521519373
73
Straznicky M. The End(s) of Discord in The Shoemaker’s Holiday. Studies in English literature, 1500-1900;36:357–72.
74
Sullivan, Garrett A., Cheney, Patrick Gerard, Hadfield, Andrew. Early modern English drama: a critical companion. New York: : Oxford University Press 2006.
75
Tennenhouse, Leonard. Power on display: the politics of Shakespeare’s genres. 1986.
76
Thomson, Peter. Shakespeare’s professional career. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1992.
77
Thomson, Peter. Shakespeare’s theatre. 2nd ed. London: : Routledge 1992.
78
Traversi, D A. William Shakespeare, the early comedies: The comedy of errors, The taming of the Shrew, The two gentlemen of Verona, Love’s labour lost, The merchant of Venice. [Place of publication not identified]: : Longmans Green for the British Council and the National Book League 1964.
79
Ward I. Shakespeare and the Politics of Community. Early Modern Literary Studies 1999;4:1–45.
80
Weimann, Robert, Schwartz, Robert. Shakespeare and the popular tradition in the theater: studies in the social dimension of dramatic form and function. Baltimore: : Johns Hopkins U.P. 1978.
81
Weimann, Robert, Schwartz, Robert. Shakespeare’s theater: tradition and experiment. In: Shakespeare and the popular tradition in the theater: studies in the social dimension of dramatic form and function. Baltimore: : Johns Hopkins U.P. 1978.
82
Wells, Stanley W., Orlin, Lena Cowen. Shakespeare: an Oxford guide. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2003.
83
Whitney C. The Devil His Due: Mayor John Spencer, Elizabethan Civic Antitheatricalism, and ‘The Shoemaker’s Holiday’. Medieval and Renaissance Drama in England 2001;14:168–85.
84
Rowland, Richard. Thomas Heywood’s theatre, 1599-1639. Burlington, VT: : Ashgate 2010.
85
Dillon, Janette. The Cambridge introduction to early English theatre. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2006.
