[1]
Adamson, Sylvia 2001. Reading Shakespeare’s dramatic language: a guide. Arden Shakespeare.
[2]
Agnew, Jean-Christophe 1986. Worlds apart: the market and the theater in Anglo-American thought, 1550-1750. Cambridge University Press.
[3]
A.L. 2005. Performing Cross-Class Clandestine Marriage in The Shoemaker’s Holiday. Studies in English literature, 1500-1900. 45, 2 (2005), 333–355.
[4]
Arabm R.A. Work, Bodies and Gender in The Shoemaker’s Holiday. Medieval and renaissance drama in England. 13.
[5]
Bamber, Linda 1982. Comic women, tragic men: a study of gender and genre in Shakespeare. Stanford University Press.
[6]
Barber, Cesar Lombardi 1959. Shakespeare’s festive comedy: a study of dramatic form and its relation to social custom. Princeton University Press.
[7]
Barton, Anne 1977. Shakespeare and the idea of the play. Greenwood Press.
[8]
Bevington, David M. et al. 2002. English Renaissance drama: a Norton anthology. W.W. Norton.
[9]
Bowsher, Julian 2012. Shakespeare’s London theatreland: archaeology, history and drama. Museum of London Archaeology.
[10]
Braunmuller, A. R. and Hattaway, Michael 2003. The Cambridge companion to English Renaissance drama. Cambridge University Press.
[11]
Briggs, J. 1997. This stage-play world: texts and contexts, 1580-1625. Oxford University Press.
[12]
Briggs, Julia 1997. This stage-play world: texts and contexts, 1580-1625. Oxford University Press.
[13]
Bristol, Michael D. 1985. Carnival and theater: plebeian culture and the structure of authority in Renaissance England. Methuen.
[14]
Carlson, Susan 1991. Women and comedy: rewriting the British theatrical tradition. University of Michigan Press.
[15]
Carson, Christie and Karim-Cooper, Farah 2008. Introduction. Shakespeare’s Globe: a theatrical experiment. Cambridge University Press.
[16]
Cavell, Stanley 1987. Disowning knowledge, in six plays of Shakespeare. C.U.P.
[17]
Champion, L. S. Shakespeare and Dekker: creative interaction and the form of romantic comedy.
[18]
Chapman, A. Whose Saint Crispin’s Day Is It?: Shoemaking, Holiday Making, and the Politics of Memory in Early Modern England. Renaissance Quarterly . 52, 4, 1467–1494.
[19]
Dillon, Janette 2006. The Cambridge introduction to early English theatre. Cambridge University Press.
[20]
Dillon, Janette 2006. The Cambridge introduction to early English theatre. Cambridge University Press.
[21]
Dollimore, Jonathan and Sinfield, Alan 1985. Political Shakespeare: new essays in cultural materialism. Manchester U.P.
[22]
Drakakis, John 1985. Alternative Shakespeares. Methuen.
[23]
Dunworth, Felicity Elizabeth 2010. Mothers and meaning on the early modern English stage. Manchester University Press.
[24]
Dusinberre, Juliet 2003. Shakespeare and the nature of women. Palgrave Macmillan.
[25]
Dutton, Richard and Howard, Jean E. 2003. A companion to Shakespeare’s works: Vol. 3: The comedies. Blackwell.
[26]
Eagleton, Terry 2003. Sweet violence: the idea of the tragic. Blackwell.
[27]
Farley-Hills, D. 1981. The comic in Renaissance comedy. Macmillan.
[28]
Foakes and R.A. 1996. Shakespeare’s Elizabethan Stages. Shakespeare: an illustrated stage history. Oxford University Press.
[29]
Friedenreich, K. 1983. ‘Accompaninge the players’: essays celebrating Thomas Middleton, 1580-1980; ed K Friedenreich. AMS Press.
[30]
Gay, Penny 1994. As she likes it: Shakespeare’s unruly women. Routledge.
[31]
Griswold, Wendy 1986. Renaissance revivals: city comedy and revenge tragedy in the London theatre, 1576-1980. University of Chicago Press.
[32]
Gurr, Andrew 2004. The plan of 1594. The Shakespeare Company, 1594-1642. Cambridge University Press.
[33]
Hall, Jonathan 1995. Anxious pleasures: Shakespearean comedy and the nation-state. Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
[34]
Harris, Jonathan Gil and Korda, Natasha 2002. Introduction: towards a materialist account of stage properties. Staged properties in early modern English drama. Cambridge University Press.
[35]
Heinemann, M. 1980. Puritanism and theatre: Thomas Middleton and opposition drama under the early Stuarts. C.U.P.
[36]
Howard, J E. 1984. Shakespeare’s art of orchestration: stage technique and audience response. U. of Illinois P.
[37]
Howard, Jean Elizabeth 1994. The stage and social struggle in early modern England. Routledge.
[38]
Jardine, Lisa 1996. Reading Shakespeare historically. Routledge.
[39]
Jardine, Lisa 1983. Still harping on daughters: women and drama in the Age of Shakespeare. Barnes & Noble.
[40]
Joughin, John J. 1997. Shakespeare and national culture. Distributed exclusively in the USA by St. Martin’s Press.
[41]
Kastan, David Scott and Stallybrass, Peter 1991. Staging the Renaissance: reinterpretations of Elizabethan and Jacobean drama. Routledge.
[42]
Kastan and D.S. 1991. Workshop and/as playhouse. Staging the Renaissance: reinterpretations of Elizabethan and Jacobean drama. Routledge.
[43]
Knowles, Ronald 1998. Shakespeare and carnival: after Bakhtin. Macmillan Press.
[44]
Krieger, Elliot 1979. A Marxist study of Shakespeare’s comedies. Macmillan.
[45]
Leech, Clifford et al. The Revels history of drama in English: Vol.3: 1576-1613 ; [by]J. Leeds Barroll ... [et al.]. Methuen.
[46]
Leggatt, Alexander 1998. English stage comedy, 1490-1990: five centuries of a genre. Routledge.
[47]
Leggatt, Alexander 2002. The Cambridge companion to Shakespearean comedy. Cambridge University Press.
[48]
M The Construction of The Shoemakers’ Holiday. Studies in English literature. 10, 2, 315–323.
[49]
Mahood, M. M. Shakespeare’s wordplay. Methuen.
[50]
Marcus, Leah S. 1988. Puzzling Shakespeare: local reading and its discontents. University of California Press.
[51]
Martin, Mathew R. 2001. Between theater and philosophy: skepticism in the major city comedies of Ben Jonson and Thomas Middleton. Associated University Presses.
[52]
Maynard, S. 1998. Feasting on Eyre: Community, Consumption and Communion in The Shoemaker’s Holiday. Comparative drama. 32, 3 (1998), 327–346.
[53]
McDonald, Russ 1988. Shakespeare and Jonson: Jonson and Shakespeare. U. of Nebraska P.
[54]
McLuskie, Kathleen 1994. Dekker and Heywood: professional dramatists. St. Martin’s Press.
[55]
Mendelson, Sara Heller and Crawford, Patricia 1998. Women in early modern England, 1550-1720. Oxford University Press.
[56]
Miola, Robert S. 1994. Shakespeare and classical comedy: the influence of Plautus and Terence. Clarendon Press.
[57]
Mortenson, P. The Economics of Joy in The Shoemakers’ Holiday. Studies in English literature, 1500-1900. 16, 2, 241–252.
[58]
Nevo, R. 1980. Comic transformations in Shakespeare. Methuen.
[59]
Newman, K. 1985. Shakespeare’s rhetoric of comic character: dramatic convention in classical and Renaissance comedy. Methuen.
[60]
Novarr, D. Dekker’s Gentle Craft and the Lord Mayor of London. Modern Philology . 57, 4, 233–239.
[61]
Ornstein, Robert 1986. Shakespeare’s comedies: from Roman farce to romantic mystery. Associated University Presses.
[62]
Parker, P. 1985. Shakespeare and the question of theory; ed P Parker and G Hartman. Methuen.
[63]
Purcell, Stephen 2009. Popular Shakespeare: simulation and subversion on the modern stage. Palgrave Macmillan.
[64]
Rowland, Richard 2010. Thomas Heywood’s theatre, 1599-1639. Ashgate.
[65]
Shakespeare, William et al. 2008. The Norton Shakespeare: based on the Oxford edition. W. W. Norton.
[66]
Sharpe, J. A. 1997. Early modern England: a social history 1550-1760. Arnold.
[67]
Smith and B 2003. Studies in Sexuality. Shakespeare: an Oxford guide. Oxford University Press.
[68]
Smith, David L. et al. 1995. The theatrical city: culture, theatre, and politics in London, 1576-1649. Cambridge University Press.
[69]
Smith, Emma and Sullivan, Garrett A. 2010. The Cambridge companion to English Renaissance tragedy. Cambridge University Press.
[70]
Straznicky, M. The End(s) of Discord in The Shoemaker’s Holiday. Studies in English literature, 1500-1900. 36, 2, 357–372.
[71]
Sullivan, Garrett A. et al. 2006. Early modern English drama: a critical companion. Oxford University Press.
[72]
Tennenhouse, Leonard 1986. Power on display: the politics of Shakespeare’s genres. (1986).
[73]
Thomson, Peter 1992. Shakespeare’s professional career. Cambridge University Press.
[74]
Thomson, Peter 1992. Shakespeare’s theatre. Routledge.
[75]
Tittler, Robert et al. 2004. A companion to Tudor Britain. Blackwell Pub.
[76]
Traversi, D A. 1964. William Shakespeare, the early comedies: The comedy of errors, The taming of the Shrew, The two gentlemen of Verona, Love’s labour lost, The merchant of Venice. Longmans Green for the British Council and the National Book League.
[77]
Ward, I. 1999. Shakespeare and the Politics of Community. Early Modern Literary Studies. 4, 3 (1999), 1–45.
[78]
Weimann, Robert and Schwartz, Robert 1978. Shakespeare and the popular tradition in the theater: studies in the social dimension of dramatic form and function. Johns Hopkins U.P.
[79]
Weimann, Robert and Schwartz, Robert 1978. Shakespeare’s theater: tradition and experiment. Shakespeare and the popular tradition in the theater: studies in the social dimension of dramatic form and function. Johns Hopkins U.P.
[80]
Wells, Stanley W. 2006. Shakespeare and Co: Christopher Marlowe, Thomas Dekker, Ben Johnson, Thomas Middleton, John Fletcher and the other players in his story. Allen Lane.
[81]
Wells, Stanley W. and Orlin, Lena Cowen 2003. Shakespeare: an Oxford guide. Oxford University Press.
[82]
Whitney, C. 2001. The Devil His Due: Mayor John Spencer, Elizabethan Civic Antitheatricalism, and ‘The Shoemaker’s Holiday’. Medieval and Renaissance Drama in England. 14, (2001), 168–185.
[83]
W.K. 1929. The Sources of the Characters in The Shoemaker’s Holiday . Modern philology. 27, 2 (1929), 175–182.
[84]
Wrightson, Keith 2002. Earthly necessities: economic lives in early modern Britain, 1470-1750. Penguin.
[85]
Wrightson, Keith 2003. English society, 1580-1680. Routledge.