Bibliography for PO622 - The International Politics of Global Climate Change BETA

1.

Bean, Richard, Royal Court Theatre. The heretic. Vol. Oberon modern plays. London: Oberon Books; 2011.

2.

Buffini, Moira. Greenland. Vol. ff plays. London: Faber and Faber; 2011.

3.

Sandler, Todd. Chapter 1. In: Global challenges: an approach to environmental, political, and economic problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.

4.

Sandler, Todd. Chapter 2. In: Global challenges: an approach to environmental, political, and economic problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.

5.

Keohane, Robert O., Nye, Joseph S. Power and interdependence. 3rd ed. New York: Longman; 2001.

6.

Barrett, Scott. Chapter 6. In: Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199286094.001.0001

7.

Garrett Hardin. The Tragedy of the Commons. Science [Internet]. 1968;162(3859). Available from: http://www.jstor.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/stable/1724745?&Search=yes&searchText=%2522The+Tragedy+of+the+Commons%2522&list=hide&searchUri=%252Faction%252FdoBasicSearch%253FQuery%253D%252522The%252BTragedy%252Bof%252Bthe%252BCommons%252522%2526gw%253Djtx%2526prq%253DThe%252BTragedy%252Bof%252Bthe%252BCommons%2526hp%253D25%2526acc%253Don%2526aori%253Da%2526wc%253Don%2526fc%253Doff&prevSearch=&item=9&ttl=1795&returnArticleService=showFullText

8.

Barrett, Scott. Chapter 15.1-15-4of Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making. In: Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199286094.001.0001

9.

Luterbacher, Urs, Sprinz, Detlef F. Bodansky, Daniel: The History of the Global Climate Change Regime. In: International relations and global climate change. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2001.

10.

Barrett, Scott. chapter 15.8-15.14. In: Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199286094.001.0001

11.

Jana von Stein. The International Law and Politics of Climate Change: Ratification of the United Nations Framework Convention and the Kyoto Protocol. The Journal of Conflict Resolution [Internet]. 2008;52(2). Available from: http://www.jstor.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/stable/27638605

12.

Underdal A, Hovi J, Kallbekken S, Skodvin T. Can conditional commitments break the climate change negotiations deadlock? International Political Science Review. 2012 Apr 13;33(4):475–93.

13.

Luterbacher, Urs, Sprinz, Detlef F. pp.221-244. In: International relations and global climate change. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2001.

14.

Hovi, Jon, Tora Skodvin, and Steinar Andresen. 2003. The Persistence of the Kyoto Protocol: Why Other Annex I Countries Move on Without the United States. Available from: http://www.mitpressjournals.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1162/152638003322757907

15.

Bang G, Tjernshaugen A, Andresen S. Future U.S. Climate Policy: International Re-engagement? International Studies Perspectives. 2005 May;6(2):285–303.

16.

Christoff P. The Bali roadmap: Climate change, COP 13 and beyond. Environmental Politics. 2008 Jun;17(3):466–72.

17.

Dessai S. Profile - Why did The Hague Climate Conference Fail? Environmental Politics. 2001 Sep;10(3):139–44.

18.

Jacoby, Henry D. Kyoto’s Unfinished Business. Foreign Affairs [Internet]. 1998;77(4):54–66. Available from: http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=4&sid=12550e95-9827-4f7a-a4da-e8592e9035b2%2540sessionmgr12&hid=18&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%253d%253d#db=a9h&AN=764885

19.

Grubb, Michael, Vrolijk, Christian, Brack, Duncan. The Kyoto protocol: a guide and assessment. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs/Earthscan; 1998.

20.

Oberthür, Sebastian, Ott, Hermann. The Kyoto Protocol: international climate policy for the 21st century. Berlin: Springer; 1999.

21.

Hovi, Jon, Stokke, Olav Schram, Ulfstein, Geir, Dawsonera. Implementing the climate regime: international compliance [Internet]. London: Earthscan; 2005. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://sid.kent.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9786000000707

22.

Aldy, Joseph E., Stavins, R. N. Architectures for agreement: addressing global climate change in the post-Kyoto world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.

23.

Barrett, Scott. chapters 7, 11, 13. In: Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199286094.001.0001

24.

Frank Grundig. Patterns of International Cooperation and the Explanatory Power of Relative Gains: An Analysis of Cooperation on Global Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and International Trade. International Studies Quarterly [Internet]. 2006;50(4). Available from: http://www.jstor.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/stable/4092779

25.

HOVI J, FROYN CB, BANG G. Enforcing the Kyoto Protocol: can punitive consequences restore compliance? Review of International Studies. 2007 Jul 17;33(03).

26.

Barrett, Scott. Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199286094.001.0001

27.

Nordhaus, William D. Chapters 1 and 9. In: A question of balance: weighing the options on global warming policies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2008.

28.

Review by: Martin L. Weitzman. A Review of ‘The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change’. Journal of Economic Literature [Internet]. 2007;45(3). Available from: http://www.jstor.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/stable/27646844

29.

Neumayer E. Global warming: discounting is not the issue, but substitutability is. Energy Policy. 1999 Jan;27(1):33–43.

30.

Luterbacher, Urs, Sprinz, Detlef F. Matthew Paterson: Principles of Justice in the Context in Global Climate Changeof International relations and global climate change. In: International relations and global climate change. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2001.

31.

Lomborg, Bjørn. Cline, William, 2004. Climate change. In: Global crises, global solutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004.

32.

Lomborg, Bjørn. Mendelsohn, Robert, 2004. Perspective Paper 1.1. In: Global crises, global solutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004.

33.

Caney S. Human rights, climate change, and discounting. Environmental Politics. 2008 Aug;17(4):536–55.

34.

Neumayer E. In defence of historical accountability for greenhouse gas emissions. Ecological Economics. 2000 May;33(2):185–92.

35.

Barkin, J. Samuel. Discounting the Discount Rate: Ecocentrism and Environmental Economics. Global Environmental Politics [Internet]. 2006;6(4):56–72. Available from: http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=3&sid=9ae0650b-18b9-422f-8aa8-3c0fc9cdb991%2540sessionmgr14&hid=18&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%253d%253d#db=a9h&AN=23830435

36.

Schultz PA, Kasting JF. Optimal reductions in CO2 emissions. Energy Policy. 1997 Apr;25(5):491–500.

37.

Tol RSJ. The damage costs of climate change: a note on tangibles and intangibles, applied to DICE. Energy Policy. 1994 May;22(5):436–8.

38.

Azar C. Azar, Christian. 1998. Are Optimal CO2 emissions really optimal? Environmental and Resource Economics. 1998;11(3/4):301–15.

39.

Lind RC. Intergenerational equity, discounting, and the role of cost-benefit analysis in evaluating global climate policy. Energy Policy. 1995 Apr;23(4–5):379–89.

40.

Miles, Edward L. Underdal, Arild.2002. One Question, Two Answers. In: Environmental regime effectiveness: confronting theory with evidence. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2002.

41.

Hovi, Jon, Detlef F. Sprinz, and Arild Underdal. 2003. The Oslo-Potsdam Solution to Measuring Regime Effectiveness: Critique, Response, and the Road Ahead. Available from: http://www.mitpressjournals.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1162/152638003322469286

42.

Frank Grundig. Patterns of International Cooperation and the Explanatory Power of Relative Gains: An Analysis of Cooperation on Global Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and International Trade. International Studies Quarterly [Internet]. 2006;50(4). Available from: http://www.jstor.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/stable/4092779

43.

Young OR. Inferences and Indices: Evaluating the Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes. Global Environmental Politics. 2001 Feb;1(1):99–121.

44.

Helm C, Sprinz D. Measuring the Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2000 Oct 1;44(5):630–52.

45.

Young, Oran R. Determining Regime Effectiveness: A Commentary on the Oslo-Potsdam Solution. Global Environmental Politics [Internet]. 2003;3(3):97–104. Available from: http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=3&sid=c3f7a118-3994-43d2-a8d3-18e5e5a12742%2540sessionmgr15&hid=18&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%253d%253d#db=a9h&AN=11254360

46.

Downs, George W. Constructing effective environmental regimes. Annual Review of Political Science [Internet]. 2000;3(1). Available from: http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=3&sid=1920f63a-b5f2-49a1-a1f6-7333e38d266a%2540sessionmgr13&hid=18&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%253d%253d#db=a9h&AN=5366735

47.

Mitchell, Ronald B. International politics and the environment. Vol. SAGE series on the foundations of international relations. London: SAGE; 2010.

48.

Hasenclever, Andreas, Mayer, Peter, Rittberger, Volker. chapter 3,4. In: Theories of international regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.

49.

Oran R. Young. Political Leadership and Regime Formation: On the Development of Institutions in International Society. International Organization [Internet]. 1991;45(3). Available from: http://www.jstor.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/stable/2706733

50.

Miles, Edward L. Underdal, Arild.2002. One Question, Two Answers. In: Environmental regime effectiveness: confronting theory with evidence. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2002.

51.

Frank Grundig. Patterns of International Cooperation and the Explanatory Power of Relative Gains: An Analysis of Cooperation on Global Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and International Trade. International Studies Quarterly [Internet]. 2006;50(4). Available from: http://www.jstor.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/stable/4092779

52.

Ward, Hugh. Game theory and the politics of global warming: The state of play and beyond. Political Studies [Internet]. 44(5):850–71. Available from: http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=3&sid=45e949a8-13f3-473b-9292-efdc6930aa39%2540sessionmgr10&hid=18&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%253d%253d#db=a9h&AN=9705162176

53.

Luterbacher, Urs, Sprinz, Detlef F. Rowlands, Ian. 2001. Classical Theories of International Relations. Vol. Global environmental accords : strategies for sustainability and institutional innovation, International relations and global climate change. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2001.

54.

Seaver BM. Stratospheric ozone protection: IR theory and the montreal protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer. Environmental Politics. 1997 Sep;6(3):31–67.

55.

Luterbacher, Urs, Sprinz, Detlef F. Grundig, Frank Hugh Ward and Ethan Zorick. 2001. Formal Approaches to Global Climate Negotiations. In: International relations and global climate change. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2001.

56.

Barrett, Scott. Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199286094.001.0001

57.

Stokke OS. Qualitative comparative analysis, shaming, and international regime effectiveness. Journal of Business Research. 2007 May;60(5):501–11.

58.

Newell P, Paterson M. A climate for business: global warming, the state and capital. Review of International Political Economy. 1998 Jan;5(4):679–703.

59.

Robert D. Putnam. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization [Internet]. 1988;42(3). Available from: http://www.jstor.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/stable/2706785

60.

Detlef Sprinz and Tapani Vaahtoranta. The Interest-Based Explanation of International Environmental Policy. International Organization [Internet]. 1994;48(1). Available from: http://www.jstor.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/stable/2706915

61.

Hovi, Jon. Implementing Long-Term Climate Policy: Time Inconsistency, Domestic Politics, International Anarchy. Global Environmental Politics [Internet]. 2009;9(3):20–39. Available from: http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=3&sid=a03d0c74-be38-45f9-83ed-7a250094f2a6%2540sessionmgr12&hid=18&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%253d%253d#db=a9h&AN=43273807

62.

Mueller, Dennis C. Public choice III [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.kentuk.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=218062

63.

Falkner, Robert. Business power and conflict in international environmental politics [Internet]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.kentuk.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=668115

64.

Bryner G. Failure and opportunity: environmental groups in US climate change policy. Environmental Politics. 2008 Apr;17(2):319–36.

65.

Lisowski M. Playing the Two-level Game: Us President Bush’s Decision to Repudiate the Kyoto Protocol. Environmental Politics. 2002 Dec;11(4):101–19.

66.

Binder S, Neumayer E. Environmental pressure group strength and air pollution: An empirical analysis. Ecological Economics. 2005 Dec;55(4):527–38.

67.

Neumayer E. Are left-wing party strength and corporatism good for the environment? Evidence from panel analysis of air pollution in OECD countries. Ecological Economics. 2003 Jun;45(2):203–20.

68.

Neumayer E. The environment, left-wing political orientation and ecological economics. Ecological Economics. 2004 Dec;51(3–4):167–75.

69.

Miles, Edward L. Underdal, Arild.2002. One Question, Two Answers,. In: Environmental regime effectiveness: confronting theory with evidence. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2002.

70.

Miles, Edward L. Underdal, Arild. 2002. ‘Conclusions’. In: Environmental regime effectiveness: confronting theory with evidence. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2002.

71.

Frank Grundig. Patterns of International Cooperation and the Explanatory Power of Relative Gains: An Analysis of Cooperation on Global Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and International Trade. International Studies Quarterly [Internet]. 2006;50(4). Available from: http://www.jstor.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/stable/4092779

72.

Young, Oran R., Osherenko, Gail. Polar politics: creating international environmental regimes. Vol. Cornell studies in political economy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1993.

73.

Mitchell RB. International Environmental Aagreements: A Survey of Their Features, Formation, and Effects. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 2003;28(1):429–61.

74.

Young, Oran R. Governance in world affairs. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press; 1999.

75.

Hugh Ward. International Linkages and Environmental Sustainability: The Effectiveness of the Regime Network. Journal of Peace Research [Internet]. 2006;43(2). Available from: http://www.jstor.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/stable/27640283

76.

Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate. Available from: http://muse.jhu.edu.chain.kent.ac.uk/journals/international_security/summary/v024/24.1.jervis.html

77.

Rosenau, James N., Czempiel, Ernst - Otto. James Rosenau. 1992. Governance, Order, and Change in World Poltics. In: Governance without government: order and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.

78.

Young, Oran R. Stokke, Olav: Regimes as Governance Systems. In: Global governance: drawing insights from the environmental experience. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 1997.

79.

John J. Mearsheimer. The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security [Internet]. 1995;19(3). Available from: http://www.jstor.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/stable/2539078?&Search=yes&searchText=Promise&searchText=Institutions&searchText=International&searchText=False&list=hide&searchUri=%252Faction%252FdoBasicSearch%253FQuery%253DThe%252BFalse%252BPromise%252Bof%252BInternational%252BInstitutions%2526filter%253Djid%25253A10.2307%25252Fj100553%2526wc%253Don%2526fc%253Doff%2526globalSearch%253D%2526sbbBox%253D%2526sbjBox%253D%2526sbpBox%253D&prevSearch=&item=1&ttl=80&returnArticleService=showFullText

80.

Young, Oran R. Chapter 5. In: The institutional dimensions of environmental change: fit, interplay, and scale. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2002.

81.

Keohane, Robert O., Dawsonera. Power and governance in a partially globalized world [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2002. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://sid.kent.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203218174

82.

Haas, Peter M. Addressing the Global Governance Deficit. Global Environmental Politics [Internet]. 2004;4(4):1–15. Available from: http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=3&sid=1906aad6-fab1-428c-943f-625d0947d7af%2540sessionmgr4&hid=18&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%253d%253d#db=a9h&AN=14860199

83.

Biermann, Frank, Bauer, Steffen. Biermann, Frank, 2005, ‘The Rationale for a World Environment Organisation’. In: A World Environment Organization: solution or threat for effective international environmental governance? Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate; 2005.

84.

Biermann, Frank, Bauer, Steffen. ‘Neither Necessary, Nor Sufficient: Why Organisational Tinkering Will Not Improve Environmental Governance’. In: A World Environment Organization: solution or threat for effective international environmental governance? Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate; 2005.

85.

Biermann, Frank, Bauer, Steffen. Von Moltke, Konrad, 2005, ‘Clustering International Environmental Agreements as an Alternative to a World Environment Organisation’. In: A World Environment Organization: solution or threat for effective international environmental governance? Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate; 2005.

86.

Biermann, Frank, Bauer, Steffen. Oberthur, Sebastian and Thomas Gehring, 2005, ‘Reforming International Environmental Governance: an Institutional Perspective on Proposals for a World Environment Organisation’. In: A World Environment Organization: solution or threat for effective international environmental governance? Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate; 2005.