1
Bean, Richard, Royal Court Theatre. The heretic. London: : Oberon Books 2011.
2
Buffini, Moira. Greenland. London: : Faber and Faber 2011.
3
Sandler, Todd. Chapter 1. In: Global challenges: an approach to environmental, political, and economic problems. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1997.
4
Sandler, Todd. Chapter 2. In: Global challenges: an approach to environmental, political, and economic problems. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1997.
5
Keohane, Robert O., Nye, Joseph S. Power and interdependence. 3rd ed. New York: : Longman 2001.
6
Barrett, Scott. Chapter 6. In: Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2005. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199286094.001.0001
7
Garrett Hardin. The Tragedy of the Commons. Science 1968;162.http://www.jstor.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/stable/1724745?&Search=yes&searchText=%2522The+Tragedy+of+the+Commons%2522&list=hide&searchUri=%252Faction%252FdoBasicSearch%253FQuery%253D%252522The%252BTragedy%252Bof%252Bthe%252BCommons%252522%2526gw%253Djtx%2526prq%253DThe%252BTragedy%252Bof%252Bthe%252BCommons%2526hp%253D25%2526acc%253Don%2526aori%253Da%2526wc%253Don%2526fc%253Doff&prevSearch=&item=9&ttl=1795&returnArticleService=showFullText
8
Barrett, Scott. Chapter 15.1-15-4of Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making. In: Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2005. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199286094.001.0001
9
Luterbacher, Urs, Sprinz, Detlef F. Bodansky, Daniel: The History of the Global Climate Change Regime. In: International relations and global climate change. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2001.
10
Barrett, Scott. chapter 15.8-15.14. In: Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2005. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199286094.001.0001
11
Jana von Stein. The International Law and Politics of Climate Change: Ratification of the United Nations Framework Convention and the Kyoto Protocol. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 2008;52.http://www.jstor.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/stable/27638605
12
Underdal A, Hovi J, Kallbekken S, et al. Can conditional commitments break the climate change negotiations deadlock? International Political Science Review 2012;33:475–93. doi:10.1177/0192512111432564
13
Luterbacher, Urs, Sprinz, Detlef F. pp.221-244. In: International relations and global climate change. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2001.
14
Hovi, Jon, Tora Skodvin, and Steinar Andresen. 2003. The Persistence of the Kyoto Protocol: Why Other Annex I Countries Move on Without the United States. http://www.mitpressjournals.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1162/152638003322757907
15
Bang G, Tjernshaugen A, Andresen S. Future U.S. Climate Policy: International Re-engagement? International Studies Perspectives 2005;6:285–303. doi:10.1111/j.1528-3577.2005.00207.x
16
Christoff P. The Bali roadmap: Climate change, COP 13 and beyond. Environmental Politics 2008;17:466–72. doi:10.1080/09644010802065807
17
Dessai S. Profile - Why did The Hague Climate Conference Fail? Environmental Politics 2001;10:139–44. doi:10.1080/714000552
18
Jacoby, Henry D. Kyoto’s Unfinished Business. Foreign Affairs 1998;77:54–66.http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=4&sid=12550e95-9827-4f7a-a4da-e8592e9035b2%2540sessionmgr12&hid=18&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%253d%253d#db=a9h&AN=764885
19
Grubb, Michael, Vrolijk, Christian, Brack, Duncan. The Kyoto protocol: a guide and assessment. London: : Royal Institute of International Affairs/Earthscan 1998.
20
Oberthür, Sebastian, Ott, Hermann. The Kyoto Protocol: international climate policy for the 21st century. Berlin: : Springer 1999.
21
Hovi, Jon, Stokke, Olav Schram, Ulfstein, Geir, et al. Implementing the climate regime: international compliance. London: : Earthscan 2005. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://sid.kent.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9786000000707
22
Aldy, Joseph E., Stavins, R. N. Architectures for agreement: addressing global climate change in the post-Kyoto world. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2007.
23
Barrett, Scott. chapters 7, 11, 13. In: Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2005. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199286094.001.0001
24
Frank Grundig. Patterns of International Cooperation and the Explanatory Power of Relative Gains: An Analysis of Cooperation on Global Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and International Trade. International Studies Quarterly 2006;50.http://www.jstor.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/stable/4092779
25
HOVI J, FROYN CB, BANG G. Enforcing the Kyoto Protocol: can punitive consequences restore compliance? Review of International Studies 2007;33. doi:10.1017/S0260210507007590
26
Barrett, Scott. Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2005. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199286094.001.0001
27
Nordhaus, William D. Chapters 1 and 9. In: A question of balance: weighing the options on global warming policies. New Haven, CT: : Yale University Press 2008.
28
Review by: Martin L. Weitzman. A Review of ‘The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change’. Journal of Economic Literature 2007;45.http://www.jstor.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/stable/27646844
29
Neumayer E. Global warming: discounting is not the issue, but substitutability is. Energy Policy 1999;27:33–43. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(98)00063-9
30
Luterbacher, Urs, Sprinz, Detlef F. Matthew Paterson: Principles of Justice in the Context in Global Climate Changeof International relations and global climate change. In: International relations and global climate change. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2001.
31
Lomborg, Bjørn. Cline, William, 2004. Climate change. In: Global crises, global solutions. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2004.
32
Lomborg, Bjørn. Mendelsohn, Robert, 2004. Perspective Paper 1.1. In: Global crises, global solutions. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2004.
33
Caney S. Human rights, climate change, and discounting. Environmental Politics 2008;17:536–55. doi:10.1080/09644010802193401
34
Neumayer E. In defence of historical accountability for greenhouse gas emissions. Ecological Economics 2000;33:185–92. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00135-X
35
Barkin, J. Samuel. Discounting the Discount Rate: Ecocentrism and Environmental Economics. Global Environmental Politics 2006;6:56–72.http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=3&sid=9ae0650b-18b9-422f-8aa8-3c0fc9cdb991%2540sessionmgr14&hid=18&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%253d%253d#db=a9h&AN=23830435
36
Schultz PA, Kasting JF. Optimal reductions in CO2 emissions. Energy Policy 1997;25:491–500. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(97)00027-X
37
Tol RSJ. The damage costs of climate change: a note on tangibles and intangibles, applied to DICE. Energy Policy 1994;22:436–8. doi:10.1016/0301-4215(94)90173-2
38
Azar C. Azar, Christian. 1998. Are Optimal CO2 emissions really optimal? Environmental and Resource Economics 1998;11:301–15. doi:10.1023/A:1008235326513
39
Lind RC. Intergenerational equity, discounting, and the role of cost-benefit analysis in evaluating global climate policy. Energy Policy 1995;23:379–89. doi:10.1016/0301-4215(95)90162-Z
40
Miles, Edward L. Underdal, Arild.2002. One Question, Two Answers. In: Environmental regime effectiveness: confronting theory with evidence. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2002.
41
Hovi, Jon, Detlef F. Sprinz, and Arild Underdal. 2003. The Oslo-Potsdam Solution to Measuring Regime Effectiveness: Critique, Response, and the Road Ahead. http://www.mitpressjournals.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1162/152638003322469286
42
Frank Grundig. Patterns of International Cooperation and the Explanatory Power of Relative Gains: An Analysis of Cooperation on Global Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and International Trade. International Studies Quarterly 2006;50.http://www.jstor.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/stable/4092779
43
Young OR. Inferences and Indices: Evaluating the Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes. Global Environmental Politics 2001;1:99–121. doi:10.1162/152638001570651
44
Helm C, Sprinz D. Measuring the Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes. Journal of Conflict Resolution 2000;44:630–52. doi:10.1177/0022002700044005004
45
Young, Oran R. Determining Regime Effectiveness: A Commentary on the Oslo-Potsdam Solution. Global Environmental Politics 2003;3:97–104.http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=3&sid=c3f7a118-3994-43d2-a8d3-18e5e5a12742%2540sessionmgr15&hid=18&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%253d%253d#db=a9h&AN=11254360
46
Downs, George W. Constructing effective environmental regimes. Annual Review of Political Science 2000;3.http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=3&sid=1920f63a-b5f2-49a1-a1f6-7333e38d266a%2540sessionmgr13&hid=18&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%253d%253d#db=a9h&AN=5366735
47
Mitchell, Ronald B. International politics and the environment. London: : SAGE 2010.
48
Hasenclever, Andreas, Mayer, Peter, Rittberger, Volker. chapter 3,4. In: Theories of international regimes. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1997.
49
Oran R. Young. Political Leadership and Regime Formation: On the Development of Institutions in International Society. International Organization 1991;45.http://www.jstor.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/stable/2706733
50
Miles, Edward L. Underdal, Arild.2002. One Question, Two Answers. In: Environmental regime effectiveness: confronting theory with evidence. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2002.
51
Frank Grundig. Patterns of International Cooperation and the Explanatory Power of Relative Gains: An Analysis of Cooperation on Global Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and International Trade. International Studies Quarterly 2006;50.http://www.jstor.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/stable/4092779
52
Ward, Hugh. Game theory and the politics of global warming: The state of play and beyond. Political Studies;44:850–71.http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=3&sid=45e949a8-13f3-473b-9292-efdc6930aa39%2540sessionmgr10&hid=18&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%253d%253d#db=a9h&AN=9705162176
53
Luterbacher, Urs, Sprinz, Detlef F. Rowlands, Ian. 2001. Classical Theories of International Relations. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2001.
54
Seaver BM. Stratospheric ozone protection: IR theory and the montreal protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer. Environmental Politics 1997;6:31–67. doi:10.1080/09644019708414341
55
Luterbacher, Urs, Sprinz, Detlef F. Grundig, Frank Hugh Ward and Ethan Zorick. 2001. Formal Approaches to Global Climate Negotiations. In: International relations and global climate change. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2001.
56
Barrett, Scott. Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2005. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199286094.001.0001
57
Stokke OS. Qualitative comparative analysis, shaming, and international regime effectiveness. Journal of Business Research 2007;60:501–11. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.003
58
Newell P, Paterson M. A climate for business: global warming, the state and capital. Review of International Political Economy 1998;5:679–703. doi:10.1080/096922998347426
59
Robert D. Putnam. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization 1988;42.http://www.jstor.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/stable/2706785
60
Detlef Sprinz and Tapani Vaahtoranta. The Interest-Based Explanation of International Environmental Policy. International Organization 1994;48.http://www.jstor.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/stable/2706915
61
Hovi, Jon. Implementing Long-Term Climate Policy: Time Inconsistency, Domestic Politics, International Anarchy. Global Environmental Politics 2009;9:20–39.http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=3&sid=a03d0c74-be38-45f9-83ed-7a250094f2a6%2540sessionmgr12&hid=18&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%253d%253d#db=a9h&AN=43273807
62
Mueller, Dennis C. Public choice III. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2003. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.kentuk.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=218062
63
Falkner, Robert. Business power and conflict in international environmental politics. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2008. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.kentuk.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=668115
64
Bryner G. Failure and opportunity: environmental groups in US climate change policy. Environmental Politics 2008;17:319–36. doi:10.1080/09644010801936255
65
Lisowski M. Playing the Two-level Game: Us President Bush’s Decision to Repudiate the Kyoto Protocol. Environmental Politics 2002;11:101–19. doi:10.1080/714000641
66
Binder S, Neumayer E. Environmental pressure group strength and air pollution: An empirical analysis. Ecological Economics 2005;55:527–38. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.009
67
Neumayer E. Are left-wing party strength and corporatism good for the environment? Evidence from panel analysis of air pollution in OECD countries. Ecological Economics 2003;45:203–20. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00012-0
68
Neumayer E. The environment, left-wing political orientation and ecological economics. Ecological Economics 2004;51:167–75. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.006
69
Miles, Edward L. Underdal, Arild.2002. One Question, Two Answers,. In: Environmental regime effectiveness: confronting theory with evidence. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2002.
70
Miles, Edward L. Underdal, Arild. 2002. ‘Conclusions’. In: Environmental regime effectiveness: confronting theory with evidence. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2002.
71
Frank Grundig. Patterns of International Cooperation and the Explanatory Power of Relative Gains: An Analysis of Cooperation on Global Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and International Trade. International Studies Quarterly 2006;50.http://www.jstor.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/stable/4092779
72
Young, Oran R., Osherenko, Gail. Polar politics: creating international environmental regimes. Ithaca: : Cornell University Press 1993.
73
Mitchell RB. International Environmental Aagreements: A Survey of Their Features, Formation, and Effects. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 2003;28:429–61. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105603
74
Young, Oran R. Governance in world affairs. Ithaca, N.Y.: : Cornell University Press 1999.
75
Hugh Ward. International Linkages and Environmental Sustainability: The Effectiveness of the Regime Network. Journal of Peace Research 2006;43.http://www.jstor.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/stable/27640283
76
Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate. http://muse.jhu.edu.chain.kent.ac.uk/journals/international_security/summary/v024/24.1.jervis.html
77
Rosenau, James N., Czempiel, Ernst - Otto. James Rosenau. 1992. Governance, Order, and Change in World Poltics. In: Governance without government: order and change in world politics. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1992.
78
Young, Oran R. Stokke, Olav: Regimes as Governance Systems. In: Global governance: drawing insights from the environmental experience. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 1997.
79
John J. Mearsheimer. The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security 1995;19.http://www.jstor.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/stable/2539078?&Search=yes&searchText=Promise&searchText=Institutions&searchText=International&searchText=False&list=hide&searchUri=%252Faction%252FdoBasicSearch%253FQuery%253DThe%252BFalse%252BPromise%252Bof%252BInternational%252BInstitutions%2526filter%253Djid%25253A10.2307%25252Fj100553%2526wc%253Don%2526fc%253Doff%2526globalSearch%253D%2526sbbBox%253D%2526sbjBox%253D%2526sbpBox%253D&prevSearch=&item=1&ttl=80&returnArticleService=showFullText
80
Young, Oran R. Chapter 5. In: The institutional dimensions of environmental change: fit, interplay, and scale. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2002.
81
Keohane, Robert O., Dawsonera. Power and governance in a partially globalized world. London: : Routledge 2002. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://sid.kent.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203218174
82
Haas, Peter M. Addressing the Global Governance Deficit. Global Environmental Politics 2004;4:1–15.http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=3&sid=1906aad6-fab1-428c-943f-625d0947d7af%2540sessionmgr4&hid=18&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%253d%253d#db=a9h&AN=14860199
83
Biermann, Frank, Bauer, Steffen. Biermann, Frank, 2005, ‘The Rationale for a World Environment Organisation’. In: A World Environment Organization: solution or threat for effective international environmental governance? Aldershot, Hants: : Ashgate 2005.
84
Biermann, Frank, Bauer, Steffen. ‘Neither Necessary, Nor Sufficient: Why Organisational Tinkering Will Not Improve Environmental Governance’. In: A World Environment Organization: solution or threat for effective international environmental governance? Aldershot, Hants: : Ashgate 2005.
85
Biermann, Frank, Bauer, Steffen. Von Moltke, Konrad, 2005, ‘Clustering International Environmental Agreements as an Alternative to a World Environment Organisation’. In: A World Environment Organization: solution or threat for effective international environmental governance? Aldershot, Hants: : Ashgate 2005.
86
Biermann, Frank, Bauer, Steffen. Oberthur, Sebastian and Thomas Gehring, 2005, ‘Reforming International Environmental Governance: an Institutional Perspective on Proposals for a World Environment Organisation’. In: A World Environment Organization: solution or threat for effective international environmental governance? Aldershot, Hants: : Ashgate 2005.
