1.
Bean, Richard, Royal Court Theatre: The heretic. Oberon Books, London (2011).
2.
Buffini, Moira: Greenland. Faber and Faber, London (2011).
3.
Sandler, Todd: Chapter 1. In: Global challenges: an approach to environmental, political, and economic problems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997).
4.
Sandler, Todd: Chapter 2. In: Global challenges: an approach to environmental, political, and economic problems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997).
5.
Keohane, Robert O., Nye, Joseph S.: Power and interdependence. Longman, New York (2001).
6.
Barrett, Scott: Chapter 6. In: Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005).
7.
Garrett Hardin: The Tragedy of the Commons. Science. 162, (1968).
8.
Barrett, Scott: Chapter 15.1-15-4of Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making. In: Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005).
9.
Luterbacher, Urs, Sprinz, Detlef F.: Bodansky, Daniel: The History of the Global Climate Change Regime. In: International relations and global climate change. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2001).
10.
Barrett, Scott: chapter 15.8-15.14. In: Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005).
11.
Jana von Stein: The International Law and Politics of Climate Change: Ratification of the United Nations Framework Convention and the Kyoto Protocol. The Journal of Conflict Resolution. 52, (2008).
12.
Underdal, A., Hovi, J., Kallbekken, S., Skodvin, T.: Can conditional commitments break the climate change negotiations deadlock? International Political Science Review. 33, 475–493 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512111432564.
13.
Luterbacher, Urs, Sprinz, Detlef F.: pp.221-244. In: International relations and global climate change. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2001).
14.
Hovi, Jon, Tora Skodvin, and Steinar Andresen. 2003. The Persistence of the Kyoto Protocol: Why Other Annex I Countries Move on Without the United States.
15.
Bang, G., Tjernshaugen, A., Andresen, S.: Future U.S. Climate Policy: International Re-engagement? International Studies Perspectives. 6, 285–303 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3577.2005.00207.x.
16.
Christoff, P.: The Bali roadmap: Climate change, COP 13 and beyond. Environmental Politics. 17, 466–472 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010802065807.
17.
Dessai, S.: Profile - Why did The Hague Climate Conference Fail? Environmental Politics. 10, 139–144 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/714000552.
18.
Jacoby, Henry D.: Kyoto’s Unfinished Business. Foreign Affairs. 77, 54–66 (1998).
19.
Grubb, Michael, Vrolijk, Christian, Brack, Duncan: The Kyoto protocol: a guide and assessment. Royal Institute of International Affairs/Earthscan, London (1998).
20.
Oberthür, Sebastian, Ott, Hermann: The Kyoto Protocol: international climate policy for the 21st century. Springer, Berlin (1999).
21.
Hovi, Jon, Stokke, Olav Schram, Ulfstein, Geir, Dawsonera: Implementing the climate regime: international compliance. Earthscan, London (2005).
22.
Aldy, Joseph E., Stavins, R. N.: Architectures for agreement: addressing global climate change in the post-Kyoto world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007).
23.
Barrett, Scott: chapters 7, 11, 13. In: Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005).
24.
Frank Grundig: Patterns of International Cooperation and the Explanatory Power of Relative Gains: An Analysis of Cooperation on Global Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and International Trade. International Studies Quarterly. 50, (2006).
25.
HOVI, J., FROYN, C.B., BANG, G.: Enforcing the Kyoto Protocol: can punitive consequences restore compliance? Review of International Studies. 33, (2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210507007590.
26.
Barrett, Scott: Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005).
27.
Nordhaus, William D.: Chapters 1 and 9. In: A question of balance: weighing the options on global warming policies. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT (2008).
28.
Review by: Martin L. Weitzman: A Review of ‘The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change’. Journal of Economic Literature. 45, (2007).
29.
Neumayer, E.: Global warming: discounting is not the issue, but substitutability is. Energy Policy. 27, 33–43 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(98)00063-9.
30.
Luterbacher, Urs, Sprinz, Detlef F.: Matthew Paterson: Principles of Justice in the Context in Global Climate Changeof International relations and global climate change. In: International relations and global climate change. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2001).
31.
Lomborg, Bjørn: Cline, William, 2004. Climate change. In: Global crises, global solutions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004).
32.
Lomborg, Bjørn: Mendelsohn, Robert, 2004. Perspective Paper 1.1. In: Global crises, global solutions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004).
33.
Caney, S.: Human rights, climate change, and discounting. Environmental Politics. 17, 536–555 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010802193401.
34.
Neumayer, E.: In defence of historical accountability for greenhouse gas emissions. Ecological Economics. 33, 185–192 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00135-X.
35.
Barkin, J. Samuel: Discounting the Discount Rate: Ecocentrism and Environmental Economics. Global Environmental Politics. 6, 56–72 (2006).
36.
Schultz, P.A., Kasting, J.F.: Optimal reductions in CO2 emissions. Energy Policy. 25, 491–500 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(97)00027-X.
37.
Tol, R.S.J.: The damage costs of climate change: a note on tangibles and intangibles, applied to DICE. Energy Policy. 22, 436–438 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(94)90173-2.
38.
Azar, C.: Azar, Christian. 1998. Are Optimal CO2 emissions really optimal? Environmental and Resource Economics. 11, 301–315 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008235326513.
39.
Lind, R.C.: Intergenerational equity, discounting, and the role of cost-benefit analysis in evaluating global climate policy. Energy Policy. 23, 379–389 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(95)90162-Z.
40.
Miles, Edward L.: Underdal, Arild.2002. One Question, Two Answers. In: Environmental regime effectiveness: confronting theory with evidence. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2002).
41.
Hovi, Jon, Detlef F. Sprinz, and Arild Underdal. 2003. The Oslo-Potsdam Solution to Measuring Regime Effectiveness: Critique, Response, and the Road Ahead.
42.
Frank Grundig: Patterns of International Cooperation and the Explanatory Power of Relative Gains: An Analysis of Cooperation on Global Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and International Trade. International Studies Quarterly. 50, (2006).
43.
Young, O.R.: Inferences and Indices: Evaluating the Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes. Global Environmental Politics. 1, 99–121 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1162/152638001570651.
44.
Helm, C., Sprinz, D.: Measuring the Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 44, 630–652 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002700044005004.
45.
Young, Oran R.: Determining Regime Effectiveness: A Commentary on the Oslo-Potsdam Solution. Global Environmental Politics. 3, 97–104 (2003).
46.
Downs, George W.: Constructing effective environmental regimes. Annual Review of Political Science. 3, (2000).
47.
Mitchell, Ronald B.: International politics and the environment. SAGE, London (2010).
48.
Hasenclever, Andreas, Mayer, Peter, Rittberger, Volker: chapter 3,4. In: Theories of international regimes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997).
49.
Oran R. Young: Political Leadership and Regime Formation: On the Development of Institutions in International Society. International Organization. 45, (1991).
50.
Miles, Edward L.: Underdal, Arild.2002. One Question, Two Answers. In: Environmental regime effectiveness: confronting theory with evidence. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2002).
51.
Frank Grundig: Patterns of International Cooperation and the Explanatory Power of Relative Gains: An Analysis of Cooperation on Global Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and International Trade. International Studies Quarterly. 50, (2006).
52.
Ward, Hugh: Game theory and the politics of global warming: The state of play and beyond. Political Studies. 44, 850–871.
53.
Luterbacher, Urs, Sprinz, Detlef F.: Rowlands, Ian. 2001. Classical Theories of International Relations. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2001).
54.
Seaver, B.M.: Stratospheric ozone protection: IR theory and the montreal protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer. Environmental Politics. 6, 31–67 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1080/09644019708414341.
55.
Luterbacher, Urs, Sprinz, Detlef F.: Grundig, Frank Hugh Ward and Ethan Zorick. 2001. Formal Approaches to Global Climate Negotiations. In: International relations and global climate change. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2001).
56.
Barrett, Scott: Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005).
57.
Stokke, O.S.: Qualitative comparative analysis, shaming, and international regime effectiveness. Journal of Business Research. 60, 501–511 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.003.
58.
Newell, P., Paterson, M.: A climate for business: global warming, the state and capital. Review of International Political Economy. 5, 679–703 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1080/096922998347426.
59.
Robert D. Putnam: Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization. 42, (1988).
60.
Detlef Sprinz and Tapani Vaahtoranta: The Interest-Based Explanation of International Environmental Policy. International Organization. 48, (1994).
61.
Hovi, Jon: Implementing Long-Term Climate Policy: Time Inconsistency, Domestic Politics, International Anarchy. Global Environmental Politics. 9, 20–39 (2009).
62.
Mueller, Dennis C.: Public choice III. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003).
63.
Falkner, Robert: Business power and conflict in international environmental politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2008).
64.
Bryner, G.: Failure and opportunity: environmental groups in US climate change policy. Environmental Politics. 17, 319–336 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010801936255.
65.
Lisowski, M.: Playing the Two-level Game: Us President Bush’s Decision to Repudiate the Kyoto Protocol. Environmental Politics. 11, 101–119 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/714000641.
66.
Binder, S., Neumayer, E.: Environmental pressure group strength and air pollution: An empirical analysis. Ecological Economics. 55, 527–538 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.009.
67.
Neumayer, E.: Are left-wing party strength and corporatism good for the environment? Evidence from panel analysis of air pollution in OECD countries. Ecological Economics. 45, 203–220 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00012-0.
68.
Neumayer, E.: The environment, left-wing political orientation and ecological economics. Ecological Economics. 51, 167–175 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.006.
69.
Miles, Edward L.: Underdal, Arild.2002. One Question, Two Answers,. In: Environmental regime effectiveness: confronting theory with evidence. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2002).
70.
Miles, Edward L.: Underdal, Arild. 2002. ‘Conclusions’. In: Environmental regime effectiveness: confronting theory with evidence. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2002).
71.
Frank Grundig: Patterns of International Cooperation and the Explanatory Power of Relative Gains: An Analysis of Cooperation on Global Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and International Trade. International Studies Quarterly. 50, (2006).
72.
Young, Oran R., Osherenko, Gail: Polar politics: creating international environmental regimes. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1993).
73.
Mitchell, R.B.: International Environmental Aagreements: A Survey of Their Features, Formation, and Effects. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 28, 429–461 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105603.
74.
Young, Oran R.: Governance in world affairs. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y. (1999).
75.
Hugh Ward: International Linkages and Environmental Sustainability: The Effectiveness of the Regime Network. Journal of Peace Research. 43, (2006).
76.
Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate.
77.
Rosenau, James N., Czempiel, Ernst - Otto: James Rosenau. 1992. Governance, Order, and Change in World Poltics. In: Governance without government: order and change in world politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992).
78.
Young, Oran R.: Stokke, Olav: Regimes as Governance Systems. In: Global governance: drawing insights from the environmental experience. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (1997).
79.
John J. Mearsheimer: The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security. 19, (1995).
80.
Young, Oran R.: Chapter 5. In: The institutional dimensions of environmental change: fit, interplay, and scale. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2002).
81.
Keohane, Robert O., Dawsonera: Power and governance in a partially globalized world. Routledge, London (2002).
82.
Haas, Peter M.: Addressing the Global Governance Deficit. Global Environmental Politics. 4, 1–15 (2004).
83.
Biermann, Frank, Bauer, Steffen: Biermann, Frank, 2005, ‘The Rationale for a World Environment Organisation’. In: A World Environment Organization: solution or threat for effective international environmental governance? Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants (2005).
84.
Biermann, Frank, Bauer, Steffen: ‘Neither Necessary, Nor Sufficient: Why Organisational Tinkering Will Not Improve Environmental Governance’. In: A World Environment Organization: solution or threat for effective international environmental governance? Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants (2005).
85.
Biermann, Frank, Bauer, Steffen: Von Moltke, Konrad, 2005, ‘Clustering International Environmental Agreements as an Alternative to a World Environment Organisation’. In: A World Environment Organization: solution or threat for effective international environmental governance? Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants (2005).
86.
Biermann, Frank, Bauer, Steffen: Oberthur, Sebastian and Thomas Gehring, 2005, ‘Reforming International Environmental Governance: an Institutional Perspective on Proposals for a World Environment Organisation’. In: A World Environment Organization: solution or threat for effective international environmental governance? Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants (2005).
