[1]
Aldy, Joseph E. and Stavins, R. N. 2007. Architectures for agreement: addressing global climate change in the post-Kyoto world. Cambridge University Press.
[2]
Azar, C. 1998. Azar, Christian. 1998. Are Optimal CO2 emissions really optimal? Environmental and Resource Economics. 11, 3/4 (1998), 301–315. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008235326513.
[3]
Bang, G. et al. 2005. Future U.S. Climate Policy: International Re-engagement? International Studies Perspectives. 6, 2 (May 2005), 285–303. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3577.2005.00207.x.
[4]
Barkin, J. Samuel 2006. Discounting the Discount Rate: Ecocentrism and Environmental Economics. Global Environmental Politics. 6, 4 (2006), 56–72.
[5]
Barrett, Scott 2005. Chapter 6. Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford University Press.
[6]
Barrett, Scott 2005. Chapter 15.1-15-4of Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making. Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford University Press.
[7]
Barrett, Scott 2005. chapter 15.8-15.14. Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford University Press.
[8]
Barrett, Scott 2005. chapters 7, 11, 13. Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford University Press.
[9]
Barrett, Scott 2005. Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford University Press.
[10]
Barrett, Scott 2005. Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford University Press.
[11]
Bean, Richard and Royal Court Theatre 2011. The heretic. Oberon Books.
[12]
Biermann, Frank and Bauer, Steffen 2005. Biermann, Frank, 2005, ‘The Rationale for a World Environment Organisation’. A World Environment Organization: solution or threat for effective international environmental governance?. Ashgate.
[13]
Biermann, Frank and Bauer, Steffen 2005. ‘Neither Necessary, Nor Sufficient: Why Organisational Tinkering Will Not Improve Environmental Governance’. A World Environment Organization: solution or threat for effective international environmental governance?. Ashgate.
[14]
Biermann, Frank and Bauer, Steffen 2005. Oberthur, Sebastian and Thomas Gehring, 2005, ‘Reforming International Environmental Governance: an Institutional Perspective on Proposals for a World Environment Organisation’. A World Environment Organization: solution or threat for effective international environmental governance?. Ashgate.
[15]
Biermann, Frank and Bauer, Steffen 2005. Von Moltke, Konrad, 2005, ‘Clustering International Environmental Agreements as an Alternative to a World Environment Organisation’. A World Environment Organization: solution or threat for effective international environmental governance?. Ashgate.
[16]
Binder, S. and Neumayer, E. 2005. Environmental pressure group strength and air pollution: An empirical analysis. Ecological Economics. 55, 4 (Dec. 2005), 527–538. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.009.
[17]
Bryner, G. 2008. Failure and opportunity: environmental groups in US climate change policy. Environmental Politics. 17, 2 (Apr. 2008), 319–336. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010801936255.
[18]
Buffini, Moira 2011. Greenland. Faber and Faber.
[19]
Caney, S. 2008. Human rights, climate change, and discounting. Environmental Politics. 17, 4 (Aug. 2008), 536–555. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010802193401.
[20]
Christoff, P. 2008. The Bali roadmap: Climate change, COP 13 and beyond. Environmental Politics. 17, 3 (Jun. 2008), 466–472. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010802065807.
[21]
Dessai, S. 2001. Profile - Why did The Hague Climate Conference Fail? Environmental Politics. 10, 3 (Sep. 2001), 139–144. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/714000552.
[22]
Detlef Sprinz and Tapani Vaahtoranta 1994. The Interest-Based Explanation of International Environmental Policy. International Organization. 48, 1 (1994).
[23]
Downs, George W. 2000. Constructing effective environmental regimes. Annual Review of Political Science. 3, 1 (2000).
[24]
Falkner, Robert 2008. Business power and conflict in international environmental politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
[25]
Frank Grundig 2006. Patterns of International Cooperation and the Explanatory Power of Relative Gains: An Analysis of Cooperation on Global Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and International Trade. International Studies Quarterly. 50, 4 (2006).
[26]
Frank Grundig 2006. Patterns of International Cooperation and the Explanatory Power of Relative Gains: An Analysis of Cooperation on Global Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and International Trade. International Studies Quarterly. 50, 4 (2006).
[27]
Frank Grundig 2006. Patterns of International Cooperation and the Explanatory Power of Relative Gains: An Analysis of Cooperation on Global Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and International Trade. International Studies Quarterly. 50, 4 (2006).
[28]
Frank Grundig 2006. Patterns of International Cooperation and the Explanatory Power of Relative Gains: An Analysis of Cooperation on Global Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and International Trade. International Studies Quarterly. 50, 4 (2006).
[29]
Garrett Hardin 1968. The Tragedy of the Commons. Science. 162, 3859 (1968).
[30]
Grubb, Michael et al. 1998. The Kyoto protocol: a guide and assessment. Royal Institute of International Affairs/Earthscan.
[31]
Haas, Peter M. 2004. Addressing the Global Governance Deficit. Global Environmental Politics. 4, 4 (2004), 1–15.
[32]
Hasenclever, Andreas et al. 1997. chapter 3,4. Theories of international regimes. Cambridge University Press.
[33]
Helm, C. and Sprinz, D. 2000. Measuring the Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 44, 5 (Oct. 2000), 630–652. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002700044005004.
[34]
HOVI, J. et al. 2007. Enforcing the Kyoto Protocol: can punitive consequences restore compliance? Review of International Studies. 33, 03 (Jul. 2007). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210507007590.
[35]
Hovi, Jon 2009. Implementing Long-Term Climate Policy: Time Inconsistency, Domestic Politics, International Anarchy. Global Environmental Politics. 9, 3 (2009), 20–39.
[36]
Hovi, Jon et al. 2005. Implementing the climate regime: international compliance. Earthscan.
[37]
Hugh Ward 2006. International Linkages and Environmental Sustainability: The Effectiveness of the Regime Network. Journal of Peace Research. 43, 2 (2006).
[38]
Jacoby, Henry D. 1998. Kyoto’s Unfinished Business. Foreign Affairs. 77, 4 (1998), 54–66.
[39]
Jana von Stein 2008. The International Law and Politics of Climate Change: Ratification of the United Nations Framework Convention and the Kyoto Protocol. The Journal of Conflict Resolution. 52, 2 (2008).
[40]
John J. Mearsheimer 1995. The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security. 19, 3 (1995).
[41]
Keohane, Robert O. and Dawsonera 2002. Power and governance in a partially globalized world. Routledge.
[42]
Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S. 2001. Power and interdependence. Longman.
[43]
Lind, R.C. 1995. Intergenerational equity, discounting, and the role of cost-benefit analysis in evaluating global climate policy. Energy Policy. 23, 4–5 (Apr. 1995), 379–389. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(95)90162-Z.
[44]
Lisowski, M. 2002. Playing the Two-level Game: Us President Bush’s Decision to Repudiate the Kyoto Protocol. Environmental Politics. 11, 4 (Dec. 2002), 101–119. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/714000641.
[45]
Lomborg, Bjørn 2004. Cline, William, 2004. Climate change. Global crises, global solutions. Cambridge University Press.
[46]
Lomborg, Bjørn 2004. Mendelsohn, Robert, 2004. Perspective Paper 1.1. Global crises, global solutions. Cambridge University Press.
[47]
Luterbacher, Urs and Sprinz, Detlef F. 2001. Bodansky, Daniel: The History of the Global Climate Change Regime. International relations and global climate change. MIT Press.
[48]
Luterbacher, Urs and Sprinz, Detlef F. 2001. Grundig, Frank Hugh Ward and Ethan Zorick. 2001. Formal Approaches to Global Climate Negotiations. International relations and global climate change. MIT Press.
[49]
Luterbacher, Urs and Sprinz, Detlef F. 2001. Matthew Paterson: Principles of Justice in the Context in Global Climate Changeof International relations and global climate change. International relations and global climate change. MIT Press.
[50]
Luterbacher, Urs and Sprinz, Detlef F. 2001. pp.221-244. International relations and global climate change. MIT Press.
[51]
Luterbacher, Urs and Sprinz, Detlef F. 2001. Rowlands, Ian. 2001. Classical Theories of International Relations. MIT Press.
[52]
Miles, Edward L. 2002. Underdal, Arild. 2002. ‘Conclusions’. Environmental regime effectiveness: confronting theory with evidence. MIT Press.
[53]
Miles, Edward L. 2002. Underdal, Arild.2002. One Question, Two Answers. Environmental regime effectiveness: confronting theory with evidence. MIT Press.
[54]
Miles, Edward L. 2002. Underdal, Arild.2002. One Question, Two Answers. Environmental regime effectiveness: confronting theory with evidence. MIT Press.
[55]
Miles, Edward L. 2002. Underdal, Arild.2002. One Question, Two Answers,. Environmental regime effectiveness: confronting theory with evidence. MIT Press.
[56]
Mitchell, R.B. 2003. International Environmental Aagreements: A Survey of Their Features, Formation, and Effects. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 28, 1 (2003), 429–461. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105603.
[57]
Mitchell, Ronald B. 2010. International politics and the environment. SAGE.
[58]
Mueller, Dennis C. 2003. Public choice III. Cambridge University Press.
[59]
Neumayer, E. 2003. Are left-wing party strength and corporatism good for the environment? Evidence from panel analysis of air pollution in OECD countries. Ecological Economics. 45, 2 (Jun. 2003), 203–220. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00012-0.
[60]
Neumayer, E. 1999. Global warming: discounting is not the issue, but substitutability is. Energy Policy. 27, 1 (Jan. 1999), 33–43. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(98)00063-9.
[61]
Neumayer, E. 2000. In defence of historical accountability for greenhouse gas emissions. Ecological Economics. 33, 2 (May 2000), 185–192. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00135-X.
[62]
Neumayer, E. 2004. The environment, left-wing political orientation and ecological economics. Ecological Economics. 51, 3–4 (Dec. 2004), 167–175. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.006.
[63]
Newell, P. and Paterson, M. 1998. A climate for business: global warming, the state and capital. Review of International Political Economy. 5, 4 (Jan. 1998), 679–703. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/096922998347426.
[64]
Nordhaus, William D. 2008. Chapters 1 and 9. A question of balance: weighing the options on global warming policies. Yale University Press.
[65]
Oberthür, Sebastian and Ott, Hermann 1999. The Kyoto Protocol: international climate policy for the 21st century. Springer.
[66]
Oran R. Young 1991. Political Leadership and Regime Formation: On the Development of Institutions in International Society. International Organization. 45, 3 (1991).
[67]
Review by: Martin L. Weitzman 2007. A Review of ‘The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change’. Journal of Economic Literature. 45, 3 (2007).
[68]
Robert D. Putnam 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization. 42, 3 (1988).
[69]
Rosenau, James N. and Czempiel, Ernst - Otto 1992. James Rosenau. 1992. Governance, Order, and Change in World Poltics. Governance without government: order and change in world politics. Cambridge University Press.
[70]
Sandler, Todd 1997. Chapter 1. Global challenges: an approach to environmental, political, and economic problems. Cambridge University Press.
[71]
Sandler, Todd 1997. Chapter 2. Global challenges: an approach to environmental, political, and economic problems. Cambridge University Press.
[72]
Schultz, P.A. and Kasting, J.F. 1997. Optimal reductions in CO2 emissions. Energy Policy. 25, 5 (Apr. 1997), 491–500. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(97)00027-X.
[73]
Seaver, B.M. 1997. Stratospheric ozone protection: IR theory and the montreal protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer. Environmental Politics. 6, 3 (Sep. 1997), 31–67. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09644019708414341.
[74]
Stokke, O.S. 2007. Qualitative comparative analysis, shaming, and international regime effectiveness. Journal of Business Research. 60, 5 (May 2007), 501–511. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.003.
[75]
Tol, R.S.J. 1994. The damage costs of climate change: a note on tangibles and intangibles, applied to DICE. Energy Policy. 22, 5 (May 1994), 436–438. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(94)90173-2.
[76]
Underdal, A. et al. 2012. Can conditional commitments break the climate change negotiations deadlock? International Political Science Review. 33, 4 (Apr. 2012), 475–493. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512111432564.
[77]
Ward, Hugh Game theory and the politics of global warming: The state of play and beyond. Political Studies. 44, 5, 850–871.
[78]
Young, O.R. 2001. Inferences and Indices: Evaluating the Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes. Global Environmental Politics. 1, 1 (Feb. 2001), 99–121. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1162/152638001570651.
[79]
Young, Oran R. 2002. Chapter 5. The institutional dimensions of environmental change: fit, interplay, and scale. MIT Press.
[80]
Young, Oran R. 2003. Determining Regime Effectiveness: A Commentary on the Oslo-Potsdam Solution. Global Environmental Politics. 3, 3 (2003), 97–104.
[81]
Young, Oran R. 1999. Governance in world affairs. Cornell University Press.
[82]
Young, Oran R. 1997. Stokke, Olav: Regimes as Governance Systems. Global governance: drawing insights from the environmental experience. MIT Press.
[83]
Young, Oran R. and Osherenko, Gail 1993. Polar politics: creating international environmental regimes. Cornell University Press.
[84]
Hovi, Jon, Detlef F. Sprinz, and Arild Underdal. 2003. The Oslo-Potsdam Solution to Measuring Regime Effectiveness: Critique, Response, and the Road Ahead.
[85]
Hovi, Jon, Tora Skodvin, and Steinar Andresen. 2003. The Persistence of the Kyoto Protocol: Why Other Annex I Countries Move on Without the United States.
[86]
Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate.