1.
Worthington S. Equity [Internet]. Second edition. Vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1573075
2.
Worthington S. Equity. 2nd ed. Vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
3.
Moffat G, Bean GMD, Probert R, Moffat G, Dawsonera. Trusts law: text and materials [Internet]. Fifth edition. Vol. The law in context series. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2009. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9780511631306
4.
Moffat G, Garton J, Bean GMD, Probert R. Moffat’s trusts law: text and materials. Sixth edition. Vol. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015.
5.
Hudson A. Understanding Equity & Trusts [Internet]. 5th ed. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis; 2015. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1766936
6.
Hudson A. Understanding equity & trusts. Fifth edition. London: Routledge; 2015.
7.
Carpi D. The concept of equity: an interdisciplinary assessment [Internet]. Vol. Anglistische Forschungen. Heidelberg: Winter; 2007. Available from: http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/fy0711/2007425657.html
8.
Degeling S, Edelman J. Equity in commercial law. Sydney, N.S.W.: Lawbook Co; 2005.
9.
Fortier M. The culture of equity in early modern England [Internet]. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2005. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=429722
10.
Halliwell M. Equity and good conscience. Second edition. London: Old Bailey Press; 2004.
11.
Klinck DR. Conscience, equity and the Court of Chancery in early modern England. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate; 2010.
12.
Maitland FW, Chaytor AH, Whittaker WJ. Equity, also the forms of action at common law: two courses of lectures [Internet]. Cambridge [Eng.]: University Press; 1929. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=beal/efa&collection=beal
13.
Maitland FW. Equity, also the forms of action at common law - two courses of lectures. Miami, FL: HardPress Publishing; 2013.
14.
Mitchell C. Constructive and resulting trusts. Oxford: Hart; 2010.
15.
Mitchell C, Mitchell P. Landmark cases in equity. Oxford: Hart; 2012.
16.
Frankel T. Fiduciary law. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.
17.
Stebbings C, Dawsonera. The private trustee in Victorian England [Internet]. Vol. Cambridge studies in English legal history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9780511303760
18.
Stebbings C. The Private Trustee in Victorian England [Internet]. Vol. Cambridge Studies in English Legal History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495458
19.
Waddams S. Dimensions of Private Law: Categories and Concepts in Anglo-American Legal Reasoning [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495564
20.
Watt G. Equity stirring: the story of justice beyond law [Internet]. Oxford: Hart; 2009. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9781847315243
21.
Bryan M, Vann VJ. Equity and trusts in Australia. Port Melbourne, Vic: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
22.
Waters DWM, Gillen MR, Smith LD. Waters’ law of trusts in Canada. 4th ed. Toronto: Carswell; 2012.
23.
Butler AS, Clarke T. Equity and trusts in New Zealand. 2nd ed. 2009. Wellington [N.Z.]: Thomson Reuters; 2009.
24.
Smith L, editor. The Worlds of the Trust [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139505994
25.
Smith L, Smith L. The worlds of the trust [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.kentuk.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1303692
26.
Worthington S. Equity [Internet]. Second edition. Vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1573075
27.
Maitland FW, Chaytor AH, Whittaker WJ. Equity, also the forms of action at common law: two courses of lectures [Internet]. Cambridge [Eng.]: University Press; 1929. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=beal/efa&collection=beal
28.
Degeling S, Edelman J. Equity in commercial law. Sydney, N.S.W.: Lawbook Co; 2005.
29.
Drakopoulou, Maria. Equity, Conscience and the Art of Judgment as lus Aequi et Boni. Law Text Culture [Internet]. 2000;5. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lwtexcu5&id=355&collection=journals&index=
30.
Endicott, Timothy A. O. Conscience of the King: Christopher St. German and Thomas More and the Development of English Equity, The. University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review [Internet]. 1989;47. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/utflr47&id=557&collection=journals&index=
31.
Mark Fortier. Equity and Ideas: Coke, Ellesmere, and James I. Renaissance Quarterly [Internet]. 1998;51(4):1255–81. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/stable/2901967
32.
Halliwell M. Equity and good conscience. Second edition. London: Old Bailey Press; 2004.
33.
Hudson A. Understanding equity and trusts [Internet]. 5th edition. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2015. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1766936
34.
Mitchell C, Mitchell P. Landmark cases in equity. Oxford: Hart; 2012.
35.
Klinck DR. Conscience, equity and the Court of Chancery in early modern England. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate; 2010.
36.
Macnair M. Equity and Conscience. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2007 Jan 1;27(4):659–81.
37.
Saint German C. Doctor and student: 1531. Menston: Scolar Press; 1970.
38.
Waddams S. Dimensions of Private Law: Categories and Concepts in Anglo-American Legal Reasoning [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495564
39.
Watt G. Equity stirring: the story of justice beyond law [Internet]. Oxford: Hart; 2009. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9781847315243
40.
Worthington S. Equity [Internet]. Second edition. Vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1573075
41.
Worthington S. Equity. 2nd ed. Vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
42.
Hudson A. Understanding equity and trusts [Internet]. 5th edition. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2015. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1766936
43.
Moffat G, Garton J, Bean GMD, Probert R. Moffat’s trusts law: text and materials. Sixth edition. Vol. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015.
44.
Capper, David. Worldwide Mareva Injunctions. Modern Law Review [Internet]. 1991;54. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/modlr54&id=347&collection=journals&index=journals/modlr
45.
Piller Problems. Law quarterly review. 1990;106.
46.
Moffat G, Bean GMD, Probert R, Dawsonera. Trusts law: text and materials. Fifth edition. Vol. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
47.
The Anglo-American Perspective on Freezing Injunctions. Civil justice quarterly. 2010;29(3).
48.
Anton Piller Orders Revisited. Journal of business law. 2000;387.
49.
Worthington S. Equity. 2nd ed. Vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
50.
Worthington S. Equity. 2nd ed. Vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
51.
Mason A. Impact of Equitable Doctrine on the Law of Contract. Anglo-American law review. 1997;27(1):1–16.
52.
Sarmas, Lisa. Story Telling and the Law: A Case Study of Louth v. Diprose. Melbourne University Law Review [Internet]. 1993;19. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/mulr19&id=727&collection=journals&index=
53.
Bryan M, Vann VJ. Equity and trusts in Australia. Port Melbourne, Vic: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
54.
Bamforth N. Unconscionability as a Vitiating Factor. Lloyd’s maritime and commercial law quarterly. 1995;
55.
Bigwood R. Undue influence: ‘impaired consent’ or ‘wicked exploitation’? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 1996 Sep 1;16(3):503–16.
56.
Beatson J, Friedmann D. Good faith and fault in contract law [Internet]. Oxford: Clarendon; 1997. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198265788.001.0001
57.
Capper D. The Unconscionable Bargain in the Common Law World. Law quarterly review. 2010;126.
58.
Devenney J, Chandler A. Unconscionability and the Taxonomy of Undue Influence. Journal of business law. 2007;541.
59.
Etherton T. The Role of Equity in Mistaken Transactions. Trust law international [Internet]. 2013;27(4). Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978978742691&rft.object_portfolio_id=
60.
Heerey, Peter. Truth, Lies and Stereotype: Stories of Mary and Louis. Newcastle Law Review [Internet]. 1995;1. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/nwclr1&id=291&collection=journals&index=journals/nwclr
61.
Lobban, Michael. Contractual Fraud in Law and Equity, c1750-c1850. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies [Internet]. 1997;17. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/oxfjls17&id=455&collection=journals&index=
62.
Mitchell C, Mitchell P. Landmark cases in equity. Oxford: Hart; 2012.
63.
Sarmas, Lisa. Response to Justice Peter Heerey, A. Newcastle Law Review [Internet]. 1998;3. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/nwclr3&id=88&collection=journals&index=
64.
Stone, Elizabeth. Infants, Lunatics and Married Women: Equitable Protection in Garcia v. National Australia Bank. Modern Law Review [Internet]. 1999;62. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/modlr62&id=618&collection=journals&index=
65.
Waddams S. Equity in English Contract Law: the Impact of the Judicature Acts (1873–75). The Journal of Legal History. 2012 Aug;33(2):185–208.
66.
Worthington S. Equity. 2nd ed. Vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
67.
Worthington S. Equity. 2nd ed. Vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
68.
Stuffing of Minerva’s Owl - Taxonomy and Taxidermy in Equity, The. Cambridge Law Journal [Internet]. 2009;68. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/camblj68&id=543&collection=journals&index=journals/camblj
69.
Mason A. The Impact of Equitable Doctrine on the Law of Contract’. Anglo-American law review. 1998;27(1):18–28.
70.
Bryan M, Vann VJ, Barkehall Thomas S. Equity and trusts in Australia. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017.
71.
Hudson A. Understanding equity & trusts [Internet]. 6th ed. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2017. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315649627
72.
Gardner S. The Remedial Discretion in Proprietary Estoppel – Again’. Law quarterly review [Internet]. 2006;122. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=
73.
Dixon M. Confining and defining proprietary estoppel: the role of unconscionability. Legal Studies. 2010 Jun 7;no-no.
74.
McFarlane B, Robertson A. The Death of Proprietary Estoppel. Lloyd’s maritime and commercial law quarterly. 2008;449.
75.
McFarlane B, Robertson A. Apocalypse Averted: Proprietary Estoppel in the House of Lords. Law quarterly review [Internet]. 2009;125. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
76.
Proprietary Estoppel and Inheritance: Enough is Enough? The Conveyancer and property lawyer [Internet]. 2013;280. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978977277488&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
77.
Mitchell C, Mitchell P. Landmark cases in equity. Oxford: Hart; 2012.
78.
Robertson A. The Reliance Basis of Proprietary Estoppel Remedies. The Conveyancer and property lawyer [Internet]. 2008;295. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978977277488&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
79.
Waddams S. Dimensions of Private Law: Categories and Concepts in Anglo-American Legal Reasoning [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495564
80.
Worthington S. Equity [Internet]. Second edition. Vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1573075
81.
Cotterrell, Roger. Power, Property and the Law of Trusts: A Partial Agenda for Critical Legal Scholarship. Journal of Law and Society [Internet]. 1987;14. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jlsocty14&id=87&collection=journals&index=
82.
Hudson A. Understanding equity and trusts [Internet]. 5th edition. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2015. Available from: http://kentuk.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1766936
83.
Synge M. Independent Schools Council v Charity Commission for England and Wales [2011] UKUT 421 (TCC). The Modern Law Review. 2012 Jul;75(4):624–39.
84.
Alexander, Gregory S. Transformation of Trusts as a Legal Category, 1800-1914, The. Law and History Review [Internet]. 1987;5. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lawhst5&id=311&collection=journals&index=
85.
Hudson A. Understanding equity & trusts [Internet]. 6th ed. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2017. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315649627
86.
Moffat G, Garton J, Bean GMD, Probert R. Moffat’s trusts law: text and materials. Sixth edition. Vol. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015.
87.
Walton C. McGovern v Attorney General: Constraints on Judicial Assessment of Charitable Benefit’. The Conveyancer and property lawyer [Internet]. 2014;317. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978977277488&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
88.
Rubin GR, Sugarman D. Law, economy and society 1750-1914: essays in the history of English law. Abingdon: Professional Books; 1984.
89.
Cotterrell R. Trusting in Law: Legal and Moral Concepts of Trust. Current Legal Problems. 1993 Jan 1;46(Part 2):75–95.
90.
Mitchell C, Mitchell P. Landmark cases in equity. Oxford: Hart; 2012.
91.
Hackney J. Charities and Public Benefit. Law quarterly review [Internet]. 2008;124. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
92.
Jaconelli J. Adjudicating on Charitable Status a Reconsideration of the Elements. The Conveyancer and property lawyer [Internet]. 2013;96. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978977277488&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
93.
Langbein, John H. Secret Life of the Trust: The Trust as an Instrument of Commerce, The. Yale Law Journal [Internet]. 1997;107. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ylr107&id=199&collection=journals&index=journals/ylr
94.
Morris D. Charities and the Big Society: a doomed coalition? Legal Studies. 2012 Mar;32(1):132–53.
95.
Degeling S, Edelman J. Equity in commercial law. Sydney, N.S.W.: Lawbook Co; 2005.
96.
Charitable purposes and public benefit - GOV.UK [Internet]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/charitable-purposes-and-public-benefit
97.
Speaking out: guidance on campaigning and political activity by charities (CC9) - Publications - GOV.UK [Internet]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/speaking-out-guidance-on-campaigning-and-political-activity-by-charities-cc9
98.
Worthington S. Equity [Internet]. Second edition. Vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1573075
99.
Millett PJ. Equity’s Place in the Law of Commerce. Law quarterly review [Internet]. 1998;114. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=
100.
Mitchell C. Stewardship of Property and Liability to Account. The Conveyancer and property lawyer [Internet]. 2014;215. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978977277488&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
101.
Moffat G, Bean GMD, Probert R, Dawsonera. Trusts law: text and materials. Fifth edition. Vol. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
102.
Hudson A. Understanding equity and trusts [Internet]. 5th edition. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2015. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1766936
103.
Capper D. Compensation for Breach of Trust. The Conveyancer and property lawyer [Internet]. 1997;14. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978977277488&rft.object_portfolio_id=
104.
Cotterrell R. Trusting in Law: Legal and Moral Concepts of Trust. Current Legal Problems. 1993 Jan 1;46(Part 2):75–95.
105.
Edelman J, Elliott S. Money Remedies Against Trustees. Trust law international [Internet]. 2004;18(3). Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978978742691&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
106.
Elliott SB. Remoteness Criteria in Equity. Modern Law Review. 2002 Jul;65(4):588–97.
107.
Getzler J. Fiduciary Investment in the Shadow of Financial Crisis: Was Lord Eldon Right? Journal of equity [Internet]. 2009;3. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=3350000000000729&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
108.
Glister J, Ridge P. Fault lines in equity [Internet]. Vol. Hart studies in private law. Oxford: Hart; 2012. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1043991
109.
Stebbings C. The Private Trustee in Victorian England [Internet]. Vol. Cambridge Studies in English Legal History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495458
110.
Stebbings C, Dawsonera. The private trustee in Victorian England [Internet]. Vol. Cambridge studies in English legal history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9780511303760
111.
Thornton, Rosy. Ethical Investments: A Case of Disjointed Thinking. Cambridge Law Journal [Internet]. 2008;67. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/camblj67&id=400&collection=journals&index=journals/camblj
112.
Great Britain, Scottish Law Commission. Trustees’ powers and duties. Vol. SCOT LAW COM. London: Stationery Office; 1999.
113.
Great Britain. Trustee exemption clauses. Vol. Command Papers. Cm. London: TSO; 2006.
114.
Great Britain. Capital and income in trusts: classification and apportionment. Vol. LAW COM. / The Law Commission. London: TSO; 2009.
115.
Social Investment by Charities: the Law Commission’s Recommendations [Internet]. Available from: http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/docs/cp216_charities_social_investment_recommendations.pdf
116.
Worthington S. Equity [Internet]. Second edition. Vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1573075
117.
Hayton D. Proprietary Liability for Secret Profits’. Law quarterly review [Internet]. 2011;127. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
118.
Goode R. Proprietary Liability for Secret Profits – a Reply. Law quarterly review [Internet]. 2011;127. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
119.
Millet PJ. Moffat, Trusts Law. Law quarterly review [Internet]. 1998;114. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
120.
Hudson A. Understanding equity and trusts [Internet]. 5th edition. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2015. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1766936
121.
Moffat G, Garton J, Bean GMD, Probert R. Moffat’s trusts law: text and materials. Sixth edition. Vol. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015.
122.
Allen, Tom. Civil Liability for Sexual Exploitation in Professional Relationships. Modern Law Review [Internet]. 1996;59. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/modlr59&id=70&collection=journals&index=
123.
Bryan M, Vann VJ, Barkehall Thomas S. Equity and trusts in Australia. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017.
124.
Mitchell C, Mitchell P. Landmark cases in equity. Oxford: Hart; 2012.
125.
McInnes M. ‘A New Direction for the Canadian Law of Fiduciary Relations? Law quarterly review [Internet]. 2010;126. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
126.
Hayton D. The Development of Equity and the "Good Person” Philosophy in Common Law Systems. The Conveyancer and property lawyer [Internet]. 2012;263. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978977277488&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
127.
Flanagan R. A Revised Canadian Test for Fact-Based Fiduciary Accountability’. Law quarterly review [Internet]. 2011;127. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
128.
Frankel T. Fiduciary law. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.
129.
Millett P. BRIBES AND SECRET COMMISSIONS AGAIN. The Cambridge Law Journal. 2012 Nov;71(03):583–614.
130.
Mitchell C, Mitchell P. Landmark cases in equity. Oxford: Hart; 2012.
131.
Smith L. Fiduciary Relationship: Ensuring Loyal Exercise of Judgement on Behalf of Another’. Law quarterly review [Internet]. 2014;130. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
132.
Waddams SM, MyiLibrary. Dimensions of private law: categories and concepts in Anglo-American legal reasoning [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://lib.myilibrary.com?id=42004
133.
Worthington S. FIDUCIARY DUTIES AND PROPRIETARY REMEDIES: ADDRESSING THE FAILURE OF EQUITABLE FORMULAE. The Cambridge Law Journal. 2013 Nov;72(03):720–52.
134.
Allen, Tom. Civil Liability for Sexual Exploitation in Professional Relationships. Modern Law Review [Internet]. 1996;59. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/modlr59&id=70&collection=journals&index=
135.
Bryan M, Vann VJ, Barkehall Thomas S. Equity and trusts in Australia. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017.
136.
Mitchell C, Mitchell P. Landmark cases in equity. Oxford: Hart; 2012.
137.
McInnes M. ‘A New Direction for the Canadian Law of Fiduciary Relations? Law quarterly review [Internet]. 2010;126. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
138.
Hayton D. The Development of Equity and the "Good Person” Philosophy in Common Law Systems. The Conveyancer and property lawyer [Internet]. 2012;263. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978977277488&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
139.
Flanagan R. A Revised Canadian Test for Fact-Based Fiduciary Accountability’. Law quarterly review [Internet]. 2011;127. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
140.
Frankel T. Fiduciary law. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.
141.
Millett P. BRIBES AND SECRET COMMISSIONS AGAIN. The Cambridge Law Journal. 2012 Nov;71(03):583–614.
142.
Mitchell C, Mitchell P. Landmark cases in equity. Oxford: Hart; 2012.
143.
Smith L. Fiduciary Relationship: Ensuring Loyal Exercise of Judgement on Behalf of Another’. Law quarterly review [Internet]. 2014;130. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
144.
Waddams SM, MyiLibrary. Dimensions of private law: categories and concepts in Anglo-American legal reasoning [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://lib.myilibrary.com?id=42004
145.
Worthington S. FIDUCIARY DUTIES AND PROPRIETARY REMEDIES: ADDRESSING THE FAILURE OF EQUITABLE FORMULAE. The Cambridge Law Journal. 2013 Nov;72(03):720–52.
146.
Worthington S. Equity [Internet]. Second edition. Vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1573075
147.
Conaglen M. Thinking about Proprietary Remedies for Breach of Confidence. Intellectual property quarterly [Internet]. 2008;1. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978984447513&rft.object_portfolio_id=
148.
Hopkins N. The Pallant v Morgan "Equity” – Again. The Conveyancer and property lawyer [Internet]. 2012;327. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978977277488&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
149.
Hudson A. Understanding equity and trusts [Internet]. 5th edition. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2015. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1766936
150.
Yip M. The Pallant v Morgan Equity Reconsidered. Legal Studies. 2013 Dec;33(4):549–71.
151.
Worthington S. Equity [Internet]. Second edition. Vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1573075
152.
Moffat G, Garton J, Bean GMD, Probert R. Moffat’s trusts law: text and materials. Sixth edition. Vol. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015.
153.
Hudson A. Understanding equity and trusts [Internet]. 5th edition. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2015. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1766936
154.
Elliott SB, Mitchell C. Remedies for Dishonest Assistance. Modern Law Review. 2004 Jan;67(1):16–47.
155.
Evans S. Rethinking Tracing and the Law of Restitution. Law quarterly review [Internet]. 1994;115. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
156.
Hayton D. ‘Lessons from Knowing Receipt Liability and Unjust Enrichment in Australia. Trust law international [Internet]. 2007;21(2). Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978978742691&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
157.
Lee R, Ho L. Reluctant Bedfellows: Want of Authority and Knowing Receipt. The Modern Law Review. 2012 Jan;75(1):91–100.
158.
Millett PJ. Tracing the Proceeds of Fraud’. Law quarterly review [Internet]. 1991;107. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
159.
Millett PJ. ‘Restitution and Constructive Trusts’. Law quarterly review [Internet]. 1998;114. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
160.
Mitchell C. Constructive and resulting trusts. Oxford: Hart; 2010.
161.
Mitchell C. Change of Position: the Developing Law’. Lloyd’s maritime and commercial law quarterly. 2005;168.
162.
Cornish WR, Jones GH, Dawsonera. Restitution: past, present and future ; essays in honour of Gareth Jones [Internet]. Oxford: Hart; 1998. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9781847313355
163.
Shine P. Dishonesty in Civil Commercial Claims: a State of Mind or a Course of Conduct? Journal of business law [Internet]. 2012;29. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921348257&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
164.
Smith L. Tracing in Taylor v Plumer: Equity in the Court of King’s Bench. Lloyd’s maritime and commercial law quarterly. 1995;240.
165.
Smith L. Simplifying Claims to Traceable Proceeds. Law quarterly review [Internet]. 2009;125. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
166.
Mitchell C, Mitchell P. Landmark cases in equity. Oxford: Hart; 2012.
167.
Waddams S. Dimensions of Private Law: Categories and Concepts in Anglo-American Legal Reasoning [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495564
168.
Worthington S. Equity [Internet]. Second edition. Vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1573075
169.
Degeling S, Edelman J. Equity in commercial law. Sydney, N.S.W.: Lawbook Co; 2005.
170.
Mason A. The Place of Equity and Equitable Remedies in the Contemporary Common Law World’. Law quarterly review [Internet]. 1994;110. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=
171.
Duggan AJ. Is Equity Efficient? Law quarterly review [Internet]. 1997;113. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=
172.
Hudson A. Understanding equity and trusts [Internet]. 5th edition. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2015. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1766936
173.
Millett PJ. Restitution and Constructive Trusts. Law quarterly review [Internet]. 1998;114. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
174.
Waddams S. Dimensions of Private Law: Categories and Concepts in Anglo-American Legal Reasoning [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495564
175.
Beatson J. The use and abuse of unjust enrichment: essays on the law of restitution. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1991.
176.
Burrows A. We Do This At Common Law But That In Equity. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2002 Mar 1;22(1):1–16.
177.
Dietrich, Joachim. Attempting Fusion: Professor Worthington’s ‘Equity’ and Its Integration with the Common Law. Common Law World Review [Internet]. 2005;34(1). Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=15998442&site=ehost-live
178.
Birks P, Birks P, Society of Public Teachers of Law. The classification of obligations. Vol. SPTL seminar series. Oxford: Clarendon; 1997.
179.
Halliwell M. Equity and good conscience. Second edition. London: Old Bailey Press; 2004.
180.
Hudson A. Great debates in equity and trusts. Vol. Palgrave Macmillan great debates in law. London: Palgrave, an imprint of Macmillan Publishers; 2014.
181.
Hudson A. Understanding equity and trusts [Internet]. 5th edition. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2015. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1766936
182.
Lobban, Michael. Preparing for Fusion: Reforming the Nineteenth-Century Court of Chancery, Part I. Law and History Review [Internet]. 2004;22. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lawhst22&id=411&collection=journals&index=
183.
Lobban, Michael. Preparing for Fusion: Reforming the Nineteenth-Century Court of Chancery, Part II. Law and History Review [Internet]. 2004;22. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lawhst22&id=587&collection=journals&index=
184.
Martin J. Fusion, Fallacy and Confusion: a Comparative Study. The Conveyancer and property lawyer [Internet]. 1994;13. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978977277488&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
185.
Degeling S, Edelman J. Equity in commercial law. Sydney, N.S.W.: Lawbook Co; 2005.
186.
Swadling W. Explaining Resulting Trusts. Law quarterly review [Internet]. 2008;124. Available from: http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
187.
Waddams S. Equity in English Contract Law: the Impact of the Judicature Acts (1873–75). The Journal of Legal History. 2012 Aug;33(2):185–208.
188.
Watt G. Equity stirring: the story of justice beyond law [Internet]. Oxford: Hart; 2009. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9781847315243
