1
Worthington S. Equity. Second edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1573075
2
Worthington S. Equity. 2nd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2006.
3
Moffat G, Bean GMD, Probert R, et al. Trusts law: text and materials. Fifth edition. Cambridge, UK: : Cambridge University Press 2009. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9780511631306
4
Moffat G, Garton J, Bean GMD, et al. Moffat’s trusts law: text and materials. Sixth edition. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2015.
5
Hudson A. Understanding Equity & Trusts. 5th ed. Hoboken: : Taylor and Francis 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1766936
6
Hudson A. Understanding equity & trusts. Fifth edition. London: : Routledge 2015.
7
Carpi D. The concept of equity: an interdisciplinary assessment. Heidelberg: : Winter 2007. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/fy0711/2007425657.html
8
Degeling S, Edelman J. Equity in commercial law. Sydney, N.S.W.: : Lawbook Co 2005.
9
Fortier M. The culture of equity in early modern England. Aldershot: : Ashgate 2005. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=429722
10
Halliwell M. Equity and good conscience. Second edition. London: : Old Bailey Press 2004.
11
Klinck DR. Conscience, equity and the Court of Chancery in early modern England. Farnham, Surrey: : Ashgate 2010.
12
Maitland FW, Chaytor AH, Whittaker WJ. Equity, also the forms of action at common law: two courses of lectures. Cambridge [Eng.]: : University Press 1929. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=beal/efa&collection=beal
13
Maitland FW. Equity, also the forms of action at common law - two courses of lectures. Miami, FL: : HardPress Publishing 2013.
14
Mitchell C. Constructive and resulting trusts. Oxford: : Hart 2010.
15
Mitchell C, Mitchell P. Landmark cases in equity. Oxford: : Hart 2012.
16
Frankel T. Fiduciary law. New York: : Oxford University Press 2011.
17
Stebbings C, Dawsonera. The private trustee in Victorian England. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2002. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9780511303760
18
Stebbings C. The Private Trustee in Victorian England. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495458
19
Waddams S. Dimensions of Private Law: Categories and Concepts in Anglo-American Legal Reasoning. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2003. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495564
20
Watt G. Equity stirring: the story of justice beyond law. Oxford: : Hart 2009. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9781847315243
21
Bryan M, Vann VJ. Equity and trusts in Australia. Port Melbourne, Vic: : Cambridge University Press 2012.
22
Waters DWM, Gillen MR, Smith LD. Waters’ law of trusts in Canada. 4th ed. Toronto: : Carswell 2012.
23
Butler AS, Clarke T. Equity and trusts in New Zealand. 2nd ed. 2009. Wellington [N.Z.]: : Thomson Reuters 2009.
24
Smith L, editor. The Worlds of the Trust. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2013. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139505994
25
Smith L, Smith L. The worlds of the trust. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2013. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.kentuk.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1303692
26
Worthington S. Equity. Second edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1573075
27
Maitland FW, Chaytor AH, Whittaker WJ. Equity, also the forms of action at common law: two courses of lectures. Cambridge [Eng.]: : University Press 1929. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=beal/efa&collection=beal
28
Degeling S, Edelman J. Equity in commercial law. Sydney, N.S.W.: : Lawbook Co 2005.
29
Drakopoulou, Maria. Equity, Conscience and the Art of Judgment as lus Aequi et Boni. Law Text Culture 2000;5.http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lwtexcu5&id=355&collection=journals&index=
30
Endicott, Timothy A. O. Conscience of the King: Christopher St. German and Thomas More and the Development of English Equity, The. University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review 1989;47.http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/utflr47&id=557&collection=journals&index=
31
Mark Fortier. Equity and Ideas: Coke, Ellesmere, and James I. Renaissance Quarterly 1998;51:1255–81.http://www.jstor.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/stable/2901967
32
Halliwell M. Equity and good conscience. Second edition. London: : Old Bailey Press 2004.
33
Hudson A. Understanding equity and trusts. 5th edition. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1766936
34
Mitchell C, Mitchell P. Landmark cases in equity. Oxford: : Hart 2012.
35
Klinck DR. Conscience, equity and the Court of Chancery in early modern England. Farnham, Surrey: : Ashgate 2010.
36
Macnair M. Equity and Conscience. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 2007;27:659–81. doi:10.1093/ojls/gqm015
37
Saint German C. Doctor and student: 1531. Menston: : Scolar Press 1970.
38
Waddams S. Dimensions of Private Law: Categories and Concepts in Anglo-American Legal Reasoning. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2003. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495564
39
Watt G. Equity stirring: the story of justice beyond law. Oxford: : Hart 2009. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9781847315243
40
Worthington S. Equity. Second edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1573075
41
Worthington S. Equity. 2nd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2006.
42
Hudson A. Understanding equity and trusts. 5th edition. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1766936
43
Moffat G, Garton J, Bean GMD, et al. Moffat’s trusts law: text and materials. Sixth edition. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2015.
44
Capper, David. Worldwide Mareva Injunctions. Modern Law Review 1991;54.http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/modlr54&id=347&collection=journals&index=journals/modlr
45
Piller Problems. Law quarterly review 1990;106.
46
Moffat G, Bean GMD, Probert R, et al. Trusts law: text and materials. Fifth edition. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2009.
47
The Anglo-American Perspective on Freezing Injunctions. Civil justice quarterly 2010;29.
48
Anton Piller Orders Revisited. Journal of business law 2000;387.
49
Worthington S. Equity. 2nd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2006.
50
Worthington S. Equity. 2nd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2006.
51
Mason A. Impact of Equitable Doctrine on the Law of Contract. Anglo-American law review 1997;27:1–16.
52
Sarmas, Lisa. Story Telling and the Law: A Case Study of Louth v. Diprose. Melbourne University Law Review 1993;19.http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/mulr19&id=727&collection=journals&index=
53
Bryan M, Vann VJ. Equity and trusts in Australia. Port Melbourne, Vic: : Cambridge University Press 2012.
54
Bamforth N. Unconscionability as a Vitiating Factor. Lloyd’s maritime and commercial law quarterly 1995.
55
Bigwood R. Undue influence: ‘impaired consent’ or ‘wicked exploitation’? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1996;16:503–16. doi:10.1093/ojls/16.3.503
56
Beatson J, Friedmann D. Good faith and fault in contract law. Oxford: : Clarendon 1997. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198265788.001.0001
57
Capper D. The Unconscionable Bargain in the Common Law World. Law quarterly review 2010;126.
58
Devenney J, Chandler A. Unconscionability and the Taxonomy of Undue Influence. Journal of business law 2007;541.
59
Etherton T. The Role of Equity in Mistaken Transactions. Trust law international 2013;27.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978978742691&rft.object_portfolio_id=
60
Heerey, Peter. Truth, Lies and Stereotype: Stories of Mary and Louis. Newcastle Law Review 1995;1.http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/nwclr1&id=291&collection=journals&index=journals/nwclr
61
Lobban, Michael. Contractual Fraud in Law and Equity, c1750-c1850. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1997;17.http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/oxfjls17&id=455&collection=journals&index=
62
Mitchell C, Mitchell P. Landmark cases in equity. Oxford: : Hart 2012.
63
Sarmas, Lisa. Response to Justice Peter Heerey, A. Newcastle Law Review 1998;3.http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/nwclr3&id=88&collection=journals&index=
64
Stone, Elizabeth. Infants, Lunatics and Married Women: Equitable Protection in Garcia v. National Australia Bank. Modern Law Review 1999;62.http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/modlr62&id=618&collection=journals&index=
65
Waddams S. Equity in English Contract Law: the Impact of the Judicature Acts (1873–75). The Journal of Legal History 2012;33:185–208. doi:10.1080/01440365.2012.698885
66
Worthington S. Equity. 2nd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2006.
67
Worthington S. Equity. 2nd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2006.
68
Stuffing of Minerva’s Owl - Taxonomy and Taxidermy in Equity, The. Cambridge Law Journal 2009;68.http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/camblj68&id=543&collection=journals&index=journals/camblj
69
Mason A. The Impact of Equitable Doctrine on the Law of Contract’. Anglo-American law review 1998;27:18–28.
70
Bryan M, Vann VJ, Barkehall Thomas S. Equity and trusts in Australia. 2nd edition. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2017.
71
Hudson A. Understanding equity & trusts. 6th ed. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2017. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315649627
72
Gardner S. The Remedial Discretion in Proprietary Estoppel – Again’. Law quarterly review 2006;122.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=
73
Dixon M. Confining and defining proprietary estoppel: the role of unconscionability. Legal Studies 2010;:no-no. doi:10.1111/j.1748-121X.2010.00162.x
74
McFarlane B, Robertson A. The Death of Proprietary Estoppel. Lloyd’s maritime and commercial law quarterly 2008;449.
75
McFarlane B, Robertson A. Apocalypse Averted: Proprietary Estoppel in the House of Lords. Law quarterly review 2009;125.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
76
Proprietary Estoppel and Inheritance: Enough is Enough? The Conveyancer and property lawyer 2013;280.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978977277488&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
77
Mitchell C, Mitchell P. Landmark cases in equity. Oxford: : Hart 2012.
78
Robertson A. The Reliance Basis of Proprietary Estoppel Remedies. The Conveyancer and property lawyer 2008;295.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978977277488&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
79
Waddams S. Dimensions of Private Law: Categories and Concepts in Anglo-American Legal Reasoning. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2003. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495564
80
Worthington S. Equity. Second edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1573075
81
Cotterrell, Roger. Power, Property and the Law of Trusts: A Partial Agenda for Critical Legal Scholarship. Journal of Law and Society 1987;14.http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jlsocty14&id=87&collection=journals&index=
82
Hudson A. Understanding equity and trusts. 5th edition. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2015. http://kentuk.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1766936
83
Synge M. Independent Schools Council v Charity Commission for England and Wales [2011] UKUT 421 (TCC). The Modern Law Review 2012;75:624–39. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00917.x
84
Alexander, Gregory S. Transformation of Trusts as a Legal Category, 1800-1914, The. Law and History Review 1987;5.http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lawhst5&id=311&collection=journals&index=
85
Hudson A. Understanding equity & trusts. 6th ed. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2017. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315649627
86
Moffat G, Garton J, Bean GMD, et al. Moffat’s trusts law: text and materials. Sixth edition. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2015.
87
Walton C. McGovern v Attorney General: Constraints on Judicial Assessment of Charitable Benefit’. The Conveyancer and property lawyer 2014;317.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978977277488&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
88
Rubin GR, Sugarman D. Law, economy and society 1750-1914: essays in the history of English law. Abingdon: : Professional Books 1984.
89
Cotterrell R. Trusting in Law: Legal and Moral Concepts of Trust. Current Legal Problems 1993;46:75–95. doi:10.1093/clp/46.Part_2.75
90
Mitchell C, Mitchell P. Landmark cases in equity. Oxford: : Hart 2012.
91
Hackney J. Charities and Public Benefit. Law quarterly review 2008;124.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
92
Jaconelli J. Adjudicating on Charitable Status a Reconsideration of the Elements. The Conveyancer and property lawyer 2013;96.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978977277488&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
93
Langbein, John H. Secret Life of the Trust: The Trust as an Instrument of Commerce, The. Yale Law Journal 1997;107.http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ylr107&id=199&collection=journals&index=journals/ylr
94
Morris D. Charities and the Big Society: a doomed coalition? Legal Studies 2012;32:132–53. doi:10.1111/j.1748-121X.2011.00216.x
95
Degeling S, Edelman J. Equity in commercial law. Sydney, N.S.W.: : Lawbook Co 2005.
96
Charitable purposes and public benefit - GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/charitable-purposes-and-public-benefit
97
Speaking out: guidance on campaigning and political activity by charities (CC9) - Publications - GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/speaking-out-guidance-on-campaigning-and-political-activity-by-charities-cc9
98
Worthington S. Equity. Second edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1573075
99
Millett PJ. Equity’s Place in the Law of Commerce. Law quarterly review 1998;114.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=
100
Mitchell C. Stewardship of Property and Liability to Account. The Conveyancer and property lawyer 2014;215.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978977277488&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
101
Moffat G, Bean GMD, Probert R, et al. Trusts law: text and materials. Fifth edition. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2009.
102
Hudson A. Understanding equity and trusts. 5th edition. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1766936
103
Capper D. Compensation for Breach of Trust. The Conveyancer and property lawyer 1997;14.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978977277488&rft.object_portfolio_id=
104
Cotterrell R. Trusting in Law: Legal and Moral Concepts of Trust. Current Legal Problems 1993;46:75–95. doi:10.1093/clp/46.Part_2.75
105
Edelman J, Elliott S. Money Remedies Against Trustees. Trust law international 2004;18.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978978742691&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
106
Elliott SB. Remoteness Criteria in Equity. Modern Law Review 2002;65:588–97. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.00397
107
Getzler J. Fiduciary Investment in the Shadow of Financial Crisis: Was Lord Eldon Right? Journal of equity 2009;3.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=3350000000000729&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
108
Glister J, Ridge P. Fault lines in equity. Oxford: : Hart 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1043991
109
Stebbings C. The Private Trustee in Victorian England. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495458
110
Stebbings C, Dawsonera. The private trustee in Victorian England. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2002. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9780511303760
111
Thornton, Rosy. Ethical Investments: A Case of Disjointed Thinking. Cambridge Law Journal 2008;67.http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/camblj67&id=400&collection=journals&index=journals/camblj
112
Great Britain, Scottish Law Commission. Trustees’ powers and duties. London: : Stationery Office 1999.
113
Great Britain. Trustee exemption clauses. London: : TSO 2006.
114
Great Britain. Capital and income in trusts: classification and apportionment. London: : TSO 2009.
115
Social Investment by Charities: the Law Commission’s Recommendations. http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/docs/cp216_charities_social_investment_recommendations.pdf
116
Worthington S. Equity. Second edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1573075
117
Hayton D. Proprietary Liability for Secret Profits’. Law quarterly review 2011;127.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
118
Goode R. Proprietary Liability for Secret Profits – a Reply. Law quarterly review 2011;127.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
119
Millet PJ. Moffat, Trusts Law. Law quarterly review 1998;114.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
120
Hudson A. Understanding equity and trusts. 5th edition. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1766936
121
Moffat G, Garton J, Bean GMD, et al. Moffat’s trusts law: text and materials. Sixth edition. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2015.
122
Allen, Tom. Civil Liability for Sexual Exploitation in Professional Relationships. Modern Law Review 1996;59.http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/modlr59&id=70&collection=journals&index=
123
Bryan M, Vann VJ, Barkehall Thomas S. Equity and trusts in Australia. 2nd edition. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2017.
124
Mitchell C, Mitchell P. Landmark cases in equity. Oxford: : Hart 2012.
125
McInnes M. ‘A New Direction for the Canadian Law of Fiduciary Relations? Law quarterly review 2010;126.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
126
Hayton D. The Development of Equity and the "Good Person” Philosophy in Common Law Systems. The Conveyancer and property lawyer 2012;263.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978977277488&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
127
Flanagan R. A Revised Canadian Test for Fact-Based Fiduciary Accountability’. Law quarterly review 2011;127.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
128
Frankel T. Fiduciary law. New York: : Oxford University Press 2011.
129
Millett P. BRIBES AND SECRET COMMISSIONS AGAIN. The Cambridge Law Journal 2012;71:583–614. doi:10.1017/S0008197312000839
130
Mitchell C, Mitchell P. Landmark cases in equity. Oxford: : Hart 2012.
131
Smith L. Fiduciary Relationship: Ensuring Loyal Exercise of Judgement on Behalf of Another’. Law quarterly review 2014;130.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
132
Waddams SM, MyiLibrary. Dimensions of private law: categories and concepts in Anglo-American legal reasoning. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2003. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://lib.myilibrary.com?id=42004
133
Worthington S. FIDUCIARY DUTIES AND PROPRIETARY REMEDIES: ADDRESSING THE FAILURE OF EQUITABLE FORMULAE. The Cambridge Law Journal 2013;72:720–52. doi:10.1017/S0008197313000755
134
Allen, Tom. Civil Liability for Sexual Exploitation in Professional Relationships. Modern Law Review 1996;59.http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/modlr59&id=70&collection=journals&index=
135
Bryan M, Vann VJ, Barkehall Thomas S. Equity and trusts in Australia. 2nd edition. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2017.
136
Mitchell C, Mitchell P. Landmark cases in equity. Oxford: : Hart 2012.
137
McInnes M. ‘A New Direction for the Canadian Law of Fiduciary Relations? Law quarterly review 2010;126.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
138
Hayton D. The Development of Equity and the "Good Person” Philosophy in Common Law Systems. The Conveyancer and property lawyer 2012;263.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978977277488&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
139
Flanagan R. A Revised Canadian Test for Fact-Based Fiduciary Accountability’. Law quarterly review 2011;127.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
140
Frankel T. Fiduciary law. New York: : Oxford University Press 2011.
141
Millett P. BRIBES AND SECRET COMMISSIONS AGAIN. The Cambridge Law Journal 2012;71:583–614. doi:10.1017/S0008197312000839
142
Mitchell C, Mitchell P. Landmark cases in equity. Oxford: : Hart 2012.
143
Smith L. Fiduciary Relationship: Ensuring Loyal Exercise of Judgement on Behalf of Another’. Law quarterly review 2014;130.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
144
Waddams SM, MyiLibrary. Dimensions of private law: categories and concepts in Anglo-American legal reasoning. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2003. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://lib.myilibrary.com?id=42004
145
Worthington S. FIDUCIARY DUTIES AND PROPRIETARY REMEDIES: ADDRESSING THE FAILURE OF EQUITABLE FORMULAE. The Cambridge Law Journal 2013;72:720–52. doi:10.1017/S0008197313000755
146
Worthington S. Equity. Second edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1573075
147
Conaglen M. Thinking about Proprietary Remedies for Breach of Confidence. Intellectual property quarterly 2008;1.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978984447513&rft.object_portfolio_id=
148
Hopkins N. The Pallant v Morgan "Equity” – Again. The Conveyancer and property lawyer 2012;327.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978977277488&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
149
Hudson A. Understanding equity and trusts. 5th edition. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1766936
150
Yip M. The Pallant v Morgan Equity Reconsidered. Legal Studies 2013;33:549–71. doi:10.1111/j.1748-121X.2012.00265.x
151
Worthington S. Equity. Second edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1573075
152
Moffat G, Garton J, Bean GMD, et al. Moffat’s trusts law: text and materials. Sixth edition. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2015.
153
Hudson A. Understanding equity and trusts. 5th edition. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1766936
154
Elliott SB, Mitchell C. Remedies for Dishonest Assistance. Modern Law Review 2004;67:16–47. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2004.06701002.x
155
Evans S. Rethinking Tracing and the Law of Restitution. Law quarterly review 1994;115.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
156
Hayton D. ‘Lessons from Knowing Receipt Liability and Unjust Enrichment in Australia. Trust law international 2007;21.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978978742691&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
157
Lee R, Ho L. Reluctant Bedfellows: Want of Authority and Knowing Receipt. The Modern Law Review 2012;75:91–100. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00890.x
158
Millett PJ. Tracing the Proceeds of Fraud’. Law quarterly review 1991;107.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
159
Millett PJ. ‘Restitution and Constructive Trusts’. Law quarterly review 1998;114.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
160
Mitchell C. Constructive and resulting trusts. Oxford: : Hart 2010.
161
Mitchell C. Change of Position: the Developing Law’. Lloyd’s maritime and commercial law quarterly 2005;168.
162
Cornish WR, Jones GH, Dawsonera. Restitution: past, present and future ; essays in honour of Gareth Jones. Oxford: : Hart 1998. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9781847313355
163
Shine P. Dishonesty in Civil Commercial Claims: a State of Mind or a Course of Conduct? Journal of business law 2012;29.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921348257&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
164
Smith L. Tracing in Taylor v Plumer: Equity in the Court of King’s Bench. Lloyd’s maritime and commercial law quarterly 1995;240.
165
Smith L. Simplifying Claims to Traceable Proceeds. Law quarterly review 2009;125.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
166
Mitchell C, Mitchell P. Landmark cases in equity. Oxford: : Hart 2012.
167
Waddams S. Dimensions of Private Law: Categories and Concepts in Anglo-American Legal Reasoning. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2003. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495564
168
Worthington S. Equity. Second edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1573075
169
Degeling S, Edelman J. Equity in commercial law. Sydney, N.S.W.: : Lawbook Co 2005.
170
Mason A. The Place of Equity and Equitable Remedies in the Contemporary Common Law World’. Law quarterly review 1994;110.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=
171
Duggan AJ. Is Equity Efficient? Law quarterly review 1997;113.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=
172
Hudson A. Understanding equity and trusts. 5th edition. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1766936
173
Millett PJ. Restitution and Constructive Trusts. Law quarterly review 1998;114.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
174
Waddams S. Dimensions of Private Law: Categories and Concepts in Anglo-American Legal Reasoning. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2003. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495564
175
Beatson J. The use and abuse of unjust enrichment: essays on the law of restitution. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1991.
176
Burrows A. We Do This At Common Law But That In Equity. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 2002;22:1–16. doi:10.1093/ojls/22.1.1
177
Dietrich, Joachim. Attempting Fusion: Professor Worthington’s ‘Equity’ and Its Integration with the Common Law. Common Law World Review 2005;34.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=15998442&site=ehost-live
178
Birks P, Birks P, Society of Public Teachers of Law. The classification of obligations. Oxford: : Clarendon 1997.
179
Halliwell M. Equity and good conscience. Second edition. London: : Old Bailey Press 2004.
180
Hudson A. Great debates in equity and trusts. London: : Palgrave, an imprint of Macmillan Publishers 2014.
181
Hudson A. Understanding equity and trusts. 5th edition. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1766936
182
Lobban, Michael. Preparing for Fusion: Reforming the Nineteenth-Century Court of Chancery, Part I. Law and History Review 2004;22.http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lawhst22&id=411&collection=journals&index=
183
Lobban, Michael. Preparing for Fusion: Reforming the Nineteenth-Century Court of Chancery, Part II. Law and History Review 2004;22.http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lawhst22&id=587&collection=journals&index=
184
Martin J. Fusion, Fallacy and Confusion: a Comparative Study. The Conveyancer and property lawyer 1994;13.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978977277488&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
185
Degeling S, Edelman J. Equity in commercial law. Sydney, N.S.W.: : Lawbook Co 2005.
186
Swadling W. Explaining Resulting Trusts. Law quarterly review 2008;124.http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
187
Waddams S. Equity in English Contract Law: the Impact of the Judicature Acts (1873–75). The Journal of Legal History 2012;33:185–208. doi:10.1080/01440365.2012.698885
188
Watt G. Equity stirring: the story of justice beyond law. Oxford: : Hart 2009. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9781847315243
