[1]
Alexander, Gregory S. 1987. Transformation of Trusts as a Legal Category, 1800-1914, The. Law and History Review. 5, (1987).
[2]
Allen, Tom 1996. Civil Liability for Sexual Exploitation in Professional Relationships. Modern Law Review. 59, (1996).
[3]
Allen, Tom 1996. Civil Liability for Sexual Exploitation in Professional Relationships. Modern Law Review. 59, (1996).
[4]
Bamforth, N. 1995. Unconscionability as a Vitiating Factor. Lloyd’s maritime and commercial law quarterly. (1995).
[5]
Beatson, J. 1991. The use and abuse of unjust enrichment: essays on the law of restitution. Clarendon Press.
[6]
Beatson, J. and Friedmann, D. 1997. Good faith and fault in contract law. Clarendon.
[7]
Bigwood, R. 1996. Undue influence: ‘impaired consent’ or ‘wicked exploitation’? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 16, 3 (Sep. 1996), 503–516. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/16.3.503.
[8]
Birks, P. et al. 1997. The classification of obligations. Clarendon.
[9]
Bryan, M. et al. 2017. Equity and trusts in Australia. Cambridge University Press.
[10]
Bryan, M. et al. 2017. Equity and trusts in Australia. Cambridge University Press.
[11]
Bryan, M. et al. 2017. Equity and trusts in Australia. Cambridge University Press.
[12]
Bryan, M. and Vann, V.J. 2012. Equity and trusts in Australia. Cambridge University Press.
[13]
Bryan, M. and Vann, V.J. 2012. Equity and trusts in Australia. Cambridge University Press.
[14]
Burrows, A. 2002. We Do This At Common Law But That In Equity. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 22, 1 (Mar. 2002), 1–16. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/22.1.1.
[15]
Butler, A.S. and Clarke, T. 2009. Equity and trusts in New Zealand. Thomson Reuters.
[16]
Capper, D. 1997. Compensation for Breach of Trust. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 14, (1997).
[17]
Capper, D. 2010. The Unconscionable Bargain in the Common Law World. Law quarterly review. 126, (2010).
[18]
Capper, David 1991. Worldwide Mareva Injunctions. Modern Law Review. 54, (1991).
[19]
Carpi, D. 2007. The concept of equity: an interdisciplinary assessment. Winter.
[20]
Charitable purposes and public benefit - GOV.UK: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/charitable-purposes-and-public-benefit.
[21]
Conaglen, M. 2008. Thinking about Proprietary Remedies for Breach of Confidence. Intellectual property quarterly. 1, (2008).
[22]
Cornish, W.R. et al. 1998. Restitution: past, present and future ; essays in honour of Gareth Jones. Hart.
[23]
Cotterrell, R. 1993. Trusting in Law: Legal and Moral Concepts of Trust. Current Legal Problems. 46, Part 2 (Jan. 1993), 75–95. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/46.Part_2.75.
[24]
Cotterrell, R. 1993. Trusting in Law: Legal and Moral Concepts of Trust. Current Legal Problems. 46, Part 2 (Jan. 1993), 75–95. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/46.Part_2.75.
[25]
Cotterrell, Roger 1987. Power, Property and the Law of Trusts: A Partial Agenda for Critical Legal Scholarship. Journal of Law and Society. 14, (1987).
[26]
Degeling, S. and Edelman, J. 2005. Equity in commercial law. Lawbook Co.
[27]
Degeling, S. and Edelman, J. 2005. Equity in commercial law. Lawbook Co.
[28]
Degeling, S. and Edelman, J. 2005. Equity in commercial law. Lawbook Co.
[29]
Degeling, S. and Edelman, J. 2005. Equity in commercial law. Lawbook Co.
[30]
Degeling, S. and Edelman, J. 2005. Equity in commercial law. Lawbook Co.
[31]
Devenney, J. and Chandler, A. 2007. Unconscionability and the Taxonomy of Undue Influence. Journal of business law. 541, (2007).
[32]
Dietrich, Joachim 2005. Attempting Fusion: Professor Worthington’s ‘Equity’ and Its Integration with the Common Law. Common Law World Review. 34, 1 (2005).
[33]
Dixon, M. 2010. Confining and defining proprietary estoppel: the role of unconscionability. Legal Studies. (Jun. 2010), no-no. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2010.00162.x.
[34]
Drakopoulou, Maria 2000. Equity, Conscience and the Art of Judgment as lus Aequi et Boni. Law Text Culture. 5, (2000).
[35]
Duggan, A.J. 1997. Is Equity Efficient? Law quarterly review. 113, (1997).
[36]
Edelman, J. and Elliott, S. 2004. Money Remedies Against Trustees. Trust law international. 18, 3 (2004).
[37]
Elliott, S.B. 2002. Remoteness Criteria in Equity. Modern Law Review. 65, 4 (Jul. 2002), 588–597. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00397.
[38]
Elliott, S.B. and Mitchell, C. 2004. Remedies for Dishonest Assistance. Modern Law Review. 67, 1 (Jan. 2004), 16–47. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2004.06701002.x.
[39]
Endicott, Timothy A. O. 1989. Conscience of the King: Christopher St. German and Thomas More and the Development of English Equity, The. University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review. 47, (1989).
[40]
Etherton, T. 2013. The Role of Equity in Mistaken Transactions. Trust law international. 27, 4 (2013).
[41]
Evans, S. 1994. Rethinking Tracing and the Law of Restitution. Law quarterly review. 115, (1994).
[42]
Flanagan, R. 2011. A Revised Canadian Test for Fact-Based Fiduciary Accountability’. Law quarterly review. 127, (2011).
[43]
Flanagan, R. 2011. A Revised Canadian Test for Fact-Based Fiduciary Accountability’. Law quarterly review. 127, (2011).
[44]
Fortier, M. 2005. The culture of equity in early modern England. Ashgate.
[45]
Frankel, T. 2011. Fiduciary law. Oxford University Press.
[46]
Frankel, T. 2011. Fiduciary law. Oxford University Press.
[47]
Frankel, T. 2011. Fiduciary law. Oxford University Press.
[48]
Gardner, S. 2006. The Remedial Discretion in Proprietary Estoppel – Again’. Law quarterly review. 122, (2006).
[49]
Getzler, J. 2009. Fiduciary Investment in the Shadow of Financial Crisis: Was Lord Eldon Right? Journal of equity. 3, (2009).
[50]
Glister, J. and Ridge, P. 2012. Fault lines in equity. Hart.
[51]
Goode, R. 2011. Proprietary Liability for Secret Profits – a Reply. Law quarterly review. 127, (2011).
[52]
Great Britain 2009. Capital and income in trusts: classification and apportionment. TSO.
[53]
Great Britain 2006. Trustee exemption clauses. TSO.
[54]
Great Britain and Scottish Law Commission 1999. Trustees’ powers and duties. Stationery Office.
[55]
Hackney, J. 2008. Charities and Public Benefit. Law quarterly review. 124, (2008).
[56]
Halliwell, M. 2004. Equity and good conscience. Old Bailey Press.
[57]
Halliwell, M. 2004. Equity and good conscience. Old Bailey Press.
[58]
Halliwell, M. 2004. Equity and good conscience. Old Bailey Press.
[59]
Hayton, D. 2007. ‘Lessons from Knowing Receipt Liability and Unjust Enrichment in Australia. Trust law international. 21, 2 (2007).
[60]
Hayton, D. 2011. Proprietary Liability for Secret Profits’. Law quarterly review. 127, (2011).
[61]
Hayton, D. 2012. The Development of Equity and the "Good Person” Philosophy in Common Law Systems. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 263, (2012).
[62]
Hayton, D. 2012. The Development of Equity and the "Good Person” Philosophy in Common Law Systems. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 263, (2012).
[63]
Heerey, Peter 1995. Truth, Lies and Stereotype: Stories of Mary and Louis. Newcastle Law Review. 1, (1995).
[64]
Hopkins, N. 2012. The Pallant v Morgan "Equity” – Again. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 327, (2012).
[65]
Hudson, A. 2014. Great debates in equity and trusts. Palgrave, an imprint of Macmillan Publishers.
[66]
Hudson, A. 2015. Understanding Equity & Trusts. Taylor and Francis.
[67]
Hudson, A. 2015. Understanding equity & trusts. Routledge.
[68]
Hudson, A. 2017. Understanding equity & trusts. Routledge.
[69]
Hudson, A. 2017. Understanding equity & trusts. Routledge.
[70]
Hudson, A. 2015. Understanding equity and trusts. Routledge.
[71]
Hudson, A. 2015. Understanding equity and trusts. Routledge.
[72]
Hudson, A. 2015. Understanding equity and trusts. Routledge.
[73]
Hudson, A. 2015. Understanding equity and trusts. Routledge.
[74]
Hudson, A. 2015. Understanding equity and trusts. Routledge.
[75]
Hudson, A. 2015. Understanding equity and trusts. Routledge.
[76]
Hudson, A. 2015. Understanding equity and trusts. Routledge.
[77]
Hudson, A. 2015. Understanding equity and trusts. Routledge.
[78]
Hudson, A. 2015. Understanding equity and trusts. Routledge.
[79]
Jaconelli, J. 2013. Adjudicating on Charitable Status  a Reconsideration of the Elements. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 96, (2013).
[80]
Klinck, D.R. 2010. Conscience, equity and the Court of Chancery in early modern England. Ashgate.
[81]
Klinck, D.R. 2010. Conscience, equity and the Court of Chancery in early modern England. Ashgate.
[82]
Langbein, John H. 1997. Secret Life of the Trust: The Trust as an Instrument of Commerce, The. Yale Law Journal. 107, (1997).
[83]
Lee, R. and Ho, L. 2012. Reluctant Bedfellows: Want of Authority and Knowing Receipt. The Modern Law Review. 75, 1 (Jan. 2012), 91–100. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00890.x.
[84]
Lobban, Michael 1997. Contractual Fraud in Law and Equity, c1750-c1850. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 17, (1997).
[85]
Lobban, Michael 2004. Preparing for Fusion: Reforming the Nineteenth-Century Court of Chancery, Part I. Law and History Review. 22, (2004).
[86]
Lobban, Michael 2004. Preparing for Fusion: Reforming the Nineteenth-Century Court of Chancery, Part II. Law and History Review. 22, (2004).
[87]
Macnair, M. 2007. Equity and Conscience. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 27, 4 (Jan. 2007), 659–681. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqm015.
[88]
Maitland, F.W. 2013. Equity, also the forms of action at common law - two courses of lectures. HardPress Publishing.
[89]
Maitland, F.W. et al. 1929. Equity, also the forms of action at common law: two courses of lectures. University Press.
[90]
Maitland, F.W. et al. 1929. Equity, also the forms of action at common law: two courses of lectures. University Press.
[91]
Mark Fortier 1998. Equity and Ideas: Coke, Ellesmere, and James I. Renaissance Quarterly. 51, 4 (1998), 1255–1281.
[92]
Martin, J. 1994. Fusion, Fallacy and Confusion: a Comparative Study. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 13, (1994).
[93]
Mason, A. 1997. Impact of Equitable Doctrine on the Law of Contract. Anglo-American law review. 27, 1 (1997), 1–16.
[94]
Mason, A. 1998. The Impact of Equitable Doctrine on the Law of Contract’. Anglo-American law review. 27, 1 (1998), 18–28.
[95]
Mason, A. 1994. The Place of Equity and Equitable Remedies in the Contemporary Common Law World’. Law quarterly review. 110, (1994).
[96]
McFarlane, B. and Robertson, A. 2009. Apocalypse Averted: Proprietary Estoppel in the House of Lords. Law quarterly review. 125, (2009).
[97]
McFarlane, B. and Robertson, A. 2008. The Death of Proprietary Estoppel. Lloyd’s maritime and commercial law quarterly. 449, (2008).
[98]
McInnes, M. 2010. ‘A New Direction for the Canadian Law of Fiduciary Relations? Law quarterly review. 126, (2010).
[99]
McInnes, M. 2010. ‘A New Direction for the Canadian Law of Fiduciary Relations? Law quarterly review. 126, (2010).
[100]
Millet, P.J. 1998. Moffat, Trusts Law. Law quarterly review. 114, (1998).
[101]
Millett, P. 2012. BRIBES AND SECRET COMMISSIONS AGAIN. The Cambridge Law Journal. 71, 03 (Nov. 2012), 583–614. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197312000839.
[102]
Millett, P. 2012. BRIBES AND SECRET COMMISSIONS AGAIN. The Cambridge Law Journal. 71, 03 (Nov. 2012), 583–614. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197312000839.
[103]
Millett, P.J. 1998. Equity’s Place in the Law of Commerce. Law quarterly review. 114, (1998).
[104]
Millett, P.J. 1998. ‘Restitution and Constructive Trusts’. Law quarterly review. 114, (1998).
[105]
Millett, P.J. 1998. Restitution and Constructive Trusts. Law quarterly review. 114, (1998).
[106]
Millett, P.J. 1991. Tracing the Proceeds of Fraud’. Law quarterly review. 107, (1991).
[107]
Mitchell, C. 2005. Change of Position: the Developing Law’. Lloyd’s maritime and commercial law quarterly. 168, (2005).
[108]
Mitchell, C. 2010. Constructive and resulting trusts. Hart.
[109]
Mitchell, C. 2010. Constructive and resulting trusts. Hart.
[110]
Mitchell, C. 2014. Stewardship of Property and Liability to Account. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 215, (2014).
[111]
Mitchell, C. and Mitchell, P. 2012. Landmark cases in equity. Hart.
[112]
Mitchell, C. and Mitchell, P. 2012. Landmark cases in equity. Hart.
[113]
Mitchell, C. and Mitchell, P. 2012. Landmark cases in equity. Hart.
[114]
Mitchell, C. and Mitchell, P. 2012. Landmark cases in equity. Hart.
[115]
Mitchell, C. and Mitchell, P. 2012. Landmark cases in equity. Hart.
[116]
Mitchell, C. and Mitchell, P. 2012. Landmark cases in equity. Hart.
[117]
Mitchell, C. and Mitchell, P. 2012. Landmark cases in equity. Hart.
[118]
Mitchell, C. and Mitchell, P. 2012. Landmark cases in equity. Hart.
[119]
Mitchell, C. and Mitchell, P. 2012. Landmark cases in equity. Hart.
[120]
Mitchell, C. and Mitchell, P. 2012. Landmark cases in equity. Hart.
[121]
Moffat, G. et al. 2015. Moffat’s trusts law: text and materials. Cambridge University Press.
[122]
Moffat, G. et al. 2015. Moffat’s trusts law: text and materials. Cambridge University Press.
[123]
Moffat, G. et al. 2015. Moffat’s trusts law: text and materials. Cambridge University Press.
[124]
Moffat, G. et al. 2015. Moffat’s trusts law: text and materials. Cambridge University Press.
[125]
Moffat, G. et al. 2015. Moffat’s trusts law: text and materials. Cambridge University Press.
[126]
Moffat, G. et al. 2009. Trusts law: text and materials. Cambridge University Press.
[127]
Moffat, G. et al. 2009. Trusts law: text and materials. Cambridge University Press.
[128]
Moffat, G. et al. 2009. Trusts law: text and materials. Cambridge University Press.
[129]
Morris, D. 2012. Charities and the Big Society: a doomed coalition? Legal Studies. 32, 1 (Mar. 2012), 132–153. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2011.00216.x.
[130]
Robertson, A. 2008. The Reliance Basis of Proprietary Estoppel Remedies. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 295, (2008).
[131]
Rubin, G.R. and Sugarman, D. 1984. Law, economy and society 1750-1914: essays in the history of English law. Professional Books.
[132]
Saint German, C. 1970. Doctor and student: 1531. Scolar Press.
[133]
Sarmas, Lisa 1998. Response to Justice Peter Heerey, A. Newcastle Law Review. 3, (1998).
[134]
Sarmas, Lisa 1993. Story Telling and the Law: A Case Study of Louth v. Diprose. Melbourne University Law Review. 19, (1993).
[135]
Shine, P. 2012. Dishonesty in Civil Commercial Claims: a State of Mind or a Course of Conduct? Journal of business law. 29, (2012).
[136]
Smith, L. 2014. Fiduciary Relationship: Ensuring Loyal Exercise of Judgement on Behalf of Another’. Law quarterly review. 130, (2014).
[137]
Smith, L. 2014. Fiduciary Relationship: Ensuring Loyal Exercise of Judgement on Behalf of Another’. Law quarterly review. 130, (2014).
[138]
Smith, L. 2009. Simplifying Claims to Traceable Proceeds. Law quarterly review. 125, (2009).
[139]
Smith, L. ed. 2013. The Worlds of the Trust. Cambridge University Press.
[140]
Smith, L. 1995. Tracing in Taylor v Plumer: Equity in the Court of King’s Bench. Lloyd’s maritime and commercial law quarterly. 240, (1995).
[141]
Smith, L. and Smith, L. 2013. The worlds of the trust. Cambridge University Press.
[142]
Speaking out: guidance on campaigning and political activity by charities (CC9) - Publications - GOV.UK: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/speaking-out-guidance-on-campaigning-and-political-activity-by-charities-cc9.
[143]
Stebbings, C. 2001. The Private Trustee in Victorian England. Cambridge University Press.
[144]
Stebbings, C. 2001. The Private Trustee in Victorian England. Cambridge University Press.
[145]
Stebbings, C. and Dawsonera 2002. The private trustee in Victorian England. Cambridge University Press.
[146]
Stebbings, C. and Dawsonera 2002. The private trustee in Victorian England. Cambridge University Press.
[147]
Stone, Elizabeth 1999. Infants, Lunatics and Married Women: Equitable Protection in Garcia v. National Australia Bank. Modern Law Review. 62, (1999).
[148]
Swadling, W. 2008. Explaining Resulting Trusts. Law quarterly review. 124, (2008).
[149]
Synge, M. 2012. Independent Schools Council v Charity Commission for England and Wales [2011] UKUT 421 (TCC). The Modern Law Review. 75, 4 (Jul. 2012), 624–639. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00917.x.
[150]
Thornton, Rosy 2008. Ethical Investments: A Case of Disjointed Thinking. Cambridge Law Journal. 67, (2008).
[151]
Waddams, S. 2003. Dimensions of Private Law: Categories and Concepts in Anglo-American Legal Reasoning. Cambridge University Press.
[152]
Waddams, S. 2003. Dimensions of Private Law: Categories and Concepts in Anglo-American Legal Reasoning. Cambridge University Press.
[153]
Waddams, S. 2003. Dimensions of Private Law: Categories and Concepts in Anglo-American Legal Reasoning. Cambridge University Press.
[154]
Waddams, S. 2003. Dimensions of Private Law: Categories and Concepts in Anglo-American Legal Reasoning. Cambridge University Press.
[155]
Waddams, S. 2003. Dimensions of Private Law: Categories and Concepts in Anglo-American Legal Reasoning. Cambridge University Press.
[156]
Waddams, S. 2012. Equity in English Contract Law: the Impact of the Judicature Acts (1873–75). The Journal of Legal History. 33, 2 (Aug. 2012), 185–208. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01440365.2012.698885.
[157]
Waddams, S. 2012. Equity in English Contract Law: the Impact of the Judicature Acts (1873–75). The Journal of Legal History. 33, 2 (Aug. 2012), 185–208. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01440365.2012.698885.
[158]
Waddams, S.M. and MyiLibrary 2003. Dimensions of private law: categories and concepts in Anglo-American legal reasoning. Cambridge University Press.
[159]
Waddams, S.M. and MyiLibrary 2003. Dimensions of private law: categories and concepts in Anglo-American legal reasoning. Cambridge University Press.
[160]
Walton, C. 2014. McGovern v Attorney General: Constraints on Judicial Assessment of Charitable Benefit’. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 317, (2014).
[161]
Waters, D.W.M. et al. 2012. Waters’ law of trusts in Canada. Carswell.
[162]
Watt, G. 2009. Equity stirring: the story of justice beyond law. Hart.
[163]
Watt, G. 2009. Equity stirring: the story of justice beyond law. Hart.
[164]
Watt, G. 2009. Equity stirring: the story of justice beyond law. Hart.
[165]
Worthington, S. 2006. Equity. Oxford University Press.
[166]
Worthington, S. 2006. Equity. Oxford University Press.
[167]
Worthington, S. 2006. Equity. Oxford University Press.
[168]
Worthington, S. 2006. Equity. Oxford University Press.
[169]
Worthington, S. 2006. Equity. Oxford University Press.
[170]
Worthington, S. 2006. Equity. Oxford University Press.
[171]
Worthington, S. 2006. Equity. Oxford University Press.
[172]
Worthington, S. 2006. Equity. Oxford University Press.
[173]
Worthington, S. 2006. Equity. Oxford University Press.
[174]
Worthington, S. 2006. Equity. Oxford University Press.
[175]
Worthington, S. 2006. Equity. Oxford University Press.
[176]
Worthington, S. 2006. Equity. Oxford University Press.
[177]
Worthington, S. 2006. Equity. Oxford University Press.
[178]
Worthington, S. 2006. Equity. Oxford University Press.
[179]
Worthington, S. 2006. Equity. Oxford University Press.
[180]
Worthington, S. 2013. FIDUCIARY DUTIES AND PROPRIETARY REMEDIES: ADDRESSING THE FAILURE OF EQUITABLE FORMULAE. The Cambridge Law Journal. 72, 03 (Nov. 2013), 720–752. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197313000755.
[181]
Worthington, S. 2013. FIDUCIARY DUTIES AND PROPRIETARY REMEDIES: ADDRESSING THE FAILURE OF EQUITABLE FORMULAE. The Cambridge Law Journal. 72, 03 (Nov. 2013), 720–752. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197313000755.
[182]
Yip, M. 2013. The Pallant v Morgan Equity Reconsidered. Legal Studies. 33, 4 (Dec. 2013), 549–571. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2012.00265.x.
[183]
2000. Anton Piller Orders Revisited. Journal of business law. 387, (2000).
[184]
1990. Piller Problems. Law quarterly review. 106, (1990).
[185]
2013. Proprietary Estoppel and Inheritance: Enough is Enough? The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 280, (2013).
[186]
Social Investment by Charities: the Law Commission’s Recommendations.
[187]
2009. Stuffing of Minerva’s Owl -  Taxonomy and Taxidermy in Equity, The. Cambridge Law Journal. 68, (2009).
[188]
2010. The Anglo-American Perspective on Freezing Injunctions. Civil justice quarterly. 29, 3 (2010).