1.
Worthington S. Equity. Vol Clarendon law series. Second edition. Oxford University Press; 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1573075
2.
Worthington S. Equity. Vol Clarendon law series. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2006.
3.
Moffat G, Bean GMD, Probert R, Moffat G, Dawsonera. Trusts Law: Text and Materials. Vol The law in context series. Fifth edition. Cambridge University Press; 2009. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9780511631306
4.
Moffat G, Garton J, Bean GMD, Probert R. Moffat’s Trusts Law: Text and Materials. Vol Law in context. Sixth edition. Cambridge University Press; 2015.
5.
Hudson A. Understanding Equity & Trusts. 5th ed. Taylor and Francis; 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1766936
6.
Hudson A. Understanding Equity & Trusts. Fifth edition. Routledge; 2015.
7.
Carpi D. The Concept of Equity: An Interdisciplinary Assessment. Vol Anglistische Forschungen. Winter; 2007. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/fy0711/2007425657.html
8.
Degeling S, Edelman J. Equity in Commercial Law. Lawbook Co; 2005.
9.
Fortier M. The Culture of Equity in Early Modern England. Ashgate; 2005. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=429722
10.
Halliwell M. Equity and Good Conscience. Second edition. Old Bailey Press; 2004.
11.
Klinck DR. Conscience, Equity and the Court of Chancery in Early Modern England. Ashgate; 2010.
12.
Maitland FW, Chaytor AH, Whittaker WJ. Equity, Also the Forms of Action at Common Law: Two Courses of Lectures. University Press; 1929. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=beal/efa&collection=beal
13.
Maitland FW. Equity, Also the Forms of Action at Common Law - Two Courses of Lectures. HardPress Publishing; 2013.
14.
Mitchell C. Constructive and Resulting Trusts. Hart; 2010.
15.
Mitchell C, Mitchell P. Landmark Cases in Equity. Hart; 2012.
16.
Frankel T. Fiduciary Law. Oxford University Press; 2011.
17.
Stebbings C, Dawsonera. The Private Trustee in Victorian England. Vol Cambridge studies in English legal history. Cambridge University Press; 2002. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9780511303760
18.
Stebbings C. The Private Trustee in Victorian England. Vol Cambridge Studies in English Legal History. Cambridge University Press; 2001. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495458
19.
Waddams S. Dimensions of Private Law: Categories and Concepts in Anglo-American Legal Reasoning. Cambridge University Press; 2003. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495564
20.
Watt G. Equity Stirring: The Story of Justice beyond Law. Hart; 2009. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9781847315243
21.
Bryan M, Vann VJ. Equity and Trusts in Australia. Cambridge University Press; 2012.
22.
Waters DWM, Gillen MR, Smith LD. Waters’ Law of Trusts in Canada. 4th ed. Carswell; 2012.
23.
Butler AS, Clarke T. Equity and Trusts in New Zealand. 2nd ed. 2009. Thomson Reuters; 2009.
24.
Smith L, ed. The Worlds of the Trust. Cambridge University Press; 2013. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139505994
25.
Smith L, Smith L. The Worlds of the Trust. Cambridge University Press; 2013. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.kentuk.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1303692
26.
Worthington S. Equity. Vol Clarendon law series. Second edition. Oxford University Press; 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1573075
27.
Maitland FW, Chaytor AH, Whittaker WJ. Equity, Also the Forms of Action at Common Law: Two Courses of Lectures. University Press; 1929. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=beal/efa&collection=beal
28.
Degeling S, Edelman J. Equity in Commercial Law. Lawbook Co; 2005.
29.
Drakopoulou, Maria. Equity, Conscience and the Art of Judgment as lus Aequi et Boni. Law Text Culture. 2000;5. http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lwtexcu5&id=355&collection=journals&index=
30.
Endicott, Timothy A. O. Conscience of the King: Christopher St. German and Thomas More and the Development of English Equity, The. University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review. 1989;47. http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/utflr47&id=557&collection=journals&index=
31.
Mark Fortier. Equity and Ideas: Coke, Ellesmere, and James I. Renaissance Quarterly. 1998;51(4):1255-1281. http://www.jstor.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/stable/2901967
32.
Halliwell M. Equity and Good Conscience. Second edition. Old Bailey Press; 2004.
33.
Hudson A. Understanding Equity and Trusts. 5th edition. Routledge; 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1766936
34.
Mitchell C, Mitchell P. Landmark Cases in Equity. Hart; 2012.
35.
Klinck DR. Conscience, Equity and the Court of Chancery in Early Modern England. Ashgate; 2010.
36.
Macnair M. Equity and Conscience. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2007;27(4):659-681. doi:10.1093/ojls/gqm015
37.
Saint German C. Doctor and Student: 1531. Scolar Press; 1970.
38.
Waddams S. Dimensions of Private Law: Categories and Concepts in Anglo-American Legal Reasoning. Cambridge University Press; 2003. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495564
39.
Watt G. Equity Stirring: The Story of Justice beyond Law. Hart; 2009. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9781847315243
40.
Worthington S. Equity. Vol Clarendon law series. Second edition. Oxford University Press; 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1573075
41.
Worthington S. Equity. Vol Clarendon law series. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2006.
42.
Hudson A. Understanding Equity and Trusts. 5th edition. Routledge; 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1766936
43.
Moffat G, Garton J, Bean GMD, Probert R. Moffat’s Trusts Law: Text and Materials. Vol Law in context. Sixth edition. Cambridge University Press; 2015.
44.
Capper, David. Worldwide Mareva Injunctions. Modern Law Review. 1991;54. http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/modlr54&id=347&collection=journals&index=journals/modlr
45.
Piller Problems. Law quarterly review. 1990;106.
46.
Moffat G, Bean GMD, Probert R, Dawsonera. Trusts Law: Text and Materials. Vol Law in context. Fifth edition. Cambridge University Press; 2009.
47.
The Anglo-American Perspective on Freezing Injunctions. Civil justice quarterly. 2010;29(3).
48.
Anton Piller Orders Revisited. Journal of business law. 2000;387.
49.
Worthington S. Equity. Vol Clarendon law series. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2006.
50.
Worthington S. Equity. Vol Clarendon law series. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2006.
51.
Mason A. Impact of Equitable Doctrine on the Law of Contract. Anglo-American law review. 1997;27(1):1-16.
52.
Sarmas, Lisa. Story Telling and the Law: A Case Study of Louth v. Diprose. Melbourne University Law Review. 1993;19. http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/mulr19&id=727&collection=journals&index=
53.
Bryan M, Vann VJ. Equity and Trusts in Australia. Cambridge University Press; 2012.
54.
Bamforth N. Unconscionability as a Vitiating Factor. Lloyd’s maritime and commercial law quarterly. Published online 1995.
55.
Bigwood R. Undue influence: ‘impaired consent’ or ‘wicked exploitation’? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 1996;16(3):503-516. doi:10.1093/ojls/16.3.503
56.
Beatson J, Friedmann D. Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law. Clarendon; 1997. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198265788.001.0001
57.
Capper D. The Unconscionable Bargain in the Common Law World. Law quarterly review. 2010;126.
58.
Devenney J, Chandler A. Unconscionability and the Taxonomy of Undue Influence. Journal of business law. 2007;541.
59.
Etherton T. The Role of Equity in Mistaken Transactions. Trust law international. 2013;27(4). http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978978742691&rft.object_portfolio_id=
60.
Heerey, Peter. Truth, Lies and Stereotype: Stories of Mary and Louis. Newcastle Law Review. 1995;1. http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/nwclr1&id=291&collection=journals&index=journals/nwclr
61.
Lobban, Michael. Contractual Fraud in Law and Equity, c1750-c1850. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 1997;17. http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/oxfjls17&id=455&collection=journals&index=
62.
Mitchell C, Mitchell P. Landmark Cases in Equity. Hart; 2012.
63.
Sarmas, Lisa. Response to Justice Peter Heerey, A. Newcastle Law Review. 1998;3. http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/nwclr3&id=88&collection=journals&index=
64.
Stone, Elizabeth. Infants, Lunatics and Married Women: Equitable Protection in Garcia v. National Australia Bank. Modern Law Review. 1999;62. http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/modlr62&id=618&collection=journals&index=
65.
Waddams S. Equity in English Contract Law: the Impact of the Judicature Acts (1873–75). The Journal of Legal History. 2012;33(2):185-208. doi:10.1080/01440365.2012.698885
66.
Worthington S. Equity. Vol Clarendon law series. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2006.
67.
Worthington S. Equity. Vol Clarendon law series. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2006.
68.
Stuffing of Minerva’s Owl - Taxonomy and Taxidermy in Equity, The. Cambridge Law Journal. 2009;68. http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/camblj68&id=543&collection=journals&index=journals/camblj
69.
Mason A. The Impact of Equitable Doctrine on the Law of Contract’. Anglo-American law review. 1998;27(1):18-28.
70.
Bryan M, Vann VJ, Barkehall Thomas S. Equity and Trusts in Australia. 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press; 2017.
71.
Hudson A. Understanding Equity & Trusts. 6th ed. Routledge; 2017. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315649627
72.
Gardner S. The Remedial Discretion in Proprietary Estoppel – Again’. Law quarterly review. 2006;122. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=
73.
Dixon M. Confining and defining proprietary estoppel: the role of unconscionability. Legal Studies. Published online 7 June 2010:no-no. doi:10.1111/j.1748-121X.2010.00162.x
74.
McFarlane B, Robertson A. The Death of Proprietary Estoppel. Lloyd’s maritime and commercial law quarterly. 2008;449.
75.
McFarlane B, Robertson A. Apocalypse Averted: Proprietary Estoppel in the House of Lords. Law quarterly review. 2009;125. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
76.
Proprietary Estoppel and Inheritance: Enough is Enough? The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 2013;280. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978977277488&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
77.
Mitchell C, Mitchell P. Landmark Cases in Equity. Hart; 2012.
78.
Robertson A. The Reliance Basis of Proprietary Estoppel Remedies. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 2008;295. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978977277488&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
79.
Waddams S. Dimensions of Private Law: Categories and Concepts in Anglo-American Legal Reasoning. Cambridge University Press; 2003. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495564
80.
Worthington S. Equity. Vol Clarendon law series. Second edition. Oxford University Press; 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1573075
81.
Cotterrell, Roger. Power, Property and the Law of Trusts: A Partial Agenda for Critical Legal Scholarship. Journal of Law and Society. 1987;14. http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jlsocty14&id=87&collection=journals&index=
82.
Hudson A. Understanding Equity and Trusts. 5th edition. Routledge; 2015. http://kentuk.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1766936
83.
Synge M. Independent Schools Council v Charity Commission for England and Wales [2011] UKUT 421 (TCC). The Modern Law Review. 2012;75(4):624-639. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00917.x
84.
Alexander, Gregory S. Transformation of Trusts as a Legal Category, 1800-1914, The. Law and History Review. 1987;5. http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lawhst5&id=311&collection=journals&index=
85.
Hudson A. Understanding Equity & Trusts. 6th ed. Routledge; 2017. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315649627
86.
Moffat G, Garton J, Bean GMD, Probert R. Moffat’s Trusts Law: Text and Materials. Vol Law in context. Sixth edition. Cambridge University Press; 2015.
87.
Walton C. McGovern v Attorney General: Constraints on Judicial Assessment of Charitable Benefit’. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 2014;317. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978977277488&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
88.
Rubin GR, Sugarman D. Law, Economy and Society 1750-1914: Essays in the History of English Law. Professional Books; 1984.
89.
Cotterrell R. Trusting in Law: Legal and Moral Concepts of Trust. Current Legal Problems. 1993;46(Part 2):75-95. doi:10.1093/clp/46.Part_2.75
90.
Mitchell C, Mitchell P. Landmark Cases in Equity. Hart; 2012.
91.
Hackney J. Charities and Public Benefit. Law quarterly review. 2008;124. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
92.
Jaconelli J. Adjudicating on Charitable Status a Reconsideration of the Elements. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 2013;96. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978977277488&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
93.
Langbein, John H. Secret Life of the Trust: The Trust as an Instrument of Commerce, The. Yale Law Journal. 1997;107. http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ylr107&id=199&collection=journals&index=journals/ylr
94.
Morris D. Charities and the Big Society: a doomed coalition? Legal Studies. 2012;32(1):132-153. doi:10.1111/j.1748-121X.2011.00216.x
95.
Degeling S, Edelman J. Equity in Commercial Law. Lawbook Co; 2005.
96.
Charitable purposes and public benefit - GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/charitable-purposes-and-public-benefit
97.
Speaking out: guidance on campaigning and political activity by charities (CC9) - Publications - GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/speaking-out-guidance-on-campaigning-and-political-activity-by-charities-cc9
98.
Worthington S. Equity. Vol Clarendon law series. Second edition. Oxford University Press; 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1573075
99.
Millett PJ. Equity’s Place in the Law of Commerce. Law quarterly review. 1998;114. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=
100.
Mitchell C. Stewardship of Property and Liability to Account. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 2014;215. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978977277488&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
101.
Moffat G, Bean GMD, Probert R, Dawsonera. Trusts Law: Text and Materials. Vol Law in context. Fifth edition. Cambridge University Press; 2009.
102.
Hudson A. Understanding Equity and Trusts. 5th edition. Routledge; 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1766936
103.
Capper D. Compensation for Breach of Trust. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 1997;14. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978977277488&rft.object_portfolio_id=
104.
Cotterrell R. Trusting in Law: Legal and Moral Concepts of Trust. Current Legal Problems. 1993;46(Part 2):75-95. doi:10.1093/clp/46.Part_2.75
105.
Edelman J, Elliott S. Money Remedies Against Trustees. Trust law international. 2004;18(3). http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978978742691&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
106.
Elliott SB. Remoteness Criteria in Equity. Modern Law Review. 2002;65(4):588-597. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.00397
107.
Getzler J. Fiduciary Investment in the Shadow of Financial Crisis: Was Lord Eldon Right? Journal of equity. 2009;3. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=3350000000000729&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
108.
Glister J, Ridge P. Fault Lines in Equity. Vol Hart studies in private law. Hart; 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1043991
109.
Stebbings C. The Private Trustee in Victorian England. Vol Cambridge Studies in English Legal History. Cambridge University Press; 2001. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495458
110.
Stebbings C, Dawsonera. The Private Trustee in Victorian England. Vol Cambridge studies in English legal history. Cambridge University Press; 2002. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9780511303760
111.
Thornton, Rosy. Ethical Investments: A Case of Disjointed Thinking. Cambridge Law Journal. 2008;67. http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/camblj67&id=400&collection=journals&index=journals/camblj
112.
Great Britain, Scottish Law Commission. Trustees’ Powers and Duties. Vol SCOT LAW COM. Stationery Office; 1999.
113.
Great Britain. Trustee Exemption Clauses. Vol Command Papers. Cm. TSO; 2006.
114.
Great Britain. Capital and Income in Trusts: Classification and Apportionment. Vol LAW COM. / The Law Commission. TSO; 2009.
115.
Social Investment by Charities: the Law Commission’s Recommendations. http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/docs/cp216_charities_social_investment_recommendations.pdf
116.
Worthington S. Equity. Vol Clarendon law series. Second edition. Oxford University Press; 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1573075
117.
Hayton D. Proprietary Liability for Secret Profits’. Law quarterly review. 2011;127. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
118.
Goode R. Proprietary Liability for Secret Profits – a Reply. Law quarterly review. 2011;127. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
119.
Millet PJ. Moffat, Trusts Law. Law quarterly review. 1998;114. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
120.
Hudson A. Understanding Equity and Trusts. 5th edition. Routledge; 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1766936
121.
Moffat G, Garton J, Bean GMD, Probert R. Moffat’s Trusts Law: Text and Materials. Vol Law in context. Sixth edition. Cambridge University Press; 2015.
122.
Allen, Tom. Civil Liability for Sexual Exploitation in Professional Relationships. Modern Law Review. 1996;59. http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/modlr59&id=70&collection=journals&index=
123.
Bryan M, Vann VJ, Barkehall Thomas S. Equity and Trusts in Australia. 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press; 2017.
124.
Mitchell C, Mitchell P. Landmark Cases in Equity. Hart; 2012.
125.
McInnes M. ‘A New Direction for the Canadian Law of Fiduciary Relations? Law quarterly review. 2010;126. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
126.
Hayton D. The Development of Equity and the "Good Person” Philosophy in Common Law Systems. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 2012;263. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978977277488&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
127.
Flanagan R. A Revised Canadian Test for Fact-Based Fiduciary Accountability’. Law quarterly review. 2011;127. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
128.
Frankel T. Fiduciary Law. Oxford University Press; 2011.
129.
Millett P. BRIBES AND SECRET COMMISSIONS AGAIN. The Cambridge Law Journal. 2012;71(03):583-614. doi:10.1017/S0008197312000839
130.
Mitchell C, Mitchell P. Landmark Cases in Equity. Hart; 2012.
131.
Smith L. Fiduciary Relationship: Ensuring Loyal Exercise of Judgement on Behalf of Another’. Law quarterly review. 2014;130. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
132.
Waddams SM, MyiLibrary. Dimensions of Private Law: Categories and Concepts in Anglo-American Legal Reasoning. Cambridge University Press; 2003. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://lib.myilibrary.com?id=42004
133.
Worthington S. FIDUCIARY DUTIES AND PROPRIETARY REMEDIES: ADDRESSING THE FAILURE OF EQUITABLE FORMULAE. The Cambridge Law Journal. 2013;72(03):720-752. doi:10.1017/S0008197313000755
134.
Allen, Tom. Civil Liability for Sexual Exploitation in Professional Relationships. Modern Law Review. 1996;59. http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/modlr59&id=70&collection=journals&index=
135.
Bryan M, Vann VJ, Barkehall Thomas S. Equity and Trusts in Australia. 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press; 2017.
136.
Mitchell C, Mitchell P. Landmark Cases in Equity. Hart; 2012.
137.
McInnes M. ‘A New Direction for the Canadian Law of Fiduciary Relations? Law quarterly review. 2010;126. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
138.
Hayton D. The Development of Equity and the "Good Person” Philosophy in Common Law Systems. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 2012;263. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978977277488&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
139.
Flanagan R. A Revised Canadian Test for Fact-Based Fiduciary Accountability’. Law quarterly review. 2011;127. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
140.
Frankel T. Fiduciary Law. Oxford University Press; 2011.
141.
Millett P. BRIBES AND SECRET COMMISSIONS AGAIN. The Cambridge Law Journal. 2012;71(03):583-614. doi:10.1017/S0008197312000839
142.
Mitchell C, Mitchell P. Landmark Cases in Equity. Hart; 2012.
143.
Smith L. Fiduciary Relationship: Ensuring Loyal Exercise of Judgement on Behalf of Another’. Law quarterly review. 2014;130. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
144.
Waddams SM, MyiLibrary. Dimensions of Private Law: Categories and Concepts in Anglo-American Legal Reasoning. Cambridge University Press; 2003. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://lib.myilibrary.com?id=42004
145.
Worthington S. FIDUCIARY DUTIES AND PROPRIETARY REMEDIES: ADDRESSING THE FAILURE OF EQUITABLE FORMULAE. The Cambridge Law Journal. 2013;72(03):720-752. doi:10.1017/S0008197313000755
146.
Worthington S. Equity. Vol Clarendon law series. Second edition. Oxford University Press; 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1573075
147.
Conaglen M. Thinking about Proprietary Remedies for Breach of Confidence. Intellectual property quarterly. 2008;1. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978984447513&rft.object_portfolio_id=
148.
Hopkins N. The Pallant v Morgan "Equity” – Again. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 2012;327. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978977277488&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
149.
Hudson A. Understanding Equity and Trusts. 5th edition. Routledge; 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1766936
150.
Yip M. The Pallant v Morgan Equity Reconsidered. Legal Studies. 2013;33(4):549-571. doi:10.1111/j.1748-121X.2012.00265.x
151.
Worthington S. Equity. Vol Clarendon law series. Second edition. Oxford University Press; 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1573075
152.
Moffat G, Garton J, Bean GMD, Probert R. Moffat’s Trusts Law: Text and Materials. Vol Law in context. Sixth edition. Cambridge University Press; 2015.
153.
Hudson A. Understanding Equity and Trusts. 5th edition. Routledge; 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1766936
154.
Elliott SB, Mitchell C. Remedies for Dishonest Assistance. Modern Law Review. 2004;67(1):16-47. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2004.06701002.x
155.
Evans S. Rethinking Tracing and the Law of Restitution. Law quarterly review. 1994;115. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
156.
Hayton D. ‘Lessons from Knowing Receipt Liability and Unjust Enrichment in Australia. Trust law international. 2007;21(2). http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978978742691&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
157.
Lee R, Ho L. Reluctant Bedfellows: Want of Authority and Knowing Receipt. The Modern Law Review. 2012;75(1):91-100. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00890.x
158.
Millett PJ. Tracing the Proceeds of Fraud’. Law quarterly review. 1991;107. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
159.
Millett PJ. ‘Restitution and Constructive Trusts’. Law quarterly review. 1998;114. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
160.
Mitchell C. Constructive and Resulting Trusts. Hart; 2010.
161.
Mitchell C. Change of Position: the Developing Law’. Lloyd’s maritime and commercial law quarterly. 2005;168.
162.
Cornish WR, Jones GH, Dawsonera. Restitution: Past, Present and Future ; Essays in Honour of Gareth Jones. Hart; 1998. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9781847313355
163.
Shine P. Dishonesty in Civil Commercial Claims: a State of Mind or a Course of Conduct? Journal of business law. 2012;29. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921348257&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
164.
Smith L. Tracing in Taylor v Plumer: Equity in the Court of King’s Bench. Lloyd’s maritime and commercial law quarterly. 1995;240.
165.
Smith L. Simplifying Claims to Traceable Proceeds. Law quarterly review. 2009;125. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
166.
Mitchell C, Mitchell P. Landmark Cases in Equity. Hart; 2012.
167.
Waddams S. Dimensions of Private Law: Categories and Concepts in Anglo-American Legal Reasoning. Cambridge University Press; 2003. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495564
168.
Worthington S. Equity. Vol Clarendon law series. Second edition. Oxford University Press; 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1573075
169.
Degeling S, Edelman J. Equity in Commercial Law. Lawbook Co; 2005.
170.
Mason A. The Place of Equity and Equitable Remedies in the Contemporary Common Law World’. Law quarterly review. 1994;110. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=
171.
Duggan AJ. Is Equity Efficient? Law quarterly review. 1997;113. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=
172.
Hudson A. Understanding Equity and Trusts. 5th edition. Routledge; 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1766936
173.
Millett PJ. Restitution and Constructive Trusts. Law quarterly review. 1998;114. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
174.
Waddams S. Dimensions of Private Law: Categories and Concepts in Anglo-American Legal Reasoning. Cambridge University Press; 2003. http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495564
175.
Beatson J. The Use and Abuse of Unjust Enrichment: Essays on the Law of Restitution. Clarendon Press; 1991.
176.
Burrows A. We Do This At Common Law But That In Equity. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2002;22(1):1-16. doi:10.1093/ojls/22.1.1
177.
Dietrich, Joachim. Attempting Fusion: Professor Worthington’s ‘Equity’ and Its Integration with the Common Law. Common Law World Review. 2005;34(1). http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=15998442&site=ehost-live
178.
Birks P, Birks P, Society of Public Teachers of Law. The Classification of Obligations. Vol SPTL seminar series. Clarendon; 1997.
179.
Halliwell M. Equity and Good Conscience. Second edition. Old Bailey Press; 2004.
180.
Hudson A. Great Debates in Equity and Trusts. Vol Palgrave Macmillan great debates in law. Palgrave, an imprint of Macmillan Publishers; 2014.
181.
Hudson A. Understanding Equity and Trusts. 5th edition. Routledge; 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=1766936
182.
Lobban, Michael. Preparing for Fusion: Reforming the Nineteenth-Century Court of Chancery, Part I. Law and History Review. 2004;22. http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lawhst22&id=411&collection=journals&index=
183.
Lobban, Michael. Preparing for Fusion: Reforming the Nineteenth-Century Court of Chancery, Part II. Law and History Review. 2004;22. http://www.heinonline.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lawhst22&id=587&collection=journals&index=
184.
Martin J. Fusion, Fallacy and Confusion: a Comparative Study. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 1994;13. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978977277488&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
185.
Degeling S, Edelman J. Equity in Commercial Law. Lawbook Co; 2005.
186.
Swadling W. Explaining Resulting Trusts. Law quarterly review. 2008;124. http://sfxhostedeu.exlibrisgroup.com/kent?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954928497439&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.fulltext=yes
187.
Waddams S. Equity in English Contract Law: the Impact of the Judicature Acts (1873–75). The Journal of Legal History. 2012;33(2):185-208. doi:10.1080/01440365.2012.698885
188.
Watt G. Equity Stirring: The Story of Justice beyond Law. Hart; 2009. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9781847315243
