[1]
About Philosophical Reviews - University of Notre Dame: .
[2]
Altham, J. E. J. and Harrison, Ross 1995. World, mind, and ethics: essays on the ethical philosophy of Bernard Williams. Cambridge University Press.
[3]
Altman and Andrew 2004. Breathing life in a Dead Argument... Philosophical studies. 117, (2004).
[4]
Altman and J. E. J. 1986. The Legacy of Emotivism. Fact, science and morality: essays on A.J. Ayer’s Language, truth and logic. Basil Blackwell.
[5]
Ayer, Alfred Jules 1946. Language, truth and logic. V. Gollancz.
[6]
Ball and Stephen 1991. Linguistic Institutions and Varieties of Ethical Naturalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. LI, (1991).
[7]
Blackburn and Simon 1988. Attitudes and Contents. Ethics: an international journal of social political and legal philosophy. 98, (1988).
[8]
Blackburn and Simon 1993. Errors and the Phenomenology of Value. Essays in quasi-realism. Oxford University Press.
[9]
Blackburn and Simon 1985. Errors and the Phenomenology of Value. Morality and objectivity: a tribute to J L Mackie; ed by T Honderich. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
[10]
Blackburn, Simon 1993. Essays in quasi-realism. Oxford University Press.
[11]
Blackburn and Simon 1999. Is Objective Moral Justification Possible on a Quasi-Realist Foundation? Inquiry (Oslo). 42, (1999).
[12]
Blackburn and Simon 1993. Moral Realism. Essays in quasi-realism. Oxford University Press.
[13]
Blackburn and Simon 1992. Morality and Thick Concepts: Through Thick and Thin. Supplementary volume - Aristotelian Society. LXVI, (1992).
[14]
Blackburn and Simon 2002. ‘Precis’ and ‘Replies’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. (2002).
[15]
Blackburn, Simon 1998. Ruling passions: a theory of practical reasoning. Oxford University Press.
[16]
Blackburn, Simon 1998. Ruling passions: a theory of practical reasoning. Oxford University Press.
[17]
Blackburn, Simon 1984. Spreading the word: groundings in the philosophy of language. Clarendon Press.
[18]
Blackburn and Simon 1998. Wittgenstein, Wright, Rorty and Minimalism. Mind: quarterly review of psychology and philosophy. 107, (1998).
[19]
Blackburn, Simon and Simmons, Keith 1999. Truth. Oxford University Press.
[20]
Bloomfield, Paul and Oxford University Press 2001. Moral reality. Oxford University Press.
[21]
Boghossian et al. 1989. Colour as a secondary quality. Mind: quarterly review of psychology and philosophy. 98, (1989).
[22]
Boyd and Richard 1997. How to be a Moral Realist? Moral discourse and practice: some philosophical approaches. Oxford University Press.
[23]
Brink and David 1997. Moral Motivation. Ethics: an international journal of social political and legal philosophy. (1997).
[24]
Brink, David Owen 1989. Moral realism and the foundations of ethics. Cambridge University Press.
[25]
Brink, David Owen 1989. Moral realism and the foundations of ethics. Cambridge University Press.
[26]
Burgess and John 1998. Error theories and Values. Australasian journal of philosophy. 76, (1998).
[27]
Copp and David 1997. Belief, Reason and Motivation. Ethics: an international journal of social political and legal philosophy. (1997).
[28]
Copp and David 2000. Milk, Honey, and the Good life on Moral Twin Earth. Synthese (Dordrecht). 124, (2000).
[29]
Copp and David 1991. Moral Realism: Facts and Norms. Ethics: an international journal of social political and legal philosophy. 101, (1991).
[30]
Copp, David and Oxford University Press 2005. The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory. Oxford University Press.
[31]
Copp, David and Oxford University Press 2005. The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory. Oxford University Press.
[32]
Copp, David and Zimmerman, David 1985. Morality, reason, and truth: new essays on the foundations of ethics. Rowman & Allanheld.
[33]
Craig, Edward 1998. Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy. Routledge.
[34]
Cullity, Garrett et al. 1997. Ethics and practical reason. Oxford University Press.
[35]
Cuneo and Terence 2002. Reconcliling Realism with Humeanism. Australasian journal of philosophy. 67, (2002).
[36]
Cuneo, Terence 2007. The normative web: an argument for moral realism. Oxford University Press.
[37]
Dancy and Jonathan 1995. Arguments from Illusion. The Philosophical quarterly. 45, (1995).
[38]
Dancy and Jonathan 1996. Real Values in a Humean Context. Ratio (Oxford). 9, (1996).
[39]
Dancy and Jonathan 1986. Two Conceptions of Moral Realism. Supplementary volume - Aristotelian Society. LX, (1986).
[40]
D’Arms et al. 2000. Sentiment and Value. Ethics: an international journal of social political and legal philosophy. 110, (2000).
[41]
Darwall et al. 1992. Toward Fin de Siecle Ethics: Some Trends. Philosophical review. 101, (1992).
[42]
Darwall, Stephen L. et al. 1997. Moral discourse and practice: some philosophical approaches. Oxford University Press.
[43]
Darwall, Stephen L. et al. 1997. Moral discourse and practice: some philosophical approaches. Oxford University Press.
[44]
Darwall, Stephen L. et al. 1997. Moral discourse and practice: some philosophical approaches. Oxford University Press.
[45]
Davidson, Donald and Oxford University Press 2001. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford University Press.
[46]
Divers et al. 1995. Platitudes and attitudes: a minimalist conception of belief. Analysis. 55, (1995).
[47]
Dworkin and Ronald 1996. Objectivity and Truth... Philosophy & public affairs. 25, (1996).
[48]
Edwards and Jim 1996. Anti-realist Truth and Concepts of Superassertability. Synthese (Dordrecht). 109, (1996).
[49]
Fisher, Andrew and Kirchin, Simon 2006. Arguing about metaethics. Routledge.
[50]
Foot and Philippa 1972. Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives. Philosophical review. 81, (1972).
[51]
Foot, Philippa et al. 1995. Virtues and reasons: Philippa Foot and moral theory: essays in honour of Philippa Foot. Oxford University Press.
[52]
Geach and P. T. 1965. Assertion. Philosophical review. 74, (1965).
[53]
Gibbard and Allan 1992. Morality and Thick Concepts: Thick concepts and Warrant for Feelings. Supplementary volume - Aristotelian Society. LXVI, (1992).
[54]
Gibbard, Allan 2003. Thinking how to live. Harvard University Press.
[55]
Gibbard, Allan 1992. Wise choices, apt feelings: a theory of normative judgment. Clarendon Press.
[56]
Haldane, John et al. 1993. Reality, representation, and projection. Oxford University Press.
[57]
Hale and Bob 2002. Can Arboreal Knotwork Help Blackburn out of Frege’s Abyss? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. (2002).
[58]
Hale and Bob 1993. Postscript. Reality, representation, and projection. Oxford University Press.
[59]
Hare and R. M. The Language of Morals. http://www.ditext.com/hare/lm/html.
[60]
Harman and Gilbert 1985. Is There a Single True Morality? Morality, reason, and truth: new essays on the foundations of ethics. Rowman & Allanheld.
[61]
Harman and Gilbert 1975. Moral Relativism Defended. Philosophical review. (1975).
[62]
Harman, Gilbert 1977. The nature of morality: an introduction to ethics. Oxford University Press.
[63]
Honderich, T. 1985. Morality and objectivity: a tribute to J L Mackie; ed by T Honderich. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
[64]
Hooker, Brad 1996. Truth in ethics. Blackwell.
[65]
Hookway and Christopher 1986. Two Conceptions of Moral Realism II. Supplementary volume - Aristotelian Society. LX, (1986).
[66]
Hopkins and Robert 2001. Kant, Quasi-Realism and the Autonomy of Aesthetic Judgement. European journal of philosophy. (2001).
[67]
Horgan et al. 1992. Troubles for New Wave Moral Semantics: the Open Question. Philosophical papers (Grahamstown). 21, (1992).
[68]
Horgan and Terence 2000. Copping out on Moral Twin Earth. Synthese (Dordrecht). 124, (2000).
[69]
http://www.lenmanethicsbibliography.group.shef.ac.uk/Bib.htm: .
[70]
Humberstone and Lloyd 1992. Directions of fit. Mind: quarterly review of psychology and philosophy. 101, (1992).
[71]
Hume and David 1963. Of the Standard of Taste. Essays, moral, political and literary. O.U.P.
[72]
Hume, David and Beauchamp, Tom L. 1998. An enquiry concerning the principles of morals. Oxford University Press.
[73]
Hume, David and Mossner, Ernest Campbell 1985. A treatise of human nature. Penguin.
[74]
Hurley, S. L. 1989. Natural reasons: personality and polity. Oxford University Press.
[75]
Jackson et al. 2003. Locke, Expressivism, and Conditionals. Analysis. 63, (2003).
[76]
Jackson et al. 1994. Minimalism and Truth-aptness. Mind: quarterly review of psychology and philosophy. 103, (1994).
[77]
Jackson, Frank 1998. From metaphysics to ethics: a defence of conceptual analysis. Clarendon Press.
[78]
Johnston and Mark 1998. Art Manifest Qualities Response-dependent? The Monist. 81, (1998).
[79]
Johnston and Mark 1989. Dispositional Theories of Value. Supplementary volume - Aristotelian Society. (1989).
[80]
Johnston and Mark 1993. Objectivity Refigured: Pragmatism without Verificationism. Reality, representation, and projection. Oxford University Press.
[81]
Johnston and Mark 2001. The Authority of Affect. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. LXIII, (2001).
[82]
Joyce and Richard 2002. Expressivism and Motivation Internalism. Analysis. 62, (2002).
[83]
Joyce, Richard 2001. The myth of morality. Cambridge University Press.
[84]
Joyce, Richard 2001. The myth of morality. Cambridge University Press.
[85]
Joyce, Richard and Kirchin, Simon 2010. A world without values: essays on John Mackie’s moral error theory. Springer.
[86]
Kennett, Jeanette 2001. Agency and responsibility: a common-sense moral psychology. Oxford University Press.
[87]
Kirchin and Simon 2003. Ethical Phenomenology and Metaethics. Ethical theory and moral practice: an international forum. 6, (2003).
[88]
Kirchin, Simon 2012. Metaethics. Palgrave Macmillan.
[89]
Kirchin and Simon 2000. Quasi-Realism, Sensibility Theory and Ethical Relativism. Inquiry (Oslo). 43, (2000).
[90]
Kirchin and Simon 2010. The Shapelessness Hypothesis. Philosophers’ imprint. 10, (2010).
[91]
Lang and Gerald 2001. The Rule-Following Considerations and Metaethics. European journal of philosophy. 9, (2001).
[92]
Lewis and David 1988. Desire as Belief. Mind: quarterly review of psychology and philosophy. (1988).
[93]
Lewis and David 1989. Dispositional Theories of Value. Supplementary volume - Aristotelian Society. (1989).
[94]
Lillehammer and Hallvard 2004. Moral Error Theory. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 104, (2004).
[95]
Lillehammer and Hallvard 1997. Smith on Moral Fetishism. Analysis. 57, (1997).
[96]
Mackie, J. L. 1977. Ethics: inventing right and wrong. Penguin.
[97]
Mackie, J. L. 1977. Ethics: inventing right and wrong. Penguin.
[98]
McDowell and John 1998. Aesthetic value, Objectivity and the Fabric of the World. Mind, value, and reality. Harvard University Press.
[99]
McDowell and John 1978. Are Moral Requirements Hypothetical Imperatives? Supplementary volume - Aristotelian Society. LII, (1978).
[100]
McDowell and John 1995. Might there be External Reasons? World, mind, and ethics: essays on the ethical philosophy of Bernard Williams. Cambridge University Press.
[101]
McDowell and John 1981. Noncognivitism and Rule-Following. Wittgenstein - to follow a rule; ed by S H Holtzman and C M Leich. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
[102]
McDowell and John 1997. Projection and Truth in Ethics. Moral discourse and practice: some philosophical approaches. Oxford University Press.
[103]
McDowell and John 1995. Two Sorts of Naturalism. Virtues and reasons: Philippa Foot and moral theory: essays in honour of Philippa Foot. Clarendon Press.
[104]
McDowell and John 1985. Values and Secondary Qualities. Morality and objectivity: a tribute to J L Mackie; ed by T Honderich. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
[105]
McDowell and John 1979. Virtue and Reason. The Monist. 62, (1979).
[106]
McDowell, John Henry 1998. Mind, value, and reality. Harvard University Press.
[107]
McDowell, John Henry 1998. Mind, value, and reality. Harvard University Press.
[108]
McFarland et al. 1998. Response Dependence without Reduction? Australasian journal of philosophy. 76, (1998).
[109]
McNaughton, David 1988. Moral vision: an introduction to ethics. Blackwell.
[110]
McNaughton, David 1988. Moral vision: an introduction to ethics. Blackwell.
[111]
Miller, A. 2013. Contemporary metaethics: an introduction. Polity.
[112]
Miller and Alex 1996. An Objection to smith’s Argument for Internalism. Analysis. 56, (1996).
[113]
Miller and Alex 1995. Objectivity Disfigured: Mark Johnston’s Missing Explanation Argument. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. (1995).
[114]
Miller and Alex 2002. Wright’s Argument against Error-theories. Analysis. (2002).
[115]
Miller, Alexander 2003. An introduction to contemporary metaethics. Polity Press.
[116]
Miller, Alexander 2003. An introduction to contemporary metaethics. Polity Press.
[117]
Moore and A. W. 2002. Quasi-Realism and Relativism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. (2002).
[118]
Moore and A. W. 2003. Williams on Ethics, Knowledge, and Reflection. Philosophy (London). 78, (2003).
[120]
Nolan et al. 2005. Moral Fictionalism versus the REst. Australasian journal of philosophy. 83, (2005).
[121]
Oddie, Graham and Oxford University Press 2005. Value, Reality, and Desire. Oxford University Press.
[122]
Pettit et al. 1990. Background Desire. Philosophical review. (1990).
[123]
Pettit and Philip 1991. Realism and Response-dependence. Mind: quarterly review of psychology and philosophy. 100, (1991).
[124]
Price and Huw 1989. Defending Desire-as-Belief. Mind: quarterly review of psychology and philosophy. (1989).
[125]
Rachels, James 1998. Ethical theory. Oxford University Press.
[126]
Railton and Peter 1986. Moral Realism. Philosophical review. 95, (1986).
[127]
Railton and Peter 1993. Reply to David Wiggins. Reality, representation, and projection. Oxford University Press.
[128]
Railton and Peter 1993. What the Non-Cognitivist Helps Us to See the Naturalist Must Help Us to Explain. Reality, representation, and projection. Oxford University Press.
[129]
Rosati and Connie 1995. Naturalism, Normativity, and the Open Question Argument. Noûs (Bloomington, Indiana). 29, (1995).
[130]
Sayre-McCord and Geoffrey 1997. The Metaethical Problem. Ethics: an international journal of social political and legal philosophy. (1997).
[131]
Scanlon and T. M. 1995. Fear of Relativism. Virtues and reasons: Philippa Foot and moral theory: essays in honour of Philippa Foot. Clarendon Press.
[132]
Scheffler and Samuel 1987. Morality through Thick and Thin. Philosophical review. 96, (1987).
[133]
Schnall and Ira 2004. Philosophy of Language and Meta-ethics. The Philosophical quarterly. 54, (2004).
[134]
Schroeder, Mark 2008. Being For: Evaluating the Semantic Program of Expressivism. Oxford University Press.
[135]
Schroeder, Mark 2007. Slaves of the Passions. Oxford University Press.
[136]
Schueler, G. F. and Oxford University Press 2003. Reasons and Purposes: Human Rationality and the Teleological Explanation of Action. Oxford University Press.
[137]
Shafer-Landau, Russ and Cuneo, Terence 2007. Foundations of ethics: an anthology. Blackwell Pub.
[138]
Shafer-Landau, Russ and Oxford University Press 2003. Moral Realism: A Defence. Oxford University Press.
[139]
Shafer-Landau, Russ and Oxford University Press 2003. Moral Realism: A Defence. Oxford University Press.
[140]
Shepski and Lee 2008. The vanishing argument from queerness. Australasian journal of philosophy. 86, (2008).
[141]
Simpson and Evan 1999. Between Internalism and Externalism in Ethics. The Philosophical quarterly. 49, (1999).
[142]
Smith and Michael 2003. Humeanism, Psychologism, and the normative. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 67, (2003).
[143]
Smith and Michael 1997. In Defense of The Moral Problem. Ethics: an international journal of social political and legal philosophy. (1997).
[144]
Smith and Michael 1994. Minimalism, Truth-aptitude, and Belief. Analysis. 54, (1994).
[145]
Smith and Michael 1993. Objectivity and Moral Realism: On the Significance... Reality, representation, and projection. Oxford University Press.
[146]
Smith and Michael 2001. Some Not-Much Discussed Problems for Non-cognitivism in Ethics. Ratio (Oxford). XIV, (2001).
[147]
Smith and Michael 1996. The Argument for Internalism: Reply to Miller. Analysis. 56, (1996).
[148]
Smith, Michael 1994. The moral problem. Blackwell.
[149]
Smith, Michael 1994. The moral problem. Blackwell.
[150]
Smith and Michael 2002. Which Passions Rule? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. (2002).
[151]
Smith and Michael 1994. Why Expressivists about Value Should Love Minimalism about Truth. Analysis. (1994).
[152]
Snare, Francis 1991. Morals, motivation, and convention: Hume’s influential doctrines. Cambridge University Press.
[153]
Snare and Frank 1975. The Argument from Motivation. Mind: quarterly review of psychology and philosophy. 84, (1975).
[154]
Sobel et al. 2001. Against direction of fit... Analysis. 61, (2001).
[155]
Sreenivasan and Gopal 2001. Understanding Alien Morals. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 62, (2001).
[156]
Stevenson and C. L. 1937. The Emotive Meaning of Ethical Terms. Mind: quarterly review of psychology and philosophy. 46, (1937).
[157]
Stoljar and Daniel Deflationary Theory of Truth. http://plato.stanford.edu.archives/fall1997/entries/truth-deflationary/.
[158]
Strattion-Lake and Philip 1998. Internalism and the Explanation of Belief/Motivation Changes. Analysis. 56, (1998).
[159]
Strattion-Lake and Philip 1999. Why Externalism is not a Problem for Intuitionists. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. XCIX, (1999).
[160]
Stratton-Lake, Philip 2002. Ethical intuitionism: re-evaluations. Clarendon Press.
[161]
Sturgeon and Nicholas 1985. Moral Explanations. Morality, reason, and truth: new essays on the foundations of ethics. Rowman & Allanheld.
[162]
Thomas, Alan 2006. Value and Context: The Nature of Moral and Political Knowledge. Oxford University Press.
[163]
Tolhurst and William 1987. The Argument from Disagreement. Ethics: an international journal of social political and legal philosophy. 97, (1987).
[164]
Van Cleve and James 1996. Minimal Truth is Realist Truth. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. LVI, (1996).
[165]
Van Roojen 1996. Expressivism and Irrationality. Philosophical review. 105, (1996).
[166]
Van Roojen 2002. Humean and Anti-Humean Internalism about Moral Judgements. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 65, (2002).
[167]
Van Roojen 2000. Motivational Internalism... The Philosophical quarterly. 50, (2000).
[168]
Wedgwood and Ralph 1997. Noncognitivism, Truth, and Logic. Philosophical studies. 86, (1997).
[169]
Wiggins and David 1993. A Neglected Position? Reality, representation, and projection. Oxford University Press.
[170]
Wiggins and David 1993. Cognitivism, Naturalism and Normativity. Reality, representation, and projection. Oxford University Press.
[171]
Wiggins, David 1998. Needs, values, truth: essays in the philosophy of value. Clarendon Press.
[172]
Wiggins, David 1998. Needs, values, truth: essays in the philosophy of value. Clarendon Press.
[173]
Wiggins and David 1996. Objective and Subjective in Ethics... Truth in ethics. Blackwell.
[174]
Williams and Bernard 1981. Internal and External Reasons. Moral luck: philosophical papers, 1973-1980. Cambridge University Press.
[175]
Williams and Bernard 1995. Replies. World, mind, and ethics: essays on the ethical philosophy of Bernard Williams. Cambridge University Press.
[176]
Williams and Bernard 1981. The Truth in Relativism. Moral luck: philosophical papers, 1973-1980. Cambridge University Press.
[177]
Williams, Bernard Arthur Owen 1985. Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Fontana Press.
[178]
Wong, David B. 2006. Natural Moralities: A Defense of Pluralistic Relativism. Oxford University Press.
[179]
Wright and Crispin 1998. Comrades Against Quietism. Mind: quarterly review of psychology and philosophy. 107, (1998).
[180]
Wright and Crispin 1988. Realism, Antirealism, Irrealism, Quasi-realism. Midwest studies in philosophy. 12, (1988).
[181]
Wright, Crispin 1992. Truth and objectivity. Harvard University Press.
[182]
Wright and Crispin 1996. Truth in Ethics. Truth in ethics. Blackwell.
[183]
Zangwill and Nick 2000. Against Analytic Moral Functionalism. Ratio (Oxford). 13, (2000).
[184]
Zangwill and Nick 1998. Direction of fit and Normative Functionalism. Philosophical studies. 91, (1998).
[185]
Zangwill and Nick 2003. Externalist Moral Motivation. American philosophical quarterly (Oxford). 40, (2003).
[186]
Zangwill and Nick 2005. Moore, Morality, Supervenience, Essence, Epistemology. American philosophical quarterly (Oxford). 42, (2005).
[187]
Zangwill and Nick 1992. Moral Modus Ponens. Ratio (Oxford). V, (1992).
[188]
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
[189]
1981. Wittgenstein - to follow a rule; ed by S H Holtzman and C M Leich. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
