[1]
‘Alexander Street Video’. [Online]. Available: http://vasc.alexanderstreet.com.chain.kent.ac.uk/
[2]
‘ERA Interactive Multimedia Projects’: .
[3]
‘CSAC Ethnographic Gallery’: .
[4]
‘Jay Ruby’s Webpage:’ .
[5]
‘Web Archive in Visual Anthropology’: .
[6]
‘Documentary Educational Resources’. .
[8]
‘Visual Anthropology’.
[9]
‘Visual Anthropology Review’.
[10]
Taylor, Lucien, Visualizing theory: selected essays from V.A.R., 1990-1994. London: Routledge, 1994.
[11]
Aufderheide, Patricia, Documentary film: a very short introduction, vol. Very short introductions. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9780199720392
[12]
Edwards, Steve, Photography: a very short introduction, vol. Very short introductions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9780191516535
[13]
MacDougall, David and Taylor, Lucien, Transcultural cinema. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1998.
[14]
Pink, Sarah, Doing visual ethnography, 3rd edition. Los Angeles: SAGA, 2013.
[15]
Pinney, Christopher, Photography and anthropology, vol. Exposures. London: Reaktion, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9781780230115
[16]
Pinney, Christopher and Dawsonera, Photography and anthropology, vol. Exposures. London: Reaktion, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9781780230115
[17]
Banks, Marcus and Morphy, Howard, Rethinking visual anthropology. London: Yale University Press, 1997.
[18]
Taylor, Lucien, Visualizing theory: selected essays from V.A.R., 1990-1994. London: Routledge, 1994.
[19]
Askew, Kelly Michelle and Wilk, Richard R., The Anthropology of media: a reader, vol. Blackwell readers in anthropology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2002.
[20]
M. Banks, Visual methods in social research. London: SAGE, 2001.
[21]
Banks, Marcus and Morphy, Howard, Rethinking visual anthropology. London: Yale University Press, 1997.
[22]
Barbash, Ilisa and Taylor, Lucien, Cross-cultural filmmaking: a handbook for making documentary and ethnographic films and videos. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 1997.
[23]
Collier, John and Collier, Malcolm, Visual anthropology: photography as a research method, Rev. and Expanded ed. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1986.
[24]
Crawford, Peter Ian, Turton, David, and Granada Centre for Visual Anthropology, Film as ethnography. Manchester: Manchester University Press, in association with the Granada Centre for Visual Anthropology, 1992.
[25]
Devereaux, Leslie and Hillman, Roger, Fields of vision: essays in film studies, visual anthropology, and photography. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.
[26]
Evans, Jessica, The camerawork essays: context and meaning in photography. London: Published in the USA by New York University Press, 1997.
[27]
Ginsburg, Faye D., Abu-Lughod, Lila, and Larkin, Brian, Media worlds: anthropology on new terrain. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=224223
[28]
Grimshaw, Anna, ‘Chapter 1: The modernist moment and after, 1895-1945’, in The ethnographer’s eye: ways of seeing in anthropology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.kentuk.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=202024
[29]
Hockings, Paul, Principles of visual anthropology, 2nd ed. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1995.
[30]
Loizos, Peter, Innovation in ethnographic film: from innocence to self- consciousness, 1955-85. Manchester: Manchester U. P., 1993.
[31]
MacDougall, David, The corporeal image: film, ethnography, and the senses. Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2006.
[32]
Crawford, Peter Ian and Postma, Metje, Reflecting visual ethnography: using the camera in anthropological research, vol. CNWS publications. Hojbjerg: Intervention Press, 2006.
[33]
Ruby, Jay, Picturing culture: explorations of film & anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.
[34]
Rollwagen, Jack R., Anthropological film and video in the 1990s, vol. Case studies in documentary filmmaking and videomaking. Brockport, N.Y.: Institute Press, 1993.
[35]
Russell, Catherine, Experimental ethnography. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1999.
[36]
Shaw, Jackie and Robertson, Clive, Participatory video: a practical approach to using video creatively in group development work. London: Routledge, 1997.
[37]
Taylor, Lucien, Visualizing theory: selected essays from V.A.R., 1990-1994. London: Routledge, 1994.
[38]
Larry Gross (ed.), ‘Studying Visual Communication’. .
[39]
Barbash, Ilisa and Taylor, Lucien, Cross-cultural filmmaking: a handbook for making documentary and ethnographic films and videos. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 1997.
[40]
Wikan and U, ‘Beyond the Words: The Power of Resonance’, American Ethnologist, vol. 19 [Online]. Available: https://www-jstor-org.chain.kent.ac.uk/stable/645196
[41]
Banks, Marcus and Morphy, Howard, Rethinking visual anthropology. London: Yale University Press, 1997.
[42]
MacDougall, David and Taylor, Lucien, Transcultural cinema. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1998.
[43]
M. Banks and J. Ruby, ‘Chapter 1: Skilled Visions: Towards and Ecology of Visual Inscriptions’, in Made to be seen: perspectives on the history of visual anthropology, Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780226036632
[44]
‘Hockings, P., Tomaselli, K., Ruby, J., MacDougall, D., Williams, D., Piette, A., Schwarz, M., Carta, S. 2014. “Where is the Theory in Visual Anthropology?” Visual Anthropology, 27(5): 436 – 456.’ [Online]. Available: http://content.ebscohost.com/ContentServer.asp?EbscoContent=dGJyMNXb4kSep7c40dvuOLCmr1Cep7BSsa24SbKWxWXS&ContentCustomer=dGJyMPGptEy1qbJPuePfgeyx43zx1%2B6B&T=P&P=AN&S=R&D=f3h&K=98530762
[45]
A. Grimshaw, The ethnographer’s eye: ways of seeing in anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=202024
[46]
Powell, Michael and Pressburger, Emeric, ‘A Canterbury tale’. Rank/Archers, Great Britain, 1944.
[47]
Flaherty and R, ‘How I Filmed Nanook of the North’. .
[48]
Powell, Michael and Pressburger, Emeric, ‘A Canterbury tale’. Rank/Archers, Great Britain, 1944.
[49]
Grimshaw, Anna, The ethnographer’s eye: ways of seeing in anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=202024
[50]
Barnouw, Erik, Documentary: a history of the non-fiction film, 2nd rev. ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
[51]
Claude Massot, ‘A revisit to Injukjuak to examine how life has changed since Flaherty filmed in 1922’. 2004.
[52]
‘La Soledad (Jorge Thielen Armand, 2016, 89 min)’. [Online]. Available: http://www.lafaenafilms.com/films/lasoledad/
[53]
Hastrup and K, ‘Anthropological visions: some notes on visual and textual authority’, in Film as ethnography, Manchester: Manchester University Press, in association with the Granada Centre for Visual Anthropology, 1992.
[54]
MacDougall and D, ‘The Visual in Anthropology’, in Rethinking visual anthropology, London: Yale University Press, 1997.
[55]
Mead and M, ‘Visual anthrpology in a discipline of words’, in Principles of visual anthropology, 2nd ed., Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1995.
[56]
Mead, M and Bateson, and G, ‘On the Use of the Camera in Anthropology’, in The Anthropology of media: a reader, vol. Blackwell readers in anthropology, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2002.
[57]
H. Morphy, ‘The Interpretation of Ritual: Reflections from Film on Anthropological Practice’, Man, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 117–146, 1994.
[58]
Spitulnik and D, ‘Anthropology and Mass Media’, Annual review of anthropology, vol. 22, 1993.
[59]
Watson, C. William, Wade, Peter, and Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory, In anthropology, the image can never have the last say: the ninth annual GDAT debate, heldin the University of Manchester on 6th December 1997, vol. The GDAT debate. Manchester: GDAT, 1998.
[60]
A. Griffiths, Wondrous difference: cinema, anthropology, and turn-of-the-century visual culture. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002.
[61]
MacDougall, David and Taylor, Lucien, Transcultural cinema. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1998.
[62]
Jackson, Michael, Minima ethnographica: intersubjectivity and the anthropological project. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.
[63]
Berger, John, Ways of seeing, vol. Penguin classics. London: Penguin, 2008.
[64]
Marcus and G, ‘The Modernist Sensibility in Recent Ethnographic Writing and the Cinematic Metaphor of Montage’, in Visualizing theory: selected essays from V.A.R., 1990-1994, London: Routledge, 1994.
[65]
Bowman and G, ‘Identifying versus identifying with the “Other”: reflections on the siting of the subject in anthropological discourse’, in After writing culture: epistemology and praxis in contemporary anthropology, vol. ASA monographs, London: Routledge, 1997 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=181747
[66]
T. Otto, ‘Ethnographic Film as Exchange’, The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 195–205, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1080/14442213.2013.768698.
[67]
Klima and A, ‘Corpore Obscuro: Meditation on the Dead in Thailand’, in Visual sense: a cultural reader, vol. Sensory formations, Oxford: Berg, 2008.
[68]
Klima, Alan, The funeral casino: meditation, massacre, and exchange with the dead in Thailand. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2002.
[69]
‘Ngat is dead: studying mortuary traditions - ResearchOnline@JCU’. [Online]. Available: http://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/9272/
[70]
P. I. Crawford, ‘Koriam’s Law: And the Dead Who Govern Directed by Gary Kildea and Andrea Simon, and anthropologist Andrew Lattas’, Visual Anthropology Review, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 105–107, May 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-7458.2009.01035.x.
[71]
Trinh, T. Minh-Ha, When the moon waxes red: representation, gender, and cultural politics. London: Routledge, 1991.
[72]
Moore and H, ‘Trinh T. Minh-Ha Observed: Anthropology and Others’, in Visualizing theory: selected essays from V.A.R., 1990-1994, London: Routledge, 1994.
[73]
Trinh, T. Minh-Ha, Framer framed. London: Routledge, 1992.
[74]
Trinh, T. Minh-Ha, Woman, native, other: writing postcoloniality and feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1989.
[75]
Crawford and P, ‘Film as Discourse: The Invention of Anthropological Realities’, in Film as ethnography, Manchester: Manchester University Press, in association with the Granada Centre for Visual Anthropology, 1992.
[76]
Wright and Chris, ‘The Third Subject: Perspectives on Visual Anthropology’, Anthropology today, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 16–22, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=Anthropology+today&s=AC_T_M&submit=Search
[77]
Stoller, Paul, The cinematic griot: the ethnography of Jean Rouch. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
[78]
Stoller, Paul, Embodying colonial memories: spirit possession, power, and the Hauka in West Africa. London: Routledge, 1995.
[79]
Herzog, ‘Grizzly Man’, 2005. .
[80]
Pini and M, ‘Girls on Film: Video Diaries as “Auto-ethnographies”’. .
[81]
D. Buckingham, M. Pini, and R. Willett, ‘“Take back the tube!”: The discursive construction of amateur film and video making’, Journal of Media Practice, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 183–201, Sep. 2007, doi: 10.1386/jmpr.8.2.183_1.
[82]
Banks, Marcus, Visual methods in social research. London: SAGE, 2001 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=254713
[83]
Benjamin, Walter, Zorn, Harry, and Arendt, Hannah, Illuminations, vol. Pimlico. London: Pimlico, 1999.
[84]
Berger and J, ‘The ambiguity of the photograph’, in The Anthropology of media: a reader, vol. Blackwell readers in anthropology, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2002.
[85]
Clifford and J, ‘On Ethnographic Authority’, in The predicament of culture: twentieth-century ethnography, literature, and art, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard U.P., 1988.
[86]
Gombrich and E, ‘The Visual Image: its Place in Communication’, in The image and the eye: further studies in the psychology of pictorial representation, Oxford: Phaidon, 1982.
[87]
Hochberg and J, ‘The representation of things and people’, in Art, perception and reality, vol. The Alvin and Fanny Blaustein Thalheimer lectures, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
[88]
MacDougall and D, ‘Transcultural Cinema’, in Transcultural cinema, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1998.
[89]
Mitchell and WJT, ‘“What is an image?”’, in Iconology: image, text, ideology, Chicago: U. of Chicago P., 1986.
[90]
Moore, Rachel O., Savage theory: cinema as modern magic. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2000.
[91]
Saussure, Ferdinand de, Bally, Charles, Sechehaye, Albert, and Riedlinger, Albert, Course in general linguistics. Chicago: Open Court, 1986.
[92]
Taussig and M, ‘Physiognomic aspects of Visual Worlds’, in Visualizing theory: selected essays from V.A.R., 1990-1994, London: Routledge, 1994.
[93]
Wright and T, ‘’Photography: theories of realism and convention’, in Anthropology and photography 1860-1920, London: Yale University Press in association with the Royal Anthropological Institute, London, 1992.
[94]
Barbash, Ilisa and Taylor, Lucien, Cross-cultural filmmaking: a handbook for making documentary and ethnographic films and videos. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 1997.
[95]
Feld and S, ‘A Rainforest Acoustemology’, in The auditory culture reader, vol. Sensory formations, Oxford: Berg, 2003.
[96]
S. Feld and D. Brenneis, ‘Doing anthropology in sound’, American Ethnologist, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 461–474, Nov. 2004, doi: 10.1525/ae.2004.31.4.461.
[97]
Samuels and D, ‘Alien Tongues’, in E.T. culture: anthropology in outerspaces, Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2005.
[98]
C. Hirschkind, ‘The Ethics of Listening: Cassette-SermonAudition in Contemporary Egypt’, American Ethnologist, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 623–649, Aug. 2001, doi: 10.1525/ae.2001.28.3.623.
[99]
L. Kunreuther, ‘Technologies of the Voice: FM Radio, Telephone, and the Nepali Diaspora in Kathmandu’, Cultural Anthropology, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 323–353, Aug. 2006, doi: 10.1525/can.2006.21.3.323.
[100]
Tacchi and J, ‘Radio Texture: Between Self and Others’, in The Anthropology of media: a reader, vol. Blackwell readers in anthropology, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2002.
[101]
‘Ongka’s Big Moka: The Kawelka of Papua New Guinea’. 1974.
[102]
‘Cowboy and Maria in Town’. 1991.
[103]
O’Rourke, ‘Cannibal Tours’. 1988.
[104]
‘The Making of Cannibal Tours’. .
[105]
‘The Gospel According to the Papuans’. 1999.
[106]
‘Amandla: A Revolution in Four Part Harmony’. 2002.
[107]
Fricke, ‘Baraka’. 1992.
[108]
‘Voices of the Rainforest’, 1991. .
[109]
Palombini, ‘Rainforest Soundwalks’. .
[110]
Schieffelin, Edward L., The sorrow of the lonely and the burning of the dancers. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1976.
[111]
Attali, Jacques, Noise: the political economy of music, vol. Theory and history of literature. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1985.
[112]
MacDougall, David, The corporeal image: film, ethnography, and the senses. Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2006.
[113]
Seremetakis and N, ‘The Screaming’, in The last word: women, death, and divination in Inner Mani, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
[114]
Classen and C, ‘An Andean Cosmology’, in Visual sense: a cultural reader, vol. Sensory formations, Oxford: Berg, 2008.
[115]
S. Helmreich, ‘An Anthropologist Underwater: Immersive Soundscapes, Submarine Cyborgs, and Transductive Ethnography’, American ethnologist, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 621–641, 2007.
[116]
Back, Les and Bull, Michael, The auditory culture reader, vol. Sensory formations. Oxford: Berg, 2003.
[117]
Banks, Marcus, Visual methods in social research. London: SAGE, 2001 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=254713
[118]
Edwards and E, ‘Beyond the Boundary: a consideration of the expressive in photography and anthropology’, in Rethinking visual anthropology, London: Yale University Press, 1997.
[119]
Faris and J, ‘The Gaze of Western Humanism’, in The Anthropology of media: a reader, vol. Blackwell readers in anthropology, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2002.
[120]
Pinney and C, ‘The parallel histories of anthropology and photography’, in Anthropology and photography 1860-1920, London: Yale University Press in association with the Royal Anthropological Institute, London, 1992.
[121]
Sprague and SF, ‘Yoruba Photography: How Yoruba See Themselves’, in The Anthropology of media: a reader, vol. Blackwell readers in anthropology, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2002.
[122]
Berger and J, ‘The ambiguity of the photograph’, in The Anthropology of media: a reader, vol. Blackwell readers in anthropology, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2002.
[123]
D. MacDougall, ‘“Photo wallahs:” An Encounter with Photography’, Visual Anthropology Review, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 96–100, Sep. 1992, doi: 10.1525/var.1992.8.2.96.
[124]
J. Berger and J. Mohr, Another way of telling, First Vintage International. New York: Vintage Books, 1995.
[125]
Young, Michael W. and Malinowski, Bronislaw, Malinowski’s Kiriwina: fieldwork photography, 1915-1918. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.
[126]
Sontag, Susan, On photography. London: Penguin, 1979.
[127]
Barthes and R, ‘“The photographic message” and “The rhetoric of image”’, in Image, music, text, vol. Fontana communications series, Glasgow: Collins, 1977.
[128]
Barthes, Roland, Camera lucida: reflections on photography. London: Cape, 1982.
[129]
Bourdieu, Pierre and Boltanski, Luc, Photography, a middle-brow art. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1990.
[130]
Burgin, Victor, Thinking photography, vol. Communications and culture. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1982.
[131]
Faris and J, ‘The Gaze of Western Humanism’, in The Anthropology of media: a reader, vol. Blackwell readers in anthropology, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2002.
[132]
Grundberg, Andy, Crisis of the real: writings on photography, 1974-1989, vol. Writers and artists on photography. New York: Aperture, 1990.
[133]
Pinney and C, ‘The lexical spaces of eye-spy’, in Film as ethnography, Manchester: Manchester University Press, in association with the Granada Centre for Visual Anthropology, 1992.
[134]
Sekula and A, ‘On the invention of photographic meaning’, in Thinking photography, vol. Communications and culture, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1982.
[135]
Tagg, John, The burden of representation: essays on photographies and histories, vol. Communications and culture. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education, 1988.
[136]
Wright and T, ‘Photography: theories of realism and convention’, in Anthropology and photography 1860-1920, London: Yale University Press in association with the Royal Anthropological Institute, London, 1992.
[137]
Mead and M, ‘Visual Anthropology in a Discipline of Words’, in Principles of visual anthropology, 2nd ed., Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1995.
[138]
Mead, M and Bateson, and G, ‘On the Use of the Camera in Anthropology’, Studies in the anthropology of visual communication, vol. 4, 1977.
[139]
E. F. im Thurn, ‘Anthropological Uses of the Camera’, Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, vol. 22, pp. 184–203, 1893.
[140]
F. H. Damon, ‘“To Restore the Events?”: On the ethnography of Malinowski’s photography’, Visual Anthropology Review, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 71–77, Mar. 2000, doi: 10.1525/var.2000.16.1.71.
[141]
A. Lakoff, ‘Freezing Time: Margaret Mead’s Diagnostic Photography’, Visual Anthropology Review, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–18, Mar. 1996, doi: 10.1525/var.1996.12.1.1.
[142]
Bateson, Gregory and Mead, Margaret, Balinese character: a photographic analysis, vol. Special publications of the New York Academy of Sciences. [New York: New York Academy of Sciences], 1942.
[143]
I. Jacknis, ‘Margaret Mead and Gregory Bateson in Bali: Their Use of Photography and Film’, Cultural Anthropology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 160–177, 1988.
[144]
Jensen, Gordon D. and Suryani, Luh Ketut, The Balinese people: a reinvestigation of character. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
[145]
P. Chiozzi, ‘Photography and anthropological research: Three case studies’, Visual Sociology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 43–50, Mar. 1989, doi: 10.1080/14725868908583636.
[146]
Collier and J, ‘Photography & visual anthropology’, in Principles of visual anthropology, 2nd ed., Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1995.
[147]
Collier, John and Collier, Malcolm, Visual anthropology: photography as a research method, Rev. and Expanded ed. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1986.
[148]
Edwards, Elizabeth and Royal Anthropological Institute, London, Anthropology and photography 1860-1920. London: Yale University Press in association with the Royal Anthropological Institute, London, 1992.
[149]
J. Grady, ‘The visual essay and sociology’, Visual Sociology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 23–38, Sep. 1991, doi: 10.1080/14725869108583689.
[150]
D. Harper, ‘The visual ethnographic narrative’, Visual Anthropology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–19, Nov. 1987, doi: 10.1080/08949468.1987.9966457.
[151]
Pinney and C, ‘The parallel histories of anthropology and photography’, in Anthropology and photography 1860-1920, London: Yale University Press in association with the Royal Anthropological Institute, London, 1992.
[152]
W. R. Norman, ‘Photography as a research tool’, Visual Anthropology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 193–216, Jan. 1991, doi: 10.1080/08949468.1991.9966560.
[153]
C. S. Suchar, ‘The sociological imagination and documentary still photography: The interrogatory stance’, Visual Sociology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 51–62, Mar. 1989, doi: 10.1080/14725868908583637.
[154]
H. E. L. Prins and J. Bishop, ‘Edmund Carpenter: Explorations In Media & Anthropology.’, Visual Anthropology Review, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 110–140, Sep. 2001, doi: 10.1525/var.2001.17.2.110.
[155]
L. Buckley, ‘Self and Accessory in Gambian Studio Photography’, Visual Anthropology Review, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 71–91, Sep. 2000, doi: 10.1525/var.2000.16.2.71.
[156]
Y. Geffroy, ‘Family photographs: A visual heritage’, Visual Anthropology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 367–409, Jan. 1990, doi: 10.1080/08949468.1990.9966540.
[157]
D. MacDougall, ‘Photo hierarchicus: Signs and mirrors in indian photography’, Visual Anthropology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 103–129, Jan. 1992, doi: 10.1080/08949468.1992.9966581.
[158]
Pinney and C, ‘Montage, doubling and the mouth of god’, in Ethnographic film aesthetics and narrative traditions, vol. Proceedings from NAFA, Aarhus: Intervention Press in association with the Nordic Anthropological Film Association, 1992.
[159]
Pinney, Christopher, Camera Indica: the social life of Indian photographs, vol. Envisioning Asia. London: Reaktion Books, 1997.
[160]
Sprague and S, ‘How I See the Yoruba See Themselves’, Studies in the anthropology of visual communication, vol. 5, 1978.
[161]
Sprague and SF, ‘Yoruba Photography: How Yoruba See Themselves’, in The Anthropology of media: a reader, vol. Blackwell readers in anthropology, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2002.
[162]
Young and C, ‘Observational Cinema’, in Principles of visual anthropology, 2nd ed., Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1995.
[163]
MacDougall, David and Taylor, Lucien, Transcultural cinema. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1998.
[164]
D. MacDougall, ‘Ethnographic Film: Failure and Promise’, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 405–425, Oct. 1978, doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.07.100178.002201.
[165]
MacDougall, David and Taylor, Lucien, Transcultural cinema. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1998.
[166]
Grimshaw, Anna, The ethnographer’s eye: ways of seeing in anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=202024
[167]
Banks and M, ‘Which Films are the Ethnographic Films’, in Film as ethnography, Manchester: Manchester University Press, in association with the Granada Centre for Visual Anthropology, 1992.
[168]
Nichols, Bill, Representing reality: issues and concepts in documentary. Bloomington: Indiana U.P., 1991.
[169]
Aufderheide, Patricia, Documentary film: a very short introduction, vol. Very short introductions. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9780199720392
[170]
‘Titicut Follies’. .
[171]
MacDougall, ‘To Live With Herds’. 1972.
[172]
Loizos, Peter, Innovation in ethnographic film: from innocence to self- consciousness, 1955-85. Manchester: Manchester U. P., 1993.
[173]
MacDougall, David and Taylor, Lucien, Transcultural cinema. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1998.
[174]
MacDougall, ‘Wedding Camels’. .
[175]
Sheppard & Parkes, ‘The Kalasha: rites of spring’. 1990.
[176]
Barnouw, Erik, Documentary: a history of the non-fiction film, 2nd rev. ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
[177]
Barsam, Richard Meran, Nonfiction film: a critical history, Rev. and Expanded. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992.
[178]
L. de Heusch, ‘The cinema and social science: A survey of ethnographic and sociological films∗’, Visual Anthropology, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 99–156, Jun. 1988, doi: 10.1080/08949468.1988.9966467.
[179]
Grimshaw, Anna, The ethnographer’s eye: ways of seeing in anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=202024
[180]
Henley and P, ‘Narratives: the guilty secret of ethnographic documentary?’, in Reflecting visual ethnography: using the camera in anthropological research, vol. CNWS publications, Hojbjerg: CNWS Publications, 2006.
[181]
Henley and P, ‘The origins of observational cinema: conversations with Colin Young’, Memories of the Origins of Visual Anthropology, 2007.
[182]
Macdonald, Kevin and Cousins, Mark, Imagining reality: the Faber book of documentary. London: Faber, 1996.
[183]
Nichols, Bill, Representing reality: issues and concepts in documentary. Bloomington: Indiana U.P., 1991.
[184]
Rabiger, Michael, Directing the documentary, 4th ed. Boston, Mass: Focal Press, 2004.
[185]
Rotha, Paul and Ruby, Jay, Robert J. Flaherty: a biography. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania P., 1983.
[186]
R. Silverstone and British Film Institute, Framing science: the making of a BBC documentary. London: BFI Pub, 1985.
[187]
Tomas and D, ‘Manufacturing Vision: Kino-Eye, The Man with a Movie Camera, and the Perceptual reconstruction of Social Identity’, in Visualizing theory: selected essays from V.A.R., 1990-1994, London: Routledge, 1994.
[188]
Winston, Brian and British Film Institute, Claiming the real: the Griersonian documentary and its legitimations. London: British Film Institute, 1995.
[189]
Young and C, ‘Observational Cinema’, in Principles of visual anthropology, 2nd ed., Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1995.
[190]
Engelbrecht, Beate, Memories of the origins of ethnographic film, vol. Menschen, Wissen, Medien. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2007.
[191]
Banks and M, ‘Which Films are Ethnographic Films’, in Film as ethnography, Manchester: Manchester University Press, in association with the Granada Centre for Visual Anthropology, 1992.
[192]
De Brigard and E, ‘The history of ethnographic film’, in Principles of visual anthropology, 2nd ed., Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1995.
[193]
F. Ginsburg, ‘Television and the Mediation of Culture: Issues In British Ethnographic Film’, Visual Anthropology Review, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 97–102, Mar. 1992, doi: 10.1525/var.1992.8.1.97.
[194]
Grimshaw, Anna, The ethnographer’s eye: ways of seeing in anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=202024
[195]
P. Harvey, ‘Ethnographic Film and the Politics of Difference: A Review of Film Festivals’, Visual Anthropology Review, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 164–176, Mar. 1993, doi: 10.1525/var.1993.9.1.164.
[196]
Henley and P, ‘British Ethnographic Film’, Anthropology today, vol. 1, no. 1, 1985 [Online]. Available: http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=Anthropology+Today&s=AC_T_M&submit=Search
[197]
Marshall, John and Ruby, Jay, The cinema of John Marshall, vol. Visual anthropology. Langhorne Pa: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1993.
[198]
Krebs and S, ‘The film elicitation technique’, in Principles of visual anthropology, 2nd ed., Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1995.
[199]
Loizos, Peter, Innovation in ethnographic film: from innocence to self- consciousness, 1955-85. Manchester: Manchester U. P., 1993.
[200]
Michaels and E, ‘How to look at us looking at the Yanamamo looking at us’, in A crack in the mirror: reflexive perspectives in anthropology, Philadelphia: U. of Pennsylvania P., 1982.
[201]
Nichols, Bill, Representing reality: issues and concepts in documentary. Bloomington: Indiana U.P., 1991.
[202]
Rollwagen, Jack R., Anthropological filmmaking: anthropological perspectives on the production of film and video for general public audiences, vol. Visual anthropology. Chur: Harwood Academic, 1988.
[203]
J. Ruby, ‘Speaking For, Speaking About, Speaking With, or Speaking Alongside An Anthropological and Documentary Dilemma’, Visual Anthropology Review, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 50–67, Sep. 1991, doi: 10.1525/var.1991.7.2.50.
[204]
Grimshaw, Anna, The ethnographer’s eye: ways of seeing in anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=202024
[205]
Rouch and J, ‘The camera and man’, in Principles of visual anthropology, 2nd ed., Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1995.
[206]
J. Wheeler, ‘“The Life That We Don’t Want”: Using Participatory Video in Researching Violence’, IDS Bulletin, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 10–18, May 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2009.00033.x.
[207]
MacDougall and D, ‘Beyond observational cinema’, in Principles of visual anthropology, 2nd ed., Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1995.
[208]
MacDougall, David and Taylor, Lucien, Transcultural cinema. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1998.
[209]
MacDougall, David and Taylor, Lucien, Transcultural cinema. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1998.
[210]
F. R. Myers, ‘From Ethnography to Metaphor: Recent Films from David and Judith MacDougall’, Cultural Anthropology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 205–220, May 1988, doi: 10.1525/can.1988.3.2.02a00050.
[211]
A. Grimshaw and A. Ravetz, ‘Observational cinema: anthropology, film, and the exploration of social life.’, in Observational cinema: anthropology, film, and the exploration of social life, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2009.
[212]
‘An example of PV from Insight Media’. .
[213]
Lunch, N & Lunch, and C, ‘Insights into Participatory Video: A Handbook for the Field’, 2006. .
[214]
Shaw, Jackie and Robertson, Clive, Participatory video: a practical approach to using video creatively in group development work. London: Routledge, 1997.
[215]
Freire, Paulo, Pedagogy of the oppressed, New rev. ed., vol. Penguin Education. London: Penguin, 1996.
[216]
Chambers, Robert, Ideas for development. London: Earthscan, 2005.
[217]
‘More Information on Participatory Video’. .
[218]
Clifford, James, The predicament of culture: twentieth-century ethnography, literature, and art. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard U.P., 1988.
[219]
Eaton, Mick, Anthropology - reality - cinema: the films of Jean Rouch. London: British Film Institute, 1979.
[220]
Loizos, Peter, Innovation in ethnographic film: from innocence to self- consciousness, 1955-85. Manchester: Manchester U. P., 1993.
[221]
Thompson, C. W. and French Institute, L’autre et le sacré: surréalisme, cinéma, ethnologie. Paris: L’Harmattan, 1995.
[222]
Stoller, Paul, The cinematic griot: the ethnography of Jean Rouch. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
[223]
Commission on Visual Anthropology, ‘Special Issue on Jean Rouch’, Visual anthropology, vol. 2, 1989.
[224]
MacDougall and D, ‘Beyond observational cinema’, in Principles of visual anthropology, 2nd ed., Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1995.
[225]
MacDougall and D, ‘Unpriveliged Camera Style’, in Transcultural cinema, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1998.
[226]
MacDougall and D, ‘Whose story is it?’, in Visualizing theory: selected essays from V.A.R., 1990-1994, London: Routledge, 1994.
[227]
MacDougall and D, ‘Whose story is it?’, in Ethnographic film aesthetics and narrative traditions, vol. Proceedings from NAFA, Aarhus: Intervention Press in association with the Nordic Anthropological Film Association, 1992.
[228]
Grimshaw, Anna and Papastergiadis, Nikos, ‘Conversations with anthropological film-makers: David MacDougall’, vol. Prickly Pear pamphlet, 1995.
[229]
Barbash, I and Taylor, and L, ‘Re-framing ethnographic film: a ’conversation with David and Judith MacDougall’, American anthropologist, vol. 98 [Online]. Available: https://www-jstor-org.chain.kent.ac.uk/stable/682894
[230]
Loizos, Peter, Innovation in ethnographic film: from innocence to self- consciousness, 1955-85. Manchester: Manchester U. P., 1993.
[231]
Turton and D, ‘Anthropology on television: what next?’, in Film as ethnography, Manchester: Manchester University Press, in association with the Granada Centre for Visual Anthropology, 1992.
[232]
Grimshaw, Anna, The ethnographer’s eye: ways of seeing in anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kentuk/detail.action?docID=202024
[233]
Abu-Lughod and L, ‘The objects of soap opera: Egyptian soap opera and the cultural politics of modernity’, in Worlds apart: modernity through the prism of the local, vol. The uses of knowledge, London: Routledge, 1995.
[234]
Abu-Lughod and L, ‘The objects of soap opera: Egyptian soap opera and the cultural politics of modernity’, in The Anthropology of media: a reader, vol. Blackwell readers in anthropology, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2002.
[235]
Ruby, Jay, Picturing culture: explorations of film & anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.
[236]
Barbash, Ilisa and Taylor, Lucien, The cinema of Robert Gardner. Oxford: Berg, 2007.
[237]
Loizos and P, ‘First exits from observational realism: narrative experiments in recent ethnographic film’, in Rethinking visual anthropology, London: Yale University Press, 1997.
[238]
Ruby, Jay, Picturing culture: explorations of film & anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.
[239]
Barbash, Ilisa and Taylor, Lucien, The cinema of Robert Gardner. Oxford: Berg, 2007.
[240]
Gardner, ‘Forest of Bliss’. 1986.
[241]
Goodale and D, ‘Pipe Dreams’. 2000.
[242]
Connolly, B and Anderson, and R, ‘First Contact’. 1983.
[243]
Connolly, B and Anderson, and R, ‘Joe Leahy’s Neighbours’. 1988.
[244]
Connolly, B and Anderson, and R, ‘Black Harvest’. 1991.
[245]
Evans and N, ‘Fantastic Invasion’. 1991.
[246]
‘Disappearing World - Tv Series’. .
[247]
‘Under The Sun - Tv Series’. .
[248]
M. Banks, ‘Television and anthropology: An unhappy marriage?’, Visual Anthropology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 21–45, Jan. 1994, doi: 10.1080/08949468.1994.9966634.
[249]
Turton and D, ‘Anthropology on television: what next?’, in Film as ethnography, Manchester: Manchester University Press, in association with the Granada Centre for Visual Anthropology, 1992.
[250]
Loizos and P, ‘Granada Television’s Disappearing World series: an appraisal’, American anthropologist, vol. 82 [Online]. Available: https://www-jstor-org.chain.kent.ac.uk/stable/677459
[251]
Devereaux, Leslie and Hillman, Roger, Fields of vision: essays in film studies, visual anthropology, and photography. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.
[252]
L. Abu-Lughod, ‘Finding a Place for Islam: Egyptian Television Serials and the National Interest’, Public Culture, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 493–513, Apr. 1993, doi: 10.1215/08992363-5-3-493.
[253]
Abu-Lughod and L, ‘The objects of soap opera: Egyptian soap opera and the cultural politics of modernity’, in Worlds apart: modernity through the prism of the local, vol. The uses of knowledge, London: Routledge, 1995.
[254]
Abu-Lughod and L, ‘The objects of soap opera: Egyptian soap opera and the cultural politics of modernity’, in The Anthropology of media: a reader, vol. Blackwell readers in anthropology, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2002.
[255]
Abu-Lughod and L, ‘Egyptian Melodrama’, in Media worlds: anthropology on new terrain, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.kentuk.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=224223
[256]
Ang and I, ‘Dallas and the ideology of mass culture’, in The cultural studies reader, 3rd ed., London: Routledge, 2007.
[257]
Ang, Ien, Watching Dallas: soap opera and the melodramatic imagination. London: Methuen, 1985.
[258]
Armbrust, Walter, Mass culture and modernism in Egypt, vol. Cambridge studies in social and cultural anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
[259]
Das and V, ‘Soap opera and tele-documentary: culture and the domestic sphere in comtemporary India’, in Worlds apart: modernity through the prism of the local, vol. The uses of knowledge, London: Routledge, 1995.
[260]
Kottak, Conrad Phillip, Prime-time society: an anthropological analysis of television and culture, vol. The Wadsworth modern anthropology library. Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth Pub. Co, 1990.
[261]
P. Batty, ‘Singing the electric: aboriginal television in Australia’, in Channels of resistance: global television and local empowerment, T. Dowmunt, Ed. London: BFI Publishing, 1993.
[262]
Mandel and R, ‘A Marshall plan of the Mind: the political economy of a Kazakh soap opera’, in Media worlds: anthropology on new terrain, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.kentuk.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=224223
[263]
Miller and D, ‘The Young and the Restless in Trinidad: a case of the local and the global in mass consumption’, in Consuming technologies: media and information in domestic spaces, London: Routledge, 1994.
[264]
Ginsburg and F, ‘Screen memories: resignifying the traditional in Indigenous Media’, in Media worlds: anthropology on new terrain, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.kentuk.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=224223
[265]
D. Spitulnik, ‘“Anthropology and Mass Media”, “Emergence of Indigenous Media”’, Annual review of anthropology, vol. 22, pp. 293–315, 1993 [Online]. Available: http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=Annual+review+of+anthropology&s=AC_T_M&submit=Search
[266]
Salazar, JF & Cordova, and A, ‘Imperfect Media and the Poetics of Indigenous Video in Latin America’, in Global indigenous media: cultures, poetics, and politics, Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2008.
[267]
T. Asch, J. I. Cardozo, H. Cabellero, and J. Bortoli, ‘The Story We Now Want to Hear Is Not Ours to Tell: Relinquishing Control Over Representation: Toward Sharing Visual Communication Skills with The Yanomami’, Visual Anthropology Review, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 102–106, Sep. 1991, doi: 10.1525/var.1991.7.2.102.
[268]
Moore and RO, ‘Marketing Alterity’, in Visualizing theory: selected essays from V.A.R., 1990-1994, London: Routledge, 1994.
[269]
Michaels and E, ‘Hundreds Shot at Aboriginal Community: ABC Makes TV Documentary at Yuendumu’, in Bad Aboriginal art: tradition, media, and technological horizons, vol. Theory out of bounds, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994.
[270]
T. Turner, ‘Defiant Images: The Kayapo Appropriation of Video’, Anthropology Today, vol. 8, no. 6, Dec. 1992, doi: 10.2307/2783265.
[271]
Turner and T, ‘Representing, resisting, rethinking: historical transformations of Kayapo culture’, in Colonial situations: essays on the contextualization of ethnographic knowledge, vol. History of anthropology, London: University of Wisconsin Press, 1991.
[272]
Faris and J, ‘Anthropological transparency: film, representation and politics’, in Film as ethnography, Manchester: Manchester University Press, in association with the Granada Centre for Visual Anthropology, 1992.
[273]
J. C. Faris, ‘A Response to Terence Turner’, Anthropology Today, vol. 9, no. 1, Feb. 1993, doi: 10.2307/2783336.
[274]
Turner and T, ‘Representation, Politics, and Cultural Imagination in Indigenous Video’, in Media worlds: anthropology on new terrain, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.kentuk.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=224223
[275]
‘37 Uses of a Dead Sheep’. 2006.
[276]
Amponsah and G, ‘The Importance of Being Elegant’. 2004.
[277]
‘Babakiueria’. 1988.
[278]
Ginsburg, F and Strickland, and A, ‘The latest in reality TV? Maori Television stakes a claim on the world stage’, 2005.
[279]
F. Ginsburg, ‘Culture/Media: a (mild) polemic’, Anthropology today, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 5–15, 1994 [Online]. Available: http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=Anthropology+Today&s=AC_T_M&submit=Search
[280]
Smith, Linda Tuhiwai, Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. Dunedin, N.Z.: University of Otago Press, 1999.
[281]
Prins and HE, ‘Visual media and the Primitive Perplex’, in Media worlds: anthropology on new terrain, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.kentuk.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=224223
[282]
Worth, S., Through Navajo eyes: an exploration in film communication and anthropology. [Place of publication not identified]: Indiana U.P., 1972.
[283]
Channel Four (Great Britain), Channels of resistance: global television and local empowerment. London: BFI Publishing, 1993.
[284]
F. Ginsburg, ‘Indigenous Media: Faustian Contract or Global Village?’, Cultural Anthropology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 92–112, Feb. 1991, doi: 10.1525/can.1991.6.1.02a00040.
[285]
Ginsburg and F, ‘Mediating Culture’, in The Anthropology of media: a reader, vol. Blackwell readers in anthropology, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2002.
[286]
Meadows and M, ‘Broadcasting in Aboriginal Australia: one mob, one voice, one land’, in Ethnic minority media: an international perspective, vol. Communication and human values, London: Sage Publications, 1992.
[287]
Michaels and E, ‘Aboriginal content - who’s got it, who needs it?’, 1991.
[288]
Michaels and E, ‘TV Tribes’, 1982. .
[289]
Ruby and J, ‘In the Belly of the Beast: Eric Michaels and Indigenous Media’, in Picturing culture: explorations of film & anthropology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.
[290]
Turner and T, ‘Representing, resisting, rethinking: historical transformations of Kayapo culture’, in Colonial situations: essays on the contextualization of ethnographic knowledge, vol. History of anthropology, London: University of Wisconsin Press, 1991.
[291]
Faris and J, ‘Anthropological transparency: film, representation and politics’, in Film as ethnography, Manchester: Manchester University Press, in association with the Granada Centre for Visual Anthropology, 1992.
[292]
T. Turner, ‘Defiant Images: The Kayapo Appropriation of Video’, Anthropology Today, vol. 8, no. 6, Dec. 1992, doi: 10.2307/2783265.
[293]
J. C. Faris, ‘A Response to Terence Turner’, Anthropology Today, vol. 9, no. 1, Feb. 1993, doi: 10.2307/2783336.
[294]
Turner and T, ‘Representation, Politics, and Cultural Imagination in Indigenous Video’, in Media worlds: anthropology on new terrain, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.kentuk.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=224223
[295]
Salazar, JF & Cordova, and A, ‘Imperfect Media and the Poetics of Indigenous Video in Latin America (1985-2005)’, in Global indigenous media: cultures, poetics, and politics, Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2008.
[296]
Salazar and JF, ‘Making Culture Visible: the mediated construction of a Mapuche Nation in Chile’, in Making our media: global initiatives toward a democratic public sphere, Vol. 1: Creating new communication spaces, vol. Euricom monographs : communicative innovations and democracy, Cresskill, N.J.: Hampton Press, 2010.
[297]
Salazar and JF, ‘Indigenous People and the Communication Rights Agenda: A Global Perspective’, in New media worlds: challenges for convergence, South Melbourne, Vic: Oxford University Press, 2007.
[298]
J. F. Salazar, ‘Indigenous Peoples and the Cultural Constructions of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Latin America’, in Information technology and indigenous people, Hershey, Pa: Information Science Publishing, 2007, pp. 14–26 [Online]. Available: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/978-1-59904-298-5.ch002
[299]
R. Mader, ‘Globo village: television in Brazil’, in Channels of resistance: global television and local empowerment, T. Dowmunt, Ed. London: BFI Publishing, 1993.
[300]
Riggins, Stephen Harold, Ethnic minority media: an international perspective, vol. Communication and human values. London: Sage Publications, 1992.
[301]
Larkin and B, ‘Indian Films and Nigerian Lovers: Media and the Creation of Parallel Modernities’, Africa, vol. 67, 1997.
[302]
E. Hahn, ‘The Tongan Tradition of Going to the Movies’, Visual Anthropology Review, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 103–111, Mar. 1994, doi: 10.1525/var.1994.10.1.103.
[303]
Hahn and E, ‘The Tongan tradition of going to the movies’, in The Anthropology of media: a reader, vol. Blackwell readers in anthropology, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2002.
[304]
Howard and A, ‘Presenting Rotuma to the World: The Making of The Land Has Eyes’, 2006.
[305]
Mankenar and P, ‘Epic Contests: Television and religious identity in India’, in Media worlds: anthropology on new terrain, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.kentuk.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=224223
[306]
Lull, James, Inside family viewing: ethnographic research on television’s audiences, vol. Comedia. London: Routledge, 1990.
[307]
Weakland and J, ‘Feature films as cultural documents’, in Principles of visual anthropology, 2nd ed., Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1995.
[308]
Kulick, D & Wilson, and M, ‘Rambo’s Wife Saves the day’, in The Anthropology of media: a reader, vol. Blackwell readers in anthropology, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2002.
[309]
Wilk and RR, ‘“It’s Destroying a Whole Generation”: Television and Moral Discourse in Belize’, in The Anthropology of media: a reader, vol. Blackwell readers in anthropology, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2002.
[310]
‘The Land Has Eyes’. .
[311]
Howard and A, ‘Presenting Rotuma to the World: The Making of The Land Has Eyes’, 2006.
[312]
Hereniko and V, ‘Indigenous Knowledge and Academic Imperialism’, Remembrance of Pacific Pasts: An Invitation to Remake History, 2000.
[313]
Hereniko, Vilsoni and Wilson, Rob, Inside out: literature, cultural politics, and identity in the new Pacific, vol. Pacific formations. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999.
[314]
Hereniko, Vilsoni Tausie, Don’t cry, mama: a three-act play. Suva: Mana, 1977.
[315]
Z. Kunuk, ‘Atanarjuat: the fast runner’. ICA Films, [United Kingdom], 2009.
[317]
‘Ten Canoes’, 2006. .
[319]
Pearson, Roberta, Reading Lost: perspectives on a hit television show, vol. Reading contemporary television. London: I. B. Tauris, 2009.
[320]
Moore, Rachel O., Savage theory: cinema as modern magic. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2000.
[321]
Ruby, Jay, Picturing culture: explorations of film & anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.
[322]
B. R. O. Anderson, Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism, Revised edition. London: Verso, 2016.
[323]
Armes, Roy, Third World film making and the West. Berkeley: U. of California P., 1987.
[324]
Fischer and M, ‘Toward a third world politics: seeing through fiction and film in the Iranian cultural area’, 1984.
[325]
H. Powdermaker, Hollywood, the dream factory: an anthropologist looks at the movie-makers. Mansfield Centre, Connecticut: Martino Publishing, 2013.
[326]
Powdermaker and H, ‘Hollywood, the Dream Factory’, in The Anthropology of media: a reader, vol. Blackwell readers in anthropology, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2002.
[327]
‘An Indonesian Film Called Primitif’, Anthropology Today, vol. 10, no. 4, Aug. 1994, doi: 10.2307/2783438.
[328]
P. Barrot, I. D. Abdoulaye, and L. Taylor, Nollywood: the video phenomenon in Nigeria, Rev. English ed. Oxford: James Currey, 2008.
[329]
Howard and A, ‘Presenting Rotuma to the World: The Making of The Land Has Eyes’, 2006.
[330]
‘The Land Has Eyes’. .
[332]
King, John, Magical reels: a history of cinema in Latin America, New ed., vol. Critical studies in Latin American and Iberian cultures. London: Verso, 2000.
[333]
Pines, Jim and Willemen, Paul, Questions of third cinema. London: British Film Institute, 1989.
[334]
Rocha and G, ‘Glauber Rocha: introduction’.
[335]
Tuft, T. 2000. Living with the Rubbish Queen. Telenovelas Culture and Modernity in Brazil. University of Luton Press. [Online]. Available: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Living-Rubbish-Queen-Telenovelas-Modernity/dp/1860205410
[336]
R. Thomas, ‘Indian Cinema: Pleasures and Popularity’, Screen, vol. 26, no. 3–4, pp. 116–131, May 1985, doi: 10.1093/screen/26.3-4.116.
[337]
Chakravarty, Sumita S., National identity in Indian popular cinema, 1947-1987, 1st ed., vol. Texas film studies series. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1993.
[338]
Dickey, Sara, Cinema and the urban poor in south India, vol. Cambridge studies in social and cultural anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
[339]
P. Hartmann, B. R. Patil, and A. Dighe, The mass media and village life: an Indian study. New Delhi: Sage Publications, 1989.
[340]
Ganti and T, ‘And Yet My Heart Is Still Indian: the Bombay Film Industry and the (H)Indianization of Hollywood’, in Media worlds: anthropology on new terrain, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.kentuk.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=224223
[341]
Uberoi and P, ‘The Diaspora comes home: Disciplining desire in DDLJ’, 1998.
[342]
Gillespie, Marie, Television, ethnicity and cultural change, vol. Comedia. London: Routledge, 1995.
[343]
Hamilton and A, ‘The National Picture: Thai Media and Cultural Identity’, in Media worlds: anthropology on new terrain, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.kentuk.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=224223
[344]
Kottak, Conrad Phillip, Prime-time society: an anthropological analysis of television and culture, vol. The Wadsworth modern anthropology library. Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth Pub. Co, 1990.
[345]
Lull, James, World families watch television, vol. Communication and human values. London: Sage Publications, 1988.
[346]
Lull, James, Inside family viewing: ethnographic research on television’s audiences, vol. Comedia. London: Routledge, 1990.
[347]
Lull, James, China turned on: television, reform, and resistance. London: Routledge, 1991.
[348]
Mankenar and P, ‘Epic Contests: Television and religious identity in India’, in Media worlds: anthropology on new terrain, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.kentuk.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=224223
[349]
Morley, David, Television, audiences and cultural studies. London: Routledge, 1992.
[350]
Silverstone, Roger and Hirsch, Eric, Consuming technologies: media and information in domestic spaces. London: Routledge, 1994.
[351]
Harding and T, ‘Strategic Distribution: Reaching Key Audiences in Innovative Ways’, in Video for change: a guide for advocacy and activism, London: Pluto Press in association with Witness, 2005.
[352]
Lamphere and L, ‘The Convergence of Applied, Practicising, and Public Anthropology in the 21st Century’, Human organization, vol. 63, 2004.
[353]
N. Scheper-Hughes, ‘The Primacy of the Ethical: Propositions for a Militant Anthropology’, Current anthropology, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 409–440, 1995.
[354]
T. Turner, ‘Anthropology as Reality Show and as Co-production: Internal Relations between Theory and Activism’, Critique of Anthropology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 15–25, Mar. 2006, doi: 10.1177/0308275X06061481.
[355]
Brody, Hugh, Maps and dreams: Indians and the British Columbia frontier. London: Faber, 2002.
[356]
Brody, Hugh, The other side of Eden: hunter-gatherers, farmers and the shaping of the world. London: Faber, 2001.
[357]
Mehta, Deepa, ‘Water’. Hamilton Mehta Productions Inc., Mongrel Media, Téléfilm Canada, Canada, 2005.
[358]
‘From The Heart Of The World: The Elder Borther’s Warning’. 1990.
[359]
‘Eco-Storm’. [Online]. Available: https://ecostorm.tv
[360]
‘Wipe Off The Map - Short Documentary From Gaza City’. .
[361]
‘The Disappearing Of Tuvalu: Trouble In Paradise’, 2004. .
[362]
R. Fletcher, Beyond resistance: the future of freedom. Nova Science Publishers, Inc, 2007.
[363]
Graeber, David, Toward an anthropological theory of value: the false coin of our own dreams. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001.
[364]
Graeber, David, Fragments of an anarchist anthropology, vol. Paradigm. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press, 2004.
[365]
Pink, Sarah, The future of visual anthropology: engaging the senses. London: Routledge, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=KentUniv&isbn=9780203003596
[366]
Pink, Sarah, Visual interventions: applied visual anthropology, vol. Studies in applied anthropology. New York: Berghahn Books, 2007.
[367]
Gregory, Sam, Video for change: a guide for advocacy and activism. London: Pluto Press in association with Witness, 2005.
[368]
Harding, Thomas, The Video Activist Handbook, 2nd ed. London: Pluto Press, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.theacademiclibrary.com/login_cat.asp?filename=0745317715
[369]
Andrew, Dudley, The major film theories: an introduction. London: O.U.P., 1976.
[370]
Andrew, Dudley, Concepts in film theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.
[371]
Bordwell and D, ‘Film Studies and Grand Theory’, in Post-theory: reconstructing film studies, vol. Wisconsin studies in film, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1996.
[372]
Mulvey and L, ‘Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema’, Screen, vol. 16, 1975.
[373]
Mulvey, Laura, Visual and other pleasures, vol. Language, discourse, society. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan, 1989.
[374]
Nichols, Bill, Movies and methods: an anthology. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976.
[375]
Turner, Graeme, Film as social practice, 3rd ed., vol. Studies in culture and communication. London: Routledge, 1999.
[376]
Weakland and J, ‘Feature films as cultural documents’, in Principles of visual anthropology, 2nd ed., Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1995.
[377]
J. Clifford, ‘On Ethnographic Surrealism’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, vol. 23, no. 04, Oct. 1981, doi: 10.1017/S0010417500013554.
[378]
Clifford, James, The predicament of culture: twentieth-century ethnography, literature, and art. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard U.P., 1988.
[379]
Clifford, James, Routes: travel and translation in the late twentieth century. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1997.
[380]
Edwards, Elizabeth, Raw histories: photographs, anthropology and museums, vol. Materializing culture. Oxford: Berg, 2001.
[381]
Hewison, Robert, The heritage industry: Britain in a climate of decline. London: Methuen London.
[382]
Karp, Ivan and Lavine, Steven D., Exhibiting cultures: the poetics and politics of museum display. London: 1991.
[383]
Merriman and N, ‘Heritage from the other side of the glass case’, Anthropology today, vol. 5, 1989.
[384]
Stocking, George W., Objects and others: essays on museums and material culture, vol. History of anthropology. Madison, Wis: University of Wisconsin Press, 1985.
[385]
Bourdieu, Pierre, Darbel, Alain, and Schnapper, Dominique, The love of art: European art museums and their public. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1990.
[386]
Clifford, James, The predicament of culture: twentieth-century ethnography, literature, and art. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard U.P., 1988.
[387]
J. Clifford, ‘On Ethnographic Surrealism’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, vol. 23, no. 04, Oct. 1981, doi: 10.1017/S0010417500013554.
[388]
Coote, Jeremy and Shelton, Anthony, Anthropology, art, and aesthetics, vol. Oxford studies in the anthropology of cultural forms. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
[389]
Firth and R, ‘Art and anthropology’, in Anthropology, art, and aesthetics, vol. Oxford studies in the anthropology of cultural forms, New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
[390]
A. Forge and Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research, Primitive art & society. London: Oxford University Press, for Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research, 1973.
[391]
Gell and A, ‘The Technology of Enchantment and the Enchantment of Technology’, in Anthropology, art, and aesthetics, vol. Oxford studies in the anthropology of cultural forms, New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
[392]
Gell, Alfred and Hirsch, Eric, The art of anthropology: essay and diagrams, vol. London School of Economics monographs on social anthropology. London: Athlone Press, 1999.
[393]
Gell, Alfred, Art and agency: an anthropological theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.
[394]
MacClancy and J, ‘Anthropology, Art and Contest’, in Contesting art: art, politics and identity in the modern world, vol. Berg ethnicity and identity series, New York: Berg, 1997.
[395]
Morphy, Howard, Ancestral connections: art and an Aboriginal system of knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
[396]
Morphy and H, ‘The Anthropology of Art’, in Companion encyclopedia of anthropology, London: Routledge, 1994 [Online]. Available: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.kentuk.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=169490
[397]
Munn, N D., Walbiri iconography: graphic representation and cultural symbolism in a central Australiansociety. [Place of publication not identified]: Cornell U.P.
[398]
Thomas, Nicholas, Losche, Diane, and Newell, Jennifer, Double vision: art histories and colonial histories in the Pacific. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
[399]
Thomas and N, ‘Collecting and nationality in the anthropology of art’, in Rethinking visual anthropology, London: Yale University Press, 1997.
[400]
Adorno and T, ‘The schema of mass culture’, in The culture industry: selected essays on mass culture, vol. Routledge classics, London: Routledge, 2001.
[401]
Adorno and T, ‘Culture industry reconsidered’, in The culture industry: selected essays on mass culture, vol. Routledge classics, London: Routledge, 2001.
[402]
Benjamin and W, ‘The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction’, in Illuminations, vol. Pimlico, London: Pimlico, 1999.
[403]
Eco and U, ‘Apocalyptic and integrated intellectuals: mass communications and theories of mass culture’, in Apocalypse postponed, London: Flamingo, 1995.
[404]
Hall and S, ‘The rediscovery of “ideology”: return of the oppressed in media studies’, in Culture, society, and the media, London: Methuen, 1982.
[405]
Hebdige, Dick, Hiding in the light: on images and things, vol. Comedia book. London: Routledge, 1988.
[406]
Huyssen, Andreas and American Council of Learned Societies, After the great divide: modernism, mass culture, postmodernism, vol. Language, discourse, society. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1986 [Online]. Available: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://name.umdl.umich.edu/HEB01765
[407]
Lave and J et al, ‘Coming of age in Birmingham’, Annual review of anthropology, vol. 21, 1992.
[408]
Rosaldo and R, ‘Whose Cultural Studies?’, American anthropologist, vol. 96 [Online]. Available: https://www-jstor-org.chain.kent.ac.uk/stable/682297
[409]
Williams and R, ‘“Culture”, “Hegemony” and “Masses”’, in Keywords: a vocabulary of culture and society, Rev. and exp. Ed., London: Fontana, 1988.
[410]
Appadurai and A, ‘Global ethnoscapes: notes for a transnational anthropology’, in Recapturing anthropology: working in the present, vol. School of American Research advanced seminar series, Santa Fe, N.M: School of American Research Press, 1991.
[411]
Baudrillard and J, ‘The order of simulacra’, in Symbolic exchange and death, vol. Theory, culture&society, London: Sage, 1993.
[412]
Fischer, Michael M J and Abedi, Mehdi, Debating Muslims: cultural dialogues in postmodernity and tradition, vol. New directions in anthropological writing : history, poetics, cultural criticism. London: U. of Wisconsin P., 1990.
[413]
Habermas and J, ‘Modernity: an incomplete project’, in The anti-aesthetic: essays on postmodern culture, Port Townsend, Washington: Bay Press, 1983.
[414]
Harvey, David, The condition of postmodernity: an enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Oxford: Blackwell, 1989.
[415]
Jameson and F, ‘Postmodernism or the cultural logic of late capitalism’, in Postmodernism, or, The cultural logic of late capitalism, London: Verso, 1991.
[416]
Jameson and F, ‘Postmodernism or the cultural logic of late capitalism’, New left review, vol. 146, 1984.
[417]
McLuhan and M, ‘The medium is the message’, in The Anthropology of media: a reader, vol. Blackwell readers in anthropology, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2002.
[418]
Miller, Daniel and Association of Social Anthropologists of the Commonwealth, Worlds apart: modernity through the prism of the local, vol. The uses of knowledge. London: Routledge, 1995.
[419]
Ruby, Jay, Picturing culture: explorations of film & anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.
[420]
Turkle, Sherry, Life on the screen: identity in the age of the Internet. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1996.
