[1]
Altman, S. 2003. A Theory of Child Support. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. 17, 2 (Aug. 2003), 173–210. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/17.2.173.
[2]
Altman, S. 2003. A Theory of Child Support. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. 17, 2 (Aug. 2003), 173–210. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/17.2.173.
[3]
Auchmuty, R. 2015. From civil partnerships to same-sex marriage: interdisciplinary reflections. Routledge.
[4]
Bainham, A. 2007. PERMANENCE FOR CHILDREN: SPECIAL GUARDIANSHIP OR ADOPTION? The Cambridge Law Journal. 66, 03 (Nov. 2007). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197307000906.
[5]
Bainham, A. 2009. THE PECULIAR FINALITY OF ADOPTION. The Cambridge Law Journal. 68, 02 (Jul. 2009). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197309000646.
[6]
Bainham, A. 2009. THE PECULIAR FINALITY OF ADOPTION. The Cambridge Law Journal. 68, 02 (Jul. 2009). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197309000646.
[7]
Barker, N. 2012. Civil Partnerships: An Alternative to Marriage? An Analysis of the Application in Ferguson and Others v United Kingdom. Family law. 42, 5 (2012), 548–551.
[8]
Barker, N. and Monk, D. eds. 2015. From civil partnerships to same-sex marriage: interdisciplinary reflections. Routledge.
[9]
Barnett, A. 2014. ‘Contact at all costs? Domestic violence and children’s welfare’. Child and family law quarterly. 26, 4 (2014).
[10]
Bill 2014-15, second reading and committee stage debates: http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2014-15/divorcefinancialprovisionbill/stages.html.
[11]
Bremner, P. 2014. Lesbian parents and biological fathers – leave to apply for contact. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 36, 1 (Jan. 2014), 79–81. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2014.886880.
[12]
Bridgeman, J. et al. eds. 2016. Regulating family responsibilities. Taylor & Francis Ltd.
[13]
Burton, M. 2015. Emergency Barring Orders in Domestic Violence Cases: What can England and Wales learn from other European countries? Child and family law quarterly. 27, 1 (2015), 25–42.
[14]
Camplin, H. and Scott, E. 2015. "We Are a Group of Feminist Lawyers Doing What We Can”: An Interview with Emma Scott, Director of Rights of Women. Feminist Legal Studies. 23, 3 (Nov. 2015), 319–328. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-015-9299-z.
[15]
Deech, R. 2009. ‘What’s a Woman Worth? Family law. (2009), 1140–1145.
[16]
Deech, R. 2009. ‘What’s a Woman Worth? Family law. (2009), 1140–1145.
[17]
Delahunty, J. and Barnes, C. 2016. Radicalisation cases in the family courts: Part 1: An introduction. Family law. Feb, (2016).
[18]
Delahunty, J. and Barnes, C. 2016. Radicalisation cases in the family courts: Part 2: Practicalities and pitfalls’. Family law. March, (2016).
[19]
Delahunty, J. and Barnes, C. 2016. ‘Radicalisation cases in the family courts: Part 3: Threshold’. Family law. June, (2016).
[20]
Dewar, J. 1998. The Normal Chaos of Family Law. Modern Law Review. 61, 4 (Jul. 1998), 467–485. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00157.
[21]
Diduck, A. 2011. What is Family Law For? Current Legal Problems. 64, 1 (Jan. 2011), 287–314. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cur010.
[22]
Diduck, Alison Justice by ADR in private family matters: is it fair and is it possible.
[23]
Doughty, J. 2015. Myths and Misunderstanding in Adoption Law and Policy. Child and family law quarterly. 27, (2015).
[24]
Doyle, Roddy 1996. The woman who walked into doors. Jonathan Cape.
[25]
Eekelaar, J. 2011. "Not of the Highest Importance”: Family justice under threat. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 33, 4 (Dec. 2011), 311–317. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2011.632883.
[26]
Eekelaar, J. and Maclean, M. 2013. Family justice: the work of family judges in uncertain times. Hart Publishing.
[27]
Eekelaar, J. and Maclean, M. 2013. Family justice: the work of family judges in uncertain times. Hart Publishing.
[28]
Ellman, I.M. et al. 2014. Child Support Judgments: Comparing Public Policy to the Public’s Policy. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. 28, 3 (Dec. 2014), 274–301. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebu011.
[29]
Elsworth, M. and Gamble, N. 2015. Are Contracts and Pre-Birth Orders the Way Forward for UK Surrogacy? International Family Law. 2, (2015).
[30]
Enright, M. 2009. Choice, Culture and the Politics of Belonging: The Emerging Law of Forced and Arranged Marriage. Modern Law Review. 72, 3 (May 2009), 331–359. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00747.x.
[31]
Fenton-Glynn, C. 2015. ‘The Regulation and Recognition of Surrogacy under English Law: An Overview of the Case-Law. Child and family law quarterly. 83, (2015).
[32]
Fowler, E. 2012. A Queer Critique on the Polygamy Debate in Canada: Law, Culture, and Diversity. Dalhousie journal of legal studies. 21, (2012), 93–125.
[33]
Fox Harding, L.M. 1991. The Children Act 1989 in context: Four perspectives in Child Care Law and Policy (II). Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 13, 4 (Jul. 1991), 285–302. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069108416148.
[34]
Gaffney-Rhys, R. 2014. Same-Sex Marriage But Not Mixed-Sex Partnerships: Should the Civil Partnership Act 2004 be extended to opposite-sex couples? Child and family law quarterly. 26, 2 (2014), 173–195.
[35]
Gaffney-Rhys, R. 2015. The Criminalisation of Forced Marriage in England and Wales: One Year On. Family law. 45, 11 (2015), 1378–1384.
[36]
Gill, A. and Anitha, S. 2009. The illusion of protection? An analysis of forced marriage legislation and policy in the UK. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 31, 3 (Sep. 2009), 257–269. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09649060903354589.
[37]
Gill, A.K. and Anitha, S. 2011. Forced marriage: introducing a social justice and human rights perspective. Zed.
[38]
Gilmore, S. 2015. Withdrawal of Parental Responsibility: Lost Authority and a Lost Opportunity. The Modern Law Review. 78, 6 (Nov. 2015), 1042–1056. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12160.
[39]
Hale, B. 2011. Equality and autonomy in family law. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 33, 1 (Mar. 2011), 3–14. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2011.571466.
[40]
Hale, B. 2014. New families and the welfare of children. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 36, 1 (Jan. 2014), 26–35. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2014.887259.
[41]
Harris-Short, S. et al. 2015. Family law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press.
[42]
Harwin, J. 2016. Considering the case for parity in policy and practice between adoption and special guardianship: findings from a population wide study. Family law. Feb, (2016).
[43]
Herring, J. et al. 2011. Ante-Nuptial Agreements: Fairness, Equality and Presumptions. Law quarterly review. 127, (2011).
[44]
Herring, J. et al. 2015. Great debates in family law. Palgrave.
[45]
Herring, J. 2014. The welfare principle and the children act: presumably it’s about welfare? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 36, 1 (Jan. 2014), 14–25. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2014.887258.
[46]
Herring, J. and Foster, C. 2012. Welfare means relationality, virtue and altruism. Legal Studies. 32, 3 (Sep. 2012), 480–498. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2012.00232.x.
[47]
Holt, K. and Kelly, N. 2016. At a crossroads: to issue or not to issue care proceedings. Family law. Dec, (2016), 1450–1455.
[48]
Holt, K. and Kelly, N. 2015. When adoption without parental consent breaches human rights: implications of [2013] EWCA Civ 963 on decision making and permanency planning for children. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 37, 2 (Apr. 2015), 228–240. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2015.1028156.
[49]
Hunter, R. 2007. Close Encounters of a Judicial Kind: "Hearing” Children’s "Voices” in Family Law Proceedings. Child and family law quarterly. 19, (2007).
[50]
Hunter, R. 2011. Doing violence to family law. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 33, 4 (Dec. 2011), 343–359. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2011.632888.
[51]
Hunter, R.C. et al. 2010. Feminist judgments: from theory to practice. Hart.
[52]
Hunter, R.C. et al. 2010. Feminist judgments: from theory to practice. Hart.
[53]
Idriss, M.M. 2015. Forced Marriages - the Need for Criminalisation? Criminal law review. 9, (2015), 687–703.
[54]
Julie Wallbank Channelling the messiness of diverse family lives: resisting the calls to order and de-centring the hetero-normative family. Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law. 32, 4, 353–368.
[55]
Kaganas, F. 2013. ‘A Presumption That Involvement of Both Parents Is Best: Deciphering Law’s Messages. Child and family law quarterly. 25, (2013).
[56]
MACLEAN, M. and EEKELAAR, J. 1993. CHILD SUPPORT: THE BRITISH SOLUTION. ‘International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family’. 7, 2 (1993), 205–229. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/7.2.205.
[57]
Marshall, J. 2012. CONCEALED BIRTHS, ADOPTION AND HUMAN RIGHTS LAW: BEING WARY OF SEEKING TO OPEN WINDOWS INTO PEOPLE’S SOULS. The Cambridge Law Journal. 71, 02 (Jul. 2012), 325–354. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197312000517.
[58]
McCarthy, M. and Hunt, S. 2015. ‘I Know it was Every Week, but I Can’t be Sure if it was Every Day: Domestic Violence and Women with Learning Disabilities. Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities. 29, (2015).
[59]
McFarlane, A. 2016. Nothing Else Will Do. Family law. Dec, (2016), 1403–1412.
[60]
Miles, J. et al. eds. 2015. Marriage rites and rights. Hart Publishing.
[61]
Munby, J. 2016. ‘the14th View from the President’s Chambers: care cases: settlement conferences and the tandem model’. Family law. 46, 9 (2016).
[62]
Nash, E. and Parker, A. 2016. No Fault Divorce: The Australian Experience. Family law. 46, 3 (2016).
[63]
Nutt, T. 2007. "A Fresh Start for Child Maintenance”? Examining Recent Child Support Policy in Long-Term Historical Perspective. Journal of social security law. 14, 3 (2007), 118–130.
[64]
Onati International Institute for the Sociology of Law 2015. Delivering family justice in the 21st century. Hart Publishing.
[65]
Phillimore, S. 2016. Contesting the making of an adoption order: Re W (A child). Family law. Sept, (2016), 1068–1072.
[66]
Phillimore, S. 2016. Making an Adoption Order: What is the Test? Family law. 46, (2016), 1021–1024.
[67]
Probert, R. et al. 2009. Responsible parents and parental responsibility. Hart Publishing.
[68]
Probert, R. et al. 2009. Responsible parents and parental responsibility. Hart Publishing.
[69]
Probert, R. 2013. The Evolving Concept of Non-Marriage. Child and family law quarterly. 25, 3 (2013), 314–335.
[70]
Probert, R. 2002. When are we married? Void, non-existent and presumed marriages. Legal Studies. 22, 3 (Sep. 2002), 398–419. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2002.tb00199.x.
[71]
Professor Alison Diduck 2014. Justice by ADR in private family matters: is it fair and is it possible? 44, 5 (2014), 581–756.
[72]
Proudman, C. and Trevena, F. 2012. ‘Setting parents up to fail: punishing hopeless parents is integral to care proceedings. Family law. Aug, (2012).
[73]
Razack, S.H. 2004. Imperilled Muslim Women, Dangerous Muslim Men and Civilised Europeans: Legal and Social Responses to Forced Marriages. Feminist Legal Studies. 12, 2 (2004), 129–174. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FEST.0000043305.66172.92.
[74]
Reece, H. 2009. ‘Parental Responsibility as Therapy. Family law. (2009).
[75]
Reece, H. 1996. The Paramountcy Principle: Consensus or Construct? Current Legal Problems. 49, 1 (Jan. 1996), 267–304. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/49.1.267.
[76]
Rhoades, H. 2012. Legislating to promote children’s welfare and the quest for certainty. Child and family law quarterly. 24, 2 (2012).
[77]
Rosier, A. 2015. No-Fault Divorce: Where Next? Family law. 45, 12 (2015).
[78]
Ruth Deech: A Clean Break | Big Issue: http://www.bigissue.com/features/4369/ruth-deech-a-clean-break.
[79]
Skinner, C. 2013. Child Maintenance Reforms: Understanding Fathers’ Expressive Agency and the Power of Reciprocity. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. 27, 2 (Aug. 2013), 242–265. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebt005.
[80]
Slater, L. 2016. ’It’s voluntary! Accommodation under s.20 of the Children Act 1989. Family law. Sept, (2016), 1141–1146.
[81]
Sloan, B. 2014. LOVING BUT POTENTIALLY HARMFUL PARENTS IN THE SUPREME COURT. The Cambridge Law Journal. 73, 01 (Mar. 2014), 28–31. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197314000142.
[82]
Sloan, B. 2014. POST-ADOPTION CONTACT REFORM: COMPOUNDING THE STATE-ORDERED TERMINATION OF PARENTHOOD? The Cambridge Law Journal. 73, 02 (Jul. 2014), 378–404. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197314000439.
[83]
‘The rise and fall of presumptions surrounding the welfare principle: http://www.jordanpublishing.co.uk/practice-areas/family/news_and_comment/Herring-MayFLJ2013-553#.WJCqP1OLS70.
[84]
Thompson, S. 2011. Levelling the Prenuptial Playing Field: Is Independent Legal Advice the Answer? International Family Law. 4, (2011), 327–331.
[85]
Treloar, R. 2016. High Conflict Post-Separation Disputes Involving Family Violence in a Neoliberal Context: British Columbia, Canada. Child and family law quarterly. 28, 2 (2016), 111–132.
[86]
Wallbank, J.A. and Herring, J. eds. 2014. Vulnerabilities, care and family law. Routledge.
[87]
Wallbank, J.A. and Herring, J. eds. 2014. Vulnerabilities, care and family law. Routledge.
[88]
Wallbank, J.A. and Herring, J. eds. 2014. Vulnerabilities, care and family law. Routledge.
[89]
Wellbourne, P. 2008. Safeguarding Children on the Edge of Care: Policy for Keeping Children Safe after the Review of the Child Care Proceedings System, Care Matters and the Carter Review of Legal Aid. Child and family law quarterly. 20, (2008).
[90]
Welstead, M. 2016. ‘The Surrogacy Market’. Family law. (2016).
[91]
Wood, C. 2016. The Pitfalls of Assisted Reproduction: When is a parent a legal parent? Family law. October, (2016), 1242–1246.
[92]
Yeatman, L. 2013. ‘Lesbian co-parents: still not real mothers’. Family law. 43, 12 (2013), 1581–1587.
[93]
Yeatman, L. 2013. ‘Lesbian co-parents: still not real mothers’. Family law. 43, 12 (2013), 1581–1587.
[94]
Case in Point: Is Consummation a Legal Oddity?
[95]
Law Commission. Getting Married: A Scoping Paper.
[96]
Surrogacy in the UK: Myth Busting and Reform: Report of the Surrogacy UK Working Group on Surrogacy Law Reform.
[97]
What’s the Deal? Marital Property Agreements, Past Present and Future.
[98]
What’s the Deal? Marital Property Agreements, Past Present and Future.