Roberts AJ, ‘Identification: Police Officer Recognising Appellant from CCTV Images - Whether Admissible - Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, Codes of Practice, Code D.’ [2009] Criminal Law review 437 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Anderson, Terence and others, Analysis of Evidence, vol Law in context (2nd ed, Cambridge University Press 2005) <http://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=University%20of%20Kent&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780511556463>
Ashworth A, ‘Human Rights: Article 6(1) - Privilege against Self-Incrimination - Offence under the Road Traffic Act 1988 s.172 of Failing to Furnish Information.’ [2007] Criminal Law review 897 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
——, ‘Human Rights: Article 6(1) - Privilege against Self-Incrimination - Austrian Equivalent of Offence under s.172 of the Road Traffic Act 1988.’ [2008] Criminal Law review 549 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
——, ‘Human Rights: Fingerprints and DNA Samples from Unconvicted Persons Retained.’ [2009] Criminal Law review 355 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Bagshaw R, ‘Anonymous Evidence: R. v Mayers.’ [2009] International journal of evidence & proof 137 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_B&C=evidence and proof>
Birch D, ‘Criminal Justice Act 2003: (4) Hearsay - Same Old Story, Same Old Song?’ [2004] criminal law review 556 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
——, ‘Criminal Justice Act 2003: (4) Hearsay - Same Old Story, Same Old Song?’ [2004] criminal law review 556 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Choo AL, ‘Confessions and Corroboration: A Comparative Perspective.’ [1991] Criminal law review 867 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Clifford B, ‘Psychological Aspects...’ [1979] Criminal law review <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Commission L, ‘Expert Evidence in Criminal Proceedings -’
Cooper S, ‘Legal Advice and Pre-Trial Silence - Unreasonable Developments.’ [2006] International journal of evidence & proof 60 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_B&C=evidence and proof>
Costigan R, ‘Identification from CCTV: The Risk of Injustice.’ [2007] Criminal Law Review 591 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
——, ‘Identification from CCTV: The Risk of Injustice’ [2007] Criminal law review 591 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
‘Criminal Justice Act 2003’
‘——’
‘——’
‘——’
‘Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994’
‘——’
Cunliffe E, ‘Without Fear or Favour? Trends and Possibilities in the Canadian Approach to Expert Human Behaviour Evidence’ [2006] International journal of evidence & proof 280 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_B&C=evidence and proof>
Dennis I, ‘The Right to Confront Witnesses: Meanings, Myths and Human Rights.’ [2010] Criminal law review 255 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Dennis, I. H., The Law of Evidence (4th ed, Sweet & Maxwell / Thomson Reuters 2010)
Denyer R, ‘Proving Bad Character.’ [2009] Criminal law review 562 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
‘Documentary Hearsay.’ [1991] Criminal law review 707 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Durston, Gregory, Evidence: Text & Materials (2nd ed, Oxford University Press 2011)
——, Evidence: Text & Materials (2nd ed, Oxford University Press 2011)
——, Evidence: Text & Materials (2nd ed, Oxford University Press 2011)
——, Evidence: Text & Materials (2nd ed, Oxford University Press 2011)
——, Evidence: Text & Materials (2nd ed, Oxford University Press 2011)
——, Evidence: Text & Materials (2nd ed, Oxford University Press 2011)
——, Evidence: Text & Materials (2nd ed, Oxford University Press 2011)
——, Evidence: Text & Materials (2nd ed, Oxford University Press 2011)
——, Evidence: Text & Materials (2nd ed, Oxford University Press 2011)
——, Evidence: Text & Materials (2nd ed, Oxford University Press 2011)
——, Evidence: Text & Materials (2nd ed, Oxford University Press 2011)
——, Evidence: Text & Materials (2nd ed, Oxford University Press 2011)
——, Evidence: Text & Materials (2nd ed, Oxford University Press 2011)
——, Evidence: Text & Materials (2nd ed, Oxford University Press 2011)
——, Evidence: Text & Materials (2nd ed, Oxford University Press 2011)
——, Evidence: Text & Materials (2nd ed, Oxford University Press 2011)
——, Evidence: Text & Materials (2nd ed, Oxford University Press 2011)
——, Evidence: Text & Materials (2nd ed, Oxford University Press 2011)
——, Evidence: Text & Materials (2nd ed, Oxford University Press 2011)
——, Evidence: Text & Materials (2nd ed, Oxford University Press 2011)
——, Evidence: Text & Materials (2nd ed, Oxford University Press 2011)
Dwyer D, ‘The Duties of Expert Witnesses of Fact and Opinion: R v Clark (Sally).’ [2003] International journal of evidence & proof 264 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_B&C=evidence and proof>
——, ‘Legal Remedies for the Negligent Expert.’ [2008] International journal of evidence & proof 93 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_B&C=evidence and proof>
Ed, ‘Examining Expert Evidence.’ [2009] Criminal Law Review 387 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
——, ‘Reliability and Admissibility of Expert Evidence.’ [2011] Criminal Law review 431 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Edwards A, ‘Case Management, Compliance and Resources.’ [2007] Criminal law review 665 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Ellison L, ‘“Could You Ask Me That in a Different Way Please?” Exploring the Impact of Courtroom Questioning and Witness Familiarisation on Adult Witness Accuracy.’ [2010] Criminal Law Review 823 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
‘Evidence.’ [1999] Criminal law review 148 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
‘Excess Alcohol in Blood - Testing of Blood Using Computer - Evidence of Results given by Scientist.’ [1987] Criminal law review 422 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
‘Expert Evidence - Mental Capacity of Defendant - Admissibility of Evidence.’ [1986] Criminal Law review 395 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
fitzpatrick B, ‘Confessions.’ [2007] Criminal law review 160 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Hartshorne J, ‘Corroboration and Care Warnings after Makanjuola.’ [1998] International journal of evidence & proof 1 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=evidence and proof&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Hartshorne J and Miola jose, ‘Expert Evidence: Difficulties and Solutions in Prosecutions for Infant Harm’ (2010) 30 Legal studies (Society of Legal Scholars) 279 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_M&C= Legal studies (Society of Legal Scholars) >
‘Hearsay Evidence and Article 6.’ [2009] Criminal law review 311 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Heffernen L and Coen M, ‘Juror Comprehension of Expert Evidence: A Reform Agenda.’ [2010] criminal law review 195 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
‘Informer Privilege - Canada’ [2007] Criminal Law review 747 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Jackson JD, ‘The Insufficiency of Identification Evidence Based on Personal Impression.’ [1986] Criminal law review 203 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Jones I, ‘A Political Judgment? Reconciling Hearsay and the Right to Challenge.’ [2010] International journal of evidence & proof 232 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_B&C=evidence and proof>
Keane A, ‘The Use at Trial of Scientific Findings Relating to Human Memory.’ [2010] Criminal law review 19 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
——, ‘The Use at Trial of Scientific Findings Relating to Human Memory.’ [2010] Criminal Law review 19 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Klinker melanie, ‘Forensic Science Expertise for International Criminal Proceedings: An Old Problem, a New Context and a Pragmatic Resolution’ [2009] International journal of evidence & proof 102 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_B&C=evidence and proof>
Laudan L, ‘Strange Bedfellows: Inference to the Best Explanation and the Criminal Standard of Proof’ (2007) 11 International journal of evidence & proof 292 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_B&C=evidence and proof>
Leake S and Ormerod DC, ‘Evidence: Whether Criminal Justice Act 1988, Sch.2, Para.3 Automatically Rendering Previous Consistent Statement Admissible as Evidence of Circumstances from Which Inference Might Be Drawn as to Accuracy or Otherwise of Documentary Hearsay Evidence Admitted under s.23 of That Act.’ [2005] Criminal law review 642 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Loof R, ‘Obtaining, Adducing and Contesting Evidence from Abroad: A Defence Perspective on Cross-Border Evidence’ [2011] Criminal law review 40 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Malik B, ‘Silence on Legal Advice: Clarity but Not Justice?: R v Beckles.’ [2005] International journal of evidence & proof 211 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_B&C=evidence and proof>
Malik B, ‘The Hearsay Rule under the Criminal Justice Act 2003: R v Xhabri (Agrol).’ [2006] International journal of evidence & proof 316 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_B&C=evidence and proof>
Munday RJC, Evidence, vol Core text series (Eighth edition, Oxford University Press 2015)
——, Evidence, vol Core text series (Eighth edition, Oxford University Press 2015)
——, Evidence, vol Core text series (Eighth edition, Oxford University Press 2015)
——, Evidence, vol Core text series (Eighth edition, Oxford University Press 2015)
——, Evidence, vol Core text series (Eighth edition, Oxford University Press 2015)
——, Evidence, vol Core text series (Eighth edition, Oxford University Press 2015)
——, Evidence, vol Core text series (Eighth edition, Oxford University Press 2015)
——, Evidence, vol Core text series (Eighth edition, Oxford University Press 2015)
——, Evidence, vol Core text series (Eighth edition, Oxford University Press 2015)
——, Evidence, vol Core text series (Eighth edition, Oxford University Press 2015)
——, Evidence, vol Core text series (Eighth edition, Oxford University Press 2015)
——, Evidence, vol Core text series (Eighth edition, Oxford University Press 2015)
——, Evidence, vol Core text series (Eighth edition, Oxford University Press 2015)
——, Evidence, vol Core text series (Eighth edition, Oxford University Press 2015)
——, Evidence, vol Core text series (Eighth edition, Oxford University Press 2015)
——, Evidence, vol Core text series (Eighth edition, Oxford University Press 2015)
——, Evidence, vol Core text series (Eighth edition, Oxford University Press 2015)
——, Evidence, vol Core text series (Eighth edition, Oxford University Press 2015)
——, Evidence, vol Core text series (Eighth edition, Oxford University Press 2015)
——, Evidence, vol Core text series (Eighth edition, Oxford University Press 2015)
——, Evidence, vol Core text series (Eighth edition, Oxford University Press 2015)
Nash S, ‘Drawing Inferences from Positive Suggestions Put to Witnesses: R v Webber’ [2005] International journal of evidence & proof 50 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_B&C=evidence and proof>
Naughton M and Tan G, ‘The Right to Access DNA Testing by Alleged Innocent Victims of Wrongful Convictions in the United Kingdom.’ [2010] International journal of evidence & proof 326 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_B&C=evidence and proof>
O’Brian WE, ‘Confrontation: The Defiance of the English Courts.’ [2011] International journal of evidence & proof <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_B&C=evidence and proof>
Ormerod D, ‘Evidence: Hearsay - Confession by Co-Defendant.’ [2007] Criminal Law review 481 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
——, ‘Appeals: Criminal Justice Act 2003 s.58 - Whether Prosecution Can Appeal against Evidentiary Ruling under s.58.’ [2008] criminal law review 466 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
——, ‘Anonymous Witnesses: Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Act 2008 - General Observations.’ [2009] Criminal law review 272 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
——, ‘Hearsay: Approach to Admissibility of Hearsay Evidence of Absent Witness under s.114(1)(d) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 Where Conditions in s.116 Not Satisfied.’ [2009] Criminal Law review 519 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
——, ‘Perjury: Corroboration - Need for Documentary Evidence to Be Independent of Sole Witness’ [2010] Criminal Law Review 949 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
——, ‘R. v Green: Evidence - Conspiracy to Supply a Controlled Drug’ [2010] Criminal law review 306 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
——, ‘R. v Horncastle and Others: Evidence - Admission at Trial of Written Statement of Witness Who Has Died.’ [2010] Criminal law review 496 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
——, ‘R.v Gian; R. v Mohd-Yussof: Evidence - Expert Evidence - Legal and Scientific Certainty.’ [2010] Criminal Law Review 409 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
——, ‘Evidence: Multiple Hearsay - Written Statements from Witnesses Abroad Describing Defendant’s Confessions to Murder.’ [2011] Criminal Law review 399 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
——, ‘R. v Ford (Kamahl): Evidence - Hearsay Evidence - Anonymous Witness.’ [2011] Criminal law review 475 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Ormerod DC, ‘Psychological Autopsies: Legal Applications and Admissibility.’ [2001] International journal of evidence & proof 1 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_B&C=evidence and proof>
Ormerod DC, ‘Sounds Familiar? Voice Identification Evidence.’ [2001] Criminal law review 595 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Ormerod DC, ‘Evidence: Hearsay - Criminal Justice Act 2003 s.116.’ [2006] Criminal law review 637 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
——, ‘Evidence: Voice Recognition - Test for Admissibility.’ [2006] Criminal law review 427 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Ormerod DC, ‘Hearsay.’ [2006] Criminal Law review 836 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Ormerod et al D, ‘Coroners and Justice Act 2009: The “Witness Anonymity” and “Investigation Anonymity” Provisions’ [2010] Criminal Law review 368 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Page F, ‘Evidence: Identification Evidence - Unusual Appearance of the Accused.’ [2005] Ciminal law review 384 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Pattenden R, ‘Machinespeak: Section 129 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003.’ [2010] Criminal law review 623 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
‘Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984’
‘——’
Redmayne M and others, ‘Forensic Science Evidence in Questions.’ [2011] Criminal law review 347 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
——, ‘Forensic Science Evidence in Questions.’ [2011] Criminal law review 347 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Redmayne, Mike, Expert Evidence and Criminal Justice, vol Oxford monographs on criminal law and justice (Oxford University Press 2001) <http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198267805.001.0001>
Requa M, ‘Absent Witnesses and the UK Supreme Court: Judicial Deference as Judicial Dialogue?’ [2010] International journal of evidence & proof 208 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_B&C=evidence and proof>
Roberts A, ‘The Problem of Mistaken Identification: Some Observations on Process.’ [2004] International journal of evidence & proof 100 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_B&C=evidence and proof>
——, ‘Drawing on Expertise: Legal Decision-Making and the Reception of Expert Evidence.’ [2008] Criminal Law review 443 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
——, ‘Evidence: Identification - Voice Recognition.’ [2008] Criminal Law review 799 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
——, ‘Evidence: Identification - Voice Recognition.’ [2008] Criminal Law review 799 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
——, ‘Privilege: Evidence - Privilege - Incrimination - Defendant Pleading Guilty to Offence of Terrorism.’ [2008] Criminal Law review 391 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
——, ‘Rejecting General Acceptance, Confounding the Gate-Keeper: The Law Commission and Expert Evidence.’ [2009] Criminal Law review 551 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
——, ‘Evidence: Expert Evidence in Cases Involving Sudden Death of Child.’ [2010] criminal law review 945 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
——, ‘Eyewitness Identification and Expert Insight: R. v Forbes.’ [2010] International journal of evidence & proof 57 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_B&C=evidence and proof>
——, ‘Evidence: Confession - Application to Exclude.’ [2011] Criminal law review 232 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
——, ‘R. v C: DNA Evidence - Disputed DNA Evidence - Compliance by Experts with Criminal Procedure Rules 2010.’ [2011] Criminal Law Review 396 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
——, ‘R. v C: DNA Evidence - Disputed DNA Evidence - Compliance by Experts with Criminal Procedure Rules 2010.’ [2011] Criminal Law Review 396 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
——, ‘R. v C: DNA Evidence - Disputed DNA Evidence - Compliance by Experts with Criminal Procedure Rules 2010.’ [2011] Criminal Law Review 396 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
——, ‘R. v Gojra (Ranjit): Evidence - Identity - One of Two Victims Identifying Defendant at Identification Parade.’ [2011] Criminal law review 311 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Roberts A, ‘R. v Gojra (Ranjit): Evidence - Identity - One of Two Victims Identifying Defendant at Identification Parade.’ [2011] criminal law review 311 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Roberts A, ‘R. v Moss (Alvin Shaun): Evidence - Identification - Informal Recognition from Photograph - Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 s.78.’ [2011] Criminal law review 560 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Roberts A j, ‘R. v Hamidi; R. v Cherazi: Evidence - Defendant Not Giving Evidence - Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 s.35.’ [2010] Criminal law review 578 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Roberts A j, ‘R. v Tabbakh: Trial - Defendant Not Giving Evidence at Trial.’ [2010] Criminal law review 79 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Roberts AJ, ‘Experts - Duties of Experts - Obligations to Court.’ [2006] Criminal Law review 745 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Roberts AJ, ‘Evidence: Street Identification - Distinct Clothing Case.’ [2007] Criminal law review 162 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Roberts AJ, ‘Identification: Direction to Jury - Weaknesses in Identification Evidence.’ [2007] Criminal law review 642 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Roberts AJ, ‘Identification: Recognition - Main Issue Credibility of Witness.’ [2007] Criminal Law Review 571 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Roberts AJ, ‘Evidence: Identification Evidence - Fresh Evidence.’ [2008] Criminal Law review 57 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Roberts AJ, ‘Identification: Police Officer Recognising Appellant from CCTV Images - Whether Admissible - Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, Codes of Practice, Code D.’ [2009] Criminal law review 437 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Roberts AJ, ‘Identification: Visual Identification - Mistaken Identification - Direction to Jury’ [2009] Criminal law review 40 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Roberts AJ, ‘R. v Atkins (D and M): Evidence - Expert - “Facial Mapping”.’ [2010] Criminal Law review 141 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Roberts A j, ‘Expert Evidence: Murder - No Medical Evidence Called by Defence at Trial.’ [2009] Criminal Law review 195 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
——, ‘Identification: Police Officer Recognising Appellant from CCTV Images - Whether Admissible - Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, Codes of Practice, Code D.’ [2009] Criminal law review 437 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Spencer, John R. and Flin, Rhona H., The Evidence of Children: The Law and the Psychology (2nd ed, Blackstone 1993)
Tapper C, ‘Use of Third Party Confessions: R v Finch.’ [2007] International journal of evidence & proof 318 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_B&C=evidence and proof>
Tapper, Colin and Cross, Rupert, Cross and Tapper on Evidence (11th ed, Butterworths 2007)
Taylor C, ‘Video Identification under PACE Code D: R v Marcus.’ [2005] International journal of evidence & proof 204 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=evidence and proof&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Thomas DA, ‘R. v Whittington: Confiscation Order - Criminal Lifestyle - Assumptions’ [2010] Criminal Law Review 65 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Walker C, ‘Terrorism: Possessing an Article in Circumstances Giving Rise to Reasonable Suspicion That Possession Being for...Terrorism.’ [2008] Criminal law review 71 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Walker CP and McCartney C, ‘Evidence: Expert Witnesses Seriously Disagreeing as to Whether Cause of Death of Infants Natural or Unnatural.’ [2005] Criminal Law review 126 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Warburton D and Lewis T, ‘Opinion Evidence; Admissibility of Ad Hoc Expert Voice Recognition Evidence: R. v Flynn’ [2009] International journal of evidence & proof 50 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_B&C=evidence and proof>
Ward tony, ‘Hearsay, Psychiatric Evidence and the Interest of Justice.’ [2009] Criminal law review 415 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Ward T, ‘Usurping the Role of the Jury? Expert Evidence and Witness Credibility in English Criminal Trials’ [2009] International journal of evidence & proof 83 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_B&C=evidence and proof>
Webster A, ‘Horncastle v R.: Statements from Witnesses Absent at Trial’ [2009] International journal of evidence & proof 324 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_B&C=evidence and proof>
Wheate R, ‘The Importance of DNA Evidence to Juries in Criminal Trials.’ [2010] International journal of evidence & proof 129 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_B&C=evidence and proof>
Williams G, ‘’Devlin Report..’ [1976] Criminal Law review <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
Worthern T, ‘The Hearsay Provisions of the Criminal Justice Act 2003: So Far, Not so Good?’ [2008] Criminal Law review 431 <http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?C=criminal law review&s=AC_T_B&V=1.0&L=DF7SM3XP4S&C=&S=SC&N=10>
‘Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999’
‘——’
