1.
Brownlie, Ian, Goodwin-Gill, Guy S. Brownlie’s documents on human rights. Sixth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
2.
Ghandhi, P. R. Blackstone’s international human rights documents. Eighth edition. Vol. Blackstone’s statutes series. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
3.
Crawford, James, Brownlie, Ian. Brownlie’s principles of public international law. 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
4.
Evans, Malcolm D. International law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
5.
Alston, Philip, Goodman, Ryan. International human rights: the successor to international human rights in context : law, politics and morals : text and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.
6.
Moeckli, Daniel, Shah, Sangeeta, Sivakumaran, Sandesh, Harris, D. J. International human rights law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
7.
Rehman, Javaid. International human rights law: a practical approach. Second edition. Harlow, England: Pearson Longman; 2009.
8.
Schutter, Olivier de. International human rights law: cases, materials, commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
9.
Smith, Rhona K. M. Textbook on international human rights. Fifth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
10.
Smith, Rhona K. M. Texts and materials on international human rights. Third edition. London: Routledge; 2013.
11.
Alston, Philip. The United Nations and human rights: a critical appraisal. Oxford: Clarendon press; 1992.
12.
Naʻim, ʻAbd Allah Ahmad. Human rights in cross-cultural perspectives: a quest for consensus. Vol. Pennsylvania studies in human rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1992.
13.
Bilchitz, David. Poverty and fundamental rights: the justification and enforcement of socio-economic rights [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552160.001.0001
14.
Bilchitz, David. Poverty and fundamental rights: the justification and enforcement of socio-economic rights [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552160.001.0001
15.
Boyle, Kevin. New institutions for human rights protection [Internet]. Vol. The collected courses of the Academy of European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570546.001.0001
16.
Charlesworth, Hilary, Chinkin, Christine. The boundaries of international law: a feminist analysis. Vol. Melland Schill studies in international law. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 2000.
17.
Clapham, Andrew, Academy of European Law. Human rights obligations of non-state actors [Internet]. Vol. The collected courses of the Academy of European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199288465.001.0001
18.
Cook, Rebecca J. Human rights of women: national and international perspectives. Vol. Pennsylvania studies in human rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1994.
19.
Donnelly, Jack. Universal human rights in theory and practice. 2nd ed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 2003.
20.
Elver, Hilal. The headscarf controversy: secularism and freedom of religion [Internet]. Vol. Religion and global politics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199769292.001.0001
21.
Emon, Anver M., Ellis, Mark S., Glahn, Benjamin, editors. Islamic law and international human rights law: searching for common ground? Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
22.
Evans, Tony. The Politics of Human Rights: A Global Perspective [Internet]. Second edition. Vol. Academic Library. London: Pluto Press; 2005. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.theacademiclibrary.com/login_cat.asp?filename=0745323731
23.
Freedman, Rosa. The United Nations Human Rights Council: A critique and early assessment [Internet]. Vol. Routledge Research in Human Rights Law. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis; 2013. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.kentuk.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1154301
24.
Freedman, Rosa. The United Nations Human Rights Council: a critique and early assessment. Vol. Routledge research in human rights law. London: Routledge; 2013.
25.
Freeman, Marsha A., Chinkin, C. M., Rudolf, Beate, editors. The UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: a commentary. Vol. Oxford commentaries on international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
26.
Griffin, James. On human rights [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199238781.001.0001
27.
Griffin, James. On human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
28.
Grabenwarter, Christoph. The European convention on human rights: a commentary. Oxford: Hart; 2012.
29.
Harris, D. J., O’Boyle, Michael, Warbrick, Colin. Harris, O’Boyle & Warbrick law of the European Convention on Human Rights. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
30.
Cambridge Books Online (Online service). Women’s Human Rights: CEDAW in International, Regional and National Law [Internet]. Hellum, Anne, Aasen, Henriette Sinding, editors. Vol. Studies on human rights conventions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.kentuk.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1303706
31.
Holder, Cindy, Reidy, David A., editors. Human rights: the hard questions [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.kentuk.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1182932
32.
Hoffmann, Stefan-Ludwig. Human rights in the twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
33.
Langford, Malcolm, Scheinin, Martin, van Genugten, Willem, Vandenhole, Wouter, Cambridge Books Online (Online service). Global Justice, State Duties: The extraterritorial scope of economic, social, and cultural rights in International Law [Internet]. Vol. Cambridge books online. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.kentuk.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1057495
34.
O’Connell, Paul. Vindicating socio-economic rights: international standards and comparative experiences [Internet]. Vol. Routledge research in human rights law. London: Routledge; 2012. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.kentuk.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=958457
35.
Renteln, Alison Dundes. International human rights: universalism versus relativism. Vol. Frontiers of anthropology. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1990.
36.
Sheeran, Scott, Rodley, Nigel S., editors. Routledge handbook of international human rights law. London: Routledge; 2012.
37.
Shelton, Dinah, editor. The Oxford handbook of international human rights law. Vol. Oxford handbooks in law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.
38.
Sweeney, James A. European Court of Human Rights in the post-Cold War era. Vol. Not YEt Published due 11/12 as at 10/9/12. [Place of publication not identified]: Taylor & Francis;
39.
Tomuschat, Christian, Academy of European Law. Human rights: between idealism and realism. Second edition. Vol. The collected courses of the Academy of European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
40.
Thornberry, Patrick. International law and the rights of minorities. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1991.
41.
Twining, William. Human rights, southern voices: Francis Deng, Abdullahi An-Na’im, Yash Ghai and Upendra Baxi. Vol. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
42.
Viljoen, Frans. International human rights law in Africa [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199218585.001.0001
43.
Viljoen, Frans. International human rights law in Africa. Second edition. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press; 2012.
44.
Waldron, Jeremy, editor. Theories of rights. Vol. Oxford readings in philosophy. Oxford: O.U.P.; 1984.
45.
Waldron, Jeremy, Dan-Cohen, Meir. Dignity, rank, and rights [Internet]. Vol. The Berkeley Tanner lectures. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199915439.001.0001
46.
Cerna CM. Universality of Human Rights and Cultural Diversity – Implementation of Human Rights in Different Social and Cultural Context. Human Rights Quarterly. 1994;(4):235–76.
47.
Johansson Dahre U. There are no such things as universal human rights – on the predicament of indigenous peoples, for example. The International Journal of Human Rights. 2010 Sept;14(5):641–57.
48.
Donnelly J. The Relative Universality of Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly. 2007;29(2):281–306.
49.
International Human Rights: Universal, Relative or Relatively Universal? In: International human rights law: six decades after the UDHR and beyond [Internet]. Farnham: Ashgate; 2010. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://sid.kent.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781409403609
50.
Donnelly J. Human Rights and Human Dignity: An Analytic Critique of Non-Western Conceptions of Human Rights. American Political Science Review. 1982;76:303–16.
51.
Getting to Rights: Treaty Ratification, Constitutional Convergence, and Human Rights Practice. Harvard International Law Journal [Internet]. 2013;54. Available from: http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_M&C=Harvard International Law Journal
52.
Evans, Tony. Human rights fifty years on: a reappraisal. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1998.
53.
Evans, Tony. Human rights fifty years on: a reappraisal. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1998.
54.
Ignatieff M. The Attack on Human Rights, (2001) 80. Foreign Affairs. 2001;80(6):102–16.
55.
Jovanović MA. Are There Universal Collective Rights? Human Rights Review. 2008 Dec 3;11(1):17–44.
56.
McCrudden C. Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights. European Journal of International Law. 2008 Sept 1;19(4):655–724.
57.
Marks, Susan, Clapham, Andrew. International human rights lexicon. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
58.
Byers, Michael. The role of law in international politics: essays in international relations and international law [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244027.001.0001
59.
Mutua M. Savages, victims and saviours, The Metaphor of Human Rights. Harvard International Law Journal. 2001;42(1):201–45.
60.
Perry MJ. Are Human Rights Universal? The Relativist Challenge and Related Matters. Human Rights Quarterly. 1997;19(3):461–509.
61.
Pollis A. Cultural Relativism Revisited: Through a State Prism. Human Rights Quarterly. 1996;18(2):316–44.
62.
Pollis, A. Human rights: cultural and ideological perspectives. [Place of publication not identified]: Praeger; 1979.
63.
Reinbold J. Political Myth and the Sacred Center of Human Rights: The Universal Declaration and the Narrative of "Inherent Human Dignity”. Human Rights Review. 2010 Oct 16;12(2):147–71.
64.
Tomuschat, Christian, Academy of European Law. Human rights: between idealism and realism. 2nd ed. Vol. The collected courses of the Academy of European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
65.
Viaene L, Brems E. Transitional justice and cultural contexts: Learning from the universality debate. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights. 2010;28(2):199–224.
66.
Waldron J. How to Argue for a Universal Claim. Columbia Human Rights Law Review. 1998;30.
67.
Waltz SE. Universalizing Human Rights: The Role of Small States in the Construction of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly. 2001;23(1):44–72.
68.
An-Naim A. Human Rights in the Muslim World: Socio-Political Conditions and Scriptural Imperatives. Harvard Human Rights Journal. 1990;3:13–52.
69.
Bennoune K. Remembering the Other’s Others: Theorizing the Approach of International Law to Muslim Fundamentalism. Columbia Human Rights Law Review. 2010;41(3):635–98.
70.
Chowdhury N. The Quest for Universal Human Rights: A Brief Comparative Study of Universal Declarations of Human Rights by the UN and the Islamic Council of Europe. The International Journal of Human Rights. 2008 June;12(3):347–52.
71.
Halliday F. Relativism and Universalism in Human Rights: the Case of the Islamic Middle East. Political Studies. 1995 Aug;43(s1):152–67.
72.
Foundations of human rights and development: a critique of African human rights instruments. Ave Maria law review [Internet]. 2012;11(1). Available from: http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_M&C=Ave Maria law review
73.
Cobbah J. African Values and the Human Rights Debate: An African Perspective. Human Rights Quarterly. 1987;9(3):309–31.
74.
Metz T. African Conceptions of Human Dignity: Vitality and Community as the Ground of Human Rights. Human Rights Review. 2011 Aug 5;13(1):19–37.
75.
Wangila MN. Religion, the African Concept of the Individual, and Human Rights Discourse: An Analysis. Journal of Human Rights. 2010 July;9(3):326–43.
76.
A Culture of Human Rights in East Asia: Deconstructing ‘Asian Values’ Claims by Uyen P. Le :: SSRN [Internet]. Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2326006
77.
Ghai Y. Human Rights and Governance: the Asian Debate. Australian Ybk Int L 5. 1994;15.
78.
The last frontier of human rights protection: interrogating resistance to regional cooperation in the Asia-Pacific. Australian International Law Journal [Internet]. 2011;18:23–52. Available from: http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_M&C=Australian International Law Journal
79.
Abebe AM. Special rapporteurs as law makers: the developments and evolution of the normative framework for protecting and assisting internally displaced persons. The International Journal of Human Rights. 2011 Feb;15(2):286–98.
80.
Boyle, Kevin. New institutions for human rights protection [Internet]. Vol. The collected courses of the Academy of European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570546.001.0001
81.
Winterkorn-Meikle MK, Genser JM. The Intersection of Politics and International Law: The United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention in Theory and in Practice. Columbia Human Rights Law Review. 2008;39(3).
82.
Golay C, Mahon C, Cismas I. The impact of the UN special procedures on the development and implementation of economic, social and cultural rights. The International Journal of Human Rights. 2011 Feb;15(2):299–318.
83.
Piccone T. The contribution of the UN’s special procedures to national level implementation of human rights norms. The International Journal of Human Rights. 2011 Feb;15(2):206–31.
84.
Naples-Mitchell J. Perspectives of UN special rapporteurs on their role: inherent tensions and unique contributions to human rights. The International Journal of Human Rights. 2011 Feb;15(2):232–48.
85.
On the responsibility of special rapporteurs. International Journal of Human Rights [Internet]. 2011;15(2). Available from: http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_M&C=International Journal of Human Rights
86.
Redondo D. Rethinking the legal foundations of control in international human rights law - the case of special procedures, 2011, 29(3). Netherlands quarterly of human rights. 2011;29(3):261–88.
87.
Subedi SP. Protection of Human Rights through the Mechanism of UN Special Rapporteurs. Human Rights Quarterly. 2011;33(1):201–28.
88.
United Nations Commission on Human Rights/United Nations Human Rights Council [Internet]. Available from: http://www.mpil.de/en/pub/service/search.cfm?fa_swww=hits&q=United Nations Commission on Human Rights%2FUnited Nations Human Rights Council&btnG=Search&entqr=0&sort=date%3AD%3AL%3Ad1&ud=1&oe=UTF-8&ie=UTF-8&hl=en&proxyreload=1&proxycustom=&output=xml&lr=&client=mpil_front&num=&proxystylesheet=mpil_front&site=mpil_pub
89.
Cox E. State Interests and the Creation and Functioning of the United Nations Human Rights Council. Journal of International Law and International Relations. 2010;6(1):87–117.
90.
Freedman R. New Mechanisms of the UN Human Rights Council. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights. 2011;29(3):289–323.
91.
Freedman, Rosa. The United Nations Human Rights Council: A critique and early assessment [Internet]. Vol. Routledge Research in Human Rights Law. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis; 2013. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://www.kentuk.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1154301
92.
Abebe AM. Of Shaming and Bargaining: African States and the Universal Periodic Review of the United Nations Human Rights Council. Human Rights Law Review. 2009 Feb 2;9(1):1–35.
93.
Boyle, Kevin. New institutions for human rights protection [Internet]. Vol. The collected courses of the Academy of European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570546.001.0001
94.
Gaer FD. A Voice Not an Echo: Universal Periodic Review and the UN Treaty Body System. Human Rights Law Review. 2007 Feb 8;7(1):109–39.
95.
Matiya J. Repositioning the international human rights protection system: the UN Human Rights Council. Commonwealth Law Bulletin. 2010 June;36(2):313–24.
96.
A step ahead in promoting human rights? The universal periodic review of the UN Human Rights Council. Global Governance [Internet]. 2012;18(2). Available from: http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_M&C=Global Governance
97.
Redondo E. The Universal Periodic Review of the UN Human Rights Council: An Assessment of the First Session. Chinese Journal of International Law. 2008;7(3).
98.
Smith R. ‘To see Themselves as Others see Them’: The Five Permanent Members of the Security Council and the Human Rights Council’s Universal Periodic Review. Human Rights Quarterly. 2013;35(1):1–32.
99.
Keller H, Fischer A. The UN Anti-terror Sanctions Regime under Pressure. Human Rights Law Review. 2009 Jan 1;9(2):257–66.
100.
The Early Harvest: Domestic Legal Changes Related to the Human Rights Committee and the ICCPR. Human Rights Quarterly. 1991;13.
101.
Heyns CH (Christof H), Viljoen F. The Impact of the United Nations Human Rights Treaties on the Domestic Level. Human Rights Quarterly. 2001;23(3):483–535.
102.
Goodman R. Measuring the Effects of Human Rights Treaties. European Journal of International Law. 2003 Feb 1;14(1):171–83.
103.
Melish T. From Paradox to Subsidiarity: The United States and Human Rights Treaty Bodies. Yale Journal of International Law. 2009;34(2).
104.
Getting to Rights: Treaty Ratification, Constitutional Convergence, and Human Rights Practice. Harvard International Law Journal [Internet]. 2013;54. Available from: http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_M&C=Harvard International Law Journal
105.
Mechlem K. Treaty Bodies and the Interpretation of Human Rights. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law. 2009;42(3):905–47.
106.
Vandenhole, Wouter. The procedures before the UN human rights treaty bodies: divergence or convergence? Antwerp: Intersentia; 2004.
107.
Alston, Philip, Crawford, James. The future of UN human rights treaty monitoring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
108.
Lewis-Anthony S, Scheinin M. Treaty-Based Procedures for Making Human Rights Complaints within the UN System. In: Guide to international human rights practice. Fourth edition. Ardsley, N.Y.: Transnational Publishers; 2004.
109.
Petitions before the UN Treaty Bodies: focus on the Human Rights Committee’s Optional Protocol. In: International human rights monitoring mechanisms: essays in honour of Jakob Th Moller. Second revised edition. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 2009.
110.
Coomans F. The Extraterritorial Scope of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the Work of the United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Human Rights Law Review. 2011 Jan 29;11(1):1–35.
111.
The Role of the Human Rights Committee in Interpreting and Developing Humanitarian Law. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law. 2010;31(4).
112.
Alston, Philip, Goodman, Ryan. International human rights: the successor to international human rights in context : law, politics and morals : text and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.
113.
Harris, D. J., O’Boyle, Michael, Warbrick, Colin. Harris, O’Boyle & Warbrick law of the European Convention on Human Rights. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
114.
Leach, Philip, Leach, Philip. Responding to systemic human rights violations: an analysis of ‘pilot judgments’ of the European Court of Human Rights and their impact at national level. Antwerp: Intersentia; 2010.
115.
What’s Wrong with the European Convention on Human Rights? Human Rights Quarterly. 2008;30(3):680–702.
116.
Greer S, Williams A. Human Rights in the Council of Europe and the EU: Towards ‘Individual’, ‘Constitutional’ or ‘Institutional’ Justice? European Law Journal. 2009 July;15(4):462–81.
117.
Greer S, Wildhaber L. Revisiting the Debate about ‘constitutionalising’ the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review. 2012 Dec 1;12(4):655–87.
118.
Sadurski W. Partnering with Strasbourg: Constitutionalisation of the European Court of Human Rights, the Accession of Central and East European States to the Council of Europe, and the Idea of Pilot Judgments. Human Rights Law Review. 2009 Aug 24;9(3):397–453.
119.
Lapitskaya J. ECHR, Russia, and Chechyna: two is not company and three is definitely a crowd. New York University journal of international law & politics. 2010;43:479–548.
120.
Can the European Court’s pilot judgment procedure help resolve systemic human rights violations? Burdov and the failure to implement domestic court decisions in Russia. Human Rights Law Review [Internet]. 2010;10(2). Available from: http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_M&C=Human Rights Law Review
121.
Leach P. Strasbourg’s Oversight of Russia - An Increasingly Strained Relationship. Public law. 2007;640–54.
122.
Uneasy partners: Russia and the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Brief [Internet]. 2012;19(3). Available from: http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_M&C=Human Rights Brief
123.
Advocacy beyond litigation: Examining Russian NGO efforts on implementation of European Court of Human Rights judgments. Communist and Post-Communist Studies [Internet]. 2012;45. Available from: http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_M&C=Communist and Post-Communist Studies
124.
Getting to rights: treaty ratification, constitutional convergence, and human rights practice. Harvard international law journal [Internet]. 2013;54(1). Available from: http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_M&C=Harvard international law journal
125.
Implementing International Human Rights Law at Home: Domestic Politics and the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Review [Internet]. 2012;13(3):279–301. Available from: http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_M&C=Human Rights Review
126.
Philip Leach. The Effectiveness of the Committee of Ministers in Supervising Enforcement of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. Public Law. 2006;443–56.
127.
The Effect of Decisions and Judgements of the ECHR in the Domestic Legal Order. Texas International Law Journal. 2005;40.
128.
Çali B. The Purposes of the European Human Rights System: One or Many? European Human Rights Law Review. 2008;3:299–306.
129.
Ruedin XB. De minimis non curat, the European Court of Human Rights: The Introduction of a New Admissibility Criterion (Article 12 of Protocol No.14). European human rights law review. 2008;1.
130.
Helfer LR. Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: Embeddedness as a Deep Structural Principle of the European Human Rights Regime. European Journal of International law. 2008;19(1):125–59.
131.
Alvarado L. Prospects and challenges in the implementation of indigenous peoples’ human rights in international law: lessons from the case of Awa Tingni v Nicaragua. Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law. 2007;24(3).
132.
Grossman C, Anaya J. The case of Awas Tingni v Nicaragua: a New Step in the international law of indigenous peoples. Arizona Journal of International and Comparative law. 2002;19.
133.
Pasqualucci J. The Evolution of International Indigenous Rights in the Inter-American Human Rights System. Human Rights Law Review. 2006;6.
134.
Pasqualucci J. International Indigenous Land Rights: A Critique of the Jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in Light of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of indigenous Peoples. Wisconsin International Law Journal. 2009;29(1).
135.
Alanís O. Indigenous Peoples’ Rights and the Extractive Industry: Jurisprudence From the Inter-American System of Human Rights. Goettingen Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2013;5(1). Available from: http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_M&C=Goettingen Journal of International Law
136.
Toward a New Paradigm of Human Rights Protection for Indigenous Peoples: A Critical Analysis of the Parameters Established by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights by Andrea Schettini :: SSRN [Internet]. Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2308841
137.
Tramontana E. The Contribution of the Inter-American Human Rights Bodies to Evolving International Law on Indigenous Rights over Lands and Natural Resources. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights. 17(2):241–63.
138.
Awas Tingni v Nicaragua, International Precedent for indigenous land rights? Boston University International law Journal. 2004;22:219–42.
139.
Burke S. Indigenous reparations re-imagined: crafting a settlement mechanism for indigenous claims in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Minnesota journal of international law. 2011;20(1).
140.
Goldman R. History and Action: The Inter-American Human Rights System and the Role of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly. 31(4):856–87.
141.
Cerna C. Reflections on the Normative Status of the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law. 2009;30(4).
142.
African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights / Legal Instruments / ACHPR [Internet]. Available from: http://www.achpr.org/instruments/achpr/
143.
United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples - International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs (IWGIA) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.iwgia.org/publications/search-pubs?publication_id=27
144.
Convention C169 - Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C169
145.
General Documents Not Relating To Specific States - General Comments or Recommendations - CESCR [Internet]. Available from: http://www.bayefsky.com/tree.php/id/19/misc/general
146.
Coomans F. The Ogoni Case Before The African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2003;52(03):749–60.
147.
Limitations to the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in Africa: A Model for Balancing National Interest in Development with the Rights of Indigenous Peoples? - Edinburgh University Press [Internet]. Available from: http://www.euppublishing.com/doi/abs/10.3366/ajicl.2012.0043
148.
Indigenous peoples’ human rights in Africa: the pragmatic revolution of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights. International & Comparative Law Quarterly. 2011;60(1).
149.
Murray R, Wheatley S. Groups and the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights. Human Rights Quarterly. 2003 Summer 2;25(1):213–36.
150.
Yupsanis A. ILO Convention No. 169 Concerning Indigenous and Tribal Peoples in Independent Countries 19892009: An Overview. Nordic Journal of International Law. 2010;79(3):433–56.
151.
Naʻim, ʻAbd Allah Ahmad. Cultural transformation and human rights in Africa. London: Zed Books; 2002.
152.
The African Regional Human Rights System, The African Charter. Penn State Law Review. 2004;108.
153.
Viljoen F, Louw L. State Compliance with the Recommendations of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, 1994-2004. American journal of international law. 2007;101:1–34.
154.
The Status of the Findings of the African Commission: From Moral Obligations to Legal Obligation. Journal of African Law [Internet]. 2004;48(1). Available from: http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_M&C=Journal of African Law
155.
Rachel, Lloyd A. Institutions with responsibility for human rights protection under the African Union. Journal of African Law. 2004;48(02):165–86.
156.
Principles and Guidelines on the Implementation of Economic, Social an Cultural Rights in the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights | ESCR-Net [Internet]. Available from: http://www.escr-net.org/docs/i/1599552
157.
Analysing the Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Jurisprudence of the African Commission: 30 Years Since the Adoption of the African Charter [Internet]. Available from: http://www.corteidh.or.cr/tablas/r26994.pdf
158.
Basedow, Jürgen, Max-Planck-Institut für Ausländisches und Internationales Privatrecht. The Max Planck encyclopedia of European private law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
159.
Cullet P. Right to water in India – plugging conceptual and practical gaps. The International Journal of Human Rights. 17(1):56–78.
160.
Limburg Principles on the Implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights | ESCR-Net [Internet]. Available from: http://www.escr-net.org/docs/i/425445
161.
Maastricht guidelines on Violations of ESC Rights [Internet]. Available from: http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/instree/Maastrichtguidelines_.html
162.
Commentary to the Maastricht Principles on Extraterritorial Obligations of States in the Area of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. 2012;43(4). Available from: http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_M&C=Human Rights Quarterly
163.
Skogly S. The requirement of using the ‘maximum of available resources’ for human rights realisation: a question of quality as well as quantity? Human rights Law Review [Internet]. 2012;12(3):393–420. Available from: http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_M&C=Human rights Law Review
164.
Bilchitz, David. Poverty and fundamental rights: the justification and enforcement of socio-economic rights [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552160.001.0001
165.
Bilchitz, David. Poverty and fundamental rights: the justification and enforcement of socio-economic rights [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552160.001.0001
166.
Clapham, Andrew, Academy of European Law. Human rights obligations of non-state actors [Internet]. Vol. The collected courses of the Academy of European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006. Available from: http://library.kent.ac.uk/cgi-bin/resources.cgi?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199288465.001.0001
167.
Carmona MS. The obligations of ‘international assistance and cooperation’ under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. A possible entry point to a human rights based approach to Millennium Development Goal 8. The International Journal of Human Rights. 2009 Feb;13(1):86–109.
168.
Home state responsibility and local communities: the case of global mining. Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal. 2008;11.
169.
Addressing Economic and Social Rights Violations by Non-state Actors through the Role of the State: A Comparison of Regional Approaches to the ‘Obligation to Protect’. Human Rights Law Review. 2009;9(2):225–55.
170.
Ssenyonjo M. The Applicability of International Human Rights Law to Non-State Actors: What Relevance to Economic, Social and Cultural Rights? The International Journal of Human Rights. 12(5):725–60.
171.
Tinta F. Justicability of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the Inter-American System of Protection of Human Rights: Beyond Traditional Paradigms and Notions. Human Rights Quarterly. 29(2):431–59.
172.
The Minimum Core of Economic and Social Rights: A Concept in Search of Content. Yale Journal of International Law. 2008;33(1).
173.
Duruigbo E. Corporate accountability and liability for international human rights abuses: Recent changes and recurring challenges. Northwestern University journal of international human rights. 2008;6(2):222–61.
174.
Roth K. Defending Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Practical Issues Faced by an International Human Rights Organization. Human Rights Quarterly. 2004 June 2;26(1):63–73.
175.
Rubenstein LS. How International Human Rights Organizations Can Advance Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Response to Kenneth Roth. Human Rights Quarterly. 2004;26(4):845–65.
176.
The Human Rights Committee General Comment No 29, on Derogations during a state of emergency [Internet]. Available from: http://www.bayefsky.com/tree.php/id/16/misc/general
177.
Sovereignty and the question of derogation: an analysis of article 15 of the ECHR and the absence of a derogation clause in the ACHPR [Internet]. Available from: http://www.bbklr.org/1-1-6.html
178.
Chowdhury, Subrata Roy. Rule of law in a state of emergency: the Paris minimum standards of human rights norms in a state of emergency. London: Pinter; 1989.
179.
Schutter, Olivier de. International human rights law: cases, materials, commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
180.
Harris, D. J., O’Boyle, Michael, Warbrick, Colin. Harris, O’Boyle & Warbrick law of the European Convention on Human Rights. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
181.
Lillich RB. Queensland Guidelines for Bodies Monitoring Respect for Human Rights During States of Emergency. American Journal of International Law. 1991;85:716–20.
182.
, Reconceptualizing states of emergency under international human rights law: theory, legal doctrine, and politics. Michigan Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2012;34(3):491–558. Available from: http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_M&C=Michigan Journal of International Law
183.
Smith, Rhona K. M. Texts and materials on international human rights. 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge; 2010.
184.
The Right to a Fair Trial in Times of Terrorism: A Method to Identify the Non- Derogable Aspects of Article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, () 1(1). Göttingen Journal of International Law. 2009;1(1):29–44.
185.
Stavros S. The Right to a Fair Trial in Emergency Situations. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 1992;41(2):343–65.
186.
Huntington S. The Clash of Civilizations? Foreign Affairs. (3):22–49.
187.
Leiter B. Foundations of religious liberty: toleration or respect? San Diego law review. 2010;47(4).
188.
From Religious Freedom to Moral Freedom. San Diego Law Review. 2010;47.
189.
Harris, D. J., O’Boyle, Michael, Warbrick, Colin. Harris, O’Boyle & Warbrick law of the European Convention on Human Rights. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
190.
Calo, Zachary R. PLURALISM, SECULARISM AND THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Journal of Law & Religion [Internet]. 2011;26(1):261–80. Available from: http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=3&sid=78412fb9-5ebd-4a05-8349-8c86ba854d94%40sessionmgr14&hid=1&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=a9h&AN=56469791
191.
Evans, Carolyn. INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS: CRACKS IN THE INTELLECTUAL ARCHITECTURE. Journal of Law & Religion [Internet]. 2011;26(1):321–43. Available from: http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=4&sid=f9f96cb9-a27b-412d-b973-d2082a24896e%40sessionmgr14&hid=1&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=a9h&AN=56469794
192.
Religious Symbols in Educational Institutions: Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. Religion and Human Rights [Internet]. 2012;7:133–49. Available from: http://df7sm3xp4s.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=DF7SM3XP4S&S=AC_T_M&C=Religion and Human Rights
193.
Hill RW. The French Prohibition on Veiling in Public Places: Rights Evolution or Violation? Oxford Journal of Law and Religion. 2013 Oct 1;2(2):417–39.
194.
Hunter-Henin M. WHY THE FRENCH DON’T LIKE THE BURQA: LAÏCITÉ, NATIONAL IDENTITY AND RELIGIOUS FREEDOM. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2012 July;61(03):613–39.
195.
Lewis T. What not to Wear: Religious Rights, the European Court, and the Margin of Appreciation. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2008 Jan 17;56(02):1–17.
196.
Vakulenko A. `Islamic Headscarves’ and the European Convention On Human Rights: an Intersectional Perspective. Social & Legal Studies. 2007 June 1;16(2):183–99.
197.
Graham, L. Bennett. Defamation of Religions: The End of Pluralism? Emory International Law Review. 2009;23(1):69–84.
198.
Cerone J. Inappropriate Renderings: The Danger of Reductionist Resolutions. Brooklyn journal of international law. 2008;33.
199.
Leo LA. Protecting religions from ‘defamation’: a threat to universal human rights standards. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy. 2011;34(2):769–803.