1.
Munday, R. J. C. Evidence. vol. Core text series (Oxford University Press, 2015).
2.
Durston, Gregory. Evidence: text & materials. (Oxford University Press, 2011).
3.
Civil Evidence Act 1995.
4.
Munday, R. J. C. Evidence. vol. Core text series (Oxford University Press, 2015).
5.
Durston, Gregory. Evidence: text & materials. (Oxford University Press, 2011).
6.
Criminal Justice Act 2003.
7.
Loof, R. Obtaining, adducing and contesting evidence from abroad: a defence perspective on cross-border evidence. Criminal Law review 40–57 (2011).
8.
Hearsay: Same Old Story. Criminal Law Review (2004).
9.
Worthern, T. The hearsay provisions of the Criminal Justice Act 2003: so far, not so good? Criminal law review 431–442 (2008).
10.
Ward, T. Hearsay, psychiatric evidence and the interest of justice. Criminal Law review 415–426 (2009).
11.
Denyer, R. L. Proving bad character. Criminal Law Review 562–570 (2009).
12.
Costigan, R. Identification from CCTV: the risk of injustice. Criminal Law review 591–608 (2007).
13.
Case Comment Documentary hearsay. Criminal Law review 707–708 (1991).
14.
Ormerod, D. & Lake, S. Case Comment Evidence: whether Criminal Justice Act 1988, Sch.2, para.3 automatically rendering previous consistent statement admissible as evidence of circumstances from which inference might be drawn as to accuracy or otherwise of documentary hearsay evidence admitted under s.23 of that Act. Criminal Law review 642–645 (2005).
15.
Ormerod, D. Case Comment Hearsay. Criminal Law review 836–840 (2006).
16.
Ormerod, D. C. Case Comment Evidence: hearsay - Criminal Justice Act 2003 s.116. Criminal Law review 637–639 (2006).
17.
Ormerod, D. Case Comment Hearsay: approach to admissibility of hearsay evidence of absent witness under s.114(1)(d) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 where conditions in s.116 not satisfied. Criminal Law review 519–524 (2009).
18.
Ormerod, D. Coroners and Justice Act 2009: the ‘witness anonymity’ and ‘investigation anonymity’ provisions. Criminal Law Review 368–388 (2010).
19.
The right to confront witnesses: meanings, myths and human rights. Criminal Law Review 255–274 (2010).
20.
Hearsay: Same Old Story. Criminal Law Review (2004).
21.
O’Brian, W. E. Confrontation: The Defiance of the English Courts. International journal of evidence & proof 15, 93–116 (2011).
22.
Requa, M. Absent Witnesses and the UK Supreme Court: Judicial Deference as Judicial Dialogue. International journal of evidence & proof 14, 208–231 (2010).
23.
Jones, I. Political Judgment - Reconciling Hearsay and the Right to Challenge,. International journal of evidence & proof 14, 232–252 (2010).
24.
Case Comment Excess alcohol in blood - testing of blood using computer - evidence of results given by scientist. Criminal Law Review 422–423 (1987).
25.
Pattenden, R. Machinespeak: section 129 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003. Criminal Law Review 623–637 (2010).
26.
Jackson, J. D. The insufficiency of identification evidence based on personal impression. Criminal Law review 203–214 (1986).
27.
Roberts, A. Problem of Mistaken Identification: Some Observations on Process. International journal of evidence & proof 8, 100–119 (2004).
28.
Munday, R. J. C. Evidence. vol. Core text series (Oxford University Press, 2015).
29.
Walker, C. Case Comment Terrorism: possessing an article in circumstances giving rise to reasonable suspicion that possession being for...terrorism. Criminal Law review 71–72 (2008).
30.
Munday, R. J. C. Evidence. vol. Core text series (Oxford University Press, 2015).
31.
Durston, Gregory. Evidence: text & materials. (Oxford University Press, 2011).
32.
Keane, A. & McKeown, P. The modern law of evidence. (Oxford University Press, 2016).
33.
Russell, G. A. Recasting the role of the indictment: a new perspective on an old problem. Criminal Law Review 840–854 (2010).
34.
Hungerford-Welch, P. Prosecution interviews of defence witnesses. Criminal Law review 690–701 (2010).
35.
Roberts, P. & Saunders, C. Introducing pre-trial witness interviews: a flexible new fixture in the Crown Prosecutor’s toolkit. Criminal Law review 831–853 (2008).
36.
Denyer, R. L. The defence statement. Criminal Law Review 340–345 (2009).
37.
Duff, P. Disclosure in Scottish Criminal Procedure: Another Step in an Inquisitorial Direction. International journal of evidence & proof 11, 153–180 (2007).
38.
Quik, H. Identifying Miscarriages of Justice: Why Innocence in the UK Is Not the Answer. International journal of evidence & proof 70, 759–777 (2007).
39.
Ormerod, D. Improving the Disclosure Regime. International journal of evidence & proof 7, 102–129 (2003).
40.
Nash, S. Non-Disclosure of Prosecution Evidence and Equality of Arms: Edwards and Lewis v. United Kingdom. International journal of evidence & proof 8, 130–134 (2004).
41.
Redmayne, M. Criminal Justice Act 2003: (1) Disclosure and its discontents. Criminal Law Review 441–462 (2004).
42.
Munday, R. J. C. Evidence. vol. Core text series (Oxford University Press, 2015).
43.
Durston, Gregory. Evidence: text & materials. (Oxford University Press, 2011).
44.
Bisgrove, M. Judges as tribunals of fact: to what extent do the provisions for a defendant to be tried on indictment by a judge sitting without a jury conflict with the defendant’s right to a fair trial where issues of PII are present? Criminal Law Review 702–710 (2010).
45.
Case Comment Informer privilege - Canada. Criminal Law Review 747–748 (2007).
46.
Munday, R. J. C. Evidence. vol. Core text series (Oxford University Press, 2015).
47.
Durston, Gregory. Evidence: text & materials. (Oxford University Press, 2011).
48.
Roberts, A. R. v Seaton (Oral): legal professional privilege - defendant accused of recent fabrication of evidence. Criminal Law review 314–316 (2011).
49.
Taylor, N. W. Legal privilege: Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 - impact on common law and statutory rights of legal privilege. Criminal law review 524–529 (2009).
50.
Roberts, A. J. Litigation privilege and legal professional privilege. Criminal Law review 643–645 (2008).
51.
Passmore, C. The future of legal professional privilege. International journal of evidence & proof 71–86 (1999).
52.
Allan, T. R. S. Legal privilege and the principle of fairness in the criminal trial. Criminal law review 449–459 (1987).
53.
Zuckerman, A. A. S. The weakness of the PACE special procedure for protecting confidential material. Criminal Law Review 472–478 (1990).
54.
Stone, R. T. H. PACE: special procedures and legal privilege. Criminal Law review 498–507 (1988).
55.
Loughrey, J. Legal advice privilege and the corporate client. International journal of evidence & proof 183–203 (2005).
56.
Ormerod, D. Coroners and Justice Act 2009: the ‘witness anonymity’ and ‘investigation anonymity’ provisions. Criminal Law Review 368–388 (2010).
57.
van Harten, G. Weakness of Adjudication in the Face of Secret Evidence. International journal of evidence & proof 13, 1–27 (2009).
58.
Munday, R. J. C. Evidence. vol. Core text series (Oxford University Press, 2015).
59.
Durston, Gregory. Evidence: text & materials. (Oxford University Press, 2011).
60.
Ashworth, A. Case Comment Human rights: article 6(1) - privilege against self-incrimination - Austrian equivalent of offence under s.172 of the Road Traffic Act 1988. Criminal Law Review 549–550 (2008).
61.
Case Comment Right to silence: confessions - Canada. Criminal Law review 248–249 (2008).
62.
Munday, R. J. C. Evidence. vol. Core text series (Oxford University Press, 2015).
63.
Durston, Gregory. Evidence: text & materials. (Oxford University Press, 2011).
64.
Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984.
65.
Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999.
66.
Cooper, D. Pigot unfulfilled: video-recorded cross-examination under section 28 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999. Criminal Law review 456–466 (2005).
67.
Plotnikoff, J. & Woolfson, R. Making the best use of the intermediary special measure at trial. Criminal Law review 91–104 (2008).
68.
Burton, M., Evans, R. & Sanders, A. Vulnerable and Intimidated Witnesses and the Adversarial Process in England and Wales. International journal of evidence & proof 11, 1–23 (2007).
69.
Roberts, P., Cooper, D. & Judge, S. Monitoring Success, Accounting for Failure: The Outcome of Prosecutors’ Applications for Special Measures Directions under the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999. International journal of evidence & proof 9, 269–290 (2005).
70.
Ellison, L. & Wheatcroft, J. ‘Could you ask me that in a different way please?’ Exploring the impact of courtroom questioning and witness familiarisation on adult witness accuracy. Criminal Law review 823–839 (2010).
71.
Leake, S. & Ellison, L. E. Case Comment Evidence: use of special measures in case of intimidated witnesses. Criminal Law Review 1034–1036 (2004).
72.
Munday, R. J. C. Evidence. vol. Core text series (Oxford University Press, 2015).
73.
Durston, Gregory. Evidence: text & materials. (Oxford University Press, 2011).
74.
Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994.
75.
Spencer, John R. & Flin, Rhona H. The evidence of children: the law and the psychology. (Blackstone, 1993).
76.
Andrew, L. & Choo, T. Confessions and corroboration: a comparative perspective. Criminal Law review 867–877 (1991).
77.
Roberts, A. Eyewitness Identification and Expert Insight: R v Forbes. International journal of evidence & proof 14, 57–62 (2010).
78.
Costigan, R. Identification from CCTV: the risk of injustice. Criminal Law Review 591–608 (2007).
79.
The use at trial of scientific findings relating to human memory. Criminal law Review 19–30 (2010).
80.
Ormerod, D. C. Case Comment Evidence: voice recognition - test for admissibility. Criminal Law review 427–430 (2006).
81.
Roberts, A. J. Case Comment Evidence: street identification - distinct clothing case. Criminal Law Review 162–165 (2007).
82.
Creighton, P. Spouse competence and compellability. Criminal Law review 34–43 (1990).
83.
Birch, D. J. A better deal for vulnerable witnesses? Criminal Law Review 223–249 (2000).
84.
Laura C H Hoyano. Variations on a theme by Pigot: special measures directions for child witnesses. Criminal Law Review 250–273 (2000).
85.
McEwan, J. In Defence of Vulnerable Witnesses: The Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999. International journal of evidence & proof 4, 1–30 (2000).
86.
Hoyano, L. C. H. Coroners and Justice Act 2009: special measures directions take two: entrenching unequal access to justice? Criminal Law review 345–367 (2010).
87.
Munday, R. J. C. Evidence. vol. Core text series (Oxford University Press, 2015).
88.
Durston, Gregory. Evidence: text & materials. (Oxford University Press, 2011).
89.
Munday, R. J. C. Evidence. vol. Core text series (Oxford University Press, 2015).
90.
Durston, Gregory. Evidence: text & materials. (Oxford University Press, 2011).
91.
Keane, A. & Fortson, R. Leading questions - a critical analysis. criminal law review 280–295 (2011).
92.
Crinion, C. Adducing the good character of prosecution witnesses. Criminal Law review 570–573 (2010).
93.
Heaton-Armstrong, Anthony. Witness testimony: psychological, investigative and evidential perspectives. (Oxford University Press, 2006).
94.
Refreshing Memory. Criminal Law Review (1978).
95.
Stephenson, G. M. Should collaborative testimony be permitted in courts of law? Criminal Law Review 302–314 (1990).
96.
Criminal Justice Act 2003.
97.
Witness - refreshing memory from document made at time - record not verified - admissibility. criminal law review 947–948 (1993).
98.
Criminal Justice Act 2003.
99.
Hearsay: Same Old Story. Criminal Law Review (2004).
100.
Durston, G. Previous (in)consistent statements after the Criminal Justice Act 2003. Criminal law review 206–214 (2005).
101.
Lewis, P. Expert evidence of delay in complaint in childhood sexual abuse prosecutions. International journal of evidence & proof 157–179 (2006).
102.
Lewis, P. Delayed complaints in childhood sexual abuse prosecutions - a comparative evaluation of admissibility determinations and judicial warnings. International journal of evidence & proof 104–127 (2006).
103.
Hamer, D. Trying delays: forensic disadvantage in child sexual assault trials. Criminal law review 671–689 (2010).
104.
Crinion, C. Adducing the good character of prosecution witnesses. Criminal law review 570–573 (2010).
105.
Ormerod, D. C. Evidence: hearsay - recent complaint - Criminal Justice Act 2003 s.120. Criminal law review 918–920 (2006).
106.
Ormerod, D. Evidence: previous inconsistent statement - admissibility. Criminal law review 887–890 (2007).
107.
Evidence that prosecution witness was a clergyman. Criminal Law review 911–912 (1999).
108.
Ormerod, D. R. v Athwal (Bachan): evidence - hearsay - previous consistent statement - admissibility - rebutting fabrication. criminal law review 726–729 (2009).
109.
Hoyano, L. Sexual offences: allegations of historic sexual abuse - credibility of complainants at issue. Criminal Law review 502–505 (2011).
110.
Munday, R. J. C. Evidence. vol. Core text series (Oxford University Press, 2015).
111.
Durston, Gregory. Evidence: text & materials. (Oxford University Press, 2011).
112.
wheatcroft, J. M. Effectiveness of witness preparation and cross-examination non-directive and directive leading question styles on witness accuracy and confidence. International journal of evidence & proof 187–207 (2010).
113.
Ellison, L. Closing the credibility gap: the prosecutorial use of expert witness testimony in sexual assault cases. International journal of evidence & proof 239–268 (2005).
114.
Keane, A. & Fortson, R. Leading questions - a critical analysis. criminal law review 280–295 (2011).
115.
Criminal Justice Act 2003.
116.
Tapper, C. Criminal Justice Act 2003: Part 3: evidence of bad character. Criminal Law Review 553–555 (2004).
117.
Ormerod, D. Case Comment Evidence: admissibility - allegations against persons other than the defendant. Criminal Law review 165–168 (2007).
118.
Criminal Procedure Act 1865.
119.
Evidence: hostile witness. Criminal law review 221–223 (1999).
120.
Ormerod, D. C. Hostile witness: hostile witness maintaining contents of prior statement not true. criminal law review 197–200 (2009).
121.
Munday, R. Calling a hostile witness. criminal Law review 866–876 (1989).
122.
Newark, M. The hostile witness and the adversary system. Criminal Law review 441–454 (1986).
123.
Pattenden, R. The Hostile Witness. Journal of Criminal law (1992).
124.
Durston, G. Bad Character Evidence and Non-Party Witnesses under the Criminal Justice Act 2003. International journal of evidence & proof 8, 233–239 (2004).
125.
Seabrooke, S. The vanishing trick - blurring the line between credit and issue. Criminal Law review 387–391 (1999).
126.
Ormerod, D. Evidence: previous inconsistent statement - admissibility. Criminal law review 887–890 (2007).
127.
Ormerod, D. C. Trial: previous inconsistent statement - admissibility. Criminal law review 407–410 (2007).
128.
Ormerod, D. Previous inconsistent statements: directing juries in relation to previous inconsistent statements in view of effect and application of s.119 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003. Criminal Law review 529–532 (2009).
129.
Munday, R. J. C. Evidence. vol. Core text series (Oxford University Press, 2015).
130.
Durston, Gregory. Evidence: text & materials. (Oxford University Press, 2011).
131.
Criminal Justice Act 2003.
132.
Tapper, C. Criminal Justice Act 2003: Part 3: evidence of bad character. Criminal Law Review 553–555 (2004).
133.
Durston, G. Bad Character Evidence and Non-Party Witnesses under the Criminal Justice Act 2003. International journal of evidence & proof 8, 233–239 (2004).
134.
Hoyano, L. ABE interview: retirement - transcript of prosecution witness’s video evidence retained by jury. Criminal law review 227–229 (2011).
135.
Roberts, A. Evidence - non-defendant’s bad character. Criminal Law review 58–61 (2011).
136.
Roberts, A. Evidence: bad character witnesses - allegations in police crime reports. Criminal law review 855–857 (2010).
137.
Munday, R. J. C. Evidence. vol. Core text series (Oxford University Press, 2015).
138.
Durston, Gregory. Evidence: text & materials. (Oxford University Press, 2011).
139.
Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1976.
140.
Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999.
141.
Temkin, Jennifer. Rape and the legal process. vol. Oxford monographs on criminal law and criminal justice (Oxford University Press, 2002).
142.
Temkin, Jennifer & Krahé, Barbara. Sexual assault and the justice gap: a question of attitude. vol. The criminal law library (Hart, 2008).
143.
Birch, D. Editorial Rethinking sexual history evidence: proposals for fairer trials. Criminal law review 531–553 (2002).
144.
McEwan, J. The rape shield askew? International journal of evidence & proof 257–262 (2001).
145.
McEwan, J. Proving consent in sexual cases: legislative change and cultural evolution. International journal of evidence & proof 1–28 (2005).
146.
|Kibble, N. Judicial perspectives on the operation of s.41 and the relevance and admissibility of prior sexual history evidence: four scenarios: Part 1. Criminal Law Review 190–205 (2005).
147.
Kibble, N. Judicial discretion and the admissibility of prior sexual history evidence under section 41 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999: sometimes sticking to your guns means shooting yourself in the foot: Part 2. Criminal Law Review 263–274 (2005).
148.
Ellison, L. Cross-examination in rape trials. Criminal law Review 605–615 (1998).
149.
Hamer, D. Trying delays: forensic disadvantage in child sexual assault trials. Criminal law review 671–689 (2010).
150.
McGlynn, C. Rape, defendant anonymity and human rights: adopting a ‘wider perspective’. Criminal Law Review 199–215 (2011).
151.
Ellison, L. The use and abuse of psychiatric evidence in rape trials. International journal of evidence & proof 28–49 (2009).
152.
Birch , D. J. Evidence: sexual offences - cross-examination about sexual behaviour of complainant. Criminal Law review 911–913 (2001).
153.
Kibble, N. R. v Harris: evidence - sexual offences - rape - cross-examination of complainant about sexual behaviour. Criminal Law Review 54–61 (2010).
154.
Kibble, N. Sexual offences: whether judge correct to refuse to allow cross-examination of complainant as to history of homosexual intercourse. Criminal Law review 910–914 (2007).
155.
Ormrod, D. Sexual history evidence. Criminal Law review 181–184 (2007).
156.
Kibble, N. Rape: fresh evidence - evidence of complainant making numerous false complaints - effect on credibility. Criminal Law review 394–398 (2008).
157.
Kibble, N. Criminal evidence: cross-examination - complainant’s sexual history. Criminal law review 635–639 (2008).
158.
Kibble, N. Criminal evidence: sexual history evidence - cross-examination. Criminal Law review 971–975 (2008).
159.
Munday, R. J. C. Evidence. vol. Core text series (Oxford University Press, 2015).
160.
Durston, Gregory. Evidence: text & materials. (Oxford University Press, 2011).
161.
Tapper, C. Criminal Justice Act 2003: Part 3: evidence of bad character. criminal Law review 533–555 (2004).
162.
Mirfield, P. Character and credibility. Criminal Law review 135–151 (2009).
163.
Spencer, John R. Evidence of bad character. vol. The criminal law library (Hart, 2009).
164.
Munday, R. Cut-throat defences and the ‘propensity to be untruthful’ under s.104 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003. Criminal Law Review 624–637 (2005).
165.
Munday, R. What constitutes ‘other reprehensible behaviour’ under the bad character provisions of the Criminal Justice Act 2003? Criminal Law review 24–43 (2005).
166.
Munday, roderick. Bad character rules and riddles: ‘explanatory notes’ and true meanings of s.103(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003. Criminal law review 337–354 (2005).
167.
Tapper, C. Criminal Justice Act 2003: Part 3: evidence of bad character. criminal Law review 533–555 (2004).
168.
Waterman, A. Bad character: feeling our way one year on. criminal law review 614–628 (2006).
169.
Redmayne, M. Recognising propensity. criminal law review 177–198 (2011).
170.
Mirfield, P. Character and credibility. Criminal Law review 135–151 (2009).
171.
Fortson, R. Bad character evidence and cross-admissibility. Criminal law review 313–334 (2009).
172.
Denyer, R. Proving bad character. Criminal law review 562–570 (2009).
173.
Mirfield, P. Character and credibility. Criminal Law review 135–151 (2009).
174.
Goudkamp, J. Bad character evidence and reprehensible behaviour. International journal of evidence & proof 116–140 (2008).
175.
Criminal Justice Act 2003.
176.
Roberts, P. Acquitted misconduct evidence and double jeopardy principles, from Sambasivam to Z. Criminal Law review 952–970 (2000).
177.
Higgins, V. & Roberts, A. J. Evidence: character of accused - character of co-accused. Criminal Law review 530–534 (2006).
178.
Rees, T. & Roberts, A. J. Evidence: Criminal Justice Act 2003 ss.100-112 - bad character of defendant. Criminal law review 534–540 (2006).
179.
Roberts, A. J. Bad character: capacity of a single previous conviction to establish a propensity to commit offences of the kind charged. Criminal law review 637–639 (2007).
180.
Roberts, A. J. Evidence: Criminal Justice Act 2003 Part II - bad character provisions. Criminal law review 433–439 (2006).
181.
Ashworth, A. J. Bad character: multiple complaints - prosecution contending each complainant’s evidence being mutually supportive. Criminal law review 380–383 (2007).
182.
Ormerod, D. Bad character and cross admissibility. Criminal law review 103–106 (2009).
183.
Ormerod, D. R. v O’Dowd: trial - length of trial - whether making trial unfair and conviction unsafe. Criminal Law Review 827–830 (2009).
184.
Roberts, A. J. R. v Lafayette: propensity - whether judge’s summing-up adequate. Criminal Law review 809–811 (2009).
185.
Roberts, A. J. Evidence: bad character - pre-Criminal Justice Act 2003 law. Criminal law review 303–306 (2008).
186.
Roberts, A. j. Previous convictions: criminal evidence - prosecution witness - previous convictions - admissibility. Criminal law review 306–308 (2008).
187.
Ormerod, david. R. v Fox: bad character - causing a child under the age of 13 to engage in sexual activity. Criminal law review 881–886 (2009).
188.
Roberts, A. j. Bad character: evidence of previous misconduct - whether misconduct having to do with offence charged. Criminal law review 969–972 (2007).
189.
roberts, A. j. Evidence: bad character - circumstantial evidence of involvement in linked offences. criminal law review 976–979 (2007).
190.
Ormerod, D. Evidence: judge admitting defendants’ previous convictions - judge ruling at start of case. Criminal law review 890–9=894 (2007).
191.
Roberts, A. J. Bad character. Criminal law review 794–796 (2007).
192.
Roberts, A. Bad character: whether evidence of oral aggression admissible. Criminal law review 712–714 (2007).
193.
Roberts, A. Summing up - direction to jury. Criminal law review 79–80 (2011).
194.
Roberts, A. j. Evidence: admissibility - bad character - evidence of previous conviction - defendant disputing facts forming background to previous conviction. Criminal law review 517–519 (2009).
195.
Roberts, A. j. Evidence: criminal evidence - admissibility - evidence of defendant’s bad character. Criminal law review 514–516 (2009).
196.
Roberts, A. J. Evidence: bad character - murder - manslaughter admitted - relevance of ‘propensity to violence’ where specific intent at issue. Criminal law review 472–475 (2008).
197.
Roberts, A. J. Evidence: bad character - Criminal Justice Act 2003 ss.101(1)(d) and 103(1) - admissibility of earlier incident for which defendant not prosecuted. Criminal law review 547–549 (2008).
198.
Roberts, A. Bad character: character of accused - previous misconduct of accused not subject of criminal convictions - causing death by dangerous driving. Criminal law review 712–716 (2008).
199.
Roberts, A. J. Bad character: direction to jury - credibility - propensity - defendant having no relevant previous convictions. Criminal Law review (2008).
200.
Criminal Justice Act 2003.
201.
Roberts, Paul & Zuckerman, A. A. S. Criminal evidence. (Oxford University Press, 2010).
202.
Tapper, C. Criminal Justice Act 2003: Part 3: evidence of bad character. Criminal law review 533–555 (2004).
203.
Roberts, A. J. Bad character: character of defendant - attack on another person’s character. Criminal Law review 709–711 (2007).
204.
Ormerod, D. Evidence: bad character - hearsay - texts sent to defendant - Criminal Justice Act 2003 s.101(1)(f) and (g), (3). Criminal Law Review 942–945 (2010).
205.
Summing up - good character of defendant - relevance to his credibility - relevance to the likelihood of his committing offence - proper direction to jury. Criminal Law Review 602–605 (1993).
206.
Roberts, A. J. R. v M: evidence - good character - adequacy of direction to jury. Criminal Law Review 232–235 (2010).
207.
Criminal Justice Act 2003.
208.
Roberts, Paul & Zuckerman, A. A. S. Criminal evidence. (Oxford University Press, 2010).
209.
Tapper, C. Criminal Justice Act 2003: Part 3: evidence of bad character. criminal Law review 533–555 (2004).
210.
Munday, R. Cut-throat defences and the ‘propensity to be untruthful’ under s.104 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003. Criminal Law review 624–637 (2005).
211.
Denyer, R. L. Non-compliance with case management orders and directions. Criminal law review 784–792 (2008).
212.
Criminal Justice Act 2003.
213.
Roberts, A. J. R. v Ramirez: evidence - admissibility - evidence of bad character of co-accused. Criminal law review 235–238 (2010).
214.
Roberts, A. J. Bad character: application by co-accused to adduce bad character evidence. Criminal law review 632–635 (2008).
215.
Lloyd-Bostock, S. The effects on juries of hearing about the defendant’s previous criminal record: a simulation study. Criminal Law review 734–755 (2000).
216.
Lloyd-Bostock, S. The effects on lay magistrates of hearing that the defendant is of ‘good character’, being left to speculate, or hearing that he has a previous conviction. Criminal Law review 189–212 (2006).
217.
Great Britain & Great Britain. Evidence of bad character in criminal proceedings: report on a reference under Section 3(1)(e) of the Law Commissions Act 1965. vol. Law Commission (Stationery Office, 2001).
218.
Justice for all: presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for the Home Department, the Lord Chancellor and the Attorney General. (TSO (The Stationery Office), 2002).
219.
Munday, R. J. C. Evidence. vol. Core text series (Oxford University Press, 2015).
220.
Durston, Gregory. Evidence: text & materials. (Oxford University Press, 2011).
221.
Redmayne, Mike. Expert evidence and criminal justice. vol. Oxford monographs on criminal law and justice (Oxford University Press, 2001).
222.
Home - Law Commission.
223.
Dwyer, D. Duties of Expert Witnesses of Fact and Opinion: R v. Clark (Sally), The. International journal of evidence & proof 7, 264–269 (2003).
224.
Walker, C. P. & McCartney, C. Case Comment Evidence: expert witnesses seriously disagreeing as to whether cause of death of infants natural or unnatural. Criminal Law Review 126–130 (2005).
225.
Roberts, A. J. Case Comment Experts - duties of experts - obligations to court. Criminal Law review 745–748 (2006).
226.
Naughton, M. & Tan, G. Right to Access DNA Testing by Alleged Innocent Victims of Wrongful Convictions in the United Kingdom, The. International journal of evidence & proof 14, 326–345 (2010).
227.
Wheate, R. Importance of DNA Evidence to Juries in Criminal Trials, The. International journal of evidence & proof 14, 129–145 (2010).
228.
Roberts, A. Case Comment Evidence: expert evidence in cases involving sudden death of child. Criminal Law Review 945–949 (2010).
229.
Keane, A. The use at trial of scientific findings relating to human memory. Criminal Law review 19–30 (2010).
230.
Coen, M. & Hefferman, L. Juror comprehension of expert evidence: a reform agenda. Criminal Law review 195–211 (2010).
231.
Ellison, L. & Wheatcroft, J. ‘Could you ask me that in a different way please?’ Exploring the impact of courtroom questioning and witness familiarisation on adult witness accuracy. Criminal law review 823–839 (2010).
232.
Expert evidence: difficulties and solutions in prosecutions for infant harm. Legal Studies 30, 279–300 (2010).
233.
Redmayne, M., Roberts, P., Aitken, C. & Jackson, G. Forensic science evidence in questions. Criminal law review 347–356 (2011).
234.
Roberts, A. Drawing on expertise: legal decision-making and the reception of expert evidence. Criminal Law review 443–462 (2008).
235.
Roberts, A. Rejecting general acceptance, confounding the gate-keeper: the Law Commission and expert evidence. Criminal Law review 551–561 (2009).
236.
Ward, T. Usurping the Role of the Jury - Expert Evidence and Witness Credibility in English Criminal Trials. International journal of evidence & proof 13, 83–101 (2009).
237.
Klinker, M. Forensic Science Expertise for International Criminal Proceedings: An Old Problem, a New Context and a Pragmatic Resolution. International journal of evidence & proof 13, 102–129 (2009).
238.
Dwyer, D. Legal Remedies for the Negligent Expert. International journal of evidence & proof 12, 93–115 (2008).
239.
Cunliffe, E. Without Fear or Favour - Trends and Possibilities in the Canadian Approach to Expert Human Behaviour Evidence. International journal of evidence & proof 10, 280–315.
