[1]
-- United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) - Home page --: .
[2]
47 Countries - 820 million citizens - Council of Europe: http://hub.coe.int/.
[3]
1990 IAEA Code of Conduct on Radioactive waste: http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/Others/inf386.shtml.
[4]
1991 Espoo Convention (Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a transboundary context): http://www.unece.org/env/eia.
[5]
1992 OSPAR Convention (Northeast Atlantic): http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/environment/water_protection_management/l28061_en.htm.
[6]
1997 Joint Convention on spent fuel and radioactive waste: http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Conventions/jointconv.html.
[7]
1998 Århus Convention: http://www.unece.org/env/pp/treatytext.html.
[8]
2001 POPs Convention: Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants: http://chm.pops.int/Home/tabid/2121/mctl/ViewDetails/EventModID/7595/EventID/442/xmid/7598/Default.aspx.
[9]
2004 Implementation of the Aarhus Convention through Community law. Env L Rev. 6, 4.
[10]
2009 Copenhagen Accord: http://unfccc.int/meetings/copenhagen_dec_2009/items/5262.php.
[11]
A/CONF.151/26 (Vol. I) REPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT: .
[12]
Aguilar, S. 2007. Elements for a robust climate change regime. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 16, 3 (2007).
[13]
Akanle, T. 2010. Impact of ozone layer protection on the avoidance of climate change: legal issues and proposals to address the problem. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 19, 2 (2010).
[14]
Alam, Shawkat 2013. Routledge handbook of international environmental law. Routledge.
[15]
Aldy, Joseph E. and Stavins, R. N. 2007. Architectures for agreement: addressing global climate change in the post-Kyoto world. Cambridge University Press.
[16]
Allan, J.A. 1996. Water Use and Development in Arid Regions: Environment, Economic Development and Water Resource Politics and Policy. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 5, 2 (Jun. 1996), 107–115. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.1996.tb00258.x.
[17]
American Society of International Law American journal of international law.
[18]
American Society of International Law 1939. Trail Smelter Arbitral Tribunal - Decision. American journal of international law. 33, 1 (1939).
[19]
Analysing the ECE Water Convention: What Lessons for the Regional Management of Transboundary Water Resources? by Patricia Wouters, Sergei Vinogradov :: SSRN: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2365813.
[20]
Ascencio, A. 1997. The transboundary movement of living modified organisms: issues relating to liability and compensation. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 6, 3 (1997).
[21]
Atapattu, Sumudu A. 2006. Emerging principles of international environmental law. Transnational Publishers.
[22]
Aust, A. and Shears, J. 1996. Liability for Environmental Damage in Antarctica. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 5, 4 (Dec. 1996), 312–320. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.1996.tb00295.x.
[23]
Averill, M. 2010. Getting into court: standing, political questions and climate tort claims. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 19, 1 (2010).
[24]
Basel Action Network (BAN): http://ban.org/library/bamako_treaty.html.
[25]
Basel Convention Home Page: http://www.basel.int/.
[26]
Bausch, C. and Mehling, M. 2006. Alive and kicking’: the first Meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 15, 2 (2006).
[27]
Bell, Stuart and McGillivray, Donald 2008. Environmental law. Oxford University Press.
[28]
Berat, L. 11993. Defending the right to a healthy environment: towards a crime of genocide I international law. Boston University International Law Journal. 11, (11993).
[29]
Bergkamp, L. 2003. Environmental risk spreading and insurance. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 12, 3 (2003).
[30]
Bergkamp, Lucas 2001. Liability and environment: private and public law aspects of civil liability for environmental harm in an international context. Kluwer Law International.
[31]
Berkman, Paul Arthur and Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies 2010. Environmental security in the Arctic Ocean: promoting co-operation and preventing conflict. Published on behalf of The Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies by Routledge Journals.
[32]
Beyerlin, Ulrich and Marauhn, Thilo 2011. International environmental law. Hart.
[33]
Beyerlin, Ulrich and Marauhn, Thilo 2011. International environmental law. Hart.
[34]
Beyerlin, Ulrich and Marauhn, Thilo 2011. International environmental law. Hart.
[35]
Beyerlin, Ulrich and Marauhn, Thilo 2011. International environmental law. Hart.
[36]
Beyerlin, Ulrich and Marauhn, Thilo 2011. International environmental law. Hart.
[37]
Beyerlin, Ulrich and Marauhn, Thilo 2011. International environmental law. Hart.
[38]
Beyerlin, Ulrich and Marauhn, Thilo 2011. International environmental law. Hart.
[39]
Beyerlin, Ulrich and Marauhn, Thilo 2011. International environmental law. Hart.
[40]
Birnie, Patricia W. et al. 2009. International law and the environment. Oxford University Press.
[41]
Birnie, Patricia W. et al. 2009. International law and the environment. Oxford University Press.
[42]
Birnie, Patricia W. et al. 2009. International law and the environment. Oxford University Press.
[43]
Birnie, Patricia W. et al. 2009. International law and the environment. Oxford University Press.
[44]
Birnie, Patricia W. et al. 2009. International law and the environment. Oxford University Press.
[45]
Birnie, Patricia W. et al. 2009. International law and the environment. Oxford University Press.
[46]
Birnie, Patricia W. et al. 2009. International law and the environment. Oxford University Press.
[47]
Birnie, Patricia W. et al. 2009. International law and the environment. Oxford University Press.
[48]
Birnie, Patricia W. et al. 2009. International law and the environment. Oxford University Press.
[49]
Bodansky, Daniel 2010. The art and craft of international environmental law. Harvard University Press.
[50]
Bodansky, Daniel et al. 2008. The Oxford handbook of international environmental law. Oxford University Press.
[51]
Bodansky, Daniel et al. 2008. The Oxford handbook of international environmental law. Oxford University Press.
[52]
Bodansky, Daniel et al. 2008. The Oxford handbook of international environmental law. Oxford University Press.
[53]
Bodansky, Daniel et al. 2008. The Oxford handbook of international environmental law. Oxford University Press.
[54]
Bodansky, Daniel et al. 2008. The Oxford handbook of international environmental law. Oxford University Press.
[55]
Bodansky, Daniel et al. 2008. The Oxford handbook of international environmental law. Oxford University Press.
[56]
Bodansky, Daniel et al. 2008. The Oxford handbook of international environmental law. Oxford University Press.
[57]
Bodansky, Daniel et al. 2008. The Oxford handbook of international environmental law. Oxford University Press.
[58]
Boister, N. 2003. Transnational criminal law? European Journal of International Law. 14, (2003).
[59]
Bolin, Bert 2007. A history of the science and politics of climate change: the role of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
[60]
Bombay, P. 2001. The role of NGOs in shaping [European] Community positions in international environmental fora. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 10, 2 (2001).
[61]
Bowman, Michael and Boyle, Alan E. 2002. Environmental damage in international and comparative law: problems of definition and valuation. Oxford University Press.
[62]
Bowman, Michael and Boyle, Alan E. 2002. Environmental damage in international and comparative law: problems of definition and valuation. Oxford University Press.
[63]
Boyle, A.E. 2005. Globalising Environmental Liability: The Interplay of National and International Law. Journal of Environmental Law. 17, 1 (Jan. 2005), 3–26. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/envlaw/eqi001.
[64]
Boyle, Alan E. and Anderson, Michael R. 1996. Human rights approaches to environmental protection. Clarendon Press.
[65]
Brans, E. 2005. Liability for damage to public natural resources under the 2004 EC environmental liability directive. Environmental law review. 7, 2 (2005).
[66]
Brans, E.H.P. 1996. Liability and Compensation for Natural Resource Damage under the International Oil Pollution Conventions. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 5, 4 (Dec. 1996), 297–304. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.1996.tb00293.x.
[67]
Bratspies, Rebecca M. and Miller, Russell A. 2006. Transboundary harm in international law: lessons from the Trail Smelter arbitration. Cambridge University Press.
[68]
British Institute of International and Comparative Law International and comparative law quarterly.
[69]
Brunee, J. 2004. Of sense and sensibility: rflections on international liability regimes as tools for environmental protection. ICLQ. 53, (2004).
[70]
Brunnée, Jutta et al. 2007. The Oxford handbook of international environmental law. Oxford University Press.
[71]
Burns, William C. G. et al. 2009. Adjudicating climate change: state, national, and international approaches. Cambridge University Press.
[72]
Caponera, D.A. 1996. Conflicts over International River Basins in Africa, the Middle East and Asia. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 5, 2 (Jun. 1996), 97–106. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.1996.tb00257.x.
[73]
Carlarne, Cinnamon Piñon 2010. Climate change law and policy: EU and US approaches. Oxford University Press.
[74]
Choksi, S. 2001. The Basel Convention on the control of transboundary movements of hazardous wastes and their disposal: 1999 Protocol on liability and compensation,. Ecology Law Quarterly. 28, (2001).
[75]
Churchill, R.R. 2002. Facilitating (Transnational) Civil Liability Litigation for Environmental Damage by Means of Treaties: Progress, Problems, and Prospects. Yearbook of International Environmental Law. 12, 1 (Jan. 2002), 3–41. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/yiel/12.1.3.
[76]
Coenen, R. 1997. Dumping of Wastes at Sea: Adoption of the 1996 Protocol to the London Convention 1972. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 6, 1 (Mar. 1997), 54–61. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9388.00075.
[77]
Comte, F. 2003. Criminal environmental law and Community competence. European Env Law Review. 12, 5 (2003), 147–156.
[78]
Comte, F. 2005. European environmental criminal law – recent developments. Yearbook of European environmental law. 4, (2005).
[79]
Comte, Françoise and Krämer, Ludwig 2004. Environmental crime in Europe: rules of sanctions. Europa Law Publishing.
[80]
CONSILIUM - Homepage: .
[81]
Convention - Introduction - About OSPAR - OSPAR Commission: .
[82]
Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution: .
[83]
Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution - Air Pollution - Environmental Policy - UNECE: http://www.unece.org/env/lrtap.
[84]
Convention on the Law of the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses - Main Page: .
[85]
Council of Europe: .
[86]
Coyle, Sean 2004. The philosophical foundations of environmental law: property, rights and nature. Hart Pub.
[87]
Crossen, T. and Niessen, V. 2007. NGO standing in the European Court of Justice – does the Aarhus Regulation open the door? Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 16, 3 (2007).
[88]
Cull, M. 2000. Standing up for the environment: citizen suits in the US and in the EC white paper on environmental liability. Environmental law review. 2, (2000).
[89]
Cullet, P. 1999. Equity and flexibility mechanisms in the climate change regime: conceptual and practical issues. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 8, 2 (1999).
[90]
Cullet, Philippe et al. 2009. Water law for the twenty-first century: national and international aspects of water law reform in India. Routledge.
[91]
CURIA: .
[92]
Daniel, A. 2003. Civil liability regimes as a complement to multilateral environmental agreements: sound international policy or false comfort? Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 12, 3 (2003).
[93]
Davies, Peter G. G. 2004. European Union environmental law: an introduction to key selected issues. Ashgate.
[94]
De Lange, F. 2003. Beyond Greenpeace, courtesy of the Aarhus Convention. Yearbook of European Environmental Law. 3, (2003).
[95]
Decisions, Recommendations and other Instruments: http://acts.oecd.org/Instruments/ShowInstrumentView.aspx?InstrumentID=221&Lang=en&Book=False.
[96]
Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment: http://legal.un.org/avl/ha/dunche/dunche.html.
[97]
Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment: http://legal.un.org/avl/ha/dunche/dunche.html.
[98]
Dellapenna, J. 2008. International water law in a climate of disruption. Michigan State. Journal of International Law. 17, (2008).
[99]
Delli Priscoli, Jerome et al. 2009. Managing and transforming water conflicts. Cambridge University Press.
[100]
Desai, Bharat and Dawsonera 2010. Multilateral environmental agreements: legal status of the secretariats. Cambridge University Press.
[101]
Dessler, Andrew Emory and Parson, Edward 2010. The science and politics of global climate change: a guide to the debate. Cambridge University Press.
[102]
Dobson, Andrew and MyiLibrary 2007. Green political thought. Routledge.
[103]
Duruigbo, E. 2000. Reforming the international law and policy on marine oil pollution. Journal of maritime law and commerce. 31, 1 (2000).
[104]
Ebeku, K. 2003. Judicial attitudes to redress for oil-related environmental damage in  Nigeria. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 12, 2 (2003).
[105]
ECOLEX - the gateway to environmental law: .
[106]
Eguh, E. 1998. The Bamako Convention and the first meeting of the parties: a glance at implementation strategies. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 7, 3 (1998).
[107]
Ellerman, A. Denny et al. 2007. Allocation in the European Emissions Trading Scheme: rights, rents and fairness. Cambridge University Press.
[108]
Environment Canada - Pollution and Waste - Can-USA Agreement: http://www.ec.gc.ca/gdd-mw/default.asp?lang=En&n=EB0B92CE-1.
[109]
EUROPA - EU laws, treaties and legislation in preparation: .
[110]
EUROPA - PRESS RELEASES Search press releases: http://europa.eu/rapid/search.htm.
[111]
European Commission - Environment - Environment DG: .
[112]
European Parliament: .
[113]
European University Institute European journal of international law: Journal européen de droit.
[114]
Europe’s environment: the Fourth Assessment – Section 2.3 Inland Waters: http://www.eea.europa.eu/.
[115]
FAO: FAO Home: .
[116]
Faure, M. 2004. European environmental criminal law: do we really need it? European Env Law Review. (2004).
[117]
Faure, M. and Hui, W. 2003. The international regimes for the compensation of oil-pollution damage: are they effective? Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 12, 3 (2003).
[118]
Faure, M.G. and Hartlief, T. 1996. Compensation Funds versus Liability and Insurance for Remedying Environmental Damage. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 5, 4 (Dec. 1996), 321–327. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.1996.tb00296.x.
[119]
Ferrier, C. 2000. Towards sustainable management of international water basins: the case of Lake Geneva. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 9, 1 (2000).
[120]
Fitzmaurice, M. 2004. General Principles Governing the Cooperation between States in Relation to Non-Navigational Uses Of International Watercourses. Yearbook of International Environmental Law. 14, 1 (Jan. 2004), 3–45. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/yiel/14.1.3.
[121]
Fitzmaurice, M. 1996. Liability for Environmental Damage Caused to the Global Commons. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 5, 4 (Dec. 1996), 305–311. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.1996.tb00294.x.
[122]
Fitzmaurice, M. et al. 2010. Research handbook on international environmental law. Edward Elgar.
[123]
Fitzmaurice, M. 2004. The Kyoto Protocol compliance regime and treaty law. Singapore Yearbook of International Law. 8, (2004).
[124]
Foundation for International Law and Development Review of European Community and international environmental law.
[125]
Fraenkel, A. 1989. The Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution: meeting the challenge of international co-operation. Harvard international law journal. 30, (1989).
[126]
Freestone, David and Streck, Charlotte 2009. Legal aspects of carbon trading: Kyoto, Copenhagen, and beyond. Oxford University Press.
[127]
Gallagher, Kevin et al. 2002. The Earthscan reader on international trade and sustainable development. Earthscan Publications.
[128]
Gardiner, Stephen Mark 2010. Climate ethics: essential readings. Oxford University Press.
[129]
Gehring, T. and Jachtenfuchs, M. 1993. Liability for transboundary environmental damage: towards the general liability regime? EJIL. 4, (1993).
[130]
Gillespie, A. 2006. Facilitating and controlling civil society in international environmental law. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 15, 3 (2006).
[131]
Gillespie, Alexander 1997. International environmental law, policy and ethics. Oxford University Press.
[132]
Goodwin, Edward J. 2011. International environmental law and the conservation of coral reefs. Routledge.
[133]
Grafton, R. Quentin and Hussey, Karen 2011. Water resources planning and management. Cambridge University Press.
[134]
Grant, Wyn et al. 2000. The effectiveness of European Union environmental policy. St. Martin’s Press.
[135]
Gray, K. 1999. Decisions in the desert: Report of the 10th Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol in Cairo. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 8, 2 (1999).
[136]
Gray, M. 1996. The international crime of ecocide. California Western International Law Journal. 26, (1996).
[137]
Grimeaud, D. 2004. The EC water framework directive – an instrument for integrating water policy. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 13, 1 (2004).
[138]
Grugg, M. 1998. International emissions trading under the Kyoto Protocol: core issues in implementation. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 7, 2 (1998).
[139]
Guilfoyle, Douglas and Dawsonera 2009. Shipping interdiction and the law of the sea. Cambridge University Press.
[140]
Gupta, J. 1998. Leadership in the climate regime: inspiring the commitment of developing countries in the post-Kyoto phase. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 7, 2 (1998).
[141]
Gupta, J. 2007. Legal steps outside the Climate Convention: litigation as a tool to address climate change. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 16, (2007).
[142]
Gupta, J. 1999. North-South aspects of the climate change issue: towards a constructive negotiating package for developing countries. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 8, 2 (1999).
[143]
Gupta, Joyeeta et al. 2013. Climate change, forests and REDD: lessons for institutional design. Routledge.
[144]
Harrison, James 2011. Making the law of the sea: a study in the development of international law. Cambridge University Press.
[145]
Havercroft, Ian et al. 2011. Carbon capture and storage: emerging legal and regulatory issues. Hart.
[146]
Hawke, Neil 2002. Environmental policy: implementation and enforcement. Ashgate.
[147]
Hedemann-Robinson 2003. Uncharted waters for EU law enforcement: EU waste management law and the marine environment – liability issues arising from the Prestige oil tanker disaster. Environmental liability. 11, 3 (2003), 89–104.
[148]
Hedemann-Robinson, M. 2008. The emergence of EU environmental criminal law -Part I. Environmental Liability. 16, 3 (2008).
[149]
Hedemann-Robinson, M. 2008. The emergence of EU environmental criminal law –Part II. Environmental Liability. 16, 4 (2008).
[150]
Hedemann-Robinson, M. 2008. The EU and Environmental Crime: The Impact of the ECJ’s Judgment on Framework Decision 2005/667 on Ship-Source Pollution. Journal of Environmental Law. 20, 2 (Feb. 2008), 279–292. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqn007.
[151]
Hedemann-Robinson, Martin 2007. Enforcement of European Union environmental law: legal issues and challenges. Routledge-Cavendish.
[152]
Hedemann-Robinson, Martin 2007. Enforcement of European Union environmental law: legal issues and challenges. Routledge-Cavendish.
[153]
Hedemann-Robinson, Martin 2007. Enforcement of European Union environmental law: legal issues and challenges. Routledge-Cavendish.
[154]
Hedemann-Robinson, Martin 2007. Enforcement of European Union environmental law: legal issues and challenges. Routledge-Cavendish.
[155]
Hey, E. 1998. The Watercourses Convention: To what extent does it provide a basis for regulating uses of international watercourses? Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 7, 3 (1998).
[156]
Hillman, K. 1999. International control of Persistent Organic Pollutants: the UNECE Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution, and beyond. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 8, 2 (1999).
[157]
Hilson, Chris 2000. Regulating pollution: a UK and EC perspective. Hart.
[158]
Hinteregger, Monika 2008. Environmental liability and ecological damage in European law. Cambridge University Press.
[159]
Hoffmann, Matthew J. 2011. Climate governance at the crossroads: experimenting with a global response after Kyoto. (2011).
[160]
Holder, Jane et al. 2007. Environmental protection, law and policy: text and materials. Cambridge University Press.
[161]
Holder, Jane et al. 2007. Environmental protection, law and policy: text and materials. Cambridge University Press.
[162]
Home - World Water Day: .
[163]
Houghton, J. T. and Dawsonera 2009. Global warming: the complete briefing. Cambridge University Press.
[164]
Howard, E.S. 1996. Pollution Prevention in the Watershed: Protect the Land to Protect the River. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 5, 2 (Jun. 1996), 116–121. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.1996.tb00259.x.
[165]
Howarth, W. 2009. Aspirations and Realities under the Water Framework Directive: Proceduralisation, Participation and Practicalities. Journal of Environmental Law. 21, 3 (Jan. 2009), 391–417. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqp019.
[166]
Hunter, David et al. 2011. International environmental law and policy. Foundation Press/Thomson Reuters.
[167]
Ibrahima, D. 2005. Recovering Damage to the Environment per se1 Following an Oil Spill: The Shadows and Lights of the Civil Liability and Fund Conventions of 1992. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 14, 1 (Apr. 2005), 63–72. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.2005.00424.x.
[168]
IMO | International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL): .
[169]
IMO | International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL): http://www.imo.org/About/Conventions/ListOfConventions/Pages/International-Convention-for-the-Prevention-of-Pollution-from-Ships-(MARPOL).aspx.
[170]
IMO | London Convention and Protocol: .
[171]
IMO | The Hong Kong International Convention for the Safe and Environmentally Sound Recycling of Ships: http://www.imo.org/about/conventions/listofconventions/pages/the-hong-kong-international-convention-for-the-safe-and-environmentally-sound-recycling-of-ships.aspx.
[172]
International Maritime Organization: .
[173]
Jacobs, F. 2006. The role of the ECJ in the protection of the environment. Journal of Env Law. 18, 2 (2006).
[174]
Jans, J. H. and Vedder, Hans 2008. European environmental law. Europa Law Publishing.
[175]
Jordan, Andrew et al. 2003. New instruments of environmental governance?: national experiences and prospects. Frank Cass.
[176]
Keessen, A.M. et al. 2010. European River Basin Districts: Are They Swimming in the Same Implementation Pool? Journal of Environmental Law. 22, 2 (Jan. 2010), 197–221. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqq003.
[177]
Kennedy, R. 2008. Access to justice under the Århus Convention and Irish judicial review. Environmental law review. 10, 2 (2008).
[178]
King, R.J. 1997. The Law and Practice of Joint Implementation. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 6, 1 (Mar. 1997), 62–67. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9388.00076.
[179]
Kiss, Alexandre Charles and Shelton, Dinah 2007. Guide to international environmental law. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
[180]
Kiss, Alexandre Charles and Shelton, Dinah 2004. International environmental law. Transnational Publishers.
[181]
Kraemer, L. 2004. Access to environmental information in an open European society – Directive 2003/4/EC. Yearbook of European Environmental Law. 4, (2004).
[182]
Krämer, L. 2006. Environment, crime and EC law. Journal of Env Law. 18, 2 (2006).
[183]
Krämer, Ludwig 2011. EU environmental law. Sweet & Maxwell.
[184]
Krämer, Ludwig and MyiLibrary 2002. Casebook on EU environmental law. Hart.
[185]
Kravchenko, S. 2007. The Aarhus Convention and innovations in compliance with multilateral environmental agreements. Yearbook of European Environmental Law. 7, (2007).
[186]
Kummer, K. 1998. The Basel Convention: Ten years on. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 7, 3 (1998).
[187]
Kummer, Katharina 1995. International management of hazardous wastes: the Basel Convention and related legal rules. Clarendon.
[188]
Kummer, Katharina 1995. International management of hazardous wastes: the Basel Convention and related legal rules. Clarendon Press.
[189]
Kwiatkowska, J.E.L. 1999. The contribution of the ICJ to the development of the law of the sea and environmental law. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 8, 1 (1999).
[190]
Kyoto Protocol: .
[191]
Lanchbery, J. 1998. Verifying compliance with the Kyoto Protocol. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 7, (1998).
[192]
LAPAZ Case: http://www1.american.edu/ted/LAPAZ.HTM.
[193]
Lawrence, P. 1998. Negotiation of a protocol on liability and compensation resulting from transboundary movements of hazardous wastes and their disposal. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 7, 3 (1998).
[194]
Lee, M. 2003. Public participation, procedure, and democratic deficit in EC environmental law. Yearbook of European Environmental Law. 3, (2003).
[195]
Lee, M. and Abbot, C. 2003. The usual suspects? Public participation under the Aarhus Convention. Modern Law Review. 66, (2003).
[196]
Lee, Maria 2005. EU environmental law: challenges, change and decision-making. Hart Publishing.
[197]
Liddick, Don 2011. Crimes against nature: illegal industries and the global environment. Praeger.
[198]
London Dumping Convention: http://www.unep.ch/regionalseas/main/legal/llondon.html.
[199]
Lopez, A. 2007. Criminal liability for environmental damage occurring in times of non-international armed conflict. Fordham Env Law Review. 18, (2007).
[200]
Louka, Elli and MyiLibrary 2006. International environmental law: fairness, effectiveness, and world order. Cambridge University Press.
[201]
Louka, Elli and MyiLibrary 2006. International environmental law: fairness, effectiveness, and world order. Cambridge University Press.
[202]
Louka, Elli and MyiLibrary 2006. International environmental law: fairness, effectiveness, and world order. Cambridge University Press.
[203]
Louka, Elli and MyiLibrary 2006. International environmental law: fairness, effectiveness, and world order. Cambridge University Press.
[204]
Louka, Elli and MyiLibrary 2006. International environmental law: fairness, effectiveness, and world order. Cambridge University Press.
[205]
Louka, Elli and MyiLibrary 2006. International environmental law: fairness, effectiveness, and world order. Cambridge University Press.
[206]
Louka, Elli and MyiLibrary 2006. International environmental law: fairness, effectiveness, and world order. Cambridge University Press.
[207]
Louka, Elli and MyiLibrary 2006. International environmental law: fairness, effectiveness, and world order. Cambridge University Press.
[208]
Lowe, A. V. and Talmon, Stefan 2009. The legal order of the oceans: basic documents on law of the sea. Hart Pub.
[209]
Mace, M. 2005. Funding for adaptation to climate change: UNFCCC and GEF developments since COP-7. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 14, 3 (2005).
[210]
Mace, M. 2008. The Bali Road Map: can it deliver an equitable post-2012 climate agreement for small island states? Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 17, 2 (2008).
[211]
Mackenzie, R. and Khalastchi, R. 1996. Liability and Compensation for Environmental Damage in the Context of the Work of the United Nations Compensation Commission. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 5, 4 (Dec. 1996), 281–289. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.1996.tb00291.x.
[212]
Malone, Linda A. and Pasternack, Scott 2006. Defending the environment: civil society strategies to enforce international environmental law. Island Press.
[213]
Martínez Gutiérrez, Norman A. 2011. Limitation of liability in international maritime conventions: the relationship between global limitation conventions and particular liability regimes. Routledge.
[214]
Massai, L. 2010. The Long way to the Copenhagen Accord: Climate change negotiations in 2009. Review of European Community & international environmental law. 19, 1 (2010).
[215]
Massai, L. 2010. The Long way to the Copenhagen Accord: Climate change negotiations in 2009. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 19, 1 (2010).
[216]
Massai, L. and SpringerLink (Online service) 2011. The Kyoto Protocol in the EU: European community and Member States under international and european law. T.M.C. Asser Press.
[217]
Matz-Lueck, N. 2010. Safe and sound scrapping of ‘rusty buckets’? The 2009 Hong Kong Ship Recycling Convention. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 19, 1 (2010).
[218]
Matz-Lueck, N. 2010. Safe and sound scrapping of ‘rusty buckets’? The 2009 Hong Kong Ship Recycling Convention. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 19, 1 (2010).
[219]
McAdam, Jane 2012. Climate change, forced migration, and international law. Oxford University Press.
[220]
McAllister, S. 1998. The Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters. Colombia.Journal of International Environmental Law & Policy. (1998).
[221]
McCormick, John 2001. Environmental policy in the European Union. Palgrave.
[222]
McEldowney, John F. and McEldowney, Sharron 1996. Environment and the law: an introduction for environmental scientists and lawyers. Prentice Hall.
[223]
McIntyre, O. 2004. The emergence of an ‘ecosystem approach’ to the protection of international watercourses under international law. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 13, 4 (2004).
[224]
Melkas, E. 2002. Sovereignty and Equity within the Framework of the Climate Regime. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 11, 2 (Jul. 2002), 115–128. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9388.t01-1-00311.
[225]
Millennium Development Goals: .
[226]
Missfeldt, F. 1998. Flexibility mechanisms: which path to take after Kyoto? Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 7, 2 (1998).
[227]
Morgera, E. 2005. An Update on the Aarhus Convention and its Continued Global Relevance. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 14, 2 (Aug. 2005), 138–147. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.2005.00434.x.
[228]
Morrow, K. 2004. Public participation in the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment – Directive 2001/42/EC, the UNECE Espoo Convention and the Kiev Protocol. Yearbook of European Environmental Law. 4, (2004).
[229]
Mueller, B. 2009. Copenhagen 2009: failure or final wake-up call for our leaders? Environmental liability. 6, (2009).
[230]
Mushkat, Roda 2004. International environmental law and Asian values: legal norms and cultural influences. UBC Press.
[231]
Nadal, C. 2008. Pursuing Substantive Environment Justice: The Aarhus Convention as a ‘Pillar’ of Empowerment. Environmental Law Review. 10, 1 (Feb. 2008), 28–45. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1350/enlr.2008.10.1.003.
[232]
Nanda, Ved P. and Pring, George W. 2013. International environmental law and policy for the 21st century. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
[233]
Neuhoff, Karsten 2011. Climate policy after Copenhagen: the role of carbon pricing. Cambridge University Press.
[234]
Nollkaemper, A. 1996. The River Rhine: from Equal Apportionment to Ecosystem Protection. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 5, 2 (Jun. 1996), 152–160. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.1996.tb00264.x.
[235]
Nurse, L. and Moore, R. 2005. Adaptation to global climate change: an urgent requirement for small island developing states. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 14, 2 (2005).
[236]
OECD: .
[237]
OECD Improving Water Management: Recent OECD Experience: http://www.oecd.org/.
[238]
Oosterveen, W. 2004. Some recent developments regarding liability for damage resulting from oil pollution – from the perspective of an EU Member State. Environmental law review. 6, 4 (2004).
[239]
Ørebech, Peter 2005. The role of customary law in sustainable development. Cambridge University Press.
[240]
Overview - Convention & Related Agreements: http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm.
[241]
Pereira, R. 2007. Environmental criminal law in the first pillar: a positive development for environmental protection in the EU? European Env Law Review. (2007).
[242]
Plakokefalos, I. 2012. 4. International / Civil Liability and Compensation. Yearbook of International Environmental Law. 23, 1 (Jan. 2012), 215–217. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/yiel/yvt042.
[243]
Prevost, R. 1999. International Criminal Environmental Law. The reality of international law: essays in honour of Ian Brownlie. Clarendon.
[244]
Prevost, R. 1999. International Criminal Environmental Law. The reality of international law: essays in honour of Ian Brownlie. Clarendon Press.
[245]
Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty (1991): http://www.antarctica.ac.uk/about_antarctica/geopolitical/treaty/update_1991.php.
[246]
Protocol to Abate Acidification, Eutrophication and Ground-level Ozone: .
[247]
Rajamani, L. 2007. Public Interest Environmental Litigation in India: Exploring Issues of Access, Participation, Equity, Effectiveness and Sustainability. Journal of Environmental Law. 19, 3 (Aug. 2007), 293–321. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqm020.
[248]
Rajamani, L. 2000. The principle of common but differentiated responsibility and the balance of commitments under the climate regime. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 9, 2 (2000).
[249]
Rao, P. K. 2002. International environmental law and economics. Blackwell Publishers.
[250]
Razzaque, J. 2005. Access to justice in environmental matters at EU Member State level –  an update on the UK. Yearbook of European Environmental Law. 5, (2005).
[251]
Razzaque, J. 2004. Trading water: the human factor. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 13, 1 (2004).
[252]
Regulation 1013/06/EC on shipments of waste (OJ 2006 L190/1): (replaced former Regulation 259/93/EEC since 12.7.2007): http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:190:0001:0001:EN:PDF.
[253]
Rest, A. 2004. Enhanced implementation of international environmental treaties by judiciary – access to justice in international environmental law for individuals and NGOs: efficacious enforcement by the Permanent Court of Arbitration. Macquarie journal of international and comparative environmental law. 1, (2004).
[254]
Runtinwa, B. 1997. Liability and compensation for injurious consequences of the transboundary movement of hazardous wastes. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 6, 1 (1997).
[255]
Sands, P. and Stewart, R.B. 1996. Valuation of Environmental Damage-US and International Law Approaches. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 5, 4 (Dec. 1996), 290–296. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.1996.tb00292.x.
[256]
Sands, Philippe et al. 2006. Documents in European Community environmental law. Cambridge University Press.
[257]
Sands, Philippe et al. 2012. Principles of international environmental law. Cambridge University Press.
[258]
Sands, Philippe et al. 2012. Principles of international environmental law. Cambridge University Press.
[259]
Sands, Philippe et al. 2012. Principles of international environmental law. Cambridge University Press.
[260]
Sands, Philippe et al. 2012. Principles of international environmental law. Cambridge University Press.
[261]
Sands, Philippe et al. 2012. Principles of international environmental law. Cambridge University Press.
[262]
Sands, Philippe et al. 2012. Principles of international environmental law. Cambridge University Press.
[263]
Sands, Philippe et al. 2012. Principles of international environmental law. Cambridge University Press.
[264]
Sands, Philippe et al. 2012. Principles of international environmental law. Cambridge University Press.
[265]
Sands, Philippe et al. 2012. Principles of international environmental law. Cambridge University Press.
[266]
Sands, Philippe. & Galizzi, Paolo 2004. Documents in international environmental law. CUP.
[267]
Schipper, E. 2006. Conceptual history of adaptation in the UNFCCC process. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 15, 1 (2006).
[268]
Selin, C. 2001. Your money or your life: a look at the Convention on the protection of the environment through criminal law. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 10, 1 (2001).
[269]
Sharp, P. 1999. Prospects for environmental liability in the International Criminal Court. Virginia environmental law journal. (1999).
[270]
Shibata, A. 2003. The Basel compliance mechanism. Review of European Community & international environmental law. 12, 2 (2003).
[271]
Shipments of radioactive waste: supervision and control: http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/energy/nuclear_energy/l11020_en.htm.
[272]
Soltau, Friedrich and Dawsonera 2009. Fairness in international climate change law and policy. Cambridge University Press.
[273]
South, Nigel and Brisman, Avi eds. 2013. Routledge international handbook of green criminology. Routledge.
[274]
South Pacific Nuclear-Free Zone (SPNFZ) Treaty of Rarotonga: http://www.nti.org/treaties-and-regimes/south-pacific-nuclear-free-zone-spnfz-treaty-rarotonga/.
[275]
Spence, C. and Kulovesi, K. 2008. Great expectations: understanding Bali and the climate change negotiations process. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 17, 2 (2008).
[276]
Spencer, C. and Kulovesi, K. 2008. Great expectations: understanding Bali and the climate change negotiations process. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 17, 2 (2008).
[277]
Steele, J. 2001. Participation and Deliberation in Environmental Law: Exploring a Problem-solving Approach. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 21, 3 (Sep. 2001), 415–442. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/21.3.415.
[278]
Stockholm 1972 - Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment: http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.Print.asp?DocumentID=97&ArticleID=1503.
[279]
Sunkin, Maurice et al. 2002. Sourcebook on environmental law. Cavendish.
[280]
Techera, Erika J. 2011. Marine environmental governance: from international law to local practice. Routledge.
[281]
Teclaff, L. and Teclaff, E. 1984. Transboundary toxic pollution and the drainage basin concept. Natural Resources Journal. 25, (1984).
[282]
The EU Water Framework Directive: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/.
[283]
The European Union Website: .
[284]
Tolsma, H. et al. 2009. The Rise and Fall of Access to Justice in The Netherlands. Journal of Environmental Law. 21, 2 (Jan. 2009), 309–321. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqp015.
[285]
Tully, S.R. 2004. The Contribution of Human Rights to Freshwater Resource Management. Yearbook of International Environmental Law. 14, 1 (Jan. 2004), 101–137. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/yiel/14.1.101.
[286]
unced home page: .
[287]
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea - Main Page: .
[288]
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) - Home page: http://www.unep.org/.
[289]
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: .
[290]
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: http://unfccc.int/2860.php.
[291]
Vanderheiden, Steve 2008. Atmospheric justice: a political theory of climate change. Oxford University Press.
[292]
Vedder and H. 2010. The Treaty of Lisbon and European environmental law and policy. Journal of environmental law. 22, (2010).
[293]
Verheyen, R. 2002. Adaptation to the impacts of anthropogenic climate change – the international legal framework. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 11, 2 (2002).
[294]
Verschuuren, J. 4AD. Public participation regarding the elaboration and approval of projects in the EU after the Aarhus Convention. Yearbook of European Environmental Law. (4AD).
[295]
Vervaele, J. The EC and harmonisation of the criminal law enforcement of Communiy policy?
[296]
Victor, David G. 2011. Global warming gridlock: creating more effective strategies for protecting the planet. Cambridge University Press.
[297]
Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer - Main Page: .
[298]
Wang, X. and Wiser, G. 2002. The implementation and compliance regimes under the Climate Change Convention and its Kyoto Protocol. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 11, 2 (2002).
[299]
Washington Declaration on Protection of the Marine Environment from Land-Based Activities (1995): .
[300]
Water Convention - UNECE: http://www.unece.org/env/water/.
[301]
Weiss, Edith Brown et al. 2005. Fresh water and international economic law. Oxford University Press.
[302]
Welcome to the Regional Seas website: .
[303]
Werksman, J. 1998. The Clean Development Mechanism: unwrapping the ‘Kyoto Surprise’. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 7, 2 (1998).
[304]
Wilkins, H. 2002. What’s new in the CDM? Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 11, 2 (2002).
[305]
Winter, G. et al. 2008. Weighing up the EC Environmental Liability Directive. Journal of Environmental Law. 20, 2 (Feb. 2008), 163–191. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqn013.
[306]
Wirth, D. 1998. Trade implications of the Basel Convention amendment banning north-south trade in hazardous wastes. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 7, 3 (1998).
[307]
Wolf, S. and Stanley, N. 2013. Wolf and Stanley on environmental law. Routledge.
[308]
World Charter for Nature: http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/37/a37r007.htm.
[309]
WTO: .
[310]
Yamin, F. 1998. The Kyoto Protocol: origins, assessment and future challenges. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 7, 2 (1998).
[311]
Yarmin, F. 2001. NGOs and international environmental law: a critical evaluation of their roles and responsibilities. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 10, 2 (2001).
[312]
Zillman, Donald N. 2008. Beyond the carbon economy: energy law in transition. Oxford University Press.
[313]
1972 Stockholm Declaration (Declaration of the UN Conference on the Human Environment). -- United Nations Environment Programme - Document Manager - United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) --.
[314]
1972 Stockholm Declaration (Declaration of the UN Conference on the Human Environment). -- United Nations Environment Programme - Document Manager - United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) --.
[315]
1972 Stockholm Declaration (Declaration of the UN Conference on the Human Environment). -- United Nations Environment Programme - Document Manager - United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) --.
[316]
1985 CLRTAP Protocol on the Reduction of Sulphur Emissions. Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution.
[317]
1987 Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer. Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer - Main Page.
[318]
1992 Convention on Biological Diversity, Art.14.
[319]
1992 Rio Declaration. A/CONF.151/26 (Vol. I) REPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT.
[320]
1992 Rio Declaration. A/CONF.151/26 (Vol. I) REPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT.
[321]
1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development.
[322]
2003 Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers (not yet in force).
[323]
2005 Decision 27/CMP.1. Search Decisions.
[324]
2007 Decision 1/CP.13. Search Decisions.
[325]
Agenda 21. DSD :: Resources - Publications - Core Publications.
[326]
Agenda21.doc.
[327]
1999. Can the oceans be harboured? A four step plan for the 21st century. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 8, 1 (1999).
[328]
Colorado journal of international environmental law and policy.
[329]
2007. Competence or confidence? The appropriate forum to address multi-purpose high seas protected areas. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 16, 1 (2007).
[330]
Convention on the Protection of the marine Environment of the Baltic Sea Area 1992 (Helsinki Convention). http://www.helcom.fi/stc/files/Convention/Conv0704.pdf.
[331]
Ecology law quarterly.
[332]
Environmental liability.
[333]
Environmental policy and law.
[334]
European Energy and Environmental Law Review.
[335]
Fordham environmental law journal.
[336]
Fordham environmental law review.
[337]
Georgetown international environmental law review.
[338]
1999. International Law and Ocean Governance: audacity and modesty. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 8, 1 (1999).
[339]
1999. International Law and Ocean Governance: audacity and modesty. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 8, 1 (1999).
[340]
International Law Association - ‘Berlin Rules’. http://www.internationalwaterlaw.org/documents/intldocs/ILA_Berlin_Rules-2004.pdf.
[341]
International trade law & regulation.
[342]
Johannesburg Plan of Implementation.
[343]
Journal of environmental law.
[344]
1999. Learning from disaster: lessons in regulatory enforcement in the maritime sector. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 8, 1 (1999).
[345]
Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons. International Court of Justice.
[346]
2010. Marine Protected Areas beyond areas of national jurisdiction: what’s mine is mine and what you think is yours is also mine. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 19, 2 (2010).
[347]
1999. Preventing pollution from ships – reflections on the ‘adequacy’ of existing rules. Review of European Community & international environmental law. 8, 1 (1999).
[348]
1999. Preventing pollution from ships – reflections on the ‘adequacy’ of existing rules. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 8, 1 (1999).
[349]
2004. Protection of the marine environment and the EU - Drifting or making headway? Some critical reflections on internal and external dimensions to law, policy and practice. Environmental Liability. 12, 1 (2004), 3–18.
[350]
1999. Protection of the marine environment through international ship-source pollution oil pollution compensation regimes. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 8, 1 (1999).
[351]
1999. The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea and the Protection and Preservation of the Marine Environment. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 8, 1 (1999).
[352]
United Nations. http://www.un.org.
[353]
World Summit On Sustainable Development) (UN Declaration on World Summit Outcome - UNGA A/RES/60/1). http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan021752.pdf.
[354]
Yearbook of European environmental law.
[355]
Yearbook of international environmental law.